Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.06
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MONOGRAF Jurnal Cita Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Konstitusi JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Jurnal Jatiswara Sosio Dialektika Indonesia Berdaya Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Unram Journal of Community Service (UJCS) Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Mataram Journal of International Law
Muh. Risnain
Facully Of Law University Of Mataram
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 52 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
ANALISIS PROVISIONAL MEASURES ICJ ATAS KASUS DUGAAN GENOSIDA DI GAZA: STUDI KASUS SENGKETA AFRIKA SELATAN V. ISRAEL Sirtufillaeli; Muh Risnain; Diva Pitaloka
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jd03ef37

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal considerations of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in issuing provisional measures and their impact on the situation in Gaza. The research employs a normative legal method with a case study approach, focusing on the South Africa v. Israel dispute and relevant international treaties. The legal materials used in this research include both primary and secondary sources, collected through library research. The ICJ established that it had prima facie jurisdiction and issued an order for provisional measures on 26 January 2024, which was subsequently reinforced by additional orders on 28 March and 24 May 2024. These measures were grounded in the need to protect certain rights that were plausibly at risk, the link between those rights and the requested measures, and the potential for irreparable harm if urgent action was not taken. In these orders, Israel was instructed to prevent acts that could be classified as genocide and to preserve evidence. Provisional measures issued by the ICJ are binding in nature, as affirmed in paragraph 109 of the Court's 2001 LaGrand case judgment. However, while binding, such measures are not enforceable in the sense that the ICJ lacks coercive authority to compel state compliance. Moreover, the presence or absence of specific intent (dolus specialis) is crucial in determining whether acts constitute genocide. Even if acts meet the threshold of international crimes, without this specific intent, they may not be classified as genocide.
Implementation of The Provincial Government’s Authority to Carry Out Sister Province Cooperation In The Perspective of International and National Law Case Study: Sister Province Cooperationbetween Province of NTB And Northern Province of Australia Amar Tyanto; Muh Risnain; Diva Pitaloka
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2846

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the position and strength of the LoI between the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government regarding sister province cooperation from the perspective of international law and national law. Furthermore, this research also examines the implementation of government authority and dispute resolution mechanisms stipulated in the Letter of Interest in the context of Sister Province agreements according to international law. The research method used is normative empirical. The Letter of Intent (LoI) between the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government regarding sister province cooperation has limited power and does not have binding legal force in the perspective of international law and national law. However, in the implementation of the authority exercised, the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government have gone through the stages of exploration, formulation of texts, and negotiations. The mechanism for resolving differences as stipulated in Article 10 requires an amicable settlement of any differences arising from the interpretation or implementation of the contents of the agreement.
Co-Authors Abuzar . Amar Tyanto Annisa Raudlatul Rahmah Asmara, M. Galang Ayu Riska Amalia Azmi Nasyath Nabila Bah Jatun Nadrati Diva Pitaloka Djumardin, Djumardin Dwi Putro, Widodo Erwin, Yulias Fani Shania Putri Farhan Farhan, Muhammad Ammar Galang Asmara Galang Asmara, Galang Gatot Dwi Hendro W Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo, Gatot Dwi Hendro Guna Nugraha, Lalu Hafina Haula Arsy Harun, Andi Ihdal Umam Ilham Ilham Imran Imran Irawan Kusumahadi Kaharudin Kaharudin Lalu Guna Nugraha M. Galang Asmara Maya, Lailatil Muhammad Sood, Muhammad Muhammad, Teguh Ernaldi Nata Legawa, Baiq Hemas Nugraha, Lalu Guna Parman, Lalu Pitaloka, Diva Rajab Fadli, Muhamad Ramadan, Galih Rodliyah Rodliyah RR. Cahyowati Sekarningrum, Elvira Alya Sembiring, Rinawati Sirtufillaeli Sri Karyati Suadi, Amran Sukma W, Pebriana Putri Wahyudi, Ikhsan Wardhana, Yunanto Estika Widodo Dwi Putro Yunanto Estika Wardhana Zampara Mernissi Zunnuraeni Zunnuraeni, Zunnuraeni