Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.111
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unram Law Review The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Unes Law Review JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Gema Wiralodra JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGAL BRIEF Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) Jurnal Bedah Hukum UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Law Development Journal Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies BHIRAWA LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Begawan Abioso Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Tasyri' Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum : Hukum dan Kesejahteraan Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum Binamulia Hukum Unifikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pamulang Law Review
Anis Rifai
Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 57 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 57 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Dampak Brand Ambassador Artis Korea dalam Pemasaran Skincare: Tinjauan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Klaim Iklan Berlebihan Maharani, Dinar Ayudya; Suartini, Suartini; Rifai, Anis
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.5607

Abstract

Praktik klaim berlebihan bukan hanya merupakan isu etika dalam dunia bisnis, tetapi juga menyangkut aspek hukum yang mendasar. Berdasarkan UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen mengatur bahwa pelaku usaha tidak boleh memproduksi maupun memperjualbelikan barang atau jasa yang tidak sesuai dengan klaim yang telah disampaikan dalam iklan. Serta dijelaskan juga di dalam pasal 7 UUPK perihal tanggung jawab pelaku usaha atas hal yang mana dilakukan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam kajian ini adalah yuridis normatif, yang berfokus pada studi terhadap norma-norma hukum tertulis, dengan tujuan untuk menganalisis dampak praktik klaim iklan berlebihan pada produk skincare, dampak dari pemakaian artis korea dalam produksi iklan tersebut. Pada pemasaran diperlukan Brand Ambassador yang memiliki peranan penting dalam meningkatkan penjualan karena mereka berfungsi sebagai perwakilan merek yang mampu membangun hubungan emosional dengan konsumen. Dengan kehadiran brand ambassador yang dikenal dan dipercaya oleh target pasar, pesan dan nilai merek dapat tersampaikan secara lebih efektif. Tetapi hal ini juga mendorong perlindungan konsumen atas hak informasi yang jujur, perihal lebeling dan iklan produk. Dengan mengacu pada Hak Konsumen dan Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha.  
Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Eksistensi dan Implementasi Justice Colaborator dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Susanti, Evy; Suparji, Suparji; Rifai, Anis
Jurnal Bedah Hukum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Bedah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Boyolali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36596/jbh.v9i2.1687

Abstract

Justice collaborators (JC) and whistleblowers are parties or legal subjects involved in the occurrence of a corruption crime. The existence of the JC is intended to help uncover the facts of corruption crimes. In reality, the JC has no legal certainty in determining the most responsible party and there is no clarity about the considerations in granting the JC. The purpose of this study is to find out the existence of justice collaborators in corruption crimes. This type of research is normative juridical with analytical descriptive nature. The conclusion in this study is that the existence of JC can shed light on a corruption crime in Indonesia, because their role can reveal the perpetrators or masters of mind or the perpetrators who have the most major contribution to the crime. In order to provide legal certainty, there needs to be comprehensive regulatory clarity on JC.
Akibat Hukum Pengiriman Surat Perintah Dimulainya Penyidikan (SPDP) Lebih Dari 7 (Tujuh) Hari Terhadap Status Penetapan Tersangka Abdurrochman, Fauzi; Anis Rifai; Suartini
Jurnal Bedah Hukum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Bedah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Boyolali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36596/jbh.v9i2.1766

