Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.056
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dedikasi Jurnal Hukum Novelty Mimbar Keadilan Tadulako Law Review Jurisprudence Law and Justice Jurnal Penelitian Kesehatan Suara Forikes DE'RECHTSSTAAT Awang Long Law Review PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JUSTISI Mulawarman Law Review Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Masyarakat Berdaya dan Inovasi JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Walisongo Law Review (Walrev) Risalah Hukum Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA) Jurnal Al-Hakim : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bestari (JPMB) Abdimas Indonesian Journal Urecol Journal. Part H: Social, Art, and Humanities Prosiding University Research Colloquium PEDAMAS (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Law and Justice Educommunity Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Jurisprudence
Marisa Kurnianingsih
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 55 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 55 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
The Guarantee of Children's Right in Determinating Guardian ad Litem on Sale and Purchase of Inherited Property Rahmadanti, Saumita Ngesti; Marisa Kurnianingsih; Ellya Nur Fariesha Binti Azrurahime
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 3 (2024): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v10i3.3236

Abstract

On selling the property of minors, absolutely parents must pay attention to the main objective, namely the welfare of the child. Thus, it is not used for personal interests and overrides the interests of children because this is contrary to children's rights. This study examines protecting children's rights for Guardian ad Litem (GAL), which will trade their children's property. To study the rules governing how a guardian ad litem can handle inherited property for the benefit of minors because he is considered an heir to his parent's property if his parents die. This study uses an empirical juridical methodology from the legislative framework, cases, conceptual frameworks, and interviews. Then, the novelty contains the role of the government in regulating minors who legally sell their inherited property and consider related children's rights. The study shows that Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) of Kota Surakarta has carried out its duties effectively, supported by the conditions set for parents who want to sell the property on behalf of their children. The results of this study are the steps taken by the government to ensure that parents do not abuse their power to steal children's property and further examine guardian ad litem ship according to Islamic law. The role of BPN of Kota Surakarta is also in collaboration with the Religious Court in charge of determining guardian ad litem of minors. It can be concluded that the reasons for parents who want to sell their children's inheritance are clear and not abused by parents who want to become guardian ad litem. It caused the role of guardian ad litem in Islam to include the maintenance of themselves and their property. So that all guardians ad litem maintain health, justice, honesty, and good behavior.
Mewujudkan Bantuan Hukum Bagi Terdakwa Kasus Narkotika di Rumah Tahanan Negara Kelas IIb Boyolali Kurnianingsih, Marisa; Iksan, Muchamad; Wibisono, Fiqkri Akbar; Anastasya, Dita Nadya; Moestofa, Yoesoef
Educommunity Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : CV. Edutechnium Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71365/ejpm.v2i2.71

Abstract

This legal counseling aims to understand the preparation and implementation process carried out by legal advisors from BKBH, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Before trial assistance, there is a preparation process that includes the defendant's rights, which are fundamental principles in the legal system. These principles aim to protect the defendant's human rights and ensure that the judicial process runs fairly. Several rights of the defendant, generally recognized and guaranteed by various legal systems, including criminal law, are the right to legal assistance, the right to a prompt trial, the right to present witnesses, the right not to bear the burden of evidence, the right to a public trial, and the right to assistance from an interpreter if they do not understand the Indonesian language. The process and stages of trial assistance for narcotics abuse cases involving prison inmates at Class IIB Boyolali State Detention Center, who are about to or are currently being tried in Boyolali District Court, go through several steps. These begin with the reading of the indictment and conclude with the final verdict. The trial stage is crucial in the criminal justice process, where all evidence will be examined publicly. This community assistance provides education related to the defendant's rights in narcotics cases at Boyolali District Court and emphasizes the importance of the legal advisor's role in ensuring that the defendant's rights are fulfilled during the trial process.
AN UNREASONABLE PURCHASE OF GOODS: A CRIMINAL LAW PERSPECTIVE Kuswardani; Kurnianingsih, Marisa; Hussain, Mazlena Mohamad; Prokosa, Andria Luhur; Fairuzzaman, Fahmi
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i1.1772

