Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.398
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Wicara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Semaya Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Desa Buletin Udayana Mengabdi JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Acta Comitas Jurnal Notariil KERTHA WICAKSANA International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) Aktual Justice POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Dewa Gde Rudy
Faculty Of Law, Udayana University
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 185 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search
Journal : Acta Comitas

 1 
PERSEKUTUAN KOMANDITER SEBAGAI SUBJEK PEMEGANG HAK GUNA BANGUNAN BERDASARKAN SURAT EDARAN MENTERI ATR/BPN NOMOR 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019 Cokorda Istri Brahmi Putri Biya; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i01.p02

Abstract

This research is based on Circular Letter 2/SE- HT.02.01/VI/2019, dated June 28, 2019 concerning the Granting of Building Use Rights for the Military Alliance (commanditaire vennootschap). This circular is a guideline for implementing the granting of HGB to the temporary Limited partnership companies (CV) when referring to Article 35 paragraph (1) of the Agrarian Law that Building Rights can only be owned by Indonesian Citizens and Legal Entities established under Indonesian law and domiciled in Indonesia, as also described in Article 19 Implementing Regulations, namely Government Regulation Number 40 of 1996 concerning Land Use Rights, Building Use Rights and Land Use Rights. Circular Number 2/SE-HT.02.01/VI/2019, dated June 28, 2019 concerning the granting of Building Rights for the Limited partnership companies(CV), cause a conflicts of legal norms between laws and regulations of one degree or another or between laws and regulations in a hierarchical manner. Furthermore is the arising of legal uncertainty from the description above, the problems that can be raised in this study are: What is the legal position of the Limited partnership companies (CV) according to the legal provisions in Indonesia and whether the Limited partnership companies (CV) can be used as the subject of the Right to Use. This research uses the Normative legal research method by using a type of approach in the form of a statutory approach and an analytical conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used in this study include primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The results of this study indicate that the legal status of limited partnership (CV) in Indonesian law is that Limited partnership companies(CV) is not a legal entity but only as a business entity. This can be assessed based on the characteristics of the legal entity that is the separation of assets of the state-owned companies with the assets of business entities, so that the state-owned companies are only responsible for the limited assets owned. Meanwhile, in CV, all active (complementary) and passive (limited partnership) companies may be held liable for losses suffered by CV, as Article 21 of the Code of Business Lawthat said CV companies has jointly responsible and jointly responsible (CV) cannot be the
PENCANTUMAN HAK OPSI PERPANJANGAN JANGKA WAKTU SEWA DALAM PERJANJIAN SEWA MENYEWA RUMAH (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 467/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Dps) Anak Agung Dalem Jagat Krisno; I Nyoman Sirtha; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas Vol 3 No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i02.p01

Abstract

Indonesian Civil Code, Act Number 1 of 2011 and Government Regulations Number 14 of 2016 does not regulate firmly on the terms of the option rights. Whereas in practice, a lease agreement that includes an option lease term extension lease clause has generated a dispute between the parties in court. The formulation of the issues to be discussed in this thesis is 1). Is the Denpasar district court decision number 467 / Pdt.G2014 / PN.Dps in relation to the lease term extension option is in compliance with the principles of contract law? 2). What are the legal consequences of the extension of the lease term option in the lease agreement? The type of research in this thesis is normative legal research because it departs from the void norm in the Indonesian Civil Code, Act Number 1 of 2011 and Government Regulation Number 14 of 2016 is related to the option right to extend the lease term. The types of approaches used are legislation approach, legal concept analysis approach and case approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is done by document study. The technique of analysis of legal materials used is technique description, evaluation, and argumentation. The results of research on the issues studied are the court ruling that overrides the tenant's option rights is incompatible with the principle of contract law, the principle of pacta sunt servanda, the principle of good faith and the principle of propierty. The tenant has the option to extend the lease term as stipulated in the lease agreement and the exercise of the right option is done in good faith.
Kedudukan Lembaga Perbankan Sebagai Pembeli Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Atas Jaminanya I Dewa Gede Agung Dhira Natsya Ora; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas Vol 6 No 02 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i02.p08

