Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.439
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Ensiklopedia of Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Ensiklopedia Education Review Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Bulletin of Community Engagement Collegium Studiosum Journal Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Journal of Social And Economics Research Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Amicus Curiae journal of social and economic research
Ermania Widjajanti
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 74 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 74 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Meningkatkan Peran Jaksa dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dan Menangani Kasus Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Golongan 1 Bintang, Cantika Ramadhani; Widjajanti, Ermania
AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584) Vol 4 No 02 (2024): Al-Mikraj, Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pascasarjana Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almikraj.v4i02.4995

Abstract

In handling class I narcotics abuse cases, a very precise role of the prosecutor is needed because in cases of narcotics abuse, the perpetrators are often immediately sent to prison, this is very ineffective. In this case, the role of the prosecutor is very important in handling cases to take legal action. In this case, there is a need for a policy of criminal law reform. The type of research used by the author is normative juridical which is descriptive in nature with secondary legal material sources using qualitative data collection techniques. As a result of this research, the author formulates how to increase the role of prosecutors in implementing criminal law reforms to handle class I narcotics abuse cases, then what are the main challenges faced by prosecutors in implementing criminal law reforms in law enforcement in class I narcotics abuse cases.
FENOMENA TREDING IN INFLUENCE DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI TANTANGAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN PEMERINTAHAN INDONESIA Kolono, Sucipto; Widjajanti, Ermania
Ensiklopedia Education Review Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Volume 6 No 3 Desember 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eer.v6i3.2846

Abstract

Abstract: The phenomenon of "Trading in Influence” in corruption crimes is a major challenge for law enforcement in Indonesia. The method in writing is Normative looking at legislation, norms, court decisions and expert opinions. the absence of specific regulations in the Indonesian legal system to ensnare perpetrators of “Trading in Influence.” This paper looks at how this legal weakness allows corruption involving influence to continue without effective sanctions, and explores legal reform solutions to strengthen Indonesia's anti-corruption legal framework. This practice involves individuals or groups utilizing the influence of their power, either as public officials or external parties, to influence government decisions for personal gain. Although Indonesia has ratified the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), regulations related to influence peddling have not been fully accommodated in the law. This study highlights the importance of legal reforms that can ensnare all actors who are outside the Government but are involved in influencing Public policy in order to close loopholes and legal gaps, in order to minimize the adverse impact of corruption on public trust and public welfareKeywords: Corruption, Corruption Crime, Treding in Influence
GABUNGAN TINDAK PIDANA PADA NYAWA DAN HARTA YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA: A Combination of Crimes Against Life and Property Committed Jointly Afianiesa, Savira; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/ntstjg65

Abstract

indak pidana pemerkosaan, serta pembunuhan ialah termasuk kedalam tindak pidana kejahatan pada tubuh dan nyawa, sedangkan tindak pidana pencurian termasuk kedalam tindak pidana kejahatan pada harta benda.Tindak pidana tersebut terjadi di Kabupaten/Kota Rokan Hilir dalam Putusan No.209/Pid.B/2020/PN.Rhl, dengan terdakwa Haris Fadillah Rangkuti bersama dengan saksi (yang dilakukan penuntutan secara terpisah) Handika Yuda Pratama secara bersamaan telah lakukan rangkaian tindak pidana yaitu pemerkosaan, pembunuhan, disertai dengan pencurian. Hakim memutus dengan menggunakan Pasal 340 KUHP Jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP. Mengenai delik pembunuhan berencana yang diatur dalam Pasal 340 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) yang dimana terdapat unsur ‘direncanakan terlebih dahulu’ yang memiliki arti antara timbulnya maksud guna membunuh dengan pelaksanaannya itu masih ada tempo untuk si pembuat dengan tenang memikirkan seperti bagaimana pembunuhan itu akan dijalankan. Peneliti mengangkat 2 (dua) substansi permasalahan yaitu bagaimanakah bentuk penyertaan yang dilakukan  oleh  pelaku  tindak  pidana  pemerkosaan,  
SURAT DAKWAAN CAMPURANTINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA (STUDI PUTUSANNO..488/PID.B/2021/PN.JKT.BRT): Indictment Letter of Combined Criminal Acts of Money Laundering Based On The Criminal Procedure Code (Study of Decision No. 488/Pid.B/2021/Pn.Jkt.Brt) Nurjanah; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/x1bfc079

