Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Governance and Public Policy

Pola Relasi Eksekutif Dan Legislatif Pada Penyusunan Legislasi Daerah Wance, Marno; Suranto, Suranto
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol 4, No 1: February 2017
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study is shown to measure the impact of the rising of many South Buru district budget is problematic(mistimed), namely from the year 2010 to 2015 discussions always happen tug of interests that result in a delayof APBD. therefore be important to do a study on (1), the Executive and Legislative Relationship Patterns inSouth Buru budget discussion. (2) Factors relations executive and legislative In the discussion of the budget.based on the findings of this study concluded that the first, found three patterns of interaction (accommodation,domination, compromise), but between the three patterns of interaction of the budget policy discussion found anymore process dominate. Second, the interaction patterns decisional is a pattern of disagreement that took placein the formulation (KUA) and (PPAS) resulting keterlamabatan determination of the budget, the interactionpatterns of power that occurred bargaining (barganing) to exchange the interest of the legislature to theexecutive are not accommodated On (RKA) SKPD These three, namely the interaction patterns AnticipatedReaction South Buru District Government receives the benefit of parliament who form the recess recommendationto maintain the stability of the Year 2015.Keempat discussion of budget, non-decisional interaction pattern thatthe legislature refuses to KUA and PPAS discussion because of the executive did not submit documents PlansWork Budget (RKA) from each SKPD. While facto factors influencing ang Relationship Patterns executive andlegislative discussion of budget 2015 ie Personal Bachground, political Bachground
REFUGEE AND LAND DISPUTE (A Case Study at Gamsungi and Tosoa Villages, South Ibu District, Regency of West Halmahera, Year 2015) La Suhu, Bakri; Wance, Marno; Hasan, Ikram
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol 6, No 1 (2019): February 2019
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.61108

Abstract

This study aims at figuring out the causes of land disputes and the settlement between Gamsungi and Tosoa villagers in South Ibu District of West Halmahera Regency. This study applies qualitative descriptive method in which it is a series of procedures used in solving the problems being investigated by describing the state of research objects at present time based on existing facts. The data sources used are primary and secondary data. While the technique of data collections are observation, document interview and secondary data aid.          The results show that the causes of land dispute between Gamsungi and Tosoa villages due to: a). The arrival of ex-refugees from Lata-lata village in South Halmahera regency, b). Land expropriation and/ or land disposal by ex-refugees of Lata-lata village to the agricultural field of Gamsungi villagers, and c). Felling of plants in the agricultural field of Gamsungi villagers done by Lata-lata refugees. Therefore, the mechanism or way of settling land disputes between these two villages is through negotiation (consensus). Negotiations were done between the two villages’ representatives (Gamsungi and Tosoa villages): the two villages’ heads, secretaries, customary figures, religious leaders, and heads of BPD, and witnessed by Subdistric Head of South Ibu, Head of Criminal Investigation Unit of West Halmahera, Representatives of West Halmahera Government, Police Chief of Ibu, Sambung Rasa Team, and Koramil of Ibu.
Pola Relasi Eksekutif Dan Legislatif Pada Penyusunan Legislasi Daerah Wance, Marno; Suranto, Suranto
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol 4, No 1: February 2017
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.v4i1.2643

Abstract

This study is shown to measure the impact of the rising of many South Buru district budget is problematic(mistimed), namely from the year 2010 to 2015 discussions always happen tug of interests that result in a delayof APBD. therefore be important to do a study on (1), the Executive and Legislative Relationship Patterns inSouth Buru budget discussion. (2) Factors relations executive and legislative In the discussion of the budget.based on the findings of this study concluded that the first, found three patterns of interaction (accommodation,domination, compromise), but between the three patterns of interaction of the budget policy discussion found anymore process dominate. Second, the interaction patterns decisional is a pattern of disagreement that took placein the formulation (KUA) and (PPAS) resulting keterlamabatan determination of the budget, the interactionpatterns of power that occurred bargaining (barganing) to exchange the interest of the legislature to theexecutive are not accommodated On (RKA) SKPD These three, namely the interaction patterns AnticipatedReaction South Buru District Government receives the benefit of parliament who form the recess recommendationto maintain the stability of the Year 2015.Keempat discussion of budget, non-decisional interaction pattern thatthe legislature refuses to KUA and PPAS discussion because of the executive did not submit documents PlansWork Budget (RKA) from each SKPD. While facto factors influencing ang Relationship Patterns executive andlegislative discussion of budget 2015 ie Personal Bachground, political Bachground
REFUGEE AND LAND DISPUTE (A Case Study at Gamsungi and Tosoa Villages, South Ibu District, Regency of West Halmahera, Year 2015) Bakri La Suhu; Marno Wance; Ikram Hasan
Journal of Governance and Public Policy Vol 6, No 1 (2019): February 2019
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgpp.61108

Abstract

This study aims at figuring out the causes of land disputes and the settlement between Gamsungi and Tosoa villagers in South Ibu District of West Halmahera Regency. This study applies qualitative descriptive method in which it is a series of procedures used in solving the problems being investigated by describing the state of research objects at present time based on existing facts. The data sources used are primary and secondary data. While the technique of data collections are observation, document interview and secondary data aid.          The results show that the causes of land dispute between Gamsungi and Tosoa villages due to: a). The arrival of ex-refugees from Lata-lata village in South Halmahera regency, b). Land expropriation and/ or land disposal by ex-refugees of Lata-lata village to the agricultural field of Gamsungi villagers, and c). Felling of plants in the agricultural field of Gamsungi villagers done by Lata-lata refugees. Therefore, the mechanism or way of settling land disputes between these two villages is through negotiation (consensus). Negotiations were done between the two villages’ representatives (Gamsungi and Tosoa villages): the two villages’ heads, secretaries, customary figures, religious leaders, and heads of BPD, and witnessed by Subdistric Head of South Ibu, Head of Criminal Investigation Unit of West Halmahera, Representatives of West Halmahera Government, Police Chief of Ibu, Sambung Rasa Team, and Koramil of Ibu.