Abstract

Abstract This paper aim to develops knowledge in the field of notarial law and finds out the difference in legal standing between Rural Banks and Commercial Banks included Regional Development Banks as buyers in the auction for the executions of collateral for their collateral. Normative legal research methods is uses for this writing. The result of this study indicates that Rural Banks and Commercial Banks have different positions in the purchase of a collateral execution auction. Only Commercial Banks that stipulated in Article 12 A paragraph (1) of the Banking Act can purchase an auction for the executions of mortgage guarantees, while Rural Banks cannot become buyers in the auction for executions of collateral for their collateral. Abstrak Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan keilmuan dalam bidang hukum kenotariatan dan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kedudukan hukum antara Bank Perkreditan Rakyat dengan Bank Umum termasuk didalamnya Bank Pembangunan Daerah sebagai pembeli dalam lelang eksekusi hak tanggungan atas jaminannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa Bank Perkreditan Rakyat dengan Bank Umum memiliki perbedaan kedudukan dalam pembelian lelang eksekusi hak tanggungan atas jaminannya. Bank yang dapat membeli lelang eksekusi hak tanggungan atas jaminannya hanyalah Bank Umum sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 12 A ayat (1) Undang-Undang Perbankan, sedangkan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat tidak dapat menjadi pembeli dalam lelang eksekusi hak tanggungan atas jaminannya.
Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Dengan Harta Pailit Berada Di Luar Negeri I Dewa Made Adhi Hutama; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i02.p12

Abstract

Kepailitan merupakan suatu upaya yang dilakukan sebagai wujud upaya perlindungan hak kreditor pada saat debitor sudah tidak mampu lagi melunasi hutangnya. Dalam prkara kepailitan dimungkinkan debitor pailit memilki harta yang berada di luar negeri yang sebelumnya tidak digunakan sebagai jaminan. Dengan keadaan demikian akan timbul permasalah mengenai bagaimana hukum Indonesia mengatur mengenai harta debitor pailit yang berada di luar negeri ? dan upaya hukum apa yang dapat dilakukan sehingga kreditor pailit dapat memperoleh pelunasan dengan harta debitor pailit yang berada di luar negeri? Penelitian ini akan dilakukan dengan metode yuridis normatif dengan meneliti bahan kepustakaan yang berhubungan dengan penelitian ini, serta dilakukan dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang tidak secara jelas mengatur mengenai harta debitor yang berada di luar negeri, tetapi dalam beberapa pasal menunjukkan memungkinkan harta tersebut dijadikan boedel pailit. Terdapat upaya yang dapat dilakukan sehingga harta debitor pailit di luar negeri bisa dieksekusi sebagai pelunasan hutangnya dengan cara mengajukan permohonan melalui pengadilan yang ada dinegara letak harta benda debitor, melalui bilateral agreement, diplomatic channel, dan menggunakan UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency with Guide to Enacment. Berdasarkan hukum di Indonesia, terhadap harta debitor yang ada di luar negeri dimungkinkan sebagai alat pelunasan hutang dengan upaya-upaya tertentu, namun akan lebih mudah dengan meratifikasi UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border Insolvency with Guide to Enacment.
Peran Notaris Dalam Pendirian Koperasi Setelah Diberlakukannya Online Single Submission I Gusti Ngurah Wira Prabawa; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas Vol 5 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i02.p17