Abstract

Drafting a charge is the most important aspect of criminal procedure, as the trial commences based on this document. Therefore, the Public Prosecutor (JPU) must carefully prepare the charge before submitting it to the district court. There are five forms of charges, namely single, alternative, subsidiary, cumulative, and combined charges. In this case, the defendant, Calvin Seidiono, was charged with a combined charge (alternative, cumulative, subsidiary) and was found guilty of money laundering. The problems raised in this journal are: 1) Is the combined charge for money laundering against the defendant appropriate? 2) What are the legal consequences if one of the criminal offences alleged by the JPU in the combined charge is not proven? To answer the research questions, the author conducted a normative study that was descriptively analyzed using secondary data. The data processing was qualitative and the conclusions were drawn using deductive logic. This study found that: 1) The prosecutor did not take the appropriate action in drafting the charge. This is because all elements must be proven when choosing a combined charge (alternative, cumulative, subsidiary). all elements must be proven. However, in the case examined in this study, only one crime was proven, so the form of the charge was inappropriate. 2) Regarding the legal consequences if one of the elements of the combined charge is not proven, the judge should have acquitted thedefendant.
ANALISA PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU PENYALAHGUNA NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I: Analysis Of Punishment Against Perpetrators Of Category I Narcotics Abuse Ismet Samuel Tahoran; Ermania Widjajanti
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 4 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i4.21661

Abstract

Narcotics offences are a social phenomenon and a wide range of community life issues exist in the surrounding area. This criminal act will always find its development in terms of quantity and quality by following the changing times. The subject matter of the problem is how the punishment of Class I Narcotics Abusers and Judges' Consideration of Narcotics Offenders. This research is a normative research based on Data analysis is carried out qualitatively and conclusions are drawn using deductive logic, based on the result and conclusiont analysis that has been carried out Criminalisation of Criminal Abusers of Class I Narcotics that the defendant's actions fulfil the elements of Article 127 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009, In imposing punishment on perpetrators of Narcotics or Drug Abusers for themselves, the judge must pay attention to SEMA Number 4 of 2010 in imposing sanctions on the actions of Mhd Hatta Sinaga Als ega, Rehabilitation as an alternative to imprisonment for perpetrators who are victims of narcotics abuse aims to restore health and reduce the risk of recurrence of harmful behaviour. Rehabilitation emphasises physical and mental recovery, as well as social sanctioning of the offender into the community and not imprisonment.
DIVERSI DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA ANAK MELALUI PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE Sofhan, Dedi; Widjajanti, Ermania
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Vol. 7 No. 1 Edisi 3 Oktober 2024
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v7i1.2709

Abstract

Abstract: The implementation of diversion in criminal cases involving children is an essential effort to prevent children from experiencing the negative effects of resolving criminal cases through the criminal justice system. This study aims to analyze and understand the application of diversion in resolving juvenile criminal cases through a restorative justice approach. It seeks to identify various forms of diversion that can be applied in juvenile legal processes and how restorative justice can contribute to restoring relationships among offenders, victims, and the community. This research employs a normative legal research method, focusing on positive legal norms, particularly those contained in applicable legislation. The findings reveal that diversion in resolving juvenile criminal cases through a restorative justice approach offers a better solution. Diversion is conducted with the aim of achieving reconciliation between the victim and the juvenile offender. This process seeks to resolve juvenile cases outside the formal judicial system to prevent negative impacts on the child’s development. The implementation of diversion is expected to safeguard the future of children involved in legal processes. The goal of diversion through a restorative justice approach is not merely to impose punishment but to create deeper balance and justice while repairing the relationship between the victim and the offender. This can be achieved through mutual agreements. In this process, victims are given the opportunity to express their losses, while offenders are provided a chance to make amends through compensation, reconciliation, or other mutually agreed-upon solutions.Keywords: Diversion, Juvenile Justice, Restorative Justice.
PENARAPAN PENGURANGAN HUKUMAN TINDAK PIDANA BERDASARKAN RESTORATIF JUSTICE MENURUT PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 Agus Sugiyatmo; Ermania Widjajanti
Journal of Social and Economics Research Vol 6 No 2 (2024): JSER, December 2024
Publisher : Ikatan Dosen Menulis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/jser.v6i2.650

