Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.803
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Peternakan Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Unes Law Review Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Journal of Administrative and Sosial Science (JASS) Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Kesosi Jurnal Sosial dan Sains Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) BULLET : Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Student Research Journal Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, Dan Sosial Humaniora Artemis Law Journal Petitum Law Journal Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi Pemuliaan Keadilan Jurihum Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Sinurat, Aksi
Faculty Of Law, Nusa Cendana University
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 47 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 47 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
SEBAB-SEBAB DAN UPAYA HUKUM DISKRIMINATIF DALAM KASUS KORUPSI TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 2573 K/Pid.Sus/2021 SERTA NOMOR 2451 K/ Pid.Sus/2021 Maria Oktaviani Padur; Aksi Sinurat; Rudepel Petrus Leo
Petitum Law Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2026): Petitum Law Journal Volume 3, Nomor 2, Mei 2026
Publisher : Petitum Law Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35508/pelana.v3i2.22750

Abstract

In practice, judicial decisions in corruption cases often reflect discriminatory patterns in sentencing. This study aims to determine and analyze the causal factors or reasons for criminal discrimination in corruption cases Number 2573 K/Pid.Sus/2021 and Number 2451 K/Pid.Sus/2021 at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, and to analyze the legal efforts that can be taken by the Public Prosecutor for criminal discrimination in corruption cases Number 2573 K/Pid.Sus/2021 and Number 2451 K/Pid.Sus/2021 at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. This study seeks to explore the underlying causes and legal solutions for the presence of discriminatory sentencing in corruption cases. Employing an empirical juridical research approach, data were collected through interviews and literature reviews, then analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the causes of discriminatory sentencing in corruption cases stem from both legal and judicial factors. Thomas More and Jonas Salean were charged together for the same act of transferring and distributing state land without legal basis. However, the difference in the legal fate of Thomas More, who was imprisoned for 8 years, and Jonas Salean was acquitted, raises an indication of criminal discrimination because the difference in treatment is not based on differences that are legally relevant.
Kajian Teori Hukum Progresif tentang Konversi Pidana Penjara sebagai Alternatif Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Analisis terhadap Beberapa Putusan Pengadilan Tipikor di NTT) Raden Haris Prastyo; Aksi Sinurat; Orpa Ganefo Manuain
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Juli
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v5i2.11882

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji Penegakan hukum korupsi di Indonesia belum optimal dalam pemulihan kerugian keuangan negara akibat paradigma legalistik-positivistik yang kaku. Hakim dan Jaksa sering kali bertindak hanya sebagai "corong undang-undang" tanpa mempertimbangkan aspek keadilan substantif dan kemanfaatan pemidanaan bagi pemulihan ekonomi negara berdasarkan prinsip hukum progresif. Penelitian yuridis normatif ini menggunakan bahan hukum sekunder dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus melalui analisis beberapa putusan Pengadilan Tipikor Kupang di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan studi pustaka, lalu dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif untuk mengkaji konversi pidana penjara sebagai alternatif pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pola berhukum klasik di persidangan memberikan kelonggaran bagi terpidana untuk mengonversi kewajiban finansialnya menjadi hukuman badan subsidair, sehingga memicu tingginya tunggakan eksekusi. Temuan ini menegaskan urgensi terobosan hukum progresif (rule breaking) oleh Hakim untuk mengoptimalkan eksekusi pidana tambahan uang pengganti secara mutlak demi mewujudkan pemulihan keuangan negara dan menjamin keadilan substantif masyarakat. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa Konversi pidana penjara sebagai alternatif pengembalian kerugian keuangan Negara melalui uang pengganti dalam tindak pidana korupsi merupakan suatu keniscayaan, namun dalam praktiknya para penyelenggara hukum terutama Hakim dan Jaksa belum bersinergitas menerapkan hukum untuk mengantarkan kepentingan mayarakat kepada kehidupan yang adil, sejahtera dan Bahagia serta Formulasi hukum progresif yang dapat mewujudkan pidana penjara sebagai alternatif pengembalian kerugian keuangan Negara dalam tindak pidana korupsi oleh penyelenggara hukum belum mengimplementasikan hukum untuk suatu kebutuhan utama bagi tujuan pemidanaan tindak pidana korupsi. 
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Berdasarkan Teori Penyertaan (Deelneming) dalam Pemberian Kredit Bermasalah pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah: Studi Putusan Nomor 38/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Kpg Jo. Nomor 3/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PT KPG Jo. Nomor 5388 K/Pid.Sus/2024 Alberth Nixon Bria; Aksi Sinurat; Orpa Juliana Nubatonis
Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Agustus: Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/atmosfer.v4i3.1938

