Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Community-Based Collaborative Management: Impacts and Challenges of Sea Turtle Conservation on the South Coast of Central Java, Indonesia Kartono Kartowijono; Aryuni Yuliantiningsih; Tedi Sudrajat; Baginda Khalid Hidayat Jati
Jurnal Hukum Vol 40, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v40i1.39386

Abstract

The use of community-based collaborative management has shown promising results in addressing the complex issues surrounding sea turtle conservation. However, the legal implications and barriers associated with this method have not been thoroughly investigated. This study seeks to examine legal policies governing conservation institutions that influence community-based turtle protection along the southern coast of Central Java, Indonesia. The focus of this study is on two specific case studies: a conservation group at Pantai Sodong and another at Pantai Kembar. Employing a qualitative research design, this study incorporated semi-structured interviews with conservation group administrators, government officials, and other relevant stakeholders. Apart from that, this research also involves analysis of legal and regulatory documents and policies which is complemented by field observations. These findings indicate that community-based conservation policies significantly increase legal behavior that is in line with conservation law provisions. However, this report also underscores the legal and institutional challenges faced by local community-based conservation groups. These challenges include the necessity of legal collaboration between community groups and the government, the availability of healthcare facilities such as quarantine centers and clinics, and the need for a permanent workforce with appropriate skills. This study emphasizes the need for more flexible standards regarding conservation institutional requirements and government support to encourage the fulfillment of the validity and legal certainty of conservation institutions. This study adds to the growing body of literature on legal approaches to community-based collaborative management, and offers important insights for policymakers and legal practitioners who wish to increase support for community-based conservation programs in Indonesia and other countries.
Strengthening Justice and Accountability: The Role of Ombudsman in Monitoring Police Public Services Oktobrian, Dwiki; Natasya, Juliana Dwi; Wiranti , Cece; Sudrajat, Tedi
Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 12 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/unifikasi.v12i02.1076

Abstract

Public service delivery in police sector of Indonesia is facing a crisis of trust, fueled by widespread reports of maladministration. In this context, social movements such as #PercumaLaporPolisi (Reporting to Police Is Useless) and incidents of police brutality have reinforced perceptions that law enforcement lacks transparency, responsiveness, and accountability. Therefore, this research aims to 1) identify the forms and patterns of maladministration in police public services, and 2) evaluate the role and effectiveness of Indonesian Ombudsman, with a specific focus on West Java Regional Office, to address and prevent maladministration. Document analysis, literature review, and interviews were integrated with key informants using a socio-legal and qualitative method. The results showed that the most frequently reported problems included investigation and prosecution procedures, such as Notice of Investigation Progress, Notice of Investigation Commencement, and Notice of Investigation Completion, as well as initial complaint handling. The issues were largely driven by rigid bureaucracy, resistance to external monitoring, and limited enforcement of Ombudsman recommendations. However, the illegally bound recommendations supported procedural reform. This was evident in the achievement of green zone status for compliance with service standards across all district police offices in West Java by 2024. The objectives of Goal 16 (Sustainable Development Goals/SDGs) were also supported to promote peace, justice, and strong institutions by emphasizing the importance of independent oversight in building accountable and humane police institutions based on public trust.
The Role of Ombudsman in Supervising Public Services in The Land Sector Oktobrian, Dwiki; Alisya, Nazwa Serin; Maharani , Yunita Putri; Sudrajat, Tedi
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jphk.v7i1.27559

Abstract

Maladministration in public land services remains a recurring structural issue that undermines legal certainty and erodes public trust in state institutions. This article addresses two main concerns: the high volume of public complaints about poor land services and the limited influence of external oversight bodies, such as the Ombudsman, in driving systemic reform. The study aims to analyze the forms and patterns of maladministration in the land sector and assess the effectiveness of the Ombudsman's role in addressing and preventing it. Using a socio-legal approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysis of the Ombudsman's annual reports and other institutional documents. The findings show that the most frequent types of maladministration include prolonged delays, procedural irregularities, and negligence, particularly in non-regular land programs such as land registration (Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap – PTSL). The Ombudsman has demonstrated the ability to process complaints factually and resolve many cases, but its recommendations are non-binding and are often disregarded by the reporting agencies. In terms of prevention, the Ombudsman has initiated public service training and legal education programs, though their reach and impact remain limited.
PEMISAHAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN JABATAN DAN PRIBADI TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG YANG MENIMBULKAN KERUGIAN NEGARA Eko Jatmiko; Tedi Sudrajat
Law Jurnal Vol 7, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v7i1.8612

Abstract

Penyalahgunaan wewenang yang menimbulkan kerugian negara yang dilakukan oleh pejabat negara dapat dikategorikan sebagai sebuah kesalahan dalam hukum administrasi negara dan disisi lain sebagai suatu kesalahan yang mengakibatkan sanksi/hukuman pidana. Penelitian ini menganalisis pemisahan pertanggungjawaban jabatan dan pribadi terhadap penyalahgunaan wewenang yang menimbulkan kerugian negara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah hukum normatif, hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa ketidakjelasan batasan antara pertanggungjawaban pejabat akibat penyalahgunaan wewenang jabatan dan tindak pidana sering memicu kriminalisasi kebijakan dan menghambat efektivitas pemerintahan. Pertanggungjawaban jabatan berkaitan dengan aspek legalitas dan tata kelola yang baik, sedangkan pertanggungjawaban pribadi muncul saat terdapat niat jahat (mens rea) untuk keuntungan pribadi. Pemisahan ini untuk menjamin kepastian hukum, melindungi ruang diskresi pejabat sebagai premium remedium, dan memastikan hukum pidana berfungsi sebagai ultimum remedium. Penelitian merekomendasikan harmonisasi regulasi antara UU Administrasi Pemerintahan dan UU Tipikor serta penguatan peran APIP dan PTUN sebagai filter utama penilaian penyalahgunaan wewenang.
PEMISAHAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN JABATAN DAN PRIBADI TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG YANG MENIMBULKAN KERUGIAN NEGARA Eko Jatmiko; Tedi Sudrajat
Law Jurnal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v7i1.8612

Abstract

Penyalahgunaan wewenang yang menimbulkan kerugian negara yang dilakukan oleh pejabat negara dapat dikategorikan sebagai sebuah kesalahan dalam hukum administrasi negara dan disisi lain sebagai suatu kesalahan yang mengakibatkan sanksi/hukuman pidana. Penelitian ini menganalisis pemisahan pertanggungjawaban jabatan dan pribadi terhadap penyalahgunaan wewenang yang menimbulkan kerugian negara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah hukum normatif, hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa ketidakjelasan batasan antara pertanggungjawaban pejabat akibat penyalahgunaan wewenang jabatan dan tindak pidana sering memicu kriminalisasi kebijakan dan menghambat efektivitas pemerintahan. Pertanggungjawaban jabatan berkaitan dengan aspek legalitas dan tata kelola yang baik, sedangkan pertanggungjawaban pribadi muncul saat terdapat niat jahat (mens rea) untuk keuntungan pribadi. Pemisahan ini untuk menjamin kepastian hukum, melindungi ruang diskresi pejabat sebagai premium remedium, dan memastikan hukum pidana berfungsi sebagai ultimum remedium. Penelitian merekomendasikan harmonisasi regulasi antara UU Administrasi Pemerintahan dan UU Tipikor serta penguatan peran APIP dan PTUN sebagai filter utama penilaian penyalahgunaan wewenang.