Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Tantangan Penegakan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan melalui Strategi Adaptasi dan Inovasi di Era Distrupsi Putra, Rengga Kusuma; Ikawati, Linda; Idris, Maulana Fahmi
Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2024): SYARIATI : Jurnal Studi Al Qur'an dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syari'ah dan Hukum (FSH) UNSIQ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32699/syariati.v10i2.7126

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas transformasi tantangan hukum di era disrupsi menjadi instrumen penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan, dengan fokus pada strategi adaptasi dan inovasi di tengah perkembangan teknologi. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa adaptasi terhadap teknologi tidak hanya meningkatkan efisiensi penegakan hukum tetapi juga memungkinkan terciptanya keadilan yang lebih inklusif. Transformasi tantangan hukum di era disrupsi menjadi instrumen penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan melalui strategi adaptasi dan inovasi di tengah perkembangan teknologi meliputi perkembangan teknologi yang sangat pesat sehingga menimbulkan berbagai permasalahan seperti kejahatan cyber crime, privasi dan keamanan data serta teknologi ai untuk menjawab itu semua hukum harus melakukan perubahan di berbagai sektor seperti perubahan terhadap regulasi undang-undang meningkatkan sumber daya penegak hukum dan melakukan riset di bidang hukum.
KEBEBASAN BERSERIKAT DAN BERKUMPUL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA Tarmudi, Tarmudi; Widagdo, Gatot Subroto; Putra, Rengga Kusuma; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Amelia, Risky
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 3a (2024): September-Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i3a.10654

Abstract

This study aims to analyze freedom of association and assembly from a human rights perspective, and explore the challenges faced in its implementation in various countries. The scope of the study includes a review of various cases of violations of the right to freedom of association and assembly, both in countries with democratic and authoritarian systems. In addition, this study will also discuss the role of international organizations and civil society in promoting and protecting these rights. This study will not only discuss the theory and basic principles of freedom of association and assembly, but will also dig deeper into how these rights are implemented in practice, the challenges faced, and steps that can be taken to strengthen the protection of these freedoms throughout the world. This study is expected to make a significant contribution to understanding the complexity of freedom of association and assembly and its impact on human rights as a whole. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. The qualitative approach was chosen because it allows researchers to dig deeper into freedom of association and assembly in the context of Human Rights (HAM).
Beyond Impunity: Reconstructing Criminal Accountability for Torture by Law Enforcement Officials Suhendar, Suhendar; Permana, Virgiawan Cikal; Putra, Rengga Kusuma
Reformasi Hukum Vol 29 No 3 (2025): December Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46257/jrh.v29i3.1389

Abstract

Torture perpetrated by law enforcement officials continues to occur within Indonesia’s criminal justice system despite explicit constitutional prohibitions and binding international human rights commitments. This persistence indicates deficiencies in the framework of criminal accountability and contributes to entrenched patterns of impunity. This study examines the normative and structural obstacles to prosecuting torture and reconstructs a more effective model of criminal accountability. Employing a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes constitutional provisions, national legislation, and relevant doctrinal sources. The findings reveal that ambiguous regulatory formulations, the predominance of an individualistic paradigm in criminal law, the absence of a specific and autonomous offence of torture, and the lack of structural accountability mechanisms collectively weaken enforcement. Moreover, existing legal frameworks insufficiently address command responsibility and institutional dimensions of abuse, thereby reinforcing systemic impunity. The study concludes that criminal law reform should incorporate explicit recognition of torture as a distinct offence, expand accountability within hierarchical command structures, and strengthen independent oversight and victim protection mechanisms. Harmonization with international standards and the establishment of effective enforcement mechanisms are recommended to ensure consistent and transparent prosecution of torture cases.