Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Legal Certainty of Songwriters' Economic Rights in Music Royalty Management in Indonesia Anggraeni, Happy Yulia; Tobing, Rismanto L.; Iskandar, Dedi
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Research Horizon - June 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.3.2025.659

Abstract

An urgent legal issue emerges from the normative disharmony between Article 9(2) and Article 23(5) of Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Article 9(2) requires creators to give written permission for the use of their works, implying a direct licensing mechanism, while Article 23(5) mandates the use of a collective management system through the National Collective Management Organization. This inconsistency has led to legal uncertainty, especially in the context of public performance royalties, and has disadvantaged songwriters due to a lack of transparency in royalty calculations. This study aims to examine the legal certainty of public performance licensing in Indonesia's music royalty management system by analyzing the implementation of Article 23(5) of Law No. 28 of 2014 and Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021. This study, using a normative juridical method, finds that despite Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021 establishing SILM and LMKN, licensing conflicts persist. It recommends harmonizing the regulation by clearly recognizing direct licensing under Article 9(2) while protecting moral rights under Article 5 of Law No. 28 of 2014.
ANALISIS YURIDIS SENGKETA NIKEL ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN UNI EROPA DI WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO) DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE (GATT) Ani Suryani; Happy Yulia Anggraeni; Hendri Darma Putra
Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/iqtishaduna.v6i4.58244

Abstract

Abstrak Indonesia, menerapkan pelarangan ekspor bijih nikel mentah sejak Januari 2020 sebagai bagian dari kebijakan hilirisasi. Kebijakan ini, didukung oleh UU Minerba dan Permen ESDM, memicu sengketa dengan Uni Eropa di WTO karena dianggap melanggar prinsip perdagangan internasional dalam GATT. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis yuridis mengenai sengketa nikel antara Indonesia dengan Uni Eropa di WTO dan untuk mengetahui keabsahan legalitas Indonesia ketika mengirim Nikel tetapi melanggar perjanjian WTO. Penelitian yang digunakan penulis ialah pendekatan penelitian yuridis normatif, penulis menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data sumber data sekunder melalui library research. Hasil dari penelitian diperoleh penulis ialah Sengketa nikel Indonesia dan Uni Eropa di WTO melanggar Pasal XI:1 GATT 1994 karena termasuk pembatasan kuantitatif, dan menolak pembelaan Indonesia berdasarkan Pasal XI:2(a) dan XX(d) GATT. Kebijakan pelarangan ekspor bijih nikel Indonesia mencerminkan dualisme keabsahan hukum, di mana secara nasional kebijakan ini sah sedangkan pada level internasional, kebijakan tersebut dinilai melanggar Pasal XI.1 GATT. Pemerintah Indonesia disarankan untuk mengedepankan diplomasi bilateral dan multilateral guna mencari solusi damai atas sengketa nikel dengan Uni Eropa, sembari menunggu kepastian hasil banding di WTO. Selain itu, pemerintah perlu menentukan sikap tegas antara melanjutkan perjuangan di forum banding WTO atau menyesuaikan regulasi ekspor nikel dengan ketentuan sesuai WTO.. Kata Kunci: GATT; Indonesia; Nikel; Uni Eropa; WTO. Abstract Indonesia has implemented a ban on the export of raw nickel ore since January 2020 as part of its downstream policy strategy. This policy, supported by the Mineral and Coal Law (UU Minerba) and regulations from the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (Permen ESDM), has led to a dispute with the European Union at the World Trade Organization (WTO). The EU argues that the ban violates international trade principles under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). This study aims to examine and analyze the legal aspects of the nickel dispute between Indonesia and the EU at the WTO, and to assess the legality of Indonesia’s actions despite potential violations of WTO agreements. The research uses a normative juridical approach, employing secondary data collection through library research. Findings reveal that the dispute violates Article XI:1 of GATT 1994, as it constitutes a quantitative restriction. The WTO panel rejected Indonesia’s defense under Articles XI:2(a) and XX(d) of GATT. While the export ban is legally valid under national law, it contradicts international obligations. It is recommended that Indonesia pursue bilateral and multilateral diplomacy to resolve the dispute peacefully while awaiting the WTO appeal outcome, and consider whether to continue the appeal or adjust export regulations to comply with WTO rules. Keywords: European Union; GATT; Indonesia; Nickel; WTO.
Nusantara Capital City Development: From Agrarian Conflict Potential to Legal Protection of Indigenous Peoples Putra, Naufal Dekananda Anggara; Anggraeni, Happy Yulia; Ridwan, Ahmad M.; Jamaludin, Ahmad
Reformasi Hukum Vol 29 No 1 (2025): April Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46257/jrh.v29i1.1067

