Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.369
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial JOURNAL EQUITABLE JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI YUSTISI JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Diklat Review : Jurnal manajemen pendidikan dan pelatihan Journal of Applied Electrical Engineering Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam RIO LAW JURNAL Collegium Studiosum Journal Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) jurnal administrasi politik dan sosial Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Journal of Social Science and Education Research Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Pendidikan NuCSJo : Nusantara Community Service Journal World Health Digital Journal (wolgitj)
Rudi Pardede
Universitas Lancang Kuning
Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH

 1 
URGENSI PENGESAHAN RUU PERAMPASAN ASET DALAM PEMULIHAN KERUGIAN NEGARA AKIBAT KORUPSI: PERSPEKTIF YUDIRIS NORMATIF Pardede, Rudi
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 3 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i3.4356

Abstract

Abstract: Corruption in Indonesia has caused state losses of up to trillions of rupiah annually, while existing legal mechanisms still focus on criminalizing perpetrators and are not optimal in recovering state assets. The disparity between state losses and recovered assets (state loss recovery gap) highlights the weakness of regulations that rely solely on confiscation of assets through criminal decisions (conviction-based asset forfeiture). This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative approach to examine the urgency of ratifying the Asset Forfeiture Bill. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) mechanism is highly relevant to addressing obstacles to law enforcement, particularly in cases where perpetrators have fled, died, or are difficult to prove criminally. Internationally, similar mechanisms have been implemented effectively in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland, and are in accordance with the mandate of the 2003 United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). However, the ratification of this bill remains hampered by political resistance and concerns about abuse of authority. Therefore, transparent, accountable regulatory design and oversight by an independent judiciary are necessary to ensure this legal instrument functions optimally. In conclusion, the ratification of the Asset Confiscation Bill is a strategic step to strengthen corruption eradication, close the state loss recovery gap, and restore public rights more equitably. Keyword: corruption, asset forfeiture, Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture, UNCAC, asset recovery Abstrak: Korupsi di Indonesia telah menimbulkan kerugian negara hingga triliunan rupiah setiap tahun, sementara mekanisme hukum yang ada masih berfokus pada pemidanaan pelaku dan belum optimal dalam memulihkan aset negara. Ketimpangan antara kerugian negara dan aset yang berhasil dikembalikan (state loss recovery gap) memperlihatkan kelemahan regulasi yang hanya mengandalkan perampasan aset melalui putusan pidana (conviction-based asset forfeiture). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif untuk mengkaji urgensi pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang (RUU) Perampasan Aset. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan mekanisme Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB) sangat relevan untuk mengatasi hambatan penegakan hukum, terutama pada kasus pelaku yang melarikan diri, meninggal dunia, atau sulit dibuktikan secara pidana. Secara internasional, mekanisme serupa telah diterapkan efektif di Amerika Serikat, Inggris, dan Swiss, serta sesuai dengan amanat United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) 2003. Namun, pengesahan RUU ini masih terkendala resistensi politik dan kekhawatiran penyalahgunaan kewenangan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan desain regulasi yang transparan, akuntabel, serta diawasi peradilan independen agar instrumen hukum ini dapat berfungsi optimal. Kesimpulannya, pengesahan RUU Perampasan Aset merupakan langkah strategis untuk memperkuat pemberantasan korupsi, menutup celah state loss recovery gap, dan memulihkan hak-hak publik secara lebih adil. Kata kunci: korupsi, perampasan aset, Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture, UNCAC, pemulihan aset.
INKONSISTENSI HUKUM DALAM PENGEMBALIAN UANG NEGARA HASIL KORUPSI DARI PERSPEKTIF KEPASTIAN HUKUM Pardede, Rudi
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 3 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i3.4159

Abstract

Abstract: This study examines legal inconsistencies in the process of recovering state financial losses due to corruption in Indonesia, focusing on the principle of legal certainty. Although the law stipulates that the return of state funds does not eliminate criminal penalties, judicial practice shows numerous deviations. This study uses a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach to analyze the inconsistency between legal norms and their implementation. Key findings indicate that the implementation of asset recovery is often used as a basis for easing perpetrators' sentences, inconsistent monetary sanctions in court decisions, weak tracking and confiscation of assets, and minimal coordination between law enforcement agencies. As a result, the asset recovery system is ineffective in recovering state losses and creates legal uncertainty. This study recommends systemic reforms to strengthen legal certainty, the proportionality of sanctions, and the effectiveness of decision execution so that substantive justice is truly realized in combating corruption. Keywords: corruption, legal certainty, asset recovery, replacement money, legal inconsistency Abstrak: Penelitian ini mengkaji inkonsistensi hukum dalam proses pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara akibat tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia, dengan fokus pada prinsip kepastian hukum. Meskipun secara normatif hukum telah mengatur bahwa pengembalian uang negara tidak menghapuskan pidana, praktik peradilan menunjukkan banyak penyimpangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual untuk menganalisis ketidaksesuaian antara norma hukum dan implementasinya. Temuan utama menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan pengembalian aset kerap dijadikan dasar untuk meringankan hukuman pelaku, tidak konsistennya sanksi uang pengganti dalam putusan pengadilan, lemahnya pelacakan serta penyitaan aset, dan minimnya koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum. Akibatnya, sistem asset recovery tidak efektif dalam memulihkan kerugian negara dan menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan reformasi sistemik guna memperkuat kepastian hukum, proporsionalitas sanksi, dan efektivitas eksekusi putusan agar keadilan substantif benar-benar terwujud dalam penanggulangan korupsi. Kata kunci: korupsi, kepastian hukum, pengembalian aset, uang pengganti, inkonsistensi   hukum
MENELAAH KOMPLEKSITAS KEBIJAKAN DALAM PENGATURAN KONFLIK KEPENTINGAN DAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI: STUDI PERBANDINGAN INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA Pardede, Rudi
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 9, No 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i1.5816