Abstract

Restorative Justice bertujuan untuk mengubah paradigma penegakan hukum yang lebih berfokus pada pemulihan daripada hukuman. Restorative dalam pidana adalah upaya terakhir (ultimum remedium). Restorative Justice sebenarnya sudah diterapkan pada jaman nenek moyang kita yang orang timur dengan penyelesaikan masalah dengan musyawarah mufakat. Perkembangan Restorative justice di Indonesia secara formal muncul dalam sistem hukum Indonesia melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (UU SPPA), yang menekankan pada pengalihan proses peradilan pidana ke proses diluar peradilan pidana (diversi) untuk anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum. Lalu berkembang berbagai peraturan dan kebijakan di tahap penyidikan di Kepolisian dengan Peraturan Polri Nomor 8 Tahun, tahap penuntutan di Kejaksaan dengan Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020, dan ditahap Pengadilan di Mahkamah Agung dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2024. Masing – masing peraturan internal lembaga tersebut dengan UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 (KUHP Baru) sebagai aturan yang lebih tinggi, dengan harapan adanya pemetaan peraturan – peraturan tersebut dapat diketahui perlunya penyesuaian atau pencabutan peraturan tersebut dengan adanya KUHP Baru. Ke depannya hasil asesmen tersebut dapat berkontribusi sebagai masukan dalam penyusunan revisi Undang – Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
PENARAPAN PENGURANGAN HUKUMAN TINDAK PIDANA BERDASARKAN RESTORATIF JUSTICE MENURUT PERMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 Agus Sugiyatmo; Ermania Widjajanti
Journal of Social and Economics Research Vol 6 No 2 (2024): JSER, December 2024
Publisher : Ikatan Dosen Menulis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/jser.v6i2.650

Abstract

Restorative Justice bertujuan untuk mengubah paradigma penegakan hukum yang lebih berfokus pada pemulihan daripada hukuman. Restorative dalam pidana adalah upaya terakhir (ultimum remedium). Restorative Justice sebenarnya sudah diterapkan pada jaman nenek moyang kita yang orang timur dengan penyelesaikan masalah dengan musyawarah mufakat. Perkembangan Restorative justice di Indonesia secara formal muncul dalam sistem hukum Indonesia melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (UU SPPA), yang menekankan pada pengalihan proses peradilan pidana ke proses diluar peradilan pidana (diversi) untuk anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum. Lalu berkembang berbagai peraturan dan kebijakan di tahap penyidikan di Kepolisian dengan Peraturan Polri Nomor 8 Tahun, tahap penuntutan di Kejaksaan dengan Peraturan Kejaksaan Nomor 15 Tahun 2020, dan ditahap Pengadilan di Mahkamah Agung dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2024. Masing – masing peraturan internal lembaga tersebut dengan UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 (KUHP Baru) sebagai aturan yang lebih tinggi, dengan harapan adanya pemetaan peraturan – peraturan tersebut dapat diketahui perlunya penyesuaian atau pencabutan peraturan tersebut dengan adanya KUHP Baru. Ke depannya hasil asesmen tersebut dapat berkontribusi sebagai masukan dalam penyusunan revisi Undang – Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Eksistensi Hukum Keuangan Negara dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dan Perannya dalam Hukum Pidana Siska Dwi Andini; Ermania Widjajanti
Bulletin of Community Engagement Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Bulletin of Community Engagement
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/bce.v4i3.1566

Abstract

State financial law is the main key to managing state finances by state administrators. Therefore, it is important to include provisions that specifically regulate state finances and become part of the legal system in Indonesia. The issues addressed in this study include the evolution of state financial law's application in statutory regulations and the ways in which state financial law and criminal law interact. This research applies a qualitative, normative juridical research methodology, examining relevant literature and statutory regulations. This research aims to understand the development of state financial law and its interaction with criminal law. The research results show that state financial law has been incorporated into Indonesia's legal framework, but it has not been fully defined, causing its meaning to change and grow as it is applied. The criminal law for corruption imposes penalties for embezzlement of public funds. It is expected that in the future, the Government and the DPR will be able to promptly enhance the definition and extent of state finances, particularly in Article 23 C of the 1945 Constitution, which serves as the theoretical foundation for state finance provisions. In this way, the spirit of legal reform is felt in both state financial law and criminal corruption law. Ultimately, it is hoped that corruption will be prevented and the space for state administrators to embezzle state funds will be reduced.     
RESTITUSI SEBAGAI HAK PEMULIHAN KORBAN KEJAHATAN: KELEBIHAN DAN KEKURANGANNYA: Restitution as a Form of Recovery For Crime Victims: Strengths and Weaknesses Aisyah, Putri Romadhatul; Widjajanti, Ermania
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/xvy9t556