Abstract

Developing Indonesia’s new capital city, Nusantara (IKN) in East Kalimantan, has the potential to significantly impact indigenous communities, particularly in agrarian conflicts arising from expanding development land that intersects with indigenous territories. This study aims to analyze the potential agrarian conflicts and adequate legal protections for indigenous peoples in addressing these impacts. The method is normative juridical, with data collected through library research on relevant regulations, literature, and studies. The findings show that agrarian conflicts resulting from the IKN development may arise due to the mismatch between the legal recognition of Indigenous land rights and the allocation of development land that does not actively involve Indigenous communities. Legal protection for indigenous peoples can be achieved by recognizing land rights, strengthening agrarian regulations that are more responsive to indigenous rights, and implementing the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) principle in the planning and management of IKN development. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of recognizing indigenous land rights and involving them in every stage of development to prevent agrarian conflicts and create more equitable development policies.
HAK PENGELOLAAN SUMBER DAYA AIR OLEH NEGARA PALESTINA MELALUI PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL ANTARA PALESTINA, ISRAEL DAN YORDANIA DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PERJANJIAN OSLO Risti Dea Nuraeni; Happy Yulia Anggraeni; Rizkita Kurniasari
El-Iqthisadi Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Juni
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/el-iqthisady.v7i1.59250

Abstract

Abstrak Konflik sumber daya air antara Palestina dan Israel telah berlangsung selama beberapa dekade dan menjadi perhatian masyarakat internasional. Ini menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang hak pengelolaan air bagi negara Palestina di bawah kerangka hukum internasional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami bagaimana pengaturan hak atas sumber daya air bagi Palestina dalam Perjanjian Oslo dan mengetahui pelaksanaan perjanjian air antara Palestina, Israel, dan Yordania. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif untuk menganalisis masalah hukum berdasarkan prinsip dan standar hukum positif dengan data sekunder melalui studi kepustakaan. Perjanjian Oslo memberikan pengakuan terbatas terhadap hak air Palestina, namun implementasinya terhambat oleh kontrol dominan Israel melalui Joint Water Committee yang memberikan hak veto kepada Israel. Kata Kunci :  Israel; Hak pengelolaan air; Palestina; Perjanjian Oslo; Yordania.   Abstract The water resources conflict between Palestine and Israel has been ongoing for decades and is of concern to the international community. It raises the question of water management rights for the Palestinian state under the international legal framework. This research aims to understand how the regulation of the right to water resources for Palestine in the Oslo Accords and to find out the implementation of the water agreement between Palestine, Israel and Jordan. This research uses a normative juridical approach to analyze legal issues based on positive legal principles and standards with secondary data through literature studies. The Oslo Agreement provides limited recognition of Palestinian water rights, but its implementation is hampered by Israel's dominant control through the Joint Water Committee which gives veto rights to Israel. Keywords: Israel; Water management rights; Palestine; Oslo Accords; Jordan.
AKIBAT HUKUM PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN HARTA KEKAYAAN BERDASARKAN HUKUM PERDATA INTERNASIONAL Aprilianti, Ajeng; Putri, Revanissa Dwi Hardianti; Kania, Meisya Adinda Putri; Rahma, Santi; S.T., S.H., M.KN., M.H., Dr. Happy Yulia Anggraeni,
PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 13 No 1 (2025): PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kapuas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51826/perahu.v13i1.1463

