Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.963
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam Amwaluna Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Journal La Sociale International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research Jurnal Impresi Indonesia JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Sewagati West Science Law and Human Rights Jurnal Hukum Islam Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Unifikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum PESHUM
Neni Sri Imaniyati
Universitas Islam Bandung
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 48 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 48 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Legal Certainty of Patients’ Right to Autonomy Protection in High-Risk Health Services Anggra Yudha Ramadianto; Neni Sri Imaniyati
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 2 No. 03 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v2i03.1148

Abstract

The relationship between medical personnel and patients in health services should be viewed as a legal relationship between humans who have equal rights. There are two basic human rights in health services, the right to autonomy and the right to information. The results of the study indicate that the protection of patients' autonomy rights is one of the principles in biomedical ethics used as the moral basis for the provision of health services. The form of protection of patients' autonomy rights in health services is realized through regulations related to Informed Consent in Law Number 17 of 2023 Concerning Health and Minister of Health Regulation Number 290 of 2008 Concerning Consent to Medical Actions. Meanwhile, regulations related to the protection of patients' autonomy rights for high-risk health care actions have not met legal certainty because the health care actions are not classified as high-risk.
Construction Of Musyârakah Muntahiyyah Bi Al-Tamlȋk Contract In Sharia Principles-Based DSN-MUI Fatwa Agus Putra, Panji Adam; Imaniyati, Neni Sri; Nurhasanah, Neneng; Sundari, Rini Irianti
AMWALUNA (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah) Vol 6, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Univeristas Islam Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (64.343 KB) | DOI: 10.29313/amwaluna.v6i1.8596

Abstract

The legitimacy and pros and cons of multi-contract and wa’ad mulzim-based fatwa products receive serious attention from contemporary fiqh scholars. One of the multi-contract and wa’ad mulzim-based fatwas issued by National Sharia Council-Indonesian Ulema Council (DSN-MUI) is fatwa Number 133 Year 2019 concerning Musyârakah Muntahiyyah bi al-Tamlȋk. This consists of a series of several contracts and contains the provisions of wa’ad mulzim. The purpose of the study was to examine the construction of Musyârakah Muntahiyyah bi al-Tamlȋk contract and explore sharia principles-based Musyârakah Muntahiyyah bi al-Tamlȋk contract. The method of this study was qualitative research using a normative juridical approach, and its data collection technique was library research. The result revealed that the construction of Musyârakah Muntahiyyah bi al-Tamlȋk contract in the fatwa is the allowed multi-contract, considering that the prohibition of multi-contract has legal reasons or legislature ratio. The wa’ad mulzim in the fatwa is a form of implementing the principle of benefit and providing the value of legal certainty in conducting a transaction. Thus, the fatwa of DSN-MUI regarding Musyârakah Muntahiyyah bi al-Tamlȋk is not out of sharia principles. The Implication of This Research That Ijtihad Products in the Field of Sharia Economic Law in the Form of Fatwas Can Be Used as Guidelines in Encouraging Product Innovation of Islamic Financial Institutions.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pencipta Ilustrasi Komik Digital yang Diunggah Kembali Tanpa Izin Melalui Aplikasi Tiktok Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Fatma Az-zahra; Neni Sri Imaniyati; Muhammad Ilman Abidin
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9827

