Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

CONFLICT BETWEEN LAW AND JUSTICE Putro, Widodo Dwi
Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN
Publisher : Jurnal IUS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12345/ius.v1i1.222

Abstract

The consequence of identifying justice with law is that seeking justice becomes constrained and it becomes limited only to the formulation of law. Although it is possible to approach justice from the ‘legal-formal’ aspect, justice cannot be reduced to law. Once justice is reduced to law, seeking justice outside the legal system ceases. The assumption that justice is identical to law is misleading, as justice is assumed to be inherent in the law itself. On the other hand, it is dangerous to make a distinct separation between law and justice. Law obtains its validity through its positive form, which is derived from the sovereign authority. The implication of this is that law is the law itself, altogether separate from justice, whereby an emphasis is placed only on its formal manifestation. However, law is not justice. Law is a calculable element, while justice is incalculable in concrete terms. Law is a tool for approaching justice. Therefore, law cannot possibly surpass justice, because assuming that law surpasses justice would be as stating that the tool colonizes its objective.  Keywords: Law, Justice, Tools, Goals.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pelaku Usaha Parkir Terhadap Kehilangan Barang Konsumen Dalam Kendaraan/Legal Responsibilities of Parking Business Actors Against Loss of Consumer Goods in Vehicles Zuhairi, Ahmad; Nurbani, Erlies Septiana; Putro, Widodo Dwi
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 12, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v12i2.10437

Abstract

Abstract: Parking area is a type of strategic business needed by the community. however, one obstacle that often arises is security disturbances such as loss of consumer goods in vehicles. It is not uncommon for parking land owners to be reluctant to take responsibility for this loss. The purpose of this study was to describe the legal relationship between parking managers and consumers and to analyze the responsibilities of parking managers in the event of loss of goods in the vehicle. This article is based on doctrinal law research with statutory regulations approach and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the legal relationship between the parking manager and the owner's consumer is an agreement for storing goods, not renting land. The legal consequence of the goods storage agreement in the parking agreement is to impose responsibility on the parking manager for the loss of the vehicle and the items in the vehicle.Keywords: parking area; agreement; legal responsibilityAbstrak Lahan parkir merupakan jenis usaha strategis yang dibutuhkan oleh masyarakat. namun, salah satu kendala yang sering muncul adalah gangguan keamanan seperti hilangnya barang konsumen di kendaraan. Tidak jarang pemilik lahan parkir enggan bertanggung jawab terhadap kehilangan tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan hubungan hukum pengelola parkir dengan konsumen dan menganalisis tanggung jawab pengelola parkir dalam hal terjadinya kehilangan barang di dalam kendaraan. Artikel ini berdasarkan penelitian hukum doctrinal dengan pendekaran peraturan perundang undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hubungan hukum antara pengelola parkir dengan konsumen pemilik adalah perjanjian penitipan barang, bukan sewa-menyewa lahan. Konsekuensi hukum dari perjanjian penitipan barang dalam perjanjian parkir adalah membebankan tanggung jawab kepada pengelola parkir terhadap kehilangan kendaraan beserta barang yang terdapat di dalam kendaraan.Kata Kunci : lahan parkir; perjanjian; tanggung jawab hukum.
Akibat Hukum Putusan Hakim yang Melanggar Hukum dalam Pemilikan Tanah Oleh Orang Asing (Studi Putusan No. 328/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Dps.) I Made Ariwangsa Wiryanatha; M. Arba; Widodo Dwi Putro
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 7, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (184.413 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v7i3.650