Abstract

Mixed marriages between Indonesian citizens (WNI) and foreign citizens (WNA) in Indonesia are an increasing phenomenon due to globalization. However, these marriages present complex legal challenges, especially in the regulation of property and children's citizenship status. Based on Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, as well as other regulations such as the Basic Agrarian Law and Law Number 12 Year 2006 on Citizenship, various issues arise due to differences in legal principles between different jurisdictions. Property in mixed marriages, including joint property, inherited property, and inheritance, is often a source of legal conflict, especially when it involves immovable assets such as land.  On the other hand, the citizenship status of children from mixed marriages is regulated through temporary dual citizenship, which must be decided when the child reaches the age of 18. Although regulations have been updated to provide better legal protection, legal differences between countries still create potential disputes. Therefore, this research highlights the importance of prenuptial agreements, legal consultations, and alignment of national and international legal policies to address issues in mixed marriages fairly and effectively.
Legal Standing on Health Workers in the Field of Emergencies and Disasters Ginanjar, Anggi; Suryana, Ucup; Anggraeni, Happy Yulia
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Research Horizon - August 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Health workers play a critical role in responding to medical emergencies and disasters. The legal responsibilities and obligations of health workers in these situations are often highlighted, both in terms of legal protection for health workers and their responsibility to save lives. This article will examine the legal standing of health workers in emergency and disaster scenarios. It will also examine the legal protection afforded to health workers in carrying out their duties, as well as the legal difficulties and issues they face in Indonesia. This research used normative legal research techniques and it used references from various national and international legal sources, as well as case studies, will be used for comparison. The legal standing of health workers in Indonesia, especially during emergencies and disasters, requires clearer and stricter rules to protect medical personnel on duty. Existing rules and regulations provide a legal framework, but in practice, health workers often face legal obstacles, especially in emergency situations and major disasters.  
Comparative Analysis of Doxing Regulations and Privacy Protection in Indonesia and Global Perspectives Rizky, Muhamad; Hamdani, Fauzie Muhammad; Anggraeni, Happy Yulia
Research Horizon Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Research Horizon - August 2025
Publisher : LifeSciFi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54518/rh.5.4.2025.728

Abstract

Doxing, the unauthorized disclosure of an individual’s personal information, poses a significant threat to the right to privacy guaranteed by law in many countries. This phenomenon is increasing with the development of technology and the use of digital media. This study aims to explore the legal regulations governing doxing in Indonesia and compare them with the legal frameworks in several other countries, such as the United States, the European Union, and Australia. The method used is a normative juridical approach with a comparative analysis based on relevant legislation, legal doctrine, and case studies. The results show that in Indonesia, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and the Draft Law on Personal Data Protection serve as the primary legal basis for personal data protection. However, these two instruments do not explicitly regulate doxing as a specific crime, creating a legal loophole that makes it difficult to prosecute perpetrators. Meanwhile, the European Union has the General Data Protection Regulation, which provides comprehensive protection and severe sanctions for privacy violations. This study recommends regulatory updates that include an explicit definition of doxing, strengthened law enforcement mechanisms, and increased public digital literacy to mitigate the risk of privacy violations.
Analisis Efektifitas Non Litigasi penyelesaian Sengketa Pembagian Harta Gono Gini Azis, Abdul; Hajri , Paris; Abidin, Zaenal; Anggraeni, Happy Yulia
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.6028

Abstract

Sengketa penyelesaian harta gono-gini di luar pengadilan (non-litigasi) semakin banyak dipilih oleh masyarakat karena dinilai lebih cepat, hemat biaya, dan menjaga privasi. Namun efektivitas jalur ini belum sepenuhnya menjamin keadilan, terutama jika tidak ada perjanjian pra-nikah yang secara tegas mengatur kepemilikan aset. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa harta gono-gini melalui jalur non-litigasi dalam perspektif hukum, khususnya dalam situasi ketiadaan perjanjian pra-nikah. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan pendekatan pada dan studi kasus, salah satunya adalah fenomena selebgram Dilan Janiyar yang menyelesaikan harta gono-gini tanpa melalui pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun non-litigasi memiliki keunggulan praktis, tetapi belum cukup kuat dari sisi perlindungan hukum jika tidak disertai mediator profesional dan kesepakatan yang adil. Selain itu, tidak adanya kekuatan hukum yang mengikat juga menjadi kendala. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan dukungan hukum yang lebih jelas dan peningkatan kesadaran masyarakat terhadap pentingnya perjanjian pra-nikah.  
Enigma Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Terhadap Tindakan Misappropriation Oleh Pihak Asing Dalam Regulasi Internasional Anggraeni, Happy Yulia; Listiawati, Erna
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i1.6710