Abstract

AbstractThe ease of accessing things via the internet is often misused by irresponsible people for personal gain. Such as the phenomenon of re-uploading digital comic illustration works through the TikTok application without the permission of the relevant parties which causes losses to the creator. This study aims to determine the legal protection for creators of digital comic illustrations that are uploaded again without permission through the TikTok application based on Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and to understand the legal remedies that can be taken by creators in the event that their digital comic illustration works are uploaded again without permission through the TikTok application based on Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. This research uses a normative juridical approach method with descriptive analysis research specifications. The research data was collected by literature/literature study using secondary data and the data analysis used was qualitative juridical. The result of this research is that preventive legal protection is given automatically to the creator of digital comic illustrations after his work is declared and published in accordance with Article 1 Paragraph (1) UUHC. Repressive legal protection is regulated in Article 54 of the UUHC in the form of final penalties such as fines, imprisonment, and additional penalties imposed after a dispute or violation occurs. Legal remedies taken in the event of a dispute are based on Article 95 UUHC through the Commercial Court litigation route and non-litigation route through alternative dispute resolution and arbitration institutions. AbstrakKemudahan mengakses sesuatu melalui internet sering kali disalahgunakan oleh orang-orang yang tidak bertanggungjawab demi keuntungan pribadi. Seperti fenomena pengunggahan kembali karya ilustrasi komik digital melalui aplikasi TikTok tanpa izin pihak terkait yang menimbulkan kerugian bagi pencipta. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum perlindungan hukum bagi pencipta ilustrasi komik digital yang diunggah kembali tanpa izin melalui aplikasi TikTok berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta dan untuk mengetahui upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pencipta dalam hal hasil karya ilustrasi komik digitalnya diunggah kembali tanpa izin melalui aplikasi TikTok berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian bersifat deskriptif analisis. Data penelitian dikumpulkan secara studi kepustakaan/literatur dengan menggunakan data sekunder dan analisis data yang digunakan yaitu yuridis kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa perlindungan hukum secara preventif diberikan secara otomatis kepada pencipta ilustrasi komik digital setelah hasil karyanya dideklarasikan dan dipublikasikan sesuai dengan Pasal 1 Ayat (1) UUHC. Perlindungan hukum secara represif diatur dalam Pasal 54 UUHC yang berupa hukuman akhir seperti denda, penjara, dan hukuman tambahan yang dijatuhkan setelah perselisihan atau pelanggaran terjadi. Upaya hukum yang dilakukan apabila terjadi sengketa yaitu berdasarkan Pasal 95 UUHC melalui jalur litigasi Pengadilan Niaga serta jalur non-litigasi melalui alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dan lembaga arbitrase.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Komik Digital, TikTok
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemilik Merek Stussy atas Peniruan Merek oleh Pelaku Usaha berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis Rizal Wiranata; Neni Sri Imaniyati
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9830

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Perkembangan kegiatan perdagangan barang dan jasa di Indonesia dalam beberapa tahun terakhir ini mengalami peningkatan yang signifikan. Perkembangan tersebut memberi kesempatan kepada pelaku usaha menggunakan reputasi dari merek yang sudah terkenal guna mendapatkan keuntungan dengan cara memperdagangkan barang tiruan dengan tujuan keuntungan pribadi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami tentang pengaturan perlindungan merek dari pelanggaran merek dalam bentuk peniruan merek dan untuk memahami tentang bentuk upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pemilik merek terdaftar dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian bersifat deskriptif analisis. Data penelitian ini dikumpulkan secara studi kepustakaan/literatur dengan menggunakan data sekunder dan analisis data yang digunakan yaitu yuridis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa perlindungan preventif hak atas merek melalui mekanisme pengajuan permohonan pendaftaran, penolakan merek, dan pencabutan merek. Perlindungan hukum represif diberikan apabila telah terjadi pelanggaran hak atas Merek melalui proses penegakan hukum melalui gugatan perdata berupa ganti rugi dan/atau penghentian semua perbuatan yang berkaitan dengan penggunaan Merek tersebut atau gugatan pidana kepada Pengadilan Niaga. ABSTRACT: The development of trade in goods and services in Indonesia in recent years has increased significantly. This development provides an opportunity for business actors to use the reputation of a well-known trademark to gain profits by trading counterfeit goods with the aim of personal gain. This study aims to understand the regulation of trademark protection from trademark infringement in the form of trademark imitation and to understand the form of legal remedies that can be taken by registered trademark owners in connection with Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. This research uses a normative juridical approach method with descriptive analysis research specifications. This research data is collected by literature study using secondary data and data analysis used is qualitative juridical. The result of this research is that the preventive protection of trademark rights through the mechanism of filing an application for registration, refusal of trademark, and revocation of trademark. Repressive legal protection is provided if there has been an infringement of rights to the Trademark through the process of law enforcement through a civil lawsuit in the form of compensation and / or cessation of all acts related to the use of the Trademark or criminal lawsuit to the Commercial Court.
Keabsahan Jual Beli Non-Fungible Token (Nft) pada Metaverse yang Dimiliki oleh Ransverse Ditinjau dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Muhammad Azis Ramdhani Sobari Afiatin; Neni Sri Imaniyati; Diana Wiyanti
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9835

