Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.283
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) JURNAL MAHKAMAH JPM (Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat) Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JCES (Journal of Character Education Society) Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Awang Long Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities YASIN: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Budaya Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Mutiara: Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Journal of Law Perspectives Review Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan ABDINE :Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure
Diani Sadiawati
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Equity in Access to Public Housing: A Comparative Study of Housing Policies in Jakarta and Singapore from an International Law Perspective Farisa, Pawit Fadila Rika; Sadiawati, Diani
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1979

Abstract

The rapid urbanization in Southeast Asia has posed significant challenges in providing adequate and affordable housing, particularly for vulnerable urban groups. This article analyzes a comparative study of public housing policies in Jakarta and Singapore from the perspective of international law on the right to adequate and inclusive housing. Using a normative comparative method with a qualitative-descriptive approach, this study examines the effectiveness of each country’s housing policy based on Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), and General Comment No. 4 of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). The findings reveal that Singapore, through its Housing and Development Board (HDB), successfully implements an inclusive public housing system with comprehensive subsidies and without discrimination based on marital status or employment type. Conversely, public housing policies in Jakarta remain exclusive due to strict administrative requirements that limit access for single individuals and informal workers. This article recommends reforming Jakarta’s public housing policies by relaxing discriminatory requirements and establishing a national public housing authority to ensure fair, inclusive, and internationally compliant housing access for all citizens.
Prinsip Non-Intervensi di Era Krisis Kemanusiaan: Reinterpretasi Normatif dalam Tindakan Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Edward Benedictus Roring; Thalia Salma Putri Kamilah; Akmal Zaki; Faiz Aryaputra; Livia Haris; Salman Alfarisi; Diani Sadiawati
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Agustus : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v3i4.2683

Abstract

The principle of non-intervention is the main foundation in international relations that affirms the prohibition of interference by other countries in the domestic affairs of a country. However, increasingly complex global dynamics, especially related to the increasing humanitarian crises such as genocide, ethnic cleansing, and systematic human rights violations have raised serious challenges to the absolutism of the principle. This article aims to analyze how the principle of non-intervention is normatively reinterpreted in the practices and actions of the United Nations (UN), especially through the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine. Using a juridical-normative approach and case studies of interventions in Rwanda, Kosovo, and Syria, this study reveals a shift in the meaning of non-intervention from an absolute prohibition to a limited allowance for humanitarian protection. This finding confirms that in conditions of extreme humanitarian crises, the legitimacy of international action is not only measured by state sovereignty, but also by the moral and international legal obligations to protect civilians. The UN, as a multilateral actor, plays a key role in balancing the principle of non-intervention with humanitarian imperatives, thus giving rise to dynamic and contextual normative reinterpretations.
Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Kelautan Indonesia Terhadap Penangkapan Ikan Secara Ilegal (Illegal Fishing) Oleh Kapal Asing Febriansyah, Raafid; Daffa Anant, Muhammad; Ivander Athala, Mas Moreno; Asy Syakur, Muhammad Zidan; Nouval Arofah, Muhammad; Sadiawati, Diani
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i1.7819

Abstract

Dalam konteks globalisasi penangkapan ikan secara ilegal (illegal fishing) telah menjadi suatu tantangan yang sangat serius dalam pengelolaan perikanan di Indonesia maupun di dunia Internasional. Sebagai negara kepulauan dengan kekayaan sumber daya laut yang sangat melimpah, Indonesia secara konsisten berupaya untuk melindungi keberlanjutan ekosistem lautnya dari praktik illegal fishing. Meskipun demikian, praktik illegal fishing sendiri terus mengancam dari adanya keberlanjutan sumber daya perikanan dan merugikan nelayan yang beroperasi secara legal. Tujuan kami dalam pembuatan artikel ini adalah untuk memberikan solusi terkait penegakkan hukum laut Indonesia dari ancaman tindakan illegal fishing. Dalam pembuatan artikel ini kami menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik studi literatur dengan menghimpun sumber-sumber yang berasal dari jurnal, buku, dan artikel yang ada di internet. Melalui penulisan artikel ini kami berharap dapat merealisasikan tujuan kami dalam memberikan kontribusi terkait solusi penegakkan hukum laut di Indonesia.
Rekayasa Sosial Hukum dan Partisipasi Bermakna: Dinamika dan Paradoks Transisi Energi Matahari di Indonesia Sadiawati, Diani; Supriyadi, Mohammad Wangsit; Achmad, Mustafid Milanto; Sahidin, Sultoni Ajie
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): November - January
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4459