Abstract

Restitution is also said to be a form of recovery for crime victims that is recognized in the legal systems of many countries, including Indonesia. The concept of restitution aims to return victims to their original position before the crime occurred through providing compensation and other forms of recovery. This journal discusses the importance of restitution as a victim's right to recovery in a criminal act. The research results show that although restitution is recognized as a victim's right, its implementation is often hampered by various factors, including low understanding among law enforcement officials and limited access to information for victims. Other challenges include the economic constraints faced by perpetrators in paying restitution, as well as the lack of effective mechanisms to enforce restitution payments. This journal also highlights the important role of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) in helping victims apply for and obtain restitution as a form of carrying out their duties and permits, although there is still much that needs to be improved in terms of outreach and operational procedures. This article examines 2 (two) legal issues, namely: first, why every perpetrator of a crime must provide restitution to the victim; second, what are the obstacles in implementing the provision of restitution to victims? This journal uses legal research with a normative approach and supporting data in the form of interviews, which aims to find internet-based solutions so that victims can receive their rights, a sense of justice and recovery.
Co-Authors Adinda Putri Elin Afianiesa, Savira Agus Sugiyatmo Aisyah, Putri Romadhatul Alfianto, Dwi Amalin FP, Haekal Anna Maria Tri Anggraini Anselmus Jefri Aldonny Pasaribu Anselmus Jefri Aldonny Pasaribu Arief Baharsyah Audina, Encik Inne Alifia B, Meky Yadi Saputra Baskoro, Novi Eko Bella Annisa Maharani Bella Annisa Maharani Bimo Ilham Wibowo Bintang, Cantika Ramadhani Dava Tubagus Rahmat Dewo Wapa Soembogo Dionysius Ansel Yuswanto Emmanuela, Michele Encik Inne Alifia Audina Endang Sutrisno Faradilla, I Gusti Agung Fikarudin, Wildan Ganjar, Silawati Dayang Hamja, Hamja Hummerson, Andi Widiatno Hutami, Trisya I Gusti Agung Faradilla Indonesia Irfan Maulana Ismet Samuel Tahoran Jeremy Arnold Christian Bangun Joan Rossy Rumbiak Jozevin Elizabeth Juliani, Wenny Kabes, Irianto Kasman Ely Kolono, Sucipto Komeni, Wirdi Hisroh Lase, Sandra Putri Olivia Maharani, Bella Annisa Margaretha, Rade Dian Matatula Zefanya Armando Doeputra Mohammad Yofarrel Mohammad Yofarrel Muchamad Feisal Abduh Muhamad Amin Faiz Muhammad Fadhiil Yashendra Muhammad Fadhiil Yashendra Muhammad Fajar Wasitomo Multiwijaya, Vience Ratna Namira Kinanti Nandang Sambas Novi Eko Baskoro Nunna, Bhanu Prakash Nurjanah Nurmayana, Suri Oemyx Wynn Tratabofa Hutasoit Owen Chinua Saragih Pradipta, Firwanda Sandi Putri Tari Septiani Putri Tari Septiani R Sri Fajriah Rade Dian Margaretha Rini Purwaningsih Rofaeda Arisia Salsabila Tanjung Saiful Hananto Salsabilla Elfrida Siska Dwi Andini Sofhan, Dedi Sony Fati Crisitan Gulo Sugiyatmo, Agus Tanjung, Rofaeda Arisia Salsabila Tri Agus Suswanto Trisya Hutami Vience Ratna Multi Wijaya Vience Ratna Multiwijaya Vience Ratna Multiwijaya Wibowo, Bimo Ilham