Abstract

ABSTRACT. The metaverse is a simulated digital environment that combines augmented reality, virtual reality, block chain, and social media to create user interaction areas that mimic the real world. It uses the block chain to ensure the uniqueness of digital goods, and non-fungible tokens (NFT) are unique and non-duplicable cryptographic tokens on the blockchain. NFT represent collectible digital assets with the same value as physical assets. However, Indonesian law does not provide specific rules for the metaverse and NFT. This research aims to describe the validity of buying and selling NFT on the metaverse, using a statutory approach method, conceptual approach method, normative juridical data collection type, analytical descriptive research specifications, and qualitative data analysis techniques. Ransverse, a virtual land buying and selling platform, does not meet the requirements of the "a lawful cause" clause in Indonesian law, as it does not have certification related to Trading Through Electronic Systems (PSME). Indonesian law mandates the use of rupiah as a means of payment for all transactions, including electronic and physical ones. Ransverse transactions are invalid and illegal, violating the principle of legal certainty. ABSTRAK. Metaverse adalah lingkungan digital simulasi yang menggabungkan augmented reality, virtual reality, blockchain, dan media sosial untuk menciptakan area interaksi pengguna yang meniru dunia nyata. Metaverse menggunakan blockchain untuk memastikan keunikan barang digital, dan non-fungible token (NFT) adalah token kriptografi yang unik dan tidak dapat digandakan pada blockchain. NFT mewakili aset digital yang dapat ditagih dengan nilai yang sama dengan aset fisik. Namun, hukum di Indonesia tidak memberikan aturan khusus untuk metaverse dan NFT. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keabsahan jual beli NFT pada metaverse, dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, metode pendekatan konseptual, tipe pengumpulan data yuridis normatif, spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis, dan teknik analisis data kualitatif. Ransverse, sebuah platform jual beli tanah virtual, tidak memenuhi syarat klausul "suatu sebab yang halal" dalam hukum Indonesia, karena tidak memiliki sertifikasi terkait Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik (PSME). Hukum Indonesia mengamanatkan penggunaan mata uang rupiah sebagai alat pembayaran untuk semua transaksi, termasuk transaksi elektronik dan fisik. Transaksi yang dilakukan oleh Ransverse tidak sah dan ilegal, melanggar asas kepastian hukum.
Penjualan Obat Sirup yang Mengandung Etilen Glikol (Eg) dan Dietilen Glikol (Deg) yang Merugikan Konsumen Ditinjau dari Undang – Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Pingkan Tirai Meyzha Sastrawinata; Neni Sri Imaniyati; Muhammad Ilman Abidin
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9841

Abstract

ABSTRAK. Dunia usaha dengan memanfaatkan teknologi menghasilkan beraneka barang dan / atau jasa termasuk obat – obatan. Adanya peraturan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen masih banyak kerugian yang terjadi pada konsumen. Hal ini sehubungan dengan ditemukannya kasus penjualan obat sirup yang mengandung Etilen Glikol dan Dietilen Glikol yang menimbulkan kerugian bagi konsumen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum dan upaya hukum bagi konsumen yang mengalami kerugian akibat kedua bahan tersebut ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Penelitian menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, spesifikasi penelitian bersifat deskriptif analisis. Data penelitian secara studi kepustakaan data sekunder dan analisis data yuridis kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini perlindungan hukum secara internal antara pelaku usaha dan konsumen sangat lemah, dalam perjanjian jual beli secara lisan konsumen hanya membeli produk dari distributor pelaku usaha seperti pada umumnya yang tidak disebutkan hak, kewajiban, tanggung jawab jika terjadi kerugian seperti dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Perlindungan hukum secara eksternal yaitu kebijakan untuk melindungi pihak yang lemah yaitu konsumen pengguna obat sirup. Adapun kebijakan tersebut adalah Undang – Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Perlindungan Konsumen, Undang – Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kesehatan, panduan Farmakope Indonesia serta adanya Lembaga BPOM. Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan yang terdapat dua cara yaitu secara litigasi dan secara kooperatif dengan cara non litigasi seperti negosiasi dan konsiliasi. Kedua cara penyelesaian sengketa tersebut dijelaskan dalam Pasal 45 ayat (2) Undang – Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. ABSTRACT. The business world, by utilizing technology, produces various goods and/or services including medicines. The existence of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection still causes many losses to consumers. This is in connection with the discovery of cases of sales of syrup drugs containing Ethylene Glycol and Diethylene Glycol which caused losses to consumers. This research aims to determine legal protection and legal remedies for consumers who experience losses due to these two substances in terms of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The research uses a normative juridical approach, research specifications are descriptive analysis. Research data consists of secondary data literature study and qualitative juridical data analysis. The results of this research are that internal legal protection between business actors and consumers is very weak, in verbal sales and purchase agreements consumers only buy products from distributors of business actors, as in general there is no mention of rights, obligations or responsibilities in the event of a loss as in the Law. Consumer protection. External legal protection is a policy to protect the weak, namely consumers who use syrup drugs. These policies are Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, Indonesian Pharmacopoeia guidelines and the existence of the BPOM Institute. There are two legal remedies that can be taken, namely by litigation and cooperatively by non-litigation methods such as negotiation and conciliation. These two methods of resolving disputes are explained in Article 45 paragraph (2) of the Consumer Protection Law.
Perlindungan Hukum Konten Kreator pada Platform Youtube terhadap Pengunggahan Ulang Video di Instagram Tanpa Izin Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Mochamad Arsya Nugraha; Neni Sri Imaniyati; Muhammad Ilman Abidin
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i1.9870

