Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.768
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REVIEW Jurnal Akta International Journal of Law Reconstruction Jurnal Selat Widya Yuridika Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Awang Long Law Review Unes Law Review Kosmik Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Jurnal Yustisiabel Ganesha Law Review Legal Spirit ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Journal of Judicial Review Jurnal Independent Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Lex Publica Conference on Management, Business, Innovation, Education and Social Sciences (CoMBInES) Conference on Community Engagement Project (Concept) Madani: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Kewirausahaan Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah
FL. Yudhi Priyo Amboro, FL. Yudhi Priyo
Universitas Internasional Batam
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 72 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 72 Documents
Search

 4   5   6   7   8 
Human Rights Protection in Business Practices: Between Social Responsibility and Legal Compliance Tan, Winsherly; Wan Rosli, Wan Rosalili; Amboro, Yudhi Priyo; Mohd Bajury, Mimi Sintia; Gunawan, Elizabeth
Lex Publica Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.12.1.2025.293

Abstract

This study examines human rights protection in business practices in Indonesia, emphasizing the role of corporations in respecting, protecting, and redressing the rights of workers and communities. Although Indonesia has ratified international instruments such as the ICESCR and enacted sectoral laws such as Law No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection, and the Job Creation Law, human rights violations remain rampant, including substandard wages, suppression of labor unions, violations of indigenous peoples' rights, and limited access to redress mechanisms. Using a normative-empirical approach, this study analyzes national laws and international standards through descriptive analysis. The findings indicate that wage and worker welfare policies serve as important indicators of respect for human rights, while corporate practices often prioritize economic efficiency over ethical obligations. This study underscores the urgent need to integrate the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights into Indonesia's legal framework.
Doing the Corporate Business with Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine: Indonesia, Us And Uk Perspective Ng Catharina Enggar Kusuma; Fl. Yudhi Priyo Amboro
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.3.2.1832.126-129

Abstract

The absence of piercing the corporate veil doctrine in the Indonesian company law shows that the subsidiaries of such corporate groups are considered a separate legal personality, hence it is probably almost impossible to held the parent company liable for its subsidiaries’ legal actions under any conditions. This research adopted a normative legal research with a comparative law study method. The goal of this research is describe the implementation of piercing the corporate veil doctrine in Indonesia, US and UK, then to make the points of contribution of this doctrine to be regulated properly in Indonesia. In fact, piercing the corporate veil doctrine is implemented in Indonesia, although there was not any normative legal basis of the doctrine itself, whereas in US and UK, the doctrine is implemented and further developed through precedents. Therefore, since there is an evident relationship between a parent company and its subsidiary, whereby in certain cases the parent company can and should be held liable for the acts of its subsidiary, there should be a more explicit regulation regarding both corporate groups and piercing the corporate veil doctrine.
Co-Authors Afandi, M Agustina Christi Agustini, Shenti Anjawai, Namrysilia Buti Ariani, Merizqa Arika, Defi Bryan Simanjuntak Christina Christina Christine Christine dede agus, dede Dedyanto Dedyanto Defi Arika Diki Diki Efendi, Syamsul Eko Nurisman Elviani Elviani Elza Syarief, Elza Essty Yana Fandias Fandias Fendy Fendy Gunawan, Elizabeth H. Hutauruk, Rufinus Hadiyati, Nur Halawa, Filemon Hermanto Hermanto Hutauruk, Rufinus H. Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana Indra Hengky Insti, Putri Deviana Jemmy Edi Joseline Junimart Girsang Kendry Tan Khusuf Komarhana Lily Persyadayani Lu Sudirman Lu Sudirman Manurung, Kristie Sugama Maysura, Neha Aswin Melisa Irianti Mende Mende, Melisa Irianti Miftahul Jannah Mimi Sintia Mohd Bajury Mohd Bajury, Mimi Sintia Muhammad Sabir Rahman Neha Aswin Maysura Ng Catharina Enggar Kusuma Novita Novita Novri, Novrianti Nur Hadiyati Nurisman, Eko Nurlaily Nurlaily NURLAILY, NURLAILY Nurul Fazri Elfikri Okta Feryanto Peter Macnico Puspita, Viona Rika Permatasari, Rika Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah Risky Hadi Putra rohani, aceng asnawi Rudiansyah Rudiansyah Rufinus H. Hutauruk Shahrullah, Rina Silviani, Ninne Zahara Simanjuntak, Bryan Simanjuntak, Kristi W Situmeang, Ampuan Steven Steven Sugianto, M Udik Suriani Suriani Tan, Winsherly Triana Dewi Seroja Triana Dewi Seroja Uji Febianika Viona Puspita Wan Rosli, Wan Rosalili Warianto, Wahyudi Weley, Nadia Carolina Wulandari, Frisca Yana, Essty Yudi Kornelis Yudi Kornelis Yudi Kornelis, Yudi Yuly Milyarti Wijaya