Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Multica Science and Technology

Determining the Quality of Earthquake Resistant House Buildings Using Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) and Technique For Order Of Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis) Burhanuddin Burhanuddin; Bakhtiar; Emi Maulani; Edi Yusuf
Multica Science and Technology Vol 4 No 1 (2024): Multica Science and Technology
Publisher : Universitas Mulia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47002/mst.v4i1.850

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the quality of house buildings using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) model and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This research uses six main criteria to assess building quality: Material strength, structural design, foundation, construction technology, construction quality, construction costs. With these six variables in determining the evaluation of house building materials. Determining the final ranking of these alternatives is based on their proximity to the ideal solution. Type A House, Type B House, Type C House, Type D House, Type E House and the weight value for each house C1 = 0.2; C2 = 0.1 ; C3 = 0.15 ; C = 0.20 ; C = 0.15; C = 0.2%. The ranking results for Type A Houses were 0.871, Type B Houses 0.874, Type C Houses 0.813, Type D Houses 0.976 and Type E Houses 0.959. The largest value is in Type D House 0.976 so the alternative Type D House 0.976 is the alternative chosen as the best alternative. Meanwhile, the ranking results for the topsis model for Type A Houses are 0.5423, Type B Houses are 0.5302, Type C Houses are 0.2709, Type D Houses are 0.8515 and Type E Houses are 0.959. The largest value is for Type D House 0.976 so that the Type E House alternative 0.8227 is the alternative chosen as the best alternative for Type E house. The research results show that the combination of the SAW and TOPSIS methods is effective in providing a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the quality of earthquake resistant house buildings. . The results of this research can be applied practically in the construction industry to improve the quality of earthquake-resistant house buildings, helping make more accurate and objective decisions.
Implementation of Ward AHC for Material Clustering Based on Mechanical Parameters Yusuf, Edy; Bakhtiar; Syukriah; Burhanuddin; Riyadhul Fajri
Multica Science and Technology Vol 4 No 2 (2024): Multica Science and Technology
Publisher : Universitas Mulia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47002/mst.v4i2.977

Abstract

This study aims to implement the Ward Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (Ward AHC) algorithm to classify materials based on mechanical parameters, including tensile strength (Su), yield strength (Sy), elastic modulus (E), shear modulus (G), Poisson's ratio (μ), and density (ρ). The clustering results reveal that the data is divided into three main groups with the following distributions: Cluster 1 (321 data points), Cluster 2 (403 data points), and Cluster 3 (828 data points). Each cluster exhibits unique characteristics: Cluster 1 is dominated by materials with low Su and Sy values, moderate E and G values, and light ρ. Cluster 2 features materials with very high E values, while Su, Sy, and G values vary. Cluster 3 is characterized by moderate Su values, low Sy values, high E and G values, and light ρ. An evaluation using the Silhouette Score yielded a value of 0.492, indicating that the clustering quality is reasonably good, though there is evidence that some data points may lie near the boundaries between clusters.
Determining the Quality of Earthquake Resistant House Buildings Using Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) and Technique For Order Of Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis) Burhanuddin Burhanuddin; Bakhtiar; Emi Maulani; Edi Yusuf
Multica Science and Technology (ACCREDITED-SINTA 5) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Multica Science and Technology
Publisher : Universitas Mulia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47002/mst.v4i1.850

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the quality of house buildings using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) model and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This research uses six main criteria to assess building quality: Material strength, structural design, foundation, construction technology, construction quality, construction costs. With these six variables in determining the evaluation of house building materials. Determining the final ranking of these alternatives is based on their proximity to the ideal solution. Type A House, Type B House, Type C House, Type D House, Type E House and the weight value for each house C1 = 0.2; C2 = 0.1 ; C3 = 0.15 ; C = 0.20 ; C = 0.15; C = 0.2%. The ranking results for Type A Houses were 0.871, Type B Houses 0.874, Type C Houses 0.813, Type D Houses 0.976 and Type E Houses 0.959. The largest value is in Type D House 0.976 so the alternative Type D House 0.976 is the alternative chosen as the best alternative. Meanwhile, the ranking results for the topsis model for Type A Houses are 0.5423, Type B Houses are 0.5302, Type C Houses are 0.2709, Type D Houses are 0.8515 and Type E Houses are 0.959. The largest value is for Type D House 0.976 so that the Type E House alternative 0.8227 is the alternative chosen as the best alternative for Type E house. The research results show that the combination of the SAW and TOPSIS methods is effective in providing a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the quality of earthquake resistant house buildings. . The results of this research can be applied practically in the construction industry to improve the quality of earthquake-resistant house buildings, helping make more accurate and objective decisions.
Implementation of Ward AHC for Material Clustering Based on Mechanical Parameters Yusuf, Edy; Bakhtiar; Syukriah; Burhanuddin; Riyadhul Fajri
Multica Science and Technology (ACCREDITED-SINTA 5) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Multica Science and Technology
Publisher : Universitas Mulia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47002/mst.v4i2.977

Abstract

This study aims to implement the Ward Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (Ward AHC) algorithm to classify materials based on mechanical parameters, including tensile strength (Su), yield strength (Sy), elastic modulus (E), shear modulus (G), Poisson's ratio (?), and density (?). The clustering results reveal that the data is divided into three main groups with the following distributions: Cluster 1 (321 data points), Cluster 2 (403 data points), and Cluster 3 (828 data points). Each cluster exhibits unique characteristics: Cluster 1 is dominated by materials with low Su and Sy values, moderate E and G values, and light ?. Cluster 2 features materials with very high E values, while Su, Sy, and G values vary. Cluster 3 is characterized by moderate Su values, low Sy values, high E and G values, and light ?. An evaluation using the Silhouette Score yielded a value of 0.492, indicating that the clustering quality is reasonably good, though there is evidence that some data points may lie near the boundaries between clusters.