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Every thought of a person can be developed into a Work of Creation, which is then channeled through digital platforms by the creator. The ease of the public in accessing and utilizing the internet does not rule out the possibility of copyright infringement. With this, this study aims to identify legal protection for content creators on the Youtube platform against reuploading videos on Instagram without permission, reviewed by Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and understand the legal consequences arising from unauthorized reuploads in the perspective of Copyright Law. This research uses a normative juridical approach method with research specifications that are descriptive analysis. Data collection in this study through literature study (libarary reasearch). The result of this research is a form of legal protection for content creators, namely Preventive Legal Protection, through protection from the government and authorized institutions in preventive measures before violations occur and Repressive Legal Protection, settlement of violations through lawsuits to the court. As a result of Copyright Infringement, the creator can conduct a complaint, subpoena to mediation to the Commercial Court, after passing several processes the authorities will request compensation by taking all or part of the income from the income from the perpetrator to confiscate evidence but if this does not provide a deterrent effect for the perpetrator then the creator can withdraw this case into criminal law by imposing fines and criminal penalties prison. ABSTRAK. Setiap olah pikir seseorang dapat dikembangkan menjadi suatu Karya Cipta, yang kemudian disalurkan melalui platform digital oleh pencipta. Kemudahan terhadap masyarakat dalam mengakses dan memanfaatkan internet tidak menutup kemungkinan dapat terjadinya suatu pelanggaran Hak Cipta. Dengan hal tersebut penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi perlindungan hukum bagi konten kreator pada platform Youtube terhadap pengunggahan ulang video di Instagram tanpa izin ditinjau Undang – undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta serta memahami akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan dari pengunggahan ulang (reupload) tanpa izin dalam perspektif Undang – undang Hak Cipta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian bersifat deskriptif analisis. Pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini melalui studi kepustakaan (libarary reasearch). Hasil dari peneliatian ini adalah bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konten kreator yaitu Perlindungan Hukum Preventif, melalui pengayoman dari pemerintah dan lembaga berwenang dalam tindakan pencegahan sebelum terjadinya pelanggaran dan Perlindungan Hukum Represif, penyelesaian pelanggaran melalui gugatan kepengadilan. Akibat hukum dari Pelanggaran Hak Cipta, pencipta dapat melakukan delik aduan, somasi hingga mediasi ke Pengadilan Niaga, setelah melewati beberapa proses pihak berwenang akan melakukan permintaan ganti rugi dengan mengambil seluruh atau sebagian penghasilan dari pendapatan dari pelaku hingga melakukan penyitaan barang bukti tetapi jika hal tersebut tidak memberikan efek jera bagi pelaku maka pencipta dapat menarik kasus ini kedalam hukum pidana dengan pemberian sanksi denda dan hukuman pidana penjara.
Perlindungan Hukum kepada Musisi Lokal dari Tindakan Bootleg T-Shirt Ditinjau Melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis Juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta Andinie Zanatine; Neni Sri Imaniyati; Muhammad Ilman Abidin
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i2.15473