Abstract

Permasalahan yang diangkat dalam tulisan ini adalah mengenai aspek yuridis Hak Tanggungan terhadap Hak Milik atas tanah Indonesia yang obyeknya “dimiliki” oleh orang asing, serta mengenai akibat hukum putusan yang melanggar hukum dalam Putusan Pengadilan No. 328/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Dps. Adapun tujuan dan manfaat dari karya tulis ini secara praktis adalah sebagai salah satu bahan pembelajaran bagi praktisi hukum, terutama hakim, untuk mendalami penggunaan UUHT (Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan) secara bertentangan dengan UUPA (Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria). Penelitian ini dikemas sebagai penelitian hukum normatif dimana terjadi pertentangan antara putusan hakim dengan norma hukum dalam UUPA. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa UUHT digunakan sebagai alat dalam melanggar hukum agar orang asing dapat memiliki tanah di Indonesia secara tidak langsung dan bahwa putusan pengadilan kurang pertimbangan hukum dan bertentangan dengan hukum (UUPA) sehingga berakibat batal karena hukum.
Penggusuran Lahan: Dibalik Investasi Besar-besaran di Mandalika Widodo Dwi Putro; Amiruddin Amiruddin; Sudiarto Sudiarto
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 3: December 2021 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v9i1.1058

Abstract

Penggusuran lahan di Kawasan Mandalika berlangsung panjang, mulai dari rezim Orde Baru hingga sekarang. Mengapa penggusuran lahan yang dilakukan rezim otoriter, justru dilanjutkan oleh rezim yang dipilih secara demokratis? Jika rezim otoriter lebih menggunakan pendekatan kekerasan, maka rezim “demokratis” mengombinasikan dengan pendekatan hukum. Penggusuran lahan yang dilakukan dengan legitimasi hukum memang lebih canggih dibanding dengan kekerasan dan intimidasi semata. Warga masyarakat yang sebelumnya gigih mempertahankan tanah meski dengan intimidasi, akhirnya merubah orientasi perjuangannya dari mempertahankan tanah menjadi tuntutan ganti rugi. Bagaimana hukum didayagunakan sebagai instrumen yang sah dalam pembebasan lahan? Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan socio-legal. Peneliti melakukan wawancara pemilik lahan, bagaimana mereka tergusur dari kampung halamannya. Peneliti juga melakukan wawancara dengan pihak perusahaan, kepolisian, Badan Pertanahan Nasional yang aktif mengambil bagian dalam proses pembebasan lahan. Pendekatan hukum ternyata tidak bisa sepenuhnya menyembunyikan kekerasan dan pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia. Terlebih lagi di era digital yang semakin terbuka, penggusuran meski dibalut dengan pendekatan hukum, tetap mendapat sorotan internasional.
CONFLICT BETWEEN LAW AND JUSTICE Widodo Dwi Putro
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 1, No 1 (2013): DIALEKTIKA KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12345/ius.v1i1.222

Abstract

The consequence of identifying justice with law is that seeking justice becomes constrained and it becomes limited only to the formulation of law. Although it is possible to approach justice from the ‘legal-formal’ aspect, justice cannot be reduced to law. Once justice is reduced to law, seeking justice outside the legal system ceases. The assumption that justice is identical to law is misleading, as justice is assumed to be inherent in the law itself. On the other hand, it is dangerous to make a distinct separation between law and justice. Law obtains its validity through its positive form, which is derived from the sovereign authority. The implication of this is that law is the law itself, altogether separate from justice, whereby an emphasis is placed only on its formal manifestation. However, law is not justice. Law is a calculable element, while justice is incalculable in concrete terms. Law is a tool for approaching justice. Therefore, law cannot possibly surpass justice, because assuming that law surpasses justice would be as stating that the tool colonizes its objective.  
ANALISIS HUKUM ALIH FUNGSI TANAH PERTANIAN MENJADI PEMBANGUNAN PERUMAHAN DAN PEMUKIMAN (STUDY DI KABUPATEN BIMA) siti nurmi; Arba arba; Widodo Dwi Putro
Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya Vol 22, No 1 (2020): Juni
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jdsb.v22i2.2878

