Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.267
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Biotika: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Excellent Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Fountain of Informatics Journal Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Computatio : Journal of Computer Science and Information Systems Sanitarian Jurnal Kesehatan Neraca Keuangan : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan YUME : Journal of Management JAKP (Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik) MAJAMATH: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Science Innovare Literasi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan BENING Generation Journal Jurnal ABDINUS : Jurnal Pengabdian Nusantara Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Journal Social Science And Technology For Community Service Jurnal Mesin Nusantara Lumbung Inovasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Media Informatika Banua Law Review MASTER: Jurnal Manajemen Strategik Kewirausahaan ProBisnis : Jurnal Manajemen Jurnal Bisnis Kompetitif Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, dan Tradisi) Indonesian Research Journal on Education Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research PPSDP International Journal of Education Jurnal Tradisi Lisan Nusantara Perkembangan Kajian Sosial Tesseract: International Journal of Geometry and Applied Mathematics Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Terapan PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender Quality
Ismanto Ismanto
Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Jl. Raya Jakarta Km. 4 Serang
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 43 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
SIGNIFIKANSI UJI KOMPETENSI AWAL TERHADAP KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU KELAS MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH DI KABUPATEN KUDUS TAHUN 2014 Santoso, Nika Lucky; Ismanto, Ismanto
QUALITY Vol 3, No 2 (2015): QUALITY
Publisher : Pascasarjana IAIN Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/quality.v3i2.1907

Abstract

This study aimed to describe: (1) The initial test of competence and pedagogical competence of MI teacher at Kudus district in 2014, and (2) the effect of the initial competency test against MI classroom teachers pedagogical competence in Kudus district in 2014. This research includes the study of ex post facto of correlational research. The samples using random sampling, with a standard error of 5% of the total population 130  MI classroom teachers at Kudusdistrict, obtained a sample of 98 people. The technique of collecting data through documentation and interviews with the LPTK Rayon 206 UIN Walisongo Semarang. While the analysis is done by using descriptive analysis and simple linear regression-correlation.  The results showed that: (1) The initial test of competence and pedagogical competence of MI  teacher at Kudus District 2014in the category good enough maing at 55.78 and 81.09 respectively, and (2) the initial competency test does not significantly influence the competence pedagogic of MI classroom teachers, with the model: Y = 78.047 + 0.056 X. While the initial competency test relations with pedagogical competence is positive and not significant with a correlation coefficient of 0.167 categorized as very low, so the initial competency test only contributes 2.8% of the  MI teacher pedagogical competence  in Kudus district.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan: (1) uji kompetensi awal dan kompetensi pedagogik guru kelas Mi di kabupaten kudus tahun 2014, serta (2) pengaruh uji kompetensi awal terhadap kompetensipedagogik guru kelas Mi di kabupaten kudus tahun 2014.  Penelitian ini termasuk jenis penelitian ex post facto bentuk correlational research. Penentuan sampel menggunakan random sampling, dengan taraf kesalahan 5% dari jumlah populasi 130 guru kelas Mi dari kabupaten kudus, didapatkan sampel sebanyak 98 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui dokumentasi dan wawancara dengan pihak lPTk Rayon 206 UIN Walisongo Semarang. Sedangkan analisis yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan regresi-korelasi linier sederhana. hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) uji kompetensi awal dan kompetensi pedagogik guru kelas Mi di kabupaten kudustahun 2014 dalam kategori cukup baik maing-masing sebesar  55,78 dan 81,09, serta (2) uji kompetensi awal tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kompetensi pedagogik guru kelas Mi, dengan model:Ŷ = 78,047 + 0,056 X. Sedangkan hubungan uji kompetensi awal dengan kompetensi pedagogik adalah positif dan tidak signifikan dengan koefisienkorelasi sebesar  0,167 berkategori sangat rendah, sehingga uji kompetensi awal hanya memberikan kontribusi sebesar 2,8% terhadap kompetensi pedagogik guru kelas madrasah ibtidaiyah di kabupaten kudus.
Artificial Intelligence in Educational Management: A Systematic Literature Review on AI-Based Primary Curriculum Design Ma’mun, Saepul; Rochaendi, Endi; Susanti, Aty; Ishar, Yulikha Shobarohmi; Shidiq, Galih Albarra; Ismanto, Ismanto
Mimbar Sekolah Dasar Vol 12, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53400/mimbar-sd.v12i4.91614

