Articles
KEABSAHAN PENGESAHAN PERJANJIAN PERDAMAIAN PADA PERKARA PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (Studi Putusan Nomor: 24/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst.)
Jenny Lim;
Ariawan Ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17941
In the world of trade and commerce, there are certain times when the company experiences financial difficulties, so that the company/debtor has difficulty or is no longer able to pay its debts. Considering that Bankruptcy is an Ultimatum Remedium, a regulations regarding Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is enacted. In PKPU, there is a peace plan known as peace agreements. This opportunity is given to debtors to save the company from bankruptcy, so that it can settle its debts. For the research, The author examines using normative juridical research methods. As the results of the research, it can be concluded that, the ratification of a peace agreement must meet the requirements and procedures for ratification of a peace agreement as regulated in the bankruptcy law and PKPU. In offering a peace agreement it must be in a good faith, the benchmark of good faith is when The agreement is based on pretium iustum which refers to reason and equity which implies a balance between losses and gains for both parties in the contract (just price)
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENANAMAN MODAL ASING YANG DILAKUKAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PEMEGANG SAHAM NOMINEE SEBAGAI PEMENUHAN SYARAT PENANAMAN MODAL ASING DIBIDANG USAHA YANG TERBUKA BERSYARAT
Daniel Daniel;
Ariawan Ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17022
The nominee agreement is an agreement that was born based on article 1319 of the Civil Code as this provision states that there are two types of agreements, namely: named agreements and unnamed agreements wherein this anonymous agreement is still recognized as long as it respects the provisions in force in the law. Civil law,as stipulated in the 1320 Civil Code, and recognized under Article 1338 of the Civil Code as an agreement that binds the parties so that the parties are obliged to heed this agreement in good faith. Investments carried out using the nominee method are not expressly and clearly prohibited because there are two recognized types of ownership, namely: Legal Owner or legal owner and beneficial owner as a settlor or arguably as Principal investor where the capital invested in a company comes from the settlor. as beneficiary owner. legally the name of the nominee is recorded in the articles of association of a company as the real owner before the law while the principal investor is the controller of the nominee. So it is difficult to deny that this method is one way for principal investors to circumvent the provisions and restrictions given by the government for them to control a certain number of shares. So that in its existence this type of agreement still exists and is still developing in the legal ecosystem in Indonesia.
ANALISIS PENOLAKAN PERMOHONAN PERNYATAAN PAILIT TERHADAP PT AKU DIGITAL INDONESIA (AKUMOBIL) (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN MA NOMOR 831 K/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2020)
Aksses Patrick Boike Pane;
Ariawan Ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17813
This writing aims to find out whether the Judge's Consideration on Decision No. 831 K / Pdt.SusBankruptcy / 2020 which strengthens theJudge's Decision No. 56 K / Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy / 2019 / PN. Niaga.Jkt.Pst to reject the bankruptcy statement application against PT Aku Digital Indonesia (Akumobil) has been in accordance with the Law. In this case, the Judge's consideration at the first level and cassation are slightly wrong because the judge states that there is a debt that is not due and there is a criminal element that makes the proof not simple. Whereas in article 2 paragraph 1 of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Insolvency and Delay of Debt Payment Obligations mentions that bankruptcy applications can be filed by Debtors who have two or more Creditors and do not pay off at least one debt that has matured and can be billed, which in fact based on the statement in the Vehicle Booking Letter owned by consumers there is debt that is due. The existence of criminal elements does not make the case unassuming because article 8 paragraph 4 of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Delay of Debt Payment Obligations stipulates that simple proof can be declared insolvent referring to Article 2 paragraph 1 so that the bankruptcy application against PT Aku Digital Indonesia (Akumobil) can be granted by the Judge. Therefore, the Judge must uphold legal certainty in accordance with Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Insolvency and Delay of Debt Payment Obligations
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PLATFORM MEDIA SOSIAL INSTAGRAM SEBAGAI PENYEDIA LAYANAN IKLAN DALAM PERKARA PENIPUAN BERKEDOK ONLINE SHOP
Vengga Vengga;
Ariawan Ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.16993
In this era, with rapid technological advancement, nowadays people can do trade and sell using liabilityonline system, especially on the social media which is Instagram Platform. Trades carried on Instagram have a risk, because dealing without meet face to face. By Juridical, do trade and sell on Instagram is not correct/safe. So that’s why legal certainty of liability on platform provider is essential in order to protect the consumer. If the consumer got losses, legal efforts are required to ensure consumer rights. Referring to the issue, the writer conducted research using the normative method and also did interview with several sources. The result from research, shows that liability of the platform provider in the positive law of Indonesian remains inadequate and is needed in the renewal of certain legal regulation. The institutions with authority on consumer cases be supposed to always inform information about consumer right so the consumer can understand the incumbency of the consumer. Reform into laws that regulate electronic transactions is needed in order to protect consumers while doing transactions electronic.
