Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.726
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA Journal of Tropical Forest Management Masalah-Masalah Hukum Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Halu Oleo Law Review JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial WAJAH HUKUM Jurnal Yuridis Veteran Law Review DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Mulawarman Law Review Jurnal Papatung : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Pemerintahan dan Politik Unnes Law Journal Law Research Review Quarterly JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) Law Development Journal IBLAM Law Review Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Abdimas Le Mujtamak Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Journal of Law and Legal Reform Referendum International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Sociology and Law International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Jurnal Hukum Statuta IPSSJ Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Iwan Erar Joesoef
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 66 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW

 1 
Reassessing Article 51 of the Indonesian Competition Law Through the KPPU Decision No. 13/KPPU-I/2014 Jingga Ardeanti Putri; Iwan Erar Joesoef
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12814

Abstract

This study analyses the principle of legal certainty in direct appointment practices conducted by State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) within the framework of Indonesian business competition law, using the KPPU Decision No. 13/KPPU-I/2014 involving PT Angkasa Pura I and PT ExecuJet Indonesia as a case study. The research examines the tension between the monopoly exemption granted to BUMN under Article 51 of Law No. 5 of 1999 and its obligation to uphold fair competition in the procurement process. A normative juridical method was employed, combining statutory and case study approaches, with secondary data analysed qualitatively. The findings reveal that although Article 51 allows BUMN to operate monopolies in sectors related to essential services, the direct appointment of PT ExecuJet Indonesia by PT Angkasa Pura I constituted conduct inconsistent with the principles of fair competition. The transaction failed to satisfy transparency and accountability requirements, thereby creating legal uncertainty in the procurement mechanism. This study concludes that the current regulatory framework does not sufficiently prevent anti-competitive behaviour by BUMN when exercising monopoly privileges. Therefore, a reformulation of procurement policies is required to align BUMN practices with the principles of legal certainty, transparency, and fair business competition. The study contributes to the development of competition law discourse by highlighting the regulatory gaps in the intersection between monopoly exemptions and procurement governance.  
The Principle of Justice in The Dispute Between Hendy Irwanto Fong and KSP Indosurya Regarding Termination of Employment Mikie Aditya Wicaksana; Iwan Erar Joesoef
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12832

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of the principle of justice in efficiency-based employment termination disputes, focusing on Supreme Court Decision No. 1774 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022 concerning the dispute between Hendy Irwanto Fong and KSP Indosurya. The increasing reliance on efficiency as a ground for termination, particularly during periods of economic crisis, has intensified tensions between business sustainability and the protection of workers’ rights. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches to examine judicial reasoning and its implications for substantive justice. The findings reveal that the Supreme Court prioritized procedural legal certainty by affirming the judex facti decision, while insufficiently addressing proportional fairness in the calculation and fulfillment of workers’ entitlements. The absence of complete material evidence, particularly regarding wage components, significantly weakened the worker’s claim and resulted in limited protection of substantive rights. This study demonstrates that formal compliance with procedural law often outweighs considerations of distributive and corrective justice, as articulated in Aristotelian justice theory. The novelty of this research lies in its dual contribution: practically, it formulates strategic guidance for drafting employment termination claims that are both formally valid and materially substantiated to strengthen workers’ access to justice; academically, it enriches labor law scholarship by integrating justice theory with judicial practice in Indonesian industrial relations disputes. The study concludes that achieving fairness in employment termination cases requires not only procedural compliance but also material completeness, judicial sensitivity to proportional justice, and institutional support to address evidentiary imbalances between employers and workers.
Co-Authors Abdul Kholiq Abrielmovich, Biyandra Timothee Aditama Candra Kusuma Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Amanda Aurelia Andre Rizaldy Angel Evelyn Ariel Lois Arifin, Azzahra Arjuna, Muhammad Gaung Syah Army Setyo Wibowo Arumdhani, Nathaniela Putri Aslihatin Zuliana Atik Winanti Azura, Dinda Maurizka Brian Mochamad F. Denaya Annisa Diani Sadia Wati Dinda Maurizka Azura Dinda Maurizka Azura Ekko Harjanto Eriz Syawaldi Sitompul Fachri Hafizd Selian Faisal Fachri Faisal Fachri FANDY GULTOM Fauzan Alsadilla Hermawan Furqon, Abdil Azizul Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Haryanto, Imam Heru Sugiyono Ilham Mahendra, Renaldy Indri Syahfitri Irwan Triadi Iswanti Rachmanisa Jingga Ardeanti Putri Joseph, Michael Geovani Kusumadewi, Dimitria Pawestri Ligina Tesalonika Lutfi, Khoirur Rizal Marina Ery Setyawati Marina Ery Setyawati Medisita Nurfauziah Istiqmalia Mikie Aditya Wicaksana Mohammad Rizky Siregar Mohd Muzakki Adli Muhammad Aby Rafdi Al Juhdi Muhammad Hafizh Izzulhaq Muhammad Helmi Fahrozi Muhammad Imaduddin Zikky Muhammad Rausyan Fikry Muthia Sakti Muttaqin, Sumayya Nugroho, Satrio Septian Okhtiara, Farizka Padmo, Aditya Pardomuan, Jaury Douglas Parhusip, Alizcia Dora Parulian Panjaitan, Mardongan Phuoc, Jeong Chun Putri, Khairunnisa Wiladi Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Redhina Elfahra Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution Rifky Anugrah Adha Rivan Dwiputra Malem Riyanto, Rajwa Khaicirinu Rofi Ayyasy Satino Satria Aldyan Firmanda Sekar Ayuning Pramewari Suherman Suherman SH Suherman Suherman Suherman, Suherman Surya Husada, Vikram Tasya Darosyifa Tri Adji Prasetya Wibowo Vedita Akbar Vikram Surya Husada Wahyu Widiyaningrum Wati, Diani Sadia Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih Zahranisza, Ayzza Rachma