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into primary education curriculum governance remains constrained by conceptual ambiguity, ethical concerns, and digital inequalities, particularly in under-resourced education systems where technological readiness is limited. This study addresses these challenges by conducting a systematic literature review to explore how AI can be ethically, effectively, and contextually embedded into curriculum decision-making. Grounded in five theoretical frameworks—Data-Driven Decision Making, Adaptive Learning, AI-Based Decision Support Systems, Contextual Curriculum Design, and Technology Ethics in Education—the review synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed publications over the past decade. Results reveal that AI holds significant potential to strengthen curriculum planning through real-time assessment, personalized learning trajectories, and prescriptive analytics that enhance evidence-based decisions. Nevertheless, systemic barriers such as poor digital infrastructure, limited AI literacy among educators, and fragmented policy directions continue to hinder large-scale adoption and sustainability. To respond to these challenges, the study proposes an integrative conceptual model that repositions AI not merely as a technological tool but as an ethically grounded and contextually adaptive agent within curriculum governance. Such a model emphasizes that the meaningful and equitable application of AI requires strong cross-sectoral collaboration, coherent policy alignment, and sustained capacity-building initiatives. By advancing this perspective, the study underscores the importance of positioning AI as a catalyst for inclusive and transformative educational change, ensuring that technological innovation aligns with ethical imperatives and local contextual needs.
EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN PERSPEKTIF KESETARAAN GENDER DALAM SISTEM PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL ismanto, Ismanto
PALASTREN: Jurnal Studi Gender Vol 8, No 2 (2015): PALASTREN
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kudus

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/palastren.v8i2.974

Abstract

Sehubungan dengan evaluasi pembelajaran, sampai sekarang masih banyak instrumen hasil belajar, baik digunakan oleh guru untuk ulangan harian atau oleh sekolah-sekolah untuk ulangan umum yang belum memenuhi persyaratan ideal yaitu, non bias dan standar dapat diukur. instrumen hasil pembelajaran yang berisi item bias akan merugikan siswa yang memiliki kemampuan yang sama dengan siswa yang menjawab dengan benar hanya karena kelompok yang berbeda. Dengan kata lain, instrumen yang berisi item bias, tidak memberikan kesempatan yang sama untuk menjawab dengan benar pada orang mengambil tes dengan kemampuan yang sama, hanya karena mereka berasal dari kelompok yang berbeda. Dalam hal ini, itu bisa berarti perbedaan dalam budaya, jenis kelamin, agama, dan banyak lagi. menurut Saifuddin Azwar, empat faktor yang diduga sebagai penyebab kesenjangan kinerja antara laki-laki dan perempuan dalam kaitannya dengan tanggapan untuk menguji pertanyaan, yaitu 1). pertanyaan tes bias, 2). format pilihan ganda, 3). kesempatan untuk menebak, dan 4) kendala waktu. Regarding to the evaluation of learning, until now there are still a lot of learning outcomes instruments, whether used by teachers for daily test or by schools for general test , have not met the requirements of an ideal yet i.e.,non biased and scalable standard. Learning outcomes instrumentcontaining bias items would be detrimental to the students who has the same abilities with studentswho answered correctly simply becauseof different groups. In other words, the instrumentscontaining bias items, do not give the same opportunity to answer correctly on the person taking the test with the same abilities, just because they come from different groups. In this case, it could mean the difference in cultures, gender, religion, and more. According to Saifuddin Azwar, four factors suspected as the causes of the performance gapbetween men and women in relation to responses to test questions, namely 1). Bias test questions , 2). multiple-choice format, 3). opportunity toguess, and 4) time constraints. 
Co-Authors Agustini, Ni Nyoman Akhsani, Rafika Alifian, Muh. Arizki An-Nisa Apriani Ana Ana Ardiansa, Windra Arenawati Arnadi Chairunnas Athailah, Ibnu Athaillah, Ibnu Budiman, Budiman Cahyani, Putri Charisma, Kinanti Charisma, Kristinanti Devi Ayu Prawindar Wulan, Devi Ayu Dewi Dewi Erla Mahmudah, Dewi Erla Eka Fery Irawan, Eka Fery Endi Rochaendi Fauzi Syam Fiernaningsih, Nilawati Fitri Kumalasari, Fitri Fitri, Inul Galih Albarra Shidiq Hamzah, Akbar Hanif Kurniadi Heri Priya Waspada Himmah, Mahmudatul Indah Perdana Sari Indara, Irmansyah Irzum Farihah Ishar, Yulikha Shobarohmi Ismanto, Denny Kartomo, Kartomo Kholil, Moch Kholil, Moch. Khummariyatun, Khummariyatun Kurniawati, Naning Kurniawati, Ulan Lestari, Fadilah Listyaningsih Listyaningsih Lita Karlitasari M. Ivan Ariful Fathoni Ma’mun, Saepul Mochammad Junus Muchamad Saiful Muluk Muhamad Stiadi Nabila, Nurhafizatun Nani Aprilia Niar Astaginy Nulziyati, Nova Nuraini, Aisyah Pramesti, Della Eka Prayogi, Guntur Reza R N Akhsanu Takwim Rannu, Monica Rian Maulana, Rian Santoso, Nika Lucky Santoso, Nika Lucky Sayuti, Muhammad Setiadi, Muhammad Shobir, Haris Sigit Rahmawan Silva, Silva Diva Da Sri Wahyuni Sulistiyasni . Sundari, Imarini Supraptono, Bambang Supriyanto Supriyanto Susanti, Aty Suwito, Nuryo Tri Saptari Haryani Triastinurmiatiningsih, Triastinurmiatiningsih Widayani, Anna Winda Winda Zubaidi Zubaidi