Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Enacting Deliberative Governance in Innovation of Labour Protection Policy (Case Study in Banyumas District, Central Java) Tasroh Tasroh; Paulus Israwan Setyoko
JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik) Vol 29, No 1 (2025): May
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jkap.102906

Abstract

This study aims to enact labor protection policy deliberations as an alternative policy innovation. By using qualitative descriptive research methods and observations of various models of labor protection policy deliberation in Banyumas Regency and a study of labor protection policy documents in the period 2021-2024, with in-depth interviews with 50 key informants, it can be concluded that two models of policy deliberation are founded. They are an elite model held by executive and legislative actors; the other is called private one handled by labour and corporate organization actors. The two models finally unified to improve the labor protection policy design process, encourage the formation of various public discussions and debates, and encourage the authentic participation of citizens, corporations, and workers. By blending them, the degree of consensus and collaboration across interests autonomously develops their potential and authority to jointly realize the target of social security participation programs. However, there are still various obstacles, including the limited budget and minimal awareness of elite actors. It is recognized that the development of more democratic labor policy deliberations shows a positive trend for regional governments in the future as the new capital for regional development. Because of the wider involvement, participation, availability of legitimate public space and wider collaboration have been proven to significantly improve the quality of labor protection policies at a local level. However, supervision and policy guidance must be carried out by all actors to improve the welfare of workers as a whole.
Performance of Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia (Case Study in Banyumas Regency) Kurniasih, Denok; Wahyuningrat, Wahyuningrat; Wijaya, Shadu Satwika; Setyoko, Paulus Israwan
IJOSPOL - International Journal of Social, Policy and Law Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : IJOSPOL - International Journal of Social, Policy and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.8888/ijospol.v7i3.286

Abstract

Improving the performance of Bureaucratic Reform (RB) in Indonesia is a crucial agenda for improving governance. Since its launch in 2010, Bureaucratic Reform has become the primary foundation for transforming the Indonesian bureaucracy. The implementation of RB includes institutional restructuring, improving governance, enhancing the quality of human resources, and enhancing public services. Evaluation of the performance of bureaucratic reform is necessary to identify its weaknesses. As a measuring tool, the Bureaucratic Reform Index (IRB) is used to monitor RB achievements from year to year. In 2023, Banyumas Regency's IRB increased to 76.90, compared to 73.08 in 2022, placing it in the BB category. Although this improvement is significant, the A predicate has not yet been achieved, so continued improvement efforts are needed. This study used various methods such as field surveys, document studies, interviews, and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Data analysis techniques used included qualitative and quantitative approaches to assess the performance of bureaucratic reform in Banyumas Regency. The results of the data analysis show that Banyumas Regency has recorded several achievements in the implementation of RB, such as the improvement of the Government Agency Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) of Banyumas Regency, which recorded a score of 80.53 in 2023, indicating a good level of accountability. However, several challenges remain, such as the Legal Reform Index which is still low with a score of 57.55 out of 100, and the low development of the Integrity Zone with a score of 0.75 out of 3.5. In addition, the achievement of bureaucratic simplification is also inadequate, with a score of 2 out of 5, and the implementation of the Electronic-Based Government System (SPBE) is still low with a score of 1 out of 5, indicating limitations in bureaucratic digitization.