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the criminal law regarding the dishonest purchase of goods or receipt of goods resulting or also known as fencing from crime between the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Penal Code of Singapore. This research uses a normative juridical method, so the data used is secondary. This data consists of the Indonesian Criminal Code and the Singapore Penal Code, as well as journals relevant to the problem. The novelty of this research is that the formulation of criminal sanctions is not only alternative but can be imposed cumulatively, and there is a separate formulation regarding the receipt of stolen motor vehicle goods. The research results show that purchasing criminal goods or receiving stolen property or fencing is regulated under Article 480 of the Indonesian Criminal Code and Article 411 of the Singapore Criminal Code. Both define the offense as intentional by a responsible perpetrator. Criminal sanctions under the Indonesian Criminal Code are alternative, and if fencing occurs, there is jurisprudence as source of formal law. While those under the Singapore Penal Code are alternative or cumulative. Receiving stolen property, particularly motor vehicles, carries cumulative penalties, plus a ban on holding or obtaining a driver's license, imposed by the court upon release from prison. The research concludes that fencing is a violation in both Indonesia and Singapore. The only differences lie in the form of punishment stipulated in the Criminal Code and the formulation of receiving stolen property for motor vehicles. The research concludes that fencing is a violation in both Indonesia and Singapore. The only differences lie in the form of punishment stipulated in the Criminal Code and the formulation of receiving stolen property for motor vehicles.
The Game of Dice on People's Entertainment Performance Islamic Perspective (Study in The District Juwana, Central Java) Kuswardani, Kuswardani; Mutadho, Ricky Alan; Kurnianingsih, Marisa; Precocious, Andria Luhur
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i1.2397

Abstract

Introduction: Gambling is an act that has a speculative element, without which is there is no hard work. Purposes of the Research:  The research aims are to describe dice game as a form of gambling from an Islamic perspective, moreover, to explain why Indonesian prohibits gambling. Methods of the Research: This manuscript is library research and empirical as an example to explain gambling as a habit in the community. Results / Findings / Novelty of the Research: The research results point out that firstly The Islamic prohibit gambling chance in the conventional forms (like this dice game) or online gambling. And Islam also forbids gambling has become a habit. second, the prohibition is as in the Word of God Al Baqarah/2:219, Al Maidah /5 90 – 91, and Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad SAW which was narrated by Imam Bukhari and Muslim. Thirdly, the Penal Code defines gambling as a crime, however, the gamble is without permission. The novelty of the research is ambiguous in the formulated with the consideration of Law Number 7 of 1974 on Controlling Gambling.
The Comparative Study of Child and Women’s Rights Protection After Marital Dissolution in Indonesia and Philippines Zuhdi, Syaifuddin; Alaba, Ma Daphnee; Kurnianingsih, Marisa; Prakoso, Andria Luhur; Fairuzzaman, Fahmi
Sakina: Journal of Family Studies Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Sakina: Journal of Family Studies
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Study Program, Sharia Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/jfs.v9i2.14981