KEABSAHAN PENGESAHAN PERJANJIAN PERDAMAIAN PADA PERKARA PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (Studi Putusan Nomor: 24/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst.)
Jenny Lim;
Ariawan Ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17942
In the world of trade and commerce, there are certain times when the company experiences financial difficulties, so that the company/debtor has difficulty or is no longer able to pay its debts. Considering that Bankruptcy is an Ultimatum Remedium, a regulations regarding Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is enacted. In PKPU, there is a peace plan known as peace agreements. This opportunity is given to debtors to save the company from bankruptcy, so that it can settle its debts. For the research, The author examines using normative juridical research methods. As the results of the research, it can be concluded that, the ratification of a peace agreement must meet the requirements and procedures for ratification of a peace agreement as regulated in the bankruptcy law and PKPU. In offering a peace agreement it must be in a good faith, the benchmark of good faith is when The agreement is based on pretium iustum which refers to reason and equity which implies a balance between losses and gains for both parties in the contract (just price)
KOMPENSASI SEBAGAI WUJUD PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA AKIBAT PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA SEPIHAK OLEH PENGUSAHA (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA PUSAT NOMOR: 210/PDT.SUS-PHI/2019/PN.JKT.PST.)
Aufa Mubarok;
Ariawan Ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i1.18013
Protection of workers who experience termination of employment unilaterally must receive proper protection in accordance with applicable laws. In contrast to unilateral layoffs carried out by companies to workers without clear reasons and without any discussion between employers and workers, which results in workers feeling disadvantaged because the termination of employment is not in accordance with Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. From this problem that will be discussed is how the form of legal protection for workers who experience termination of employment unilaterally, to find out the company's responsibility for unilateral termination of employment, and to know the efforts made by workers who experience termination of employment unilaterally. The author uses normative legal research methods and uses interview data as supporting data. The results of the study reveal that workers who experience unilateral termination of employment can try to resolve disputes with the company through a bipartite process, if the bipartite process fails then it can be continued with the tripartite method through mediation. If there is no agreement between the worker and the entrepreneur, the dispute can be resolved through the industrial relations court.
