Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Optimalisasi Sistem Penilaian Pembinaan Narapidana Untuk Remisi Berbasis Keadilan Distributif Di Lapas Perempuan Mataram Dewanti, Yuvana; Rina Rohayu Harun; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara
Commerce Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Commerce Law
Publisher : Departement Business Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/commercelaw.v5i1.7328

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis optimalisasi Sistem Penilaian Pembinaan Narapidana (SPPN) sebagai indikator pemberian remisi serta mengidentifikasi kendala penerapan prinsip keadilan distributif di Lapas Perempuan Kelas III Mataram. Metode yang digunakan adalah normatif empiris, dengan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, kasus, dan sosiologis untuk mengkaji efektivitas hukum dan kebijakan pemasyarakatan dalam praktik lapangan.SPPN merupakan instrumen strategis dalam menilai kemajuan pembinaan narapidana secara objektif, sejalan dengan pergeseran paradigma pemasyarakatan dari pendekatan retributif ke rehabilitatif. Diterapkan berdasarkan Keputusan Dirjen Pemasyarakatan No. PAS-10.OT.02.02 Tahun 2021, SPPN di Lapas Perempuan Kelas III Mataram dijalankan oleh tim Wali Pemasyarakatan dan Asesor melalui penilaian berbasis data dan bukti. Penilaian ini mencakup observasi perilaku, wawancara, telaah dokumen, serta tes, dengan pendekatan yang terindividualisasi sesuai karakteristik masing-masing narapidana.Optimalisasi SPPN telah menunjukkan dampak positif, seperti meningkatnya transparansi, motivasi narapidana, serta efektivitas dalam pemberian remisi dan hak-hak lainnya. Namun demikian, penelitian ini menemukan sejumlah kendala signifikan yang menghambat prinsip keadilan distributif. Kendala tersebut meliputi subjektivitas petugas, keterbatasan data yang akurat dan lengkap, belum optimalnya digitalisasi, serta rendahnya kapasitas SDM. Selain itu, inkonsistensi antarunit, resistensi terhadap sistem baru, dan tantangan integrasi data dengan Balai Pemasyarakatan (Bapas) turut memperparah ketimpangan dalam penilaian.Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya pembenahan menyeluruh melalui penguatan infrastruktur, pelatihan petugas, standardisasi teknis, serta percepatan digitalisasi. Langkah ini penting agar SPPN dapat benar-benar menjadi alat evaluasi yang adil dan efektif dalam mendukung pemasyarakatan yang humanis dan berkeadilan.
The Role of Motive in Premeditated Murder Rukanda, Lalu Muhammad; Harun, Rina Rohayu; Ufran, Ufran
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.3968

Abstract

The motive behind a crime is contingent upon the perpetrator's mens rea, or their inner attitude and intention, to carry out an actus rea, or the actual commission of a wrongful act. This study seeks to offer a comprehensive examination and evaluation of the significance of discerning the purpose as a means for courts to ascertain the underlying circumstances of planned homicide, so enabling judges to render suitable and equitable judgments. This study employs a normative juridical methodology, which centers on doing literature and legislation research with analytical descriptive research parameters. The research findings indicate a lack of comprehensive elucidation on the motives outlined in Article 340 of the Criminal Code. Hence, the utilization of motive is constrained to the principles of law and the personal judgment of the presiding judge in the trial. As there is no analysis of the underlying intention, the Panel of Judges is not obligated to establish a motive for the homicide based on the information presented. Consequently, a range of conclusions were rendered, with some resulting in acquittal and others in conviction, as the judge did not establish any reason for the murder based on the evidence presented. Nevertheless, according to the Indonesian edition of the Criminal Code, Law no. 1 of 2023, the motive mentioned in Article 54 Paragraph (1) Sub B of the Criminal Code must be present prior to the verdict.
Imposition Of Criminal Sanctions for Minor Criminal Actions of Theft (A Case On Judgement Number 826/Pid.B/2023/Pn.Mtr) Mandasari, Santi; Harun, Rina Rohayu; Jiwantara, Firzhal Arzhi; Septyanun, Nurjannah
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4825

Abstract

The imposition of criminal sanctions for minor criminal actions, such as theft, presents a complex and multifaceted challenge for legal systems worldwide. This study examines the imposition of criminal sanctions for minor theft offenses, with a specific focus on the case adjudicated under Judgment Number 826/Pid.B/2023/Pn.Mtr. The research aims to analyze the legal reasoning behind the court's decision, the proportionality of the sanctions imposed, and the broader implications for the criminal justice system. Utilizing a qualitative approach, this study involves a detailed case analysis, reviewing court documents, and interviews with legal experts. Findings indicate that while the court adhered to statutory guidelines, there were significant considerations regarding the socio-economic background of the offender and the value of the stolen property. The study concludes that although the sanctions imposed were within legal parameters, there is a need for a more nuanced approach that considers restorative justice principles. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on criminal justice reform, particularly concerning minor offenses, and advocates for policy adjustments that balance deterrence with rehabilitation.
The Interpretation of Article 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics in Addressing Drug Abuse through Restorative Justice Wardika, Made; Harun, Rina Rohayu; Jiwantara, Firzhal Arzhi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4890

Abstract

Narcotics crime refers to a range of illegal activities involving the distribution, purchase, sale, possession, and abuse of drugs without proper authorisation. These activities cause harm to both the broader community and the individuals involved. Restorative Justice has emerged as a response. Its primary focus is to resolve cases involving drug abusers who are addicted to narcotics. In addition to Restorative Justice, there is an alternative for rehabilitating narcotics abusers through the involvement of police investigators, the prosecutor's office, or decisions made by judges. The purpose of this study is to analyse the relationship between the interpretation and execution of Article 127 of Law No. 35 on Narcotics and Restorative Justice, based on literal interpretation. Based on the analyses, the enforcement of Article 127 of Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, which focuses on Restorative Justice, has been supported by multiple regulations. However, the law's implementation has not aligned with expected standards and legislation, leading to ambiguity in Article 112 and Article 127. This ambiguity creates opportunities for unscrupulous law enforcement to make illicit gains, increasing the incidence of drug-related offenses. The author proposes an immediate revision of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics due to the ambiguity in the law's article parts and the current legal framework's inability to effectively curb opioid misuse.