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis peran hukum sebagai alat rekayasa sosial (law as a tool for social engineering) dalam konteks transisi energi di Indonesia, dengan fokus pada pengembangan energi matahari sebagai sumber energi terbarukan strategis. Di tengah komitmen nasional mencapai Net Zero Emission (NZE) pada tahun 2060, Indonesia dihadapkan pada tantangan struktural berupa ketergantungan historis terhadap energi fosil, ketidakkonsistenan regulasi, serta lemahnya partisipasi publik dalam pengambilan kebijakan energi. Dengan menggunakan kerangka Sociological Jurisprudence dari Roscoe Pound, penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana hukum energi difungsikan untuk menyeimbangkan kepentingan umum (keamanan dan stabilitas energi), kepentingan sosial (perlindungan lingkungan hidup), dan kepentingan individu (hak dan kesejahteraan masyarakat). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-empiris melalui analisis peraturan perundang-undangan serta studi kasus pengembangan PLTS Terapung Cirata dan dinamika regulasi PLTS Atap, yang kemudian dibandingkan dengan praktik partisipatif berbasis komunitas pada model Desa Energi Berdikari Keliki. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan adanya paradoks dalam hukum energi Indonesia: di satu sisi hukum berperan sebagai akselerator pembangunan infrastruktur energi surya berskala besar melalui pendekatan teknokratis dan sentralistik, namun di sisi lain mengalami disfungsi dalam merekayasa perubahan perilaku masyarakat akibat penghapusan insentif ekonomi serta degradasi prinsip partisipasi bermakna pasca berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Artikel ini merekomendasikan rekonstruksi kebijakan energi yang menempatkan partisipasi publik dan keadilan transisi sebagai elemen utama, guna memastikan hukum berfungsi efektif sebagai instrumen transformasi sosial menuju energi bersih yang berkelanjutan.
Perbandingan Sanksi Administratif KPPU dan Antitrust Law Amerika Serikat Tambok Julius; Diani Sadiawati
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13119

Abstract

This study examines the elements of business conspiracy and the effectiveness of administrative sanctions imposed by the Indonesian Competition Commission (KPPU) in Decision Number 08/KPPU-L/2024, as well as compares them with the United States Antitrust Law framework. The research is motivated by the limited deterrent effect and lack of legal certainty for victims of unfair business competition in Indonesia, particularly in conspiracy cases causing substantial losses. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, case, and comparative approaches by analyzing Law Number 5 of 1999 and its implementing regulations alongside the Sherman Act, Clayton Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act. The findings reveal that all elements of business conspiracy in Decision 08/KPPU-L/2024 were legally established; however, the administrative sanctions imposed were disproportionate to the losses incurred, did not include individual liability, and failed to provide direct restitution mechanisms for injured parties. Consequently, administrative sanctions have not functioned effectively as deterrence and legal protection instruments. The novelty of this study lies in its comparative analysis, positioning private enforcement and victim restitution under U.S. Antitrust Law as benchmarks for strengthening Indonesia’s administrative sanction regime. This study recommends enhancing KPPU’s authority, extending sanctions to both corporations and individuals, and establishing clear restitution mechanisms to ensure legal certainty and substantive justice in competition law enforcement.   Penelitian ini menganalisis unsur persekongkolan usaha dan efektivitas penerapan sanksi administratif oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Putusan Nomor 08/KPPU-L/2024, serta membandingkannya dengan rezim Antitrust Law Amerika Serikat. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh masih lemahnya efek jera dan ketidakpastian hukum bagi korban praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehat di Indonesia, khususnya dalam perkara persekongkolan yang menimbulkan kerugian signifikan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan perbandingan melalui analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999, peraturan pelaksananya, serta Sherman Act, Clayton Act, dan Federal Trade Commission Act. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa seluruh unsur persekongkolan usaha dalam Putusan 08/KPPU-L/2024 telah terpenuhi secara sah, namun penjatuhan sanksi administratif berupa denda dinilai tidak proporsional dengan kerugian yang ditimbulkan, tidak disertai sanksi terhadap individu pelaku, serta tidak memberikan mekanisme pemulihan langsung bagi pihak yang dirugikan. Kondisi ini menyebabkan tujuan sanksi administratif sebagai instrumen efek jera dan perlindungan hukum belum tercapai secara optimal. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis komparatif yang menempatkan private enforcement dan restitusi korban dalam Antitrust Law Amerika Serikat sebagai tolok ukur untuk memperkuat sistem sanksi administratif di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan kewenangan KPPU, pengenaan sanksi terhadap korporasi dan individu, serta perumusan mekanisme restitusi langsung guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum dan keadilan substantif dalam penegakan hukum persaingan usaha.
State Responsibility dalam Pemerataan Akses Energi Terbarukan di Wilayah 3T Fattah, Akhmad Kautsar; Nafis, Abdul Haris; Prihantono, Pradipta; Sadiawati, Diani
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 1: Desember 2025
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v5i1.14568

