Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

KIP-K Scholarship Eligibility for Economically Established Students: Perspectives of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama Figures Qomariyah, Nurul; Putri, Eka Desiana; Aziz, Muhammad Irfan; Musafa'ah, Suqiyah
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/komparatif.v6i1.3171

Abstract

The Indonesia Smart College Card Scholarship (KIP-K) is an assistance program organized by the government with the aim of easing the burden of education costs for students from underprivileged families. However, in practice, many underprivileged students receive KIP-K scholarships. This study examines in depth the comparative analysis of the views of NU and Muhammadiyah figures regarding the provision of KIP scholarships to underprivileged students. This type of research is a normative-empirical law with a descriptive-comparative approach. Data was obtained through literature studies and in-depth interviews with figures from Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama. The data were analyzed comparatively. The results of the study show a difference in approach between Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) figures regarding the ethics of the utilization of scholarship, especially the KIP-K program. Muhammadiyah leaders tend to emphasize a normative, procedural approach grounded in maqāṣid al-syarī'ah, particularly the principles of ḥifẓ al-'aql (safeguarding reason) and ḥifẓ al-māl (safeguarding property). Meanwhile, NU figures highlight aspects of social ethics and pesantren values, such as honesty, trust, and social responsibility. The similarity between the two lies in the understanding that scholarship is a mandate that must be used honestly and on target, and that any deviation is a violation of Islamic law. Both Muhammadiyah and NU leaders view the act of receiving scholarships illegally as a form of deprivation of rights that are not justified by morality and Islamic law.
Why Is Interfaith Marriage Problematic in the Qur'anic Perspective? A Study of Hifz al-Din through Maqasid al-Shari'ah Nurul Maulida; Suqiyah Musafaah; Andy Luqman Hakim
QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): August
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/qist.v5i2.17254

Abstract

Purpose - Interfaith marriage in Indonesia continues to generate theological, juridical, and socio-legal debates, particularly in the context of legal tensions surrounding Law No. 1/1974 and the Compilation of Islamic Law (Kompilasi Hukum Islam). While previous studies have predominantly approached this issue from legal and sociological perspectives, the epistemological function of ḥifẓ al-dīn (protection of faith) within a systematic Qur'anic framework remains insufficiently explored. This study investigates how the Qur'an conceptualizes interfaith marriage through the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharī'ah), with particular emphasis on faith preservation. Design/methodology/approach - The study employs a qualitative library-based approach using thematic Qur'anic exegesis (tafsīr maudhū'ī) integrated with the maqāṣid al-sharī'ah framework. The analysis focuses primarily on QS. al-Baqarah [2]:221 and QS. al-Mā'idah [5]:5, complemented by classical and contemporary exegetical sources, Islamic jurisprudence, and modern hermeneutical perspectives to evaluate the teleological objectives underlying the relevant legal rulings. Findings - The study demonstrates that the Qur'anic prohibition of interfaith marriage functions not merely as a legal restriction but as a preventive mechanism for safeguarding faith, preserving spiritual stability, and ensuring intergenerational transmission of Islamic values. It further argues that classical juridical concessions regarding marriage with the People of the Book (Ahl al-Kitāb) require contextual re-evaluation in contemporary socio-legal settings through the principle of taqyīd al-mubāḥ for the realization of maṣlaḥah (public welfare). Research implications/limitations - The analysis is confined to Qur'anic theological and maqāṣid-based perspectives and does not include empirical investigation of contemporary interfaith families. Future research may integrate doctrinal and socio-empirical approaches across diverse Muslim societies. Originality/value - This study contributes to Qur'anic legal scholarship by positioning ḥifẓ al-dīn as the central epistemological rationale underlying the Qur'anic regulation of interfaith marriage. It offers a teleological framework that bridges thematic exegesis, maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, and contemporary Islamic family law, providing conceptual guidance for legal policy, premarital counseling, and the development of Islamic family regulations in pluralistic societies.