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal analysis of the conversion of agricultural land into housing development in Kabupaten Bima. This research is structured as an empirical legal research based on the consideration that this research in problem analysis is carried out by combining secondary and primary legal materials obtained in the field. The approach used is the statute approach, conceptual approach, and the sociological approach to law. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the mechanism for changing the function of agricultural land into housing development is divided into two mechanisms, namely through a location permit if the land requested is more than 10,000 m2 while the land use change permit is used if the land use is less than 10,000 m2. With the provision that a treatise is required for technical land considerations issued by the National Land Agency of Bima Regency and a decision from the regional spatial planning coordination team regarding recommendations for space utilization permits for housing development. The policy issued by the Bima regency government is to become a reference in the conversion of land functions in line with the main agrarian law regulations and regional regulations on the spatial plan for the Bima district.
Topiramate as an adjunctive therapy in children with intractable epilepsy Hardiono D. Pusponegoro; Tri Lestari Handayani; Irawan Mangunatmadja; Dwi Putro Widodo; Rulina Suradi
Paediatrica Indonesiana Vol 42 No 11-12 (2002): November 2002
Publisher : Indonesian Pediatric Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (315.257 KB) | DOI: 10.14238/pi42.6.2002.287-91

Abstract

Background Epilepsy is a chronic disease that requires antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Only 60-70% of new patients could be controlled effectively by standard AEDs and this stimulates the search for new, more effective and well-tolerated AEDs.Objective To asses the efficacy and safety of topiramate, as an adjunctive therapy to standard AEDs for children with intractable epilepsy.Methods This was an open label, parallel group study. Forty children with at least 4 seizures during a 4-week baseline period were randomly assigned to topiramate (n=20) or control group (n=20). In the topiramate group, the drug was given in adjunct to AEDs for  2-week titration dosage continued with a 12-week stabilization period, while the control group received only AEDs adjusted to their clinical responses.Results Mean reduction from baseline in monthly seizures frequency was significantly greater in the topiramate group (88.6% vs. 25%; P=0.030). Other variable of efficacy was significantly different (e"50% reduction in seizures: 14/20 vs. 6 /20; P=0.049). Adverse effects of topiramate, such as decreased weight, paresthesia, somnolence, diarrhea, fever, aggressive reaction and flushing, were temporary and mild.Conclusion Results of this trial strongly suggested that topiramate is effective and well tolerated in reducing seizures of intractable epilepsy.
Clinical Features and Management of Some Muscular Disorders in Children - A Brief Review Dwi Putro Widodo
Paediatrica Indonesiana Vol 38 No 11-12 (1998): November - December 1998
Publisher : Indonesian Pediatric Society

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3326.267 KB) | DOI: 10.14238/pi38.11-12.1998.233-42

Abstract

Study has proven that electrical activity of resting and contracting skeletal muscles and conduction of the nerve impulse have become one of the most useful diagnostic tools in neurology. EMG and nerve conduction studies have become indispensable in the diagnosis and management of peripheral nerve and muscle disease (neurological differential diagnosis).
Perlindungan Bagi Pembeli Beritikad Baik Dalam Sengketa Perdata Berobyek Tanah Widodo Dwi Putro; Ahmad Zuhairi; Khotibul Islam; Rina Khairani Pancaningrum
Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Problem yang banyak ditemui di masyarakat adalah salah satunya terkait sengketa perdata yang berobjek tanah. Masyarakat sering melakukan transaksi jual beli tanah namun tidak memperhatikan prinsip kehati-hatian (duty of care) sehingga di belakang hari menimbulkan sengketa tanah. Selain itu mayoritas kasus yang terjadi di Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia di Kamar Perdata adalah kasus tanah. Oleh karena itu tujuan dari penyuluhan ini adalah memberikan pemahaman kepada masyarakat terkait dengan pembeli beritikad baik dalam transaksi tanah sehingga mereka mendapat perlindungan hukum jika terjadi sengketa di belakang hari, selain itu untuk mengurangi penumpukan kasus yang ada di pengadilan terkait dengan sengketa jual beli tanah. Metode yang dilakukan dalam penyuluhan ini adalah metode ceramah, diskusi dan pendampingan kepada masyarakat. Kegiatan ini dilakukan di Desa Kekeri, Kecamatan Gunung Sari, Kabupaten Lombok Barat. Hasil dari penyuluhan ini adalah banyak masyarakat sangat membutuhkan pengetahuan terkait dengan pembeli beritikad baik dalam sengketa perdata berobyek tanah. Hal ini dibuktikan dari antusiasme masyarakat dalam mengikuti kegiatan penyuluhan dan berharap dapat pendampingan serta mendapatkan program-program penyuluhan hukum selanjutnya untuk meningkatkan pemahaman masyarakat sehingga tidak dirugikan dalam transaksi jual beli tanah.
MENIMBANG PRINSIP ”DUTY OF CARE”: ‘PEMBELI’ MELAWAN ‘PEMBELI’ DALAM SENGKETA JUAL BELI TANAH Widodo Dwi Putro; Ahmad Zuhairi
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 10, No 1 (2017): ABROGATIO LEGIS
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v10i1.133