Abstract

As a public official, Notary has the authority in making authentic deeds. Koperasi is a business entity which is a populist economic movement and is based on the principle of kinship. To obtain status as a legal entity, Koperasi must have a Koperasi Establishment Deed which is drawn up before a Notaris Pembuat Akta Koperasi, which then must obtain approval of the Koperasi Establishment Deed thru the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. Since the promulgation of PP No. 24 year 2018, the business licensing process in Indonesia will be carried out electronically and the businessmen will obtain an NIB as the identity of the business. The problem that arises from this research is how the role of the notary in the establishment of Koperasi is after the implementation of OSS. This research is a normative legal research using the concept approach. The role of the Notary after the enactment of the OSS related to the establishment of the Koperasi is that it will help in providing counseling related to Koperasi and make a deed of establishment of the Koperasi. After the establishment deed is done, then the Notary will apply for legalization of the Koperasi establishment deed through AHU Online, because without the legalization from Ministry of Law and Human Rights, the Koperasi, cannot access the OSS to take process the business licensing. Sebagai pejabat umum, Notaris memiliki kewenangan untuk pembuatan akta otentik. Koperasi merupakan badan usaha yang merupakan gerakan ekonomi kerakyatan dan didasarkan atas asas kekeluargaan. Sebuah Koperasi agar bisa mendapatkan status sebagai badan hukum, maka harus memiliki Akta Pendirian Koperasi yang dibuat dihadapan Notaris Pembuat Akta Koperasi, yang kemudian harus mendapatkan pengesahan atas Akta Pendirian Koperasi tersebut oleh Kementrian Hukum dan HAM. Sejak diundangkannya PP No. 24 Thn. 2018, maka pengurusan perizinan ber-usaha di Indonesia akan dilaksanakan secara elektronik dan pelaku usaha akan mendapatkan NIB sebagai identitas dari pelaku usaha. Permasalahan yang timbul dari penelitian ini ialah Bagaimanakah peran notaris dalam pendirian koperasi setelah diberlakukannya sistem OSS. Penelitian ini merupaan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendakatan konsep. Peran Notaris setelah berlakunya OSS terkait dengan pendirian Koperasi ialah akan membantu dalam memberikan penyuluhan terkait perkoperasian dan membuat akta pendirian koperasi. Setelah adanya akta pendirian, maka Notaris akan melakukan pendaftaran pengesahan akta pendirian Koperasi melalui AHU Online, karena tanpa pengesahan tersebut, pelaku usaha yang dalam hal ini adalah Koperasi tidak dapat mengakses OSS untuk mengurus perizinan usaha.
Hak Waris Anak Yang Berbeda Agama Dengan Pewaris Berdasarkan Kompilasi Hukum Islam Moh Ariq Fauzan; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas Vol 6 No 01 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i01.p18

Abstract

This article purpose to find out that children of different religions have the right to inheritance from the heir and to find out how to get children of different religions to get a share of the inheritance from the heir. This paper uses a normative legal research method. The Islamic Law Compilation determines that an heir who has a different religion from his parents, in this case has a religion other than Islam, will not inherit from his parents. This means that the heirs cannot be non-Muslim. Then that an heir is obliged to be Muslim and proven by owning or based on testimony that the heir is Muslim, and if the heir is still an infant or is not yet capable, it will be considered in accordance with the religion of the parents. The resolution so that children as heirs of different religions receive inheritance from the heirs can be seen from the actions taken by judges in the form of legal breakthroughs based on the jurisprudence of the Salatiga Religious Court Decision and Determination, Badung Religious Court, and Supreme Court Judgment Jurisprudence, and in line with the views of ulama Abdul Wahab. Khallaf is based on surah al-Nisa: 11-14., Then a child or an heir who has a different religion than his parents or heirs will still receive property or inheritance that can be obtained through a will wajibaah, the inheritance obtained is not permitted more of 1/3 of the inheritance. Artikel ilmiah ini memiliki tujuan yaitu untuk mengetahui anak yang berbeda agama berhak atas warisan dari pewaris dan untuk mengetahui cara agar anak yang berbeda agama itu mendapatkan bagian harta warisan dari pewaris. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Kompilasi Hukum Islam menentukan bahwa seorang ahli waris yang memiliki agama yang berbeda dengan orang tuanya dalam hal ini memiliki agama selain Islam maka ia tidak akan mendapatkan warisan dari orang tuanya. Artinya ahli waris tidak boleh dari yang beragama non Islam. Kemudian seorang ahli waris diwajibkan beragama Islam dan dibuktikan dengan memiliki maupun berdasarkan kesaksian bahwa ahli waris tersebut beragama islam, dan apabila ahli waris masih bayi atau belum cakap, maka akan dipandang sesuai dengan agama orang tuanya. Penyelesaian agar anak sebagai ahli waris yang berbeda agama mendapatkan harta warisan dari pewaris dapat dilihat dari tindakan yang dilakukan hakim berupa terobosan hukum berdasarkan yurisprudensi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Salatiga dan Penetapan, Pengadilan Agama Badung, serta Yurisprudensi Putusan Mahkamah Agung, dan Sejalan dengan pandangan ulama Abdul Wahab Khallaf berdasarkan surat al-Nisa’: 11-14., maka seorang anak atau seorang ahli waris yang memiliki agama berbeda dengan orang tua atau pewaris tetap memperoleh harta benda atau harta warisan yang bisa diperoleh melalui wasiat wajibaah, harta warisan yang diperoleh tidak diijinkan lebih dari 1/3 dari harta waris.
Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab Tim Investigasi Dalam Pengawasan Dan Pembinaan Notaris Kadek Setiadewi; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas Vol 6 No 03 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2021.v06.i03.p1