Abstract

Abstract The Letter of Notification of Commencement of Investigation (SPDP) is an important instrument in the criminal justice process in Indonesia that functions as an initial notification regarding the commencement of an investigation. The SPDP is crucial in ensuring due process of law and protecting the rights of suspects, public prosecutors, and reporters. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of delays or negligence in sending the SPDP on the validity of suspect determination. The study uses a juridical-normative method with a case approach, in which three relevant pretrial decisions, namely the Decision of the Jakarta Selatan District Court Number 109/Pid/Prap/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel, the Decision of the Bangkinang District Court Number 02/Pid.Pra/2019/PN Bkn, and the Decision of the Tangerang District Court Number 16/Pid.Pra/2024/PN. Tng, are analyzed in depth. The study results indicate that the inaccuracy of sending the SPDP has implications for formal defects in determining the suspect, which causes the cancellation of the suspect status. Constitutional Court Decision Number 130/PUU-XIII/2015 confirms that investigators are required to send SPDP within a maximum of 7 days to the public prosecutor, suspect, and reporter. Violation of this obligation not only violates the principle of procedural justice but also harms the constitutional rights of the parties concerned. Abstrak Surat Pemberitahuan Dimulainya Penyidikan (SPDP) merupakan instrumen penting dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia yang berfungsi sebagai pemberitahuan awal mengenai dimulainya penyidikan. SPDP memiliki peran krusial dalam menjamin due process of law serta melindungi hak-hak tersangka, penuntut umum, dan pelapor. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis akibat hukum dari keterlambatan atau tidak dikirimkan SPDP terhadap keabsahan penetapan tersangka. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan kasus, di mana tiga putusan praperadilan yang relevan, yaitu “Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 109/Pid/Prap/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel”, “Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bangkinang Nomor 02/Pid.Pra/2019/PN Bkn”, dan “Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang Nomor 16/Pid.Pra/2024/PN. Tng”, dianalisis secara mendalam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keterlambatan ataupun tidak dikirimkan SPDP berimplikasi pada cacat formil dalam penetapan tersangka, yang menyebabkan batalnya status tersangka tersebut. Karena sudah diputuskan melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 130/PUU-XIII/2015 menegaskan bahwa penyidik wajib mengirimkan SPDP dalam waktu maksimal 7 (tujuh) hari kepada penuntut umum, tersangka, dan pelapor. Pelanggaran terhadap kewajiban ini tidak hanya mencederai asas keadilan prosedural, tetapi juga merugikan hak-hak konstitusional pihak-pihak terkait.
Suitability of Converting Debt Into Shares As A Means of Homologizing Company Bankruptcy Sari, Novita; Rifai, Anis; Machmud, Aris
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v13i4.1113

Abstract

The present paper examines the efficacy of debt conversion into shares as a means of corporate bankruptcy homologation, with particular emphasis on Waskita's vendor debt case study. In this case, one possible way to repair business finances and pay off debts to creditors—particularly vendors—is to convert debt into shares. Postponement of debt payments refers to the suspension of debt payments for a predetermined amount of time as stipulated by law. During this time, debtors and creditors can talk about debt settlement options through rulings made by commercial courts. This entails creating a repayment schedule that can call for restructuring the debt in addition to paying back the entire amount owed. Because it stresses the use of secondary data to explain the homologation process and the effects of converting debt into shares at PT Waskita Beton Precast Tbk (WSBP), this research employs a normative legal approach. The findings of this study indicate that submitting a Peace Plan by the PKPU Debtor, PT Waskita Beton Precast, Tbk (In PKPU), is appropriate. The actions conducted by the PKPU Debtor are compliant with the terms of Article 281 paragraph (1) of Law Number 37 of 2004 about Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, given that the voting results regarding the settlement plan have been completed. Recalling that on June 17, 2022, PT Waskita Beton Precast, Tbk (In PKPU) was a party to the Peace Agreement pertaining to the Peace Plan, and that on that same day, PKPU Debtors and Creditors were present and took part in the voting on the Peace Plan, which was approved
Akuntabilitas Penyidik dan Prinsip Keadilan: Menimbang Nilai Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah pada Penetapan Tersangka Septiawan, Aris; Rifai, Anis; Suartini, Suartini
Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Tasyri'
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tsyr.v4i1.418

Abstract

Fair law enforcement requires accountability of investigators in every process of determining suspects. In practice, there are still procedural irregularities that cause legal uncertainty and violations of the human rights of suspects. This research aims to examine the principle of accountability of National Police investigators in determining suspects based on the Criminal Code and police regulations, and to weigh them from the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, especially the value of justice ('adl) and the protection of rights (ḥifẓ al-nafs wa al-'ird). This study uses a juridical-normative approach with a descriptive qualitative analysis method, through the study of laws and regulations, pretrial decisions, and Islamic legal literature. The data were analyzed using the framework of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah as an ethical and normative knife. The results of the study show that the determination of suspects without sufficient preliminary evidence violates the principle of due process of law and harms the maqāṣid of justice. Investigator accountability should be realized through internal control mechanisms, ethical sanctions, and judicial supervision through pretrial. The discussion emphasized that the integration of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah values can strengthen the national legal accountability system, as it places justice and the protection of individual rights as the main goals of law enforcement. Therefore, a reconstruction of the maqāṣid-based investigation paradigm is needed to realize humane, ethical, and substantive law enforcement.
Creating Legal Certainty for Victims: A Comparative Analysis of the Resolution of Past Gross Human Rights Violations Through Judicial and Non-Judicial Mechanisms Ramadhan, Muhammad Iqbal; Ahmad, Suparji; Rifai, Anis
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v6i2.243