Abstract

Abstract. Musicians create works such as songs, often released in physical formats like vinyl records and cassette tapes, and increasingly use merchandise as a key connection with their fans. However, the rise of "bootleg t-shirts" has negatively impacted local musicians by infringing on their official merchandise. This research aims to explore the legal protections available to local musicians against bootleg t-shirts that unlawfully use their names, logos, portraits, and designs. It also seeks to identify the legal actions musicians can pursue under the Trademark and Geographical Indications Law (UU MIG) and the Copyright Law (UUHC). Using a normative juridical approach and descriptive-analytical research, data is collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that bootleg t-shirts using a musician's identity without permission constitute trademark counterfeiting under the UU MIG. Trademark rights are protected preventively through registration and can be defended repressively through civil lawsuits, criminal prosecution, and alternative dispute resolution. Additionally, unauthorized use of portraits and designs on bootleg t-shirts is classified as copyright infringement under the UUHC, with automatic copyright protection granted upon creation. Repressive measures for copyright infringement include civil lawsuits, criminal action, and alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation and arbitration. Abstrak. Musisi menciptakan karya seperti lagu, yang sering dirilis dalam format fisik seperti piringan hitam dan kaset, serta semakin sering menggunakan merchandise sebagai cara utama untuk terhubung dengan penggemar mereka. Namun, munculnya "kaos bootleg" telah berdampak negatif pada musisi lokal dengan melanggar produksi merchandise resmi mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi perlindungan hukum yang tersedia bagi musisi lokal terhadap kaos bootleg yang secara ilegal menggunakan nama, logo, potret, dan desain mereka. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mencari tindakan hukum yang dapat ditempuh oleh musisi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis (UU MIG) serta Undang-Undang Hak Cipta (UUHC). Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan penelitian deskriptif-analitis, data dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa kaos bootleg yang menggunakan identitas musisi tanpa izin termasuk dalam kategori pemalsuan merek menurut UU MIG. Hak merek dilindungi secara preventif melalui pendaftaran dan dapat dipertahankan secara represif melalui gugatan perdata, penuntutan pidana, dan penyelesaian sengketa alternatif. Selain itu, penggunaan potret dan desain secara tidak sah pada kaos bootleg dikategorikan sebagai pelanggaran hak cipta menurut UUHC, dengan perlindungan hak cipta yang diberikan secara otomatis saat karya tersebut diciptakan. Tindakan represif untuk pelanggaran hak cipta mencakup gugatan perdata, tindakan pidana, dan metode penyelesaian sengketa alternatif seperti mediasi dan arbitrase.
Aspek Hukum Pembayaran Royalti oleh Pemilik Kafe kepada Pencipta Musik Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengelolaan Royalti Lagu dan/atau Musik Fellisa Shafa Azzahra; Imaniyati, Neni Sri; Supriatna, Rimba
Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcsls.v4i2.15767

Abstract

Abstract. This research analyses the legal aspects related to royalty payments by café owners to creators for music performances, with a focus on the application of Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021 concerning the Management of Song and/or Music Royalties. The case study was conducted at Kohi Coffee Cafe in Bandung City. This research explores the legal protection for creators in the context of royalty payments and the responsibility of café owners in using unauthorised music. The findings show that many business owners have not fully understood and complied with royalty payment obligations, resulting in less than optimal copyright protection. In conclusion, further efforts are needed in socialisation and enforcement of relevant regulations to ensure better compliance in this sector. Abstrak. Penelitian ini menganalisis aspek hukum terkait pembayaran royalti oleh pemilik kafe kepada pencipta atas pertunjukan musik, dengan fokus pada penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengelolaan Royalti Lagu dan/atau Musik. Studi kasus dilakukan pada Kafe Kopi Kohi di Kota Bandung. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi perlindungan hukum bagi pencipta dalam konteks pembayaran royalti dan tanggung jawab pemilik kafe dalam menggunakan musik tanpa izin. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa banyak pemilik usaha belum sepenuhnya memahami dan mematuhi kewajiban pembayaran royalti, yang mengakibatkan perlindungan hak cipta belum maksimal. Kesimpulannya, diperlukan upaya lebih lanjut dalam sosialisasi dan penegakan regulasi terkait untuk memastikan kepatuhan yang lebih baik di sektor ini.
Murabahah Financing in Islamic Banks with Fiduciary Collateral Review from the Perspective of Legal Certainty and Utility Nugraha, Ivan; Imaniyati, Neni Sri; Putra, Panji Adam Agus
Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research Vol 5 No 1 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research (IJSSR)
Publisher : Future Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11594/ijssr.05.01.20