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to examine the authority of the Investigation Team in the supervision and guidance of Notaries and also to find out the responsibilities of the Investigation Team regarding the supervision and guidance of Notaries. The writing of this article uses a normative legal research method and uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this research are that referring to the Decree of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights Number: AHU03.UM.01.01 of 2018, the investigation team has several powers, namely receiving public complaints that are directly submitted to the regional office, helping the smooth work of the Notary Supervisory Council, and also examining complaints received. Meanwhile, the responsibility of the Investigation Team is to find a bright spot on the problems faced by the Notary in a report on violations of the Law on the Position of Notary that is reported by the public. Abstrak Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kewenangan dari Tim Investigasi dalam pengawasan dan pembinaan Notaris dan juga untuk mengetahui tanggung jawab dari Tim Investigasi terkait dengan pengawasan dan pembinaan Notaris. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan mengunakan pendekatan perundang–undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa merujuk SK Kemenkumham Nomor: AHU03.UM.01.01 Tahun 2018, tim investigasi memiliki beberapa kewenangan yaitu menerima pengaduan masyarakat yang langsung disampaikan kepada kantor wilayah, membantu kelancaran tugas daripada Majelis Pengawas Notaris, dan juga memeriksa pengaduan yang diterima, sedangkan tanggung jawab dari tim investigasi adalah mencari titik terang dari permasalahan yang dihadapi Notaris dalam suatu laporan pelanggaran Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris yang dilaporkan oleh masyarakat.
Penyatuan Regulasi Pembuatan Badan Usaha Dengan Konsep Omnibus Law Serta Peran Notaris di Dalamnya Shafira Rahmania Anindita; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas Vol 7 No 03 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2022.v07.i03.p10

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out whether the idea of the Omnibus Law can integrate regulations for the formation of business entities into one law and to find out the role of a Notary in supporting this attampt. This research use normative legal methods with library research. The results show that attampt to combine regulations into one law with the concept of the Omnibus Law can be carried out, because all forms of business entities have characteristics that can be categorized into various groups.The role of the Notary in supporting also attampt to use the Omnibus Law concept by making Authentic Deeds that have legal force and can be accountable.
Terjadinya Force Majeure Dalam Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Notaris Ida Bagus Putra Prawira; Ketut Rai Setiabudhi; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas Vol 8 No 01 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i01.p7

Abstract

This study aims to be able to provide an understanding related to the position of notary deed minuta storage in the event of force majeure and efforts to prevent damage to notary deed minuta caused by force majeure. The writer's method of writing uses normative law departing from the void of norms. The research study of the vacuum of this norm is due to the non-regulation of damage or loss to the storage of minutes of deeds by a Notary which is an obligation in carrying out his position. This research contains primary legal sources that examine the Notary Office Act and secondary legal sources by reviewing several scientific journal literature. Through this research, using the approach refers to laws and regulations regarding the issue of depositing minuta deed referring to the Notary Office Law. The results of the author's research show that the Notary Office Law does not specifically regulate the electronic storage of minutes of deeds. Juridically, safeguarding the minuta deed is not stated in the Notary Office Law and only states that the storage is part of the Notary's protocol. Force majeure is a situation that cannot be predicted by humans, let alone natural disasters. The urgency of updating for the storage of minutes of deeds that are protected from coercive circumstances or beyond human control force majeure is by making electronic fillings with the concept of Cyber Notary.
Kepastian Hukum Penyerahan Protokol PPAT Kepada Penerima Protokol I Dewa Gede Wira Mahardika; Dewa Gde Rudy
Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Vol 8 No 02 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i02.p4