ANALISIS KEABSAHAN DAN EFEKTIFITAS HUKUM PELAKSANAAN RAPAT UMUM PEMEGANG SAHAM (RUPS) PERSEROAN TERBATAS YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA DARING (ONLINE)
Harry Harry;
Ariawan Ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17814
As time goes by, of course, Science and Technology continues to develop, so that there are facilities such as internet networks and electronic media that can be used for two-way communication and allow each other to see each other such as chat, teleconference and video-conference . The implementation of the General Meeting of Stakeholders (GMS) can also be carried out by teleconference, considering the cost and time efficiency.This study aims to determine the mechanism of the general meeting of shareholders limited with online media as well as the validity of the statement on the minutes of the meeting decision general meeting of shareholders limited liability company that carried out through media teleconference by positive law in Indonesia and to review the legal effectiveness of holding general meeting of shareholders with online media
ANALISIS KEPASTIAN HUKUM PENJAMIN PERORANGAN YANG MELEPASKAN HAK ISTIMEWA DAN DIMOHONKAN DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) (STUDI PUTUSAN: Nomor 141/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN.Niaga Jkt.Pst)
Reny Agustini;
ariawan ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.13578
In this era of globalization more and more people are plunging into the field of business. In his decision to dive into the field of business, not a few people are willing to borrow credit for the sake of business continuity. In the case of this Lender the Bank must receive a guarantee first to guarantee the repayment of the debt. The current guarantee is not enough just in the form of material guarantees but often requested third-party guarantees. In this case, it is a Personal Guarantee. In the event of a Guarantee, the Creditor will ask the Guarantor to waive its privileges in a special agreement between the Creditor and the Guarantor. This resulted in his position. If many debtors do not pay their debts, lancer will request Postponement in debt repayment obligations. But nowadays not only debtors are requested but guarantors are also requested. This is a very dilemma and until now there is no Legal Certainty on the matter of guarantors requested for Postponement in debt repayment obligations. This is due to the difference in the interpretation of the waiver of privileges and the existence of special provisions in the Bankruptcy Law and Postponement in debt repayment obligations that do not govern clearly and specifically. So this matter becomes uncertain.
ANALISIS TANGGUNG JAWAB PT. SUMBER ALFARIA TRIJAYA TBK TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN UANG KEMBALIAN KONSUMEN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERKAIT PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR: 533 K/PDT.SUS-KIP/2018
Federico Octaviano B.;
Ariawan Ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.16981
Alfamart collects funds through the use of consumer change. The problem faced is the responsibility of PT. Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Tbk on the use of consumer change based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection related to Supreme Court Decision Number: 533 K/Pdt.Sus-KIP/2018. The research method used in this paper is a normative juridical research method. The results showed that PT. Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Tbk to collect funds through the use of consumer change based on Law No. 8 of 1999 is based on the distribution mechanism of the results of public donations conducted by PT. Sumber Alfaria Trijaya Tbk, which throughout 2015 has collaborated with 8 credible foundations on a national and international scale. This can be proven by the Decree of the Minister of Social Affairs regarding the procedure for collecting donations, program period, donation collection area, beneficiary foundations, and also the obligation to disseminate information to the public in which the letter was officially issued by the Ministry of Social Affairs so that in its role as perpetrators of collecting donations who already have legal force. For the Alfamart or other business actors who raise social funds by quoting consumer change, it is expected to be able to carry out accountability to the public who have participated in donating by making financial reports that can be accounted for and easily accessible by the public
KOMPENSASI SEBAGAI WUJUD PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA AKIBAT PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA SEPIHAK OLEH PENGUSAHA (STUDI KASUS: PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA PUSAT NOMOR: 210/PDT.SUS-PHI/2019/PN.JKT.PST.)
Aufa Mubarok;
Ariawan Ariawan
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i1.18012
Protection of workers who experience termination of employment unilaterally must receive proper protection in accordance with applicable laws. In contrast to unilateral layoffs carried out by companies to workers without clear reasons and without any discussion between employers and workers, which results in workers feeling disadvantaged because the termination of employment is not in accordance with Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. From this problem that will be discussed is how the form of legal protection for workers who experience termination of employment unilaterally, to find out the company's responsibility for unilateral termination of employment, and to know the efforts made by workers who experience termination of employment unilaterally. The author uses normative legal research methods and uses interview data as supporting data. The results of the study reveal that workers who experience unilateral termination of employment can try to resolve disputes with the company through a bipartite process, if the bipartite process fails then it can be continued with the tripartite method through mediation. If there is no agreement between the worker and the entrepreneur, the dispute can be resolved through the industrial relations court.