Abstract

Abstract: This study examines the complexity of policies governing conflicts of interest and corruption between Indonesia and Singapore through a normative juridical approach. The study was conducted by examining the regulatory framework, institutions, and legal implementation in preventing the practice of abuse of public office. The results of the study indicate that the Indonesian regulatory framework, although comprehensive, tends to function as a legislative showcase without transformative power because it is trapped in a political dynamic that is permissive towards corruption. Instruments such as the Corruption Law, PP 53/2010, and the code of ethics for public officials are more symbolic than substantive, thus failing to change bureaucratic behavior that is still shaped by a culture of patronage and clientelism. In contrast, Singapore proves that simple but sharp regulations, such as the Prevention of Corruption Act, when supported by an independent anti-corruption agency (CPIB), indiscriminate law enforcement, and integrity-based bureaucratic incentives, can suppress corruption to a minimum level. However, Singapore's system remains subject to criticism, particularly regarding the risk of legal authoritarianism and vulnerability to cross-border global financial issues. Therefore, this study confirms that the effectiveness of corruption eradication is not determined by the number of regulations, but rather by political consistency, independent institutional design, and the internalization of integrity values within the bureaucratic culture. For Indonesia, an important lesson from Singapore is the urgency of simplifying regulations, strengthening the independence of anti-corruption institutions, and fostering a bureaucratic culture that rejects patronage. Keywords: complexity, nurative, legislative showcase, authoritarianism, internalization, bureaucracy Abstrak: Penelitian ini menelaah kompleksitas kebijakan pengaturan konflik kepentingan dan tindak pidana korupsi antara Indonesia dan Singapura melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif. Kajian dilakukan dengan menelaah kerangka regulasi, kelembagaan, serta implementasi hukum dalam mencegah praktik penyalahgunaan jabatan publik. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerangka regulasi Indonesia, meskipun komprehensif, cenderung berfungsi sebagai legislative showcase tanpa daya transformasi karena terjebak dalam dinamika politik yang permisif terhadap korupsi. Instrumen seperti UU Tipikor, PP 53/2010, maupun kode etik pejabat publik lebih bersifat simbolik daripada substantif, sehingga gagal mengubah perilaku birokrasi yang masih dibentuk oleh budaya patronase dan clientelism. Sebaliknya, Singapura membuktikan bahwa regulasi yang sederhana namun tajam, seperti Prevention of Corruption Act. Jika ditopang lembaga antikorupsi independen (CPIB), penegakan hukum tanpa pandang bulu, dan insentif birokrasi berbasis integritas, mampu menekan korupsi hingga level minimal. Meski demikian, sistem Singapura tetap menyisakan kritik, terutama terkait risiko otoritarianisme hukum dan kerentanan terhadap isu keuangan global lintas batas. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa efektivitas pemberantasan korupsi tidak ditentukan oleh banyaknya regulasi, melainkan oleh konsistensi politik, desain kelembagaan yang independen, serta internalisasi nilai integritas dalam budaya birokrasi. Bagi Indonesia, pelajaran penting dari Singapura adalah urgensi menyederhanakan regulasi, memperkuat independensi lembaga antikorupsi, dan menumbuhkan budaya birokrasi yang menolak patronase. Kata kunci: kompleksitas, nuratif, legislatif showcase, otoritarisme, internalisasi, birokrasi
Co-Authors Afriandi, Angga Afriansyah, Ricky Ardan, Andra Ardiansah, Ardiansah Ardiansah, Ardiansah Asnawi, Edi Bagio Kadaryanto, Bagio Bangun, Tri Suranta Budiarto, Yusuf Daeng, Yusuf DM , M. Yusuf DM, M. Yusuf DM, Yusuf Eddy Asnawi Ernawaty, Beby Fahmi Fahmi Fahmi Fitriyanti Nakul Harahap, Irawan Hartono, Wandi Heru Wijanarko Hutabarat, santa Delima ILFAN AFRIANDI JAHRI, ILFAN AFRIANDI Iqbal Maulana Syafei Koto, Arsyad Kurnia, Putri M. Yusuf DM Meinecky, Ryan Minggu, Sumber Horas Muhammad Faizin Muhammad Rasyid Abdillah Muhammad Rizki Muhardi, Dekky Nofarizal, Dedi Nugraha, Ahmad Angga Oryta, Deny Purba, Desi Valentianna Br Purnomo, Candra Putra, Alghoni Bumantara Rahmi Mahdaliza Reski Putra, Hapis Rizqa Anita sandra dewi Sandra Dewi Sari M, Ayu Novita Sihombing, Indra Lamhot Sihombing, Rainer Wilona Sihotang, Marito Sari Simamora, Bona Adrian Sistha, Windy Widya Toruan, Yohanes Janter Lumban Waloyo, Waloyo Yalid Yalid Yetti, Yetti Yusuf DM, M. Yusuf Yusuf