Abstract

This research aims to understand and evaluate the legal consequences that arise from the late submission of PPAT protocols to the protocol recipients, and to analyze the regulation of PPAT who are unwilling to accept the protocol. The research method used in this paper is normative legal research method to analyze the legal clarity in the process of submitting PPAT protocols to the protocol recipients. It utilizes a legislative and conceptual approach, including the use of relevant legal materials. The results of the discussion indicate that there are no sanctions that can be imposed in the event of protocol submission exceeding the 30-day time limit as stipulated in Article 28 of the Ministerial Regulation on PPAT, or it can be said that there is a norm vacuum. egarding the Legal Certainty of the regulation on PPAT who are unwilling to accept protocols, sanctions such as written reprimand, temporary suspension, honorable or dishonorable discharge can be imposed in accordance with Article 13 paragraph (1) of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning Regulation No. 2 of 2018.
Co-Authors A A Bramahasta Pramana A A Sri Indrawati A. A. Gede Agung Dharma Kusuma A. A. Sri Indrawati A.A Gede Agung Darmakusuma A.A Sri Indrawati A.A. Gede Agung Dharmakusuma A.A. Sri Indrawati Adnyani, Ni Luh Putu Sri Agung Brahmanda Yoga Agus Fahmi Prasetya Ahmad Rosidi Aminuyati Anak Agung Ayu Manik Pratiwiningrat Anak Agung Dalem Jagat Krisno Anak Agung Gde Kusuma Wardana Anak Agung Hari Narayana Anak Agung Istri Anom Sinta Wedaswara Anak Agung Ngurah Bagus Candra Dinata Anak Agung Ngurah Dinda Putra Narendra Anak Agung Ngurah Dwi Juniadi Anak Agung Ngurah Gede Rama Satyawan Anak Agung Sintya Iswari Anak Agung Sri Indrawati Angelina Putri Suhartini Ari Agung Satrianingsih Arrely Syamsa Kartika Bagus Gede Ardi Artha Prabawa barusu, yogi nugraha Bella Eunika Buda Astawa, I Kadek Alit Cok Istri Anom Pemayun Cokorda Istri Brahmi Putri Biya Dely Bunga Sarasvita Desak Putu Dewi Kasih Dewa Ayu Adelia Pebriyanti Putri Dewa Ayu Budiartini Dewa Ayu Putri Sukadana Dewa Ayu Putu Andina Novianta Dewa Ayu Putu Dian Permatasari Dewa Gde Ary Wicaksana Dewa Gede Angga Sumanjaya Dewa Made Delha Saputra Asuntya Dewi, Cokorda Istri Sita Diah Iswari, Desak Ayu Intan Elfrin Sagita Christ Dharny Manurung Enda Lorenza Br Tarigan Girsang Fabian Margiano Alexander Latubatara Gede Bagus Adhi Prasadana Gede Irwan Mahardika Gede Parartha Gede Resa Ananda Gede Yudhi Sutrisna Gusti Ngurah Surianto Habibatul Aliyah Halawa, Yolanda Aniska Hardy Pranata Hendra Gita Dharma Here Bessie, Jayvenson Christopher Dellano Hermanto, Bagus I D. A. D. Mayasari I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari I Dewa Gede Agung Dhira Natsya Ora I Dewa Gede Cahaya Dita Darmaangga I Dewa Gede Eka Dharma Yuda I Dewa Gede Wira Mahardika I Dewa Made Adhi Hutama I G Ngurah Vinanta Diputra Kelakan I Gede Andy Diatmika I Gede D.E. Adi Atma Dewantara I Gede Manik Askare I Gede Yusa I Gst. Ag. Tirta Sari Dew I Gst. Ayu Puspawati I Gusi Made Agus Putra Yuda I Gusti Agung Bagus Putu Editya Hambarsika I Gusti Agung Ngurah Bagus Wiranata I Gusti