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas kewajiban negara Indonesia dalam menjamin pemerataan akses energi terbarukan di wilayah 3T sebagai bagian integral dari pemenuhan hak atas pembangunan, hak atas lingkungan hidup yang baik, serta hak-hak dasar lainnya. Latar belakang penelitian didasarkan pada meningkatnya urgensi transisi energi dan ketimpangan struktural yang menyebabkan masyarakat 3T tertinggal dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan energi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, serta analisis bahan hukum melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa energi terbarukan memiliki karakter sebagai enabling right yang memungkinkan terpenuhinya hak-hak fundamental seperti pendidikan, kesehatan, dan standar hidup layak, sehingga negara berkewajiban untuk menghindari diskriminasi akses energi melalui kebijakan afirmatif dan kerangka regulasi yang kuat. Selain itu, penelitian menemukan bahwa model pertanggungjawaban negara idealnya mencakup prinsip obligation to respect, protect, and fulfil, standar due diligence, mekanisme pengawasan dan pengaduan yang efektif, serta partisipasi masyarakat dalam perumusan kebijakan energi. Kesimpulannya, pemerataan energi terbarukan di wilayah 3T merupakan mandat konstitusional dan kewajiban HAM yang hanya dapat dipenuhi melalui model pertanggungjawaban negara yang komprehensif, partisipatif, dan berorientasi pada keadilan energi.
The Challenges of Preserving the Kasepuhan Karang Indigenous Forest and Its Strategic Role in Addressing Climate Change Dirkareshza, Rianda; Sadiawati, Diani; Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman; Fauzan, Muhammad; Maula, Putri Ni'matul; Tobing, Vania Athalia Lumban
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 11, No 4 (2025): Volume 11, Number 4 October-Desember 2025
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v11i4.12893

Abstract

Kasepuhan Karang is one of the Sundanese indigenous communities located in the Lebak Regency, Banten Province, Indonesia. This community is part of a network of kasepuhan around the Gunung Halimun Salak National Park (TNGHS). Their lives are closely related to environmental sustainability, especially in the management of customary forests. The social and cultural systems of the Kasepuhan Karang community reflect harmony between humans and nature. These values are reflected in customary traditions such as ngaseuk (planting), customary spatial planning that divides the area into restricted forests, production forests, and agricultural land, as well as tatali paranti (customary rules) that serve as guidelines for maintaining ecosystem sustainability. This study focuses on the importance of the Kasepuhan Karang Customary Forest in the context of environmental conservation and climate change mitigation. In addition, this study will identify the main challenges faced in preserving customary forests, including policy aspects, cross-sectoral understanding, and external pressures that threaten their sustainability. By prioritizing the perspective of indigenous peoples as the primary managers of the forest, this study aims to provide an overview of how synergy between local traditions and modern policies can be realized to support sustainable development.
Reconstructing Law Enforcement Against Digital Content Piracy on Streaming Platforms in Indonesia: An Effectiveness Analysis from a Copyright Perspective Miranti Dwi Pangesti; Aurora Jillena Meilala; Diani Sadiawati
Journal of Law Perspectives Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Catalist Indo Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64670/jlpr.v2i2.90

Abstract

Digital content piracy on streaming platforms is one of the major challenges in copyright protection in the era of information technology. This phenomenon has grown along with technological advancement and easy internet access, which are exploited by perpetrators to distribute content illegally without the consent of copyright holders. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of legal enforcement against digital content piracy in Indonesia, based on Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright and other related regulations. The research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and case study analysis, including cases such as IndoXXI and pirated film channels on Telegram. The findings reveal that although the legal framework is normatively sufficient, its implementation remains weak due to the lack of criminal enforcement, limited institutional capacity, and low public legal awareness. Based on Lawrence M. Friedman's legal system theory and Soerjono Soekanto's theory of legal effectiveness, it is concluded that the imbalance between legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture is the main cause of ineffective law enforcement against digital piracy. Therefore, regulatory reform, institutional capacity building, and public education campaigns are urgently needed to ensure more effective copyright protection in the digital space.
Analysis of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine in Terms of Humanitarian Law Muhammad Naufal Akbar Syaefudin; Diani Sadiawati
Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan Vol 10, No 1 (2023): April
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia (Islamic Law) at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/mzn.v10i1.2951