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of the Deelneming theory as a basis for imposing criminal liability on parties involved in the granting of non-performing loans that resulted in state financial losses at the Regional Development Bank of East Nusa Tenggara. The study is motivated by the fact that criminal liability in banking corruption cases is often focused solely on credit analysts, despite the collective decision-making process involving multiple officials with distinct authorities. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The primary legal materials consist of laws and regulations governing banking, corruption, and criminal law, while secondary legal materials include court decisions, legal doctrines, and relevant scientific literature. The findings indicate that non-performing loans are fundamentally part of banking business risk but may transform into corruption when the credit approval process violates the prudential principle, involves abuse of authority, and causes state financial losses. The study further reveals that the Deelneming doctrine provides a normative basis for extending criminal liability to all parties who substantially contribute to unlawful credit approval. Therefore, harmonization between banking law and anti-corruption law is necessary to establish clear legal parameters distinguishing legitimate business risk from criminal conduct while strengthening legal certainty and effective law enforcement in the banking sector.
Ratio Decidendi terhadap Perbuatan Aktif dan Pasif dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Ditinjau dari Perspektif Keadilan: Analisis Putusan Nomor 816/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Bpp jo. Putusan Nomor 124/Pid/2021/PT SMR jo. Putusan Nomor 5102 K/Pid.Sus/2021 Frisca Regina Ferreira Lay; Aksi Sinurat; Simplexius Asa
Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Agustus: Atmosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Budaya, dan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59024/atmosfer.v4i3.1940

Abstract

This study examines the accuracy of the ratio decidendi in distinguishing active and passive money laundering in District Court Decision Number 816/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Bpp, High Court Decision Number 124/Pid/2021/PT SMR, and Supreme Court Decision Number 5102 K/Pid.Sus/2021. This normative legal research applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials comprise relevant legislation and court decisions, while secondary materials include legal literature and previous studies. The materials were analyzed qualitatively using descriptive and prescriptive reasoning. The findings show that the court applied Article 5 of Law Number 8 of 2010 and sentenced the defendant to four years’ imprisonment and a fine of IDR 900 million. However, the proven facts revealed fund flows totaling IDR 56.637 billion, followed by transfers, fictitious interest payments, asset purchases, and business financing. These actions indicate characteristics of active money laundering under Articles 3 and 4. The court’s reasoning did not adequately compare the three alternative charges or comprehensively assess the defendant’s intent and transactional control. Accurate offense classification is therefore essential to ensure consistent legal reasoning, proportional criminal responsibility, fairness, and effective prevention of money laundering.
Analisis terhadap Kriteria Penentuan Saksi Ahli dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Perspektif Hukum Indonesia dan Belanda Fiani Arista Pinga; Aksi Sinurat; Rudepel Petrus Leo
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Kesosi Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Jurnal Abdimas KESOSI
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Kesetiakawanan Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57213/abdimas.v9i1.417

Abstract

An expert witness is a person with specialized knowledge who provides testimony to clarify technical or scientific aspects in criminal cases. In Indonesia, experts are appointed based on professional competence, without a centralized certification system, while the Netherlands has a strict system through the Netherlands Register of Court Experts (NRGD), which requires verification and certification of expertise. This difference impacts the quality, objectivity, and evidentiary value of expert testimony. This research is a normative juridical study with a qualitative approach, focusing on regulations, literature reviews, and analysis. The study finds that while both Indonesia and the Netherlands emphasize the importance of special expertise, Indonesia lacks a formal accreditation system for expert witnesses, whereas the Netherlands has institutions like NRGD and NFI (Netherlands Forensic Institute) to regulate and certify expertise. The legal system differences between Indonesia and the Netherlands create complexities in the role of expert witnesses, affecting the evidentiary value and the professionalism and independence of experts in court. Despite both countries following the civil law system, their distinct legal frameworks lead to significant variations in expert witness roles and the reliability of their testimony.
Pengaturan Hukum Kejahatan Cyberbullying Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik: Studi Normatif Berdasarkan Kasus Arya Mohan Maria Suryani Sutantri Kura; Aksi Sinurat; Debi F. Ng. Fallo
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Kesosi Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Jurnal Abdimas KESOSI
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Kesetiakawanan Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57213/abdimas.v9i1.421