Abstract

Disputes in import-export businesses pose substantial challenges to the dynamics of global trade. This study examines the critical factors influencing dispute resolution methods, focusing on a comparative analysis of litigation and arbitration in the context of international trade. Employing a normative legal research methodology with a comparative approach, the study evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each method. Key factors considered include the complexity of disputes, monetary value, confidentiality needs, the dynamics of the parties involved, and the potential impact on business relationships. The findings indicate that arbitration often provides a more flexible, efficient, and relationship-preserving solution than traditional litigation, though the optimal approach depends on the specific characteristics of each case. This study offers strategic insights for businesses navigating international trade disputes, underscoring the importance of adopting a tailored and measurable dispute resolution strategy.
Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Business Judgement Rules dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Direksi BUMN PT. Asabri Persero (Studi Putusan Nomor 13/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2022/PT.DKI) Idris Nasution, Muhammad; Rifai, Anis
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Maret - April 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i3.1888

Abstract

Case from PT. Asabri Persero highlighted the important role of BUMN's direction in maintaining company integrity following the principles of Business Judgment Rules (BJR). In the context of BJR, directives have the authority to make business decisions in good faith and rationally, but the case shows alleged violations of integrity and legal compliance by directives, highlighting weaknesses in the company's internal oversight. This research aims to apply the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in making decisions regarding the direction of BUMN Persero, especially in the context of corruption cases. Normative research methods are used by analyzing legal norms related to BJR and the principles contained therein. The results of the analysis show that the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in the context of BUMN Persero is important to ensure the sustainability and sustainability of the business. However, in cases of criminal acts of corruption, the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) requires careful adjustments to the principles of transparency, accountability and public interest. In conclusion, the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) in the direction of BUMN Persero's decision-making must be in line with the values ??of integrity and good governance, taking into account the legal consequences that may arise.
Stigma Negatif Perkara Kepailitan Di Indonesia dan Upaya Penanggulangannya Dalam Mewujudkan Kepastian Berusaha Di Indonesia Rifai, Anis
Jurnal Bedah Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Bedah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Boyolali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36596/jbh.v6i1.721

Abstract

With the Covid-19 pandemic, every company is trying to avoid the bankruptcy legal process. This reflects the company's lack of readiness to understand bankruptcy. For example, understanding the consequences of declaring bankruptcy of a company is still considered as one way to write off the company's debts, so the decision is not accompanied by an understanding that filing for bankruptcy is a serious step, and will not necessarily erase the company's debts. Thus, there is still a lot of negative stigma that arises in the community, especially business actors. For this reason, an effort must be made to remove the negative stigma of bankruptcy cases in order to create legal certainty in doing business in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical, namely by conducting research on library materials, both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. From the study conducted, it is known that the Negative Stigma of Bankruptcy Cases in Indonesia occurs because the procedures regulated in the provisions of laws and regulations are still considered to be long and long-winded. Due to the negative public perception of the judiciary, the public feels that there is no effective means that creditors can use to protect their interests, especially so that naughty debtors can pay off their obligations, if necessary by legal coercion through the courts. Efforts to Overcome the Negative Stigma of Bankruptcy Cases in Indonesia One of the ways to do this is by organizing socialization activities on the Law on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (SDPO) and increasing publications on bankruptcy and SDPO, strengthening partnerships between professional organizations of curators and administrators, and make it easier for business actors to obtain information about bankruptcy and SDPO. Dengan adanya pandemi Covid-19 setiap perusahaan berusaha untuk menghindari proses hukum kepailitan. Hal tersebut mencerminkan masih kurangnya kesiapan perusahaan dalam memahami kepailitan. Sebagai contoh, pemahaman mengenai akibat dari menyatakan pailit suatu perusahaan masih dianggap sebagai salah satu cara yang akan menghapus hutang perusahaan, sehingga keputusan tersebut tidak disertai dengan pemahaman bahwa mengajukan kepailitan adalah langkah yang serius, dan belum tentu akan langsung menghapus hutang perusahaan. Dengan demikian, masih banyak stigma negatif yang timbul dimasyarakat, khususnya pelaku usaha. Untuk itu diperlukan suatu upaya yang harus dilakukan untuk menghapus stigma negatif perkara kepailitan tersebut agar tercipta kepastian hukum dalam berusaha di Indonesia.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, yaitu dengan melakukan penelitian bahan kepustakaan, baik bahan hukum primer maupun bahan hukum sekunder. Dari kajian yang dilakukan diketahui Stigma Negatif Perkara Kepailitan di Indonesia terjadi dikarenakan prosedur yang diatur dalam ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan masih dianggap cenderung lama dan bertele-tele. Karena persepsi masyarakat yang negatif terhadap badan peradilan, maka masyarakat merasa tidak ada sarana yang efektif yang dapat digunakan Kreditor untuk dapat melindungi kepentingannya, khususnya agar Debitor yang nakal dapat melunasi kewajibannya, jika perlu dengan melakukan paksaan secara hukum melalui pengadilan. Upaya Untuk Menanggulangi Stigma Negatif Perkara Kepailitan di Indonesia Dapat dilakukan salah satunya dengan cara menyelenggarakan kegiatan Sosialisasi Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) dan memperbanyak publikasi tentang kepailitan dan PKPU, mempererat jalinan kemitraan antara organisasi profesi Kurator dan Pengurus, dan mempermudah pelaku usaha untuk mendapatkan infomasi mengenai kepailitan dan PKPU.
Potensi Masalah Hukum Dalam Tanda Tangan Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia Fauzi, Irvan; Rifai, Anis; Shebubakar, Arina Novizas
Jurnal Bedah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Bedah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Boyolali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36596/jbh.v8i1.1047