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the impact of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, with a specific focus on humanitarian violations and related international responses. The primary research question investigates the extent of humanitarian law breaches during the invasion and examines how the international community responds to these violations. The research adopts a field research methodology with a descriptive-qualitative approach. Data are collected through the analysis of various sources, including news reports, official documents, and interviews with experts in international relations. The analysis aims to identify humanitarian violations occurring during the conflict. Research findings indicate that Russia's invasion of Ukraine resulted in a series of humanitarian violations, including civilian casualties, forced displacements, and inhumane treatment of prisoners of war. International responses include investigations by the United Nations (UN) and the deployment of a forensic expert team by the Dutch government to gather evidence. The conclusion emphasizes the severity of Russia's invasion on global peace and underscores the importance of upholding international humanitarian law. While acknowledging Ukraine's violations as a victim, the more serious nature of Russia's actions draws sharp criticism from the international community. UN responses and diplomatic efforts highlight the crucial role of international institutions in addressing global crises. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the impact of armed conflicts on human rights and emphasizes the necessity for collaborative global efforts to maintain world peace
Cyber-Duty of Care: Kerangka Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Lembaga Arbitrase Internasional atas Pelanggaran Keamanan Data dalam Persidangan Virtual di Indonesia Afandono Cahyo Putranto; Fakhrul Ardiyan; Irvandi Irvandi; Riski Ari Wibowo; Diani Sadiawati
AHKAM Vol 5 No 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10266

Abstract

The increasing adoption of virtual conferencing technology after the COVID-19 pandemic has encouraged the use of online hearings in arbitration proceedings, while also giving rise to risks of confidential data leakage and cybersecurity breaches in transnational commercial disputes. This study aims to analyze the legal framework for the liability of international arbitration institutions for data security breaches in virtual hearings in Indonesia and to reconstruct relevant legal doctrines for the national arbitration regime. This study uses a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches based on functional comparison. The results show that there is no legally binding standardization of cybersecurity protocols for international arbitration institutions in Indonesia, unlike Singapore and the United Kingdom, which already have more comprehensive regulatory frameworks. In addition, the construction of arbitral civil liability in the Indonesian legal system remains fragmented and has not been able to address losses resulting from data breaches in transnational commercial disputes. The conclusion of this study affirms the need to reconstruct the concept of Cyber-Duty of Care as a new legal doctrine in the Indonesian arbitration regime that systematically integrates the principles of personal data protection, cybersecurity standards, and arbitral civil liability. These findings provide a theoretical contribution to the development of arbitration law and data protection in virtual hearings, as well as practical implications for policymakers and arbitration institutions in strengthening data security protocols in international arbitration proceedings in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Achmad, Mustafid Milanto Afandono Cahyo Putranto Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Aisyah Nurhalizah Aji Lukman Ibrahim Akbar, Sahda Saraswati Akhdan, Fariz Ridhanus Akmal Zaki Alma Florydia Gutama Amanda, Nur Septiana Anggie Artha Gayo Aryaputri, Aqila Shafiqa Asy Syakur, Muhammad Zidan Aurora Jilena Meliala Aurora Jillena Meilala Baehaqi Bernadin Dwi M Bilqis, Audrey Azka Daffa Anant, Muhammad Dermawan, Kayla Daffanya Putri Edward Benedictus Roring Egi Rivaldi Gumilar Elizabet Devi Permatasari Faiz Aryaputra Fakhrul Ardiyan Falevi, Yunizar Farisa, Pawit Fadila Rika Fattah, Akhmad Kautsar Febriansyah, Raafid Gilang Abi Zaifa Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Hanggawan, Miftah Farid Hanum, Syanaya Karina Haryanto, Imam Hulu, Samuel Arthur Irvandi Irvandi Ivander Athala, Mas Moreno Kaharuddin Kesya Fadhilah Azzahra Laily Hanifah Ligina Tesalonika Livia Haris Lutecia Zahra Maharani Wibisono M. Rizki Yudha Prawira Marasabessy, Masita Maula, Putri Ni'matul Miftah Farid Hanggawan Miranti Dwi Pangesti Mohammad AL'Rainier Geraldine Muhammad fauzan Muhammad Naufal Akbar Muhammad Naufal Akbar Syaefudin Muthia Sakti Nafis, Abdul Haris Nouval Arofah, Muhammad Novyana, Hilda Nugraha, Rifansyah Permatasari, Elizabet Devi Prihantono, Pradipta Pritha Maya Savitri Raymond Erlangga Siringoringo Rianda Dirkareshza Ribka Arthauli Riski Ari Wibowo Rosita Miladmahesi Sahara, Melian Sahidin, Sultoni Ajie Salman Alfarisi Salsabila Yasmin Qanita Sintha Fransiske Simanungkalit Siti Helmyati Suharyati Suharyati Supriyadi, Mohammad Wangsit Tambok Julius Taufiqurrohman Syahuri Thalia Salma Putri Kamilah Tobing, Vania Athalia Lumban YUDI NUR SUPRIADI