Abstract

This study aims to provide confirmation of the accommodation of disclosure which is still questionable in the cluster of international regulations, this is done in order to obtain the same interpretation of regulations in international practice for the protection of Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge (SDGPT), which is also an implication of the existing system in Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents has not been able to protect it optimally. By using a normative juridical method with qualitative analysis, this study justifies the results that have been in previous studies that the beneficial sharing mechanism has become the government's effort to protect SDGPT from acts of misappropriation, but this research found a novelty, namely by supporting the affirmation and perfecting of these matters which need to be acknowledged are not sufficient to meet the needs of international practice, because it was found that there are still Indonesian State patents taken without beneficialy sharing due to the plurality of interpretations and accommodations of the Patent Law which are not in accordance with international practice requirements. Thus, the accommodation of disclosure or the formulation of disclosure requirements deserves a position in the regulation of the Patent Law in Indonesia for steps to encourage the sound of the same interpretation in the echoes of international practices and regulations, so that the benefits can be maintained and felt by people of origin.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan penegasan terhadap akomodasi pengungkapan yang masih menyoal dalam rumpun regulasi internasional, hal ini dilakukan guna mendapatkan penafsiran regulasi yang sama dalam praktik internasional atas perlindungan Sumber Daya Genetik dan Pengetahuan Tradisional (SDGPT), yang juga merupakan implikasi dari sistem yang ada dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten belum dapat melindungi secara maksimal. Keterbatasan pemahaman masyarakat tradisional di negara berkembang yang seringkali dibenturkan dengan orientasi komersil yang dimiliki oleh masyarakat di negara maju dalam pemanfaatan SDGPT dengan membuat paten. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan analisis kualititif, penelitian ini menjustifikasi hasil yang telah ada dalam penelitian-penelitian terdahulu bahwa mekanisme beneficialy sharing telah menjadi upaya pemerintah dalam melindungi SDGPT dari tindakan misappropriation, namun penelitian ini mendapati kebaruan yaitu dengan menyokong penegasan dan menyempurnakan hal tersebut yang perlu diakui tidak cukup untuk memenuhi kebutuhan praktik internasional, karena ditemukan hasil bahwa masih terdapat paten Negara Indonesia yang diambil tanpa beneficialy sharing karena kemajemukan penafsiran dan akomodasi UU Paten yang tidak sesuai dengan kebutuhan praktik secara internasional. Maka, akomodasi pengungkapan atau rumusan disclosure requirements layak mendapatkan posisi dalam regulasi UU Paten di Indonesia untuk langkah mendorong suara penafsiran yang sama dalam gaungan praktik dan regulasi internasional, sehingga manfaat dapat tetap terjaga dan dirasakan oleh masyarakat asal.    
Peran Arbitrase Nasional dan Internasional dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Yulistiawati, Novitri; Bomba, Ignasius Yulianus Jagkson; Hutagaol, Roy Richardo; Satyaningrum, Diah; Anggraeni, Happy Yulia
Action Research Literate Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): Action Research Literate
