Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Cultural Enculturization in the Art of Masks: A Case Study of the Industrial Enterprise of Batik Kayu, Bobung, Patuk, Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta Slamet Subiyantoro; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Kristiani Kristiani; Dwi Maryono; Yasin Surya Wijaya
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 3, No 4 (2020): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute November
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v3i4.1400

Abstract

This study aims to explore the process of enculturation of mask art with a case study in the wooden batik (batik Kayu) enterprise of Bobung Village, Patuk, Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta. This study method uses a netnographic approach, which in principle is the same as classical ethnography, except that netnography uses the internet as a research media. The data were sourced from informants, places & events, and documents or archives. Data from informants were collected using in-depth online interviews. Place and event data were collected using online participatory observation techniques. In addition, the source documents or archives were collected using data analysis techniques or literature studies on relevant online data. The validity of the data was tested by using informant review techniques and source triangulation. Data were analyzed using flow techniques with data reduction, display, and verification procedures. The results of the study show that the process of enculturation or culture of mask art, both classic masks and creative masks (batik Kayu), is carried out informally (family environment), non-formal (community, UKM, and studio), and formal (learning in schools). This enculturation process is carried out from generation to generation, when the mask is still a classic mask (Panji mask) until the mask develops into a superior product with economic and tourism value as it is today (Creative Mask). The art of batik and classical masks has become the identity of the people of Bobung Village, Gunung Kidul, who have undergone changes in form, function and meaning during the enculturation process from previous generations to the next.
The Conception of Restorative Justice in Actualization of the Indonesian Criminal Justice System Roy Rovalino Herudiansyah; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Nur Rochaeti
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 3 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i3.6649

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to study and analyze the actualization of restorative justice in the Indonesian criminal justice system. In this writing, the author uses normative juridical methods with research specifications in the form of descriptive analysis. Based on the discussion of the weaknesses of the Indonesian criminal justice system, the criminal justice system tends to be emotional in punishing perpetrators. An overly positivist understanding places the law as an absolute rule in order to achieve legal certainty and disregard the expediency and justice of the law for perpetrators and victims of a criminal justice legal system that tends to override the rights of defendants or suspects and victims. Restorative justice is a way of resolving cases through legal processes outside the courts that aim to achieve justice that emphasizes the recovery of the condition of the perpetrator and victim. Recovery is defined as recovery to the victim as well as the perpetrator. So what is restored is not just the victim. The position of restorative justice in Indonesia is strictly regulated in various laws and regulations such as the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, Law Number 14 of 1985 as amended by Law Number 5 of 2004 as last amended by Law Number 3 of 2009 concerning the Supreme Court.