Agung Putri Maha Dewi I Gusti Ayu Puspawati I Gusti Bagus Wijaya Negara I Gusti Gumanti Adi Darma I Gusti Ngurah Bagus Surya Aditya I Gusti Ngurah Gilang Mahabisana Nurdyputra I Gusti Ngurah Krisna Suryana I Gusti Ngurah Wira Prabawa I Kadek Alit Buda Astawa I Kadek Dwi Gemilang I Kadek Yudana Billy Aryambau I Ketut Arjuna Satya Prema I Ketut Markeling I Ketut Surya Buana I KETUT WESTRA I Komang Heryawan Trilaksana I Komang Heryawan Trilaksana I Made Arief Mahrdyan I Made Dedy Priyanto I Made Yudana I Nyoman Darmadha I Nyoman Mudana I Nyoman Restuin Mangdalena I Nyoman Sirtha I Putu Gde Sumantri Wikarma Putra I Putu Iwan Kharisma Putra I Putu Wira Prasetya I Wayan Suatmaja Mimba I. M. D. Priyanto I. M. Sarjana I.B. Gede Agung Suryaningrat I.K. Westra Ida Ayu Dwi Weda Astuti Ida Ayu Surya Kencana Dewi Ida Bagus Gede Partha Suwirya Ida Bagus Nyoman Kartika Yudha Ida Bagus Putra Atmadja Ida Bagus Putra Prawira Ida Bagus Putu Sutama Ida Bagus Suardhana Wijaya Intiara Filla Harlita Irma Suryanti Kadek Ayu Dwi Ningsih Kadek Ayu Sri Cempakasari Kadek Chedi Sinar Amanda Kadek Indra Dewantara Kadek Setiadewi Kadjar, Gde Arya Brian Ketut Braditya Pradnyana Putra Ketut Hari Purnayasa Tanaya Ketut Rai Setiabudhi Ketut Sandhi Sudarsana Khrisna Dinatha Komang Adi Murti Pranata Komang Ayu Ananda Putri Komang Gede Indra Parisuda Komang Pradnyana Sudibya Laritmas, Selfianus Leonita Citriana Putri Liabrintika Oktaviani Gunawan Lily Karuna Dewi Luh Ayu Adi Wardani Luh Ketut Sri Kartika Prema Dewi KST Luh Suni Muci Paryani Luthfi Novansa Putra Made Agra Kumaradhika Made Ayu Gita Lestari Made Dwi Pranata Made Hendra Pranata Dharmaputra P. Made Topan Antakusuma Made Winda Diantika Sari Meliandriani, Komang Mia Wijayanti Ekalandika Moh Amirul Afifullah Moh Ariq Fauzan Mutia Rizkiana Nessya Nindri Sari Ngakan Ketut Dunia Ngurah Pradita Putra Ni Gusti Lidya Stephanie Ni Ketut Lilik Purnama Dewi Ni Ketut Pradnyawati Ni Komang Ayu Noviyanti Ni Komang Ayuk Tri Buti Apsari Ni Komang Lia Hariana Ni Komang Theda Febrina Subagia Ni Luh Anggun Ari Pertiwi Ni Luh Gede Dini Rahyuni Septiana Ni Luh Wayan Kori Agustini Ni Made Cindhi Duaty Githasmara Ni Nengah Ayu Putri Darsani Ni Nyoman Dianita Pramesti Ni Putu Maya Kartika Dewi Ni Putu Purwanti Ni Putu Sintha Tjiri Pradnya Dewi Ni Wayan Padma Dewi Nyoman Angga Dharma Utama Nyoman Riela Pricilia P. D. Y. Utami P. Yogantara P.S. Sumadi Pande Putu Frisca Indiradewi Putri Febyana Br. Surbakti Putu Alvin Janitra Putu Ayu Filri Regeena Sutawan Putu Ayu Ratih Tribuana Putu Dian Kusuma Wardani Putu Dyva Dhamahadi Yadnya Putu Eka Krisna Sanjaya Putu Hartawiguna Yasa Putu Henny Pratiwi Dharmaputri P. Putu Mahanta Pradana Putra Putu Pogy Kusuma Putu Suindra Wiranata Putu Surya Mahardika R.A.R Murni Rantika Andreani Rosia Luckyani Sidauruk Sari Dewi, Ni Komang Ayu Novita SARI, SUSANTHY PUSPITA Selvi Marcellia Shafira Rahmania Anindita Soraya Taufik Suartra Putrawan Suatra Putrawan Tasya Adella Dewi Teja, Nyoman Suekhrisna Tri Aditya Winata Umi Aliffa Verjenia Beatriks Regon Willy Jayandi Parasian Sinaga Wira Dhita Kusuma Wirya Iswari Krisnanda Bhagavata Yohanna Feryna Zuraida Saroha Handayani