Abstract

One of the financing contracts offered by Islamic banks is the Murabahah financing contract. The Murabahah financing contract functions to increase the utility of money and capital, as well as the utility of goods. Article 127 of the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES) allows the seller to request the buyer to provide collateral in the Murabahah contract. Fatwa DSN-MUI No. 03/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 regarding Murabahah permits banks to request collateral from financed customers. This provision aims to ensure that customers are serious about making payments. Based on KHES and the fatwa, banks are allowed to request collateral from customers to protect or ensure that their rights are not violated. In practice, to ensure that customers comply with payments, banks request collateral from customers. This collateral can be movable or immovable property. Collateral in the form of immovable property is called fiduciary collateral. Fiduciary collateral is regulated in Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Collateral (UUJF). According to Article 5 paragraph 1 of UUJF, the imposition of collateral with fiduciary collateral "must" be made by a notarial deed. With this provision of UUJF, there is a difference. KHES and the fatwa of DSN MUI do not require financing contracts to be made using a notarial deed, while UUJF requires it to be made by a notarial deed. Islamic banks, some of which require financing contracts to be made by a notarial deed, while others do not. The adoption of UUJF in Islamic financing is considered inappropriate because it violates Sharia values. Objectives: (1) Explain the regulations used in Murabahah financing contracts in Islamic banks with fiduciary collateral according to the objectives of legal certainty and utility. (2) Describe the implementation of legal protection for customers using Murabahah financing contracts in Islamic banks with fiduciary collateral according to the objectives of legal certainty and utility. Research Method: Research approach: normative juridical. Research nature: descriptive analysis. Data types: secondary data and primary data. Sample determination technique: purposive sampling. Data collection technique: literature study and interviews. Data analysis technique: interpretation and legal analogy.
Co-Authors Adinda Mutiara I Ahmad Faizal Adha Alamsyah, Indra Fajar Andinie Zanatine Anggra Yudha Ramadianto Anwar Hafidz Amrullah Arham Bima Amantana Arif Firmansyah Asep Hakim Zakiran Cecep Kusmana Dede Kania Dhody Ananta Rivandi W Dian Prihanto Diana Wiyanti Dikha Anugrah Dini Dewi Heniarti Eman Suparman Erny Kencanawati Fatma Az-zahra Fellisa Shafa Azzahra Felly Faradina Ghinna Annissa Salma Hanifah Purnamasari Hery Widijanto Hesti Dwi Astuti Husni Syawali Idhofi Fahrizal Intan Nurrachmi Jejen Hendar Juarsa, Eka Kamilah, Anita M Faiz Mufidi Makmur Makmur Mentari Nuralya Fahirattunisa Mochamad Arsya Nugraha Mohamad Donie Aulia Muhamad Firhan Fauzan Muhammad Azis Ramdhani Sobari Afiatin Muhammad Ilman Abidin Muhammad Reza Subhan Mustofa Abdul Basir Mustofa Abdul Basir Nandang Sambas Nandiny Pratiwi Ariandi Neni Ruhaeni Nugraha, Ivan Nurrohman Syarif, Nurrohman Panji Adam Agus Putra Pingkan Tirai Meyzha Sastrawinata Rachmat Januardi Tanjung Ratna Januarita Reni Trimelawati Reza Sri Astriyana Riefa Adzany Rimba Supriatna Rimba Supriatna Rimsyahtono Rimsyahtono Rimsyahtono Riska Andina Putri Rizal Wiranata Sandi Gunawan Sadda Shendya Rizky Sephiany Sri Pujiastoeti Sri Ratna Suminar Sundari, Rini Irianti Syafa Puteri Ananda Tarisya Ramadhania Putri Trimelawati, Reni Viony Yulia Putri WAHYUDI WEISHAGUNA WEISHAGUNA Yaumi Sidik Ginanjar Yoghi Arief Susanto Zeis Zultaqawa Zulhendrawan