Abstract

Abstract: Marriage dissolution through divorce or annulment often impacts the rights of children and women, necessitating strong legal protections. This study aims to compare the protection mechanisms for children's and women's rights after marital dissolution in Indonesia and the Philippines. Employing a normative-legal research method with a comparative approach, the study analyzes primary legal sources including Indonesia’s Marriage Law, Compilation of Islamic Law, Child Protection Law, and the Philippine Family Code and Constitution. The findings show that Indonesia provides two legal paths, divorce and annulment, offering a clearer framework for protecting post-marital rights, although enforcement remains inconsistent. Conversely, the Philippines, which only recognizes annulment for non-Muslims, faces challenges due to the absence of divorce, limiting access to legal remedies for women and children. Despite different legal systems, both countries prioritize the best interests of the child and uphold fundamental human rights principles. However, systemic obstacles, socio-cultural stigma, and gaps in implementation persist. The study concludes that enhancing the effectiveness of legal protections requires not only comprehensive legislation but also structural reforms to improve access to justice and empower vulnerable groups affected by marital dissolution. Abstrak Pembubaran perkawinan melalui perceraian atau pembatalan sering berdampak terhadap hak-hak anak dan perempuan, sehingga memerlukan perlindungan hukum yang kuat. Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan mekanisme perlindungan hak anak dan perempuan pasca pembubaran perkawinan di Indonesia dan Filipina. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pendekatan komparatif, studi ini menganalisis sumber hukum primer seperti Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak di Indonesia, serta Family Code dan Konstitusi Filipina. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia menyediakan dua jalur hukum, yaitu perceraian dan pembatalan, yang memberikan kerangka perlindungan lebih jelas, meskipun implementasinya masih menghadapi tantangan. Sebaliknya, Filipina yang hanya mengakui pembatalan bagi non-Muslim mengalami keterbatasan perlindungan akibat tiadanya mekanisme perceraian. Meskipun sistem hukum berbeda, kedua negara tetap mengutamakan kepentingan terbaik anak dan prinsip-prinsip hak asasi manusia. Namun demikian, hambatan sistemik, stigma sosial budaya, dan kesenjangan implementasi masih menjadi tantangan besar. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa untuk memperkuat perlindungan hukum, diperlukan tidak hanya legislasi yang komprehensif, tetapi juga reformasi struktural untuk meningkatkan akses keadilan dan memberdayakan kelompok rentan yang terdampak pembubaran perkawinan.
Co-Authors Abdullah Al Mamun Absori Absori Achmadi Achmadi Aidul Fitriciada Azhari Alaba, Ma Daphnee Alfath Sartanto Alfath Sartanto Alfath Sartanto Amiludin, A Anastasya, Dita Nadya Andi Intan Purnamasari Andria Luhur Prakoso Andria Luhur Precocious Anindhita Nurfaatin Sukirman Anindhita Nurfaatin Sukirman Aprilia, Lina Arief Budiono Aristya Windiana Pamuncak Attirmidzi, M. Zaki Avip Rusdi Hananto Ayesha Hendriana Ngestiningrum Berlianti, Soffana Zamzam Cahyani, Elfrida Nur Cahyo Kuntoro Cahyo, Yoga Tri Dewanto, Daffa Rafif Dewi Iriani Dita Nadya Anastasya Ellya Nur Fariesha Binti Azrurahime Elok Putri Nimasari Fahmi Fairuzzaman Febriani, Hanifah Firdaus, Lutfi`ah Haekal Septiawan Hananto, Avip Rusdi Hanif Al Hafizh, Muhammad Hartanto hartanto hartanto Hussain, Mazlena Mohamad Ivan Andika Handono Johan Cahya Kusuma Sakti Kelik Wardiono Khudzaifah Dimyati Kuntoro, Cahyo Kuswardani Kuswardani Kuswardani Kuswardani Kuswardani Kuswardani Kuswardani, Kuswardani M. Zaki Attirmidzi Marjanah, Iramadya Dyah Moestofa, Yoesoef Muchamad Iksan Muhammad Naufal Nada Sima Muhammad Risal Fitrah Ramadhan Mustofa, Yoesoef Mutadho, Ricky Alan Muthia Aulia Alyda Natangsa Surbakti Naufal Fakhri Ghozali Nugraha, Rokhman Adi Putera Oktaviary, Adinda Rizky Pambudi, Rizal Pradana, Aditya Bayu Precocious, Andria Luhur Prokosa, Andria Luhur Purwanto purwanto Rachmawati, Elisa Rahmadanti, Saumita Ngesti Ramadhan, Muhammad Risal Fitrah Ricky Alan Mutadho Rizal Pambudi Rizka Rokhman Adi Putera Nugraha Roykha Adi Panama Sakti, Johan Cahya Kusuma Salazar, Ramonita A Samodra, Nerisia Bunga Saputra, Cahya Handy Saputri, Irwinda Mutiara Sari, Winda Permata Sartanto, Alfath Shinta Aprilia Sandra Kusuma Sukirman, Anindhita Nurfaatin Tashya Panji Nugraha Teddy Satrio Wicaksono Tri Setiawan, Wiranto Tyana, Irma Nurul Wardah Yuspin Wibisono, Fiqkri Akbar Winda Permata Sari Windiani, Arovah Yustika Kusumaningrum Zuhdi, Syaifuddin Zuhdi, Syaifudin