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Berkembang pesatnya perekonomian di era global seiring dengan terbukanya perdagangan bebas baik Nasional maupun International membuka celah perselisihan ataupun sengketa dalam bisnis. Penyelesaian sengketa melalui Pengadilan dianggap menghabiskan waktu dan tenaga serta merenggangkan hubungan antar pihak yang bersengketa setelah adanya ketetapan putusan. Arbiterase sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa diluar pengadilan membuka kesempatan untuk penyelesaian sengketa bisnis dengan lebih cepat, mudah, privat dan tentunya memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sama dengan putusan Pengadilan. Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis dengan arbitrase hanya bisa dilakukan bila sudah tertuang dalam perjanjian bisnis yang telah disepakati sebelumnya serta mengikuti aturan yang ditetapkan. Dalam penyelesaian sengketa dengan arbitrase subjek hukum tidak hanya dalam lingkup nasional melainkan juga Internasional. Pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa malalui jalur Arbitrase secara hukum nasional telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan secara Hukum Internasional diatur UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules 1976 serta UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial 1985. Setelah didapatkan putusan melalui lembaga abitrase yang ditunjuk, salinan otentik putusan arbitrase diserahkan dan didaftarkan pada Pengadilan Negeri guna mendapatkan kekuatan dan kepastian hukum.
Co-Authors Abdul Azis AHMAD JAMALUDIN Akbar, Alvian Alpin Iskandar Amalia, Tya Ananda Sujati Ani Suryani Annisa Nurfitriyah Annisatul Lutfiyah Sugiarto Aprilianti, Ajeng Arini, Yeni Atmaja, Deni Auriana Dewi, Anisya Bomba, Ignasius Yulianus Jagkson Budi Santosa Budi Santosa Cahya Maulana Ciptawan STP, Beni Damayanti, Tamara Dawami, Siti Fauziah Dede Hermawan Dede Hermawan Dedi Iskandar Desmika, Nurlita Fachrurahman, Indra Fiqhan Yasfi Mahasy Fiter, Joni Fitri Jihad Aminah Fitri Wahyuni Fitri Wahyuni Fitri, Rani Lailatul Gantina, Mochamad Ilham Ginanjar, Anggi Gunawan Gunawan Gunawan Gunawan Hajri , Paris Hamdan, Angkasa Ramatuan Hamdani, Fauzie Muhammad Harahap, Hely Ramadhini Hatima, Husnul Hendra, Maijoni Hendri Darma Putra Hutagaol, Roy Richardo Ilham Kurniawan Abdullah Ilham Tri Putra Mahpudin Indra Fachrurahman Iskandar, Alpin Jeremy, Danny Aguswahyudy Johan, Willy Joni Yusufa Juliantary, Sella Romika Kania, Meisya Adinda Putri L, Ilma Nurul Ligar Ayu Pramesty Listiawati, Erna Liza Aulia Putri Lorentzon, Elmend Lukman, Maman Mahasy, Fiqhan Yasfi Mahpud, Inal Mahpudin, Ilham Tri Putra Maman Lukman Mardiani, Reni Marpaung, Yohan Edward Muhamad Reza Muhammad Hasrul Naturrohmah, Ikna Ia Nugroho, Enggar Adi Nurajijah, Raihana Nurul Amalia Nurul Amalia Nurvidyaning, Setyana Eka Parulian, Alfred Tigor Parulian, Indra Pipit Fitriyani Pradita Wuri Safitri Pramesty, Ligar Ayu Praniko Imam Sagita Prayuti, Yuyut Putra, Mochamad Andika Wibawa Putra, Naufal Dekananda Anggara Putri, Revanissa Dwi Hardianti Ragylia, R Tiara Rahma, Santi Rahmawesih, Rahmawesih Rangga, Dika Egi Ratna Juwita Regina Widyadana Rendy Rahmawan Ridwan, Ahmad M. Risdiana, Yendi Risti Dea Nuraeni Rizkita Kurnia Sari Rizkita Kurniasari Rizky, Muhamad Rony Musthafa Bisry Rosmawia Rosmawia Rustandi, Dedi SABAR Sadroi, Ado Safitri, Pradita Wuri Sagita, Praniko Imam Salma Annisa Luthfiyyah Sanjaya, Kadek Edy Januar Sari, Novi Eka Sariyat Muliadin Satrio, Andri Putro Satyaningrum, Diah Sehafudin, Sultan Septiani, Tya Sheilla Priyayi Yantini Sugiarto, Annisatul Lutfiyah Sujana, I Kadek Eka Sujati, Ananda Sukandi, Diman Suryana, Ucup Syafa, Hilda Ainis Syahruddin Syahruddin Takaryanto, Davin Tobing, Rismanto L. Wahyu Utami, Febriyanti Widya Widya, Widya Widyansyah, Aliffiani Yuanita Yulistiawati, Novitri Yusmana, Fane Virginia Yusufa, Joni Zaenal Abidin