Abstract

Abstract Electronic signatures are currently often used on digital-based documents which basically can be said to be in the form of non-paper documents which can be debated in the process of proving civil procedural law because they are not in accordance with the types of evidence where the requirements are in physical form. Therefore the author raises issues such as what is the legal basis for the validity of electronic signatures in making agreements between parties in the technological era? how is the legal force of proving electronic signatures in Indonesian civil procedural law? The research method in this scientific journal uses a normative juridical approach using existing data through Open Source. The results of the research found that the legal basis for electronic signatures is regulated in the Electronic Transactions Act which provides a definition in the form of part of an electronic agreement for parties to agree together through the existence of an electronic system in preparing, analyzing, collecting, processing, storing , convey and be able to disseminate information electronically. Electronic signing as a form of electronic data on an agreement document in civil procedural law can be a potential problem if it is used as evidence in a proving trial process in court. Where electronic signing is a paperless transaction. This of course raises problems when the proof process is not in accordance with what is regulated in Article 1866 of the Civil Code, in this case it means that the evidence in the form of electronic data submitted is considered to have no legal force of proof, therefore it does not rule out the possibility that judges and other parties will reject it as evidence. Suggestions for the future are that the court can accommodate evidence in the form of electronic signatures. electronic data submitted is considered to have no legal force of proof, therefore it does not rule out the possibility that judges and other parties will reject it as evidence. Suggestions for the future are that the court can accommodate evidence in the form of electronic signatures Abstrak Tanda tangan elektronik saat ini sering dipakai pada dokumen yang berbasis digital yang pada dasarnya dapat dikatakan sebagai bentuk dari dokumen non-kertas yang dapat menjadi perdebatan dalam proses pembuktian hukum acara perdata karena tidak sesuai dengan jenis-jenis alat bukti yang mana persyaratannya dalam bentuk fisik. Oleh sebab itu penulis mengangkat permasalahan seperti bagaimanakah dasar hukum keabsahan dari tanda tangan elektronik dalam melakukan perjanjian antara para pihak di era teknologi? bagaimana kekuatan hukum pembuktian tanda tangan elektronik dalam hukum acara perdata Indonesia? Metode penelitian pada jurnal ilmiah ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan memakai data-data yang ada melalui Open Source. Hasil dari penelitian menemukan dasar hukum dari tanda tangan elektronik diatur pada Undang-Undang Transaksi Elektronik yang memberikan definisi berupa bagian dari suatu perjanjian elektronik bagi para pihak secara bersama-sama untuk bersepakat melalui adanya sistem secara elektronik dalam mempersiapkan, menganalisis, mengumpulkan, mengolah, menyimpan, menyampaikan dan dapat untuk menyebarkan suatu informasi secara elektronik. Penandatanganan Elektronik sebagai bentuk dari data elektronik pada suatu dokumen perjanjian dalam hukum acara perdata ini dapat menjadi potensi masalah apabila digunakan sebagai bahan bukti di dalam sebuah proses persidangan pembuktian di pengadilan. Yang mana adanya penandatanganan secara elektronik merupakan transaksi tanpa kertas. Hal ini tentu menimbulkan permasalahan pada saat proses pembuktian yang tidak sesuai dengan yang diatur dalam pasal 1866 KUH Perdata, dalam hal ini berarti bukti berupa data elektronik yang diserahkan dianggap tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum pembuktian, oleh karenanya tidak menutup kemungkinan hakim dan pihak lain akan menolaknya sebagai alat bukti. Saran kedepannya agar pengadilan dapat mengakomodir alat bukti berupa tanda tangan elektronik.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terkait Upaya Pemohon dan Termohon Atas Putusan Arbitrase Menurut Perundang-undangan di Indonesia Muspardi, Muspardi; Rifai, Anis; Suartini, Suartini
Jurnal Bedah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Bedah Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Boyolali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36596/jbh.v8i1.1096