Abstract

This research utilizes a normative juridical approach oriented towards regulation and conceptual analysis, focusing on comparing legal norms before and after the amendment. The findings indicate that the Cyberbullying experienced by Arya Mohan substantially fulfills the elements of a criminal offense as regulated in Article 27 paragraph (3) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (2008-2016) and Article 27A of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to the ITE Law. These articles specifically criminalize defamation and insult through electronic platforms, with criminal penalties. The context explains that the changes through Law Number 1 of 2024 affirm this case as an absolute complaint offense, meaning legal proceedings only commence upon an official report from the victim or their proxy. The case involving Arya Mohan shows that the absence of a victim's report and the loss of most evidence due to deletion actions resulted in unfulfilled formal requirements and insufficient evidence, leading to the discontinuation of legal proceedings despite all substantive elements being met, such as intent and dissemination of insults. The legal implications of these findings show that successful law enforcement regarding Cyberbullying heavily depends on victim reports and the availability of valid electronic evidence, such as screenshots or server logs. Indonesia's legal framework has provided a robust normative basis for addressing Cyberbullying, but implementation remains dependent on complaint mechanisms and criminal procedural testing. To address this, reforms such as strengthening evidence preservation protocols by platform providers and public education on victims' rights are needed to enhance law enforcement in the digital era.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anggota TNI yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Terhadap Warga Sipil: Studi Putusan Nomor: 1-K/PM.III-17/AU/I/2025 di PengadilanMiliter III-15 Kupang Verena Yolanda Fernandes; Aksi Sinurat; Deddy R. Ch. Manafe
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Kesosi Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Januari: Jurnal Abdimas KESOSI
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Kesetiakawanan Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57213/abdimas.v9i1.425

Abstract

Fraud committed by members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces (Tentara Nasional Indonesia/TNI) against civilians constitutes an unlawful act that not only causes losses to victims but also undermines the principle of justice and the doctrine of equality before the law. Although TNI members are subject to military law, in practice there remain issues concerning criminal liability and the competent judicial forum to adjudicate such cases. This research aims to analyze the criminal liability of TNI members who commit fraud against civilians and to examine the application of law in Decision Number: 1-K/PM.III-17/AU/I/2025 at the Military Court III-15 Kupang. The research method employed is normative legal research using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The legal materials consist of primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and court decisions, secondary legal materials including legal literature and scholarly journals, and tertiary legal materials as supporting references. The results of the research indicate that TNI members who commit fraud against civilians may legally be held criminally liable under general criminal law, particularly the Indonesian Criminal Code. However, based on the provisions of Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military Courts and Law Number 34 of 2004 concerning the Indonesian National Armed Forces, the judicial process is still conducted within the military court system. Decision Number: 1-K/PM.III-17/AU/I/2025 shows that the panel of judges imposed criminal sanctions on the defendant; nevertheless, the decision raises debates regarding the fulfillment of the principles of justice and equality before the law for civilian victims.
Co-Authors A.C. Tabun Adrianus Djara Dima Adrya Gusmar Kapitan Agusthinus Banik Agustina Putri Patricia Alberth Nixon Bria Andreas F. Ratoe Oedjoe Ariance Boboy Astiana Diana Delima Bida, Deni Novein Saputra Cardial L.O. Leo-Penu, Cardial L.O. Dance Mauboy, Yandrif Darius Antonius Kian Daud Dima Tallo Debi F. Ng. Fallo Debi F. Ng. Fallo Deddy R. Ch. Manafe Detji K. E. R. Nuban Dhesy Arisandielis Kase Djaclyn Herlince Kitu Rihi Fatma Ayu Jati Putri Ferdinan L. Bagaihing Fiani Arista Pinga Fortuna Umbu Laiya, Andraviani Franky Simamora Frisca Regina Ferreira Lay Geraldus Damansus Boro Sale Getri Kefi Gideon Tasi Heryanto Amalo Hironimus Buyanaya Jauhari Effendi Jauhari Effendi Karolus K. Medan Karolus Kopong Medan Khusnul Khusy Pit’ay Kopong Medan, Karolus Krisna Boboy, Rini L. Pekuwali, Umbu Mandala, Mersy Junedy Manuain, Orpa Ganefo Manubulu, Cristin Octavia Maria Elviana Lelangwayan Maria Fatima More Maria Odilia Kolo Maria Oktaviani Kartika Tua Maria Oktaviani Padur Maria Suryani Sutantri Kura Markus Yohanis Hage Marselinus Mardi Anto Masu, Reny Rebeka Ndaumanu, Novaldy I Obe, Elfrida Tipe Orpa G. Manuain Orpa G. Manuain Orpa G.Manuain Orpa Ganefo Manuain Orpa Ganefo Manuain Orpa Juliana Nubatonis Paulus, Gery Mario Paulus, Gery Mario Pello, Jimmy Petrus Leo, Rudepel Petrus, Marfilson Putri, Fatma Ayu Jati Raden Haris Prastyo Rosalind Angel Fanggi Rudepel Petrus Leo Rudepel Petrus Leo Rudepel Petrus Leo Saryono Yohanes Simplexius Asa Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Sulistyanta Susana Amos Pah Theresia Edelweis Putri Nurak Thomas Lapenangga Tri Nugraheni Uran, Maria Novita Nigun Verena Yolanda Fernandes Vinni Denivita Tome Vinsensius Rau Wilhelmus, Bhisa Vitus Yayu Mederlin Nenotek Yohana Yosiana Djara Dima