Abstract

ABSTRAKSengketa jual beli tanah dalam perkara ini menyeret pihak penjual yang telah menjual objek yang sama kepada dua pembeli dalam dua kali transaksi. Pembeli kedua (penggugat) melayangkan gugatannya terhadap pembeli pertama (tergugat II). Posisi hukumnya dilematis. Kedua pembeli sama-sama merasa mempunyai hak atas tanah sengketa karena telah membeli objek yang sama dari penjual. Untuk membuktikan siapa pembeli yang berhak, hakim perlu mempertimbangkan asas "iktikad baik" (good faith), sebagai dasar untuk menentukan pembeli yang patut mendapat perlindungan hukum. Permasalahannya, kedua pembeli sama-sama mengklaim dirinya adalah pembeli yang beriktikad baik. Sehingga, untuk menilai siapa pembeli yang patut mendapat perlindungan hukum, hakim berpegangan pada prinsip duty of care, dengan mempertimbangkan siapa pembeli yang berhati-hati dan cermat memeriksa data yuridis dan data fisik sebelum dan saat jual beli dilakukan. Prinsip duty of care ini bersifat abstrak, maka metode penulisan yang digunakan, menelusuri dan mengkaji pendapat para ahli hukum perdata dan agraria untuk didialogkan dengan putusan-putusan hakim. Perkembangan putusan-putusan pengadilan mengenai pembeli beriktikad baik yang mengadopsi prinsip duty of care, seharusnya menjadi 'pegangan' para hakim dalam menangani kasus yang serupa, untuk menilai kapan pembeli dikategorikan sebagai pembeli beriktikad baik.Kata kunci: iktikad baik, perlindungan hukum, duty of care, data yuridis dan fisik.ABSTRACTThe dispute of land sale and purchase in this case drag the seller who had sold the same object to two buyers in two transactions. The second buyer (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against the first buyer (defendant II). Its legal standing created a dilemma. Both buyers felt equally entitled to be the owner of the disputed land, which is the same object purchased from the seller. In providing evidence of the most eligible buyer, the judge should take into consideration the principle of "good faith" as the basis for determining the buyer deserving legal protection. The problem is that both buyers claimed that they were buyers of good faith. Therefore, to appraise which buyer deserving the legal protection, the judges adhered to principle of "duty of care" by taking into account which one of them was carefully and meticulously reading-through the juridical and physical data prior to and during the sale and purchase of the land was conducted. Given the abstract nature of the principle of "duty of care" the analysis method used in this discussion is exploring and studying the opinions of the experts of civil and agrarian law as to be juxtaposed with the decisions of the judges. The development of court decisions related to the issue of good faith buyers adopting the principle of "duty of care" should serve as a reference for the judges in handling similar cases to determine a good faith buyer.Keywords: good faith, legal protection, duty of care, juridical and physical data.