Abstract

Kata Latin arbitrase menunjukkan otoritas untuk membawa suatu tindakan ke suatu kesimpulan sesuai dengan tingkat keahlian seseorang. Suatu persepsi dapat timbul bahwa seorang arbiter atau majelis arbitrase tidak lagi terikat oleh prinsip-prinsip hukum ketika menyelesaikan suatu sengketa dan hanya akan fokus pada pencapaian penyelesaian yang disetujui bersama. Arbiter atau panel sebenarnya menerapkan hukum seperti hakim atau pengadilan, bertentangan dengan kepercayaan umum. Arbitrase adalah mekanisme hukum untuk menyelesaikan sengketa perdata yang terjadi di luar sistem peradilan adat, sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Makalah ini mengeksplorasi upaya hukum yang tersedia dalam menanggapi keputusan arbitrase yang final dan mengikat. Artikel ini terutama akan mengkaji Pasal 70 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang pengaturan arbitrase dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa. Selain itu, ini akan mengeksplorasi aturan terkait mengenai proses peninjauan kembali dengan alasan membatalkan hasil arbitrase. Karena pendekatan yuridis normatif diambil untuk penelitian, sumber sekunder memberikan informasi awal. Data primer berasal dari teks hukum primer, sedangkan data sekunder berasal dari bahan hukum sekunder. Berdasarkan temuan jurnal ini, dengan syarat yang diatur dalam Pasal 70 UU No. 30 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Putusan Arbitrase dapat diajukan ke Pengadilan Negeri untuk Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase. Menurut penelitian yang dipaparkan dalam jurnal ilmiah ini, sesuai dengan ketentuan yang dituangkan dalam Pasal 70 UU No. 30 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Putusan Arbitrase dapat diajukan ke Pengadilan Negeri untuk membatalkan putusan tersebut.
Co-Authors Abdurrochman, Fauzi Ade Arianto Asril Adi Satria, Kun Hartawan Adithio, Stephano Ranno Agus Surya Negara Ahmad, Suparji Akhir, Muhammad Rhobiul Andi Fachriyanto Andini, Dwi Aprilia, Debi Arina Novizas Shebubakar Arina Shebubakar Aurora Jillena Meliala Carona, Nina Dessy Kurnia Doni Septo Fauzi, Irvan Ferdinandus, Aisyah Firdaus, Firman Fokky Fuad Fokky Fuad Haq, Manasikanal Hidayat , Yusuf Ida Ayu Putu Sri Widnyani Idris Nasution, Muhammad Indra Pratama Putra, Dirga Istiani, Nisa Jaya, Reki Putera Kadek Wahyudi Saputra Khairunnisa, Adriana Latifansyah, Muhammad Anzar Lutfi, Anas Machmud, Aris Maguchu, Prosper Maharani, Dinar Ayudya Mokoagow, Jody Askabul Muhammad Rhobiul Akhir Muspardi Muspardi Novita Sari nugroho, dimas restu Nur Rijal Permana, Yoga Matofani Puspitasari, Anggraeni Qolbi Ramadhan Ramadhan, Muhammad Iqbal Rijal, Nur Rimun Wibowo, Rimun Rizki Maulana, Rizki Roswitha Dwi Wahyuningsih Rusman Rusman Sadino Sadino Sadino, Sadino Saputra, Kadek Wahyudi Saputra, M. Bilal Satriadi, Dharma Septiawan, Aris Shebubakar, Arina Shebubakar, Arina Novizas Siti Farhani Suartini Suartini, Suartini Subagja, Aba Sumarna, Reza SUPARJI Suparji Suparji Sururoh, Yeni Lin Susanti, Evy Syafia, Saida Putri Wijaya, Maulana