Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.545
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamika Hukum Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam JUSTISI Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum Mulawarman Law Review SYARIATI : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum Reformasi Hukum Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik SCLS Kertha Patrika Open Access DRIVERset
Putra, Rengga Kusuma
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Reformasi Hukum

 1 
Evaluation of the Implementation of Pancasila Values and Human Rights Enforcement in Indonesian Judicial System Through Constitutional Approach Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana; Putra, Rengga Kusuma
Reformasi Hukum Vol 28 No 3 (2024): December Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46257/jrh.v28i3.1082

Abstract

This study evaluates the application of Pancasila values and the enforcement of human rights in Indonesia's judicial system through a constitutional approach. Using normative legal research methods, the approach taken includes analysis of legislation, conceptual studies, as well as case studies of a number of relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The results show that the values of Pancasila, particularly the second and fifth precepts, play a fundamental role as the philosophical basis in the application and interpretation of human rights principles in Indonesia. The Constitutional Court has a strategic role in safeguarding the constitution while ensuring the enforcement of human rights through progressive legal interpretation. However, despite these positive steps, challenges such as inconsistencies in lower court decisions and mismatches between the rule of law and the needs of society remain. This research recommends strengthening Pancasila-based legal education, harmonizing legal policies, and increasing the capacity of judges in integrating human rights with social justice principles holistically. The findings confirm that the judicial system, with a strong constitutional approach, can be an effective tool in realizing social justice in accordance with the values of Pancasila and the constitution.
Beyond Impunity: Reconstructing Criminal Accountability for Torture by Law Enforcement Officials Suhendar, Suhendar; Permana, Virgiawan Cikal; Putra, Rengga Kusuma
Reformasi Hukum Vol 29 No 3 (2025): December Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46257/jrh.v29i3.1389

Abstract

Torture perpetrated by law enforcement officials continues to occur within Indonesia’s criminal justice system despite explicit constitutional prohibitions and binding international human rights commitments. This persistence indicates deficiencies in the framework of criminal accountability and contributes to entrenched patterns of impunity. This study examines the normative and structural obstacles to prosecuting torture and reconstructs a more effective model of criminal accountability. Employing a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes constitutional provisions, national legislation, and relevant doctrinal sources. The findings reveal that ambiguous regulatory formulations, the predominance of an individualistic paradigm in criminal law, the absence of a specific and autonomous offence of torture, and the lack of structural accountability mechanisms collectively weaken enforcement. Moreover, existing legal frameworks insufficiently address command responsibility and institutional dimensions of abuse, thereby reinforcing systemic impunity. The study concludes that criminal law reform should incorporate explicit recognition of torture as a distinct offence, expand accountability within hierarchical command structures, and strengthen independent oversight and victim protection mechanisms. Harmonization with international standards and the establishment of effective enforcement mechanisms are recommended to ensure consistent and transparent prosecution of torture cases.
Co-Authors Agustin, Yulia Ahmad Dafiqi, Zaki Amelia, Risky Ardani, Ni Ketut Budi Raharjo Christiana, Titi Dwiprigitaningtias, Indah Fahrizal, Fahrizal S.Siagian Firouzfar, Saied Hattori, Mariko Hermanto, Bagus I Gede Yusa Idris, Maulana Fahmi Ikawati, Linda Imalia, Tri Imaliya, Tri Ishwara , Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ivory, Jared Kapsah Karisma, Dian Khasanah, Dian Ratu Ayu Uswatun Kossay, Methodius Kriswandaru, Althea Serafim Mahmud Mulyadi Mardani, Retno Eko Miano, Muhammad Ryan Ramadhani Mochammad Imron Awalludin Nugroho, Aziz Widhi Nuroini, Indi Nurul Ihsan, Latif Permana, Virgiawan Cikal Prasetyo, Arif Hadi Putra, Panca Sarjana Ramadhan, Adi Suryo Ronald Jolly Pongantung Salwa, Athiyah Saragih, Geofani Milthree Saraya, Sitta Sari, Nunung Wulan Satriya Nugraha Sjuhudi, Ichsan Suhendar Suhendar, Suhendar Tarmudi, Tarmudi Tobing, Rudyanti Dorotea Widagdo, Gatot Subroto Widhiati , Greget Widhiati, Greget Yulianingsih, Sri