Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

PEMENUHAN HAK NARAPIDANA HAMIL DAN MENYUSUI DI LAPAS RAMAH IBU DAN ANAK: Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Perempuan Kelas IIa Pontianak Siagian, Parulian; Harefa, Safaruddin; Gayatri, Nungky Dwi; Akadol, Nina Septiana Jasri; Hayuningtyas, Defria Puspita Sari; Fadhilah, Muhamad Khoiron
As-Sidanah Vol 8 No 1 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : LP2M Universitas Ibrahimy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35316/assidanah.v8i1.85-113

Abstract

The correctional system in Indonesia emphasizes a rehabilitative approach that respects human rights, including the right to health for female inmates who are pregnant and breastfeeding. However, the fulfillment of maternal health rights in correctional institutions still faces several challenges, including limited health facilities, shortages of medical personnel, and limited understanding among inmates regarding their health rights. This community service activity aims to improve female inmates’ understanding of basic maternal health rights for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers and to encourage correctional services that are more responsive to the needs of mothers and children. The program applied the Participatory Action Research (PAR) method, which emphasizes inmates' active participation in identifying problems, discussing possible solutions, and reflecting on the outcomes of the activities. The activity was conducted on July 14, 2025, at the Women’s Correctional Institution Class IIA Pontianak, involving 40 female inmates, including four pregnant inmates and three breastfeeding inmates, with support from correctional officers and an academic team from Universitas Tanjungpura. The program included educational sessions, interactive discussions, and participatory reflections on maternal health rights, nutrition during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and procedures for accessing health services inside and outside the correctional institution. The results show increased understanding of maternal health rights and the importance of proper nutrition and accessible health services. Discussions also identified institutional limitations, including maternal health facilities, lactation support, and availability of medical personnel.
THE ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN RELATION TO THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN CASES OF SEXUAL CONTENT DISSEMINATION Harefa, Safaruddin
Domus Legalis Cogitatio Vol 3 No 1 (2026): Domus Legalis Cogitatio Vol 3 No 1 April 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law Atma Jaya Yogyakarta University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/dlc.v3i1.12751

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has transformed the nature of crime and evidence, requiring legal systems to accommodate electronic forms of proof. This study analyzes the admissibility of electronic evidence in Indonesian criminal procedure law and its implications for the protection of privacy, particularly in cases involving the dissemination of sexual content. Using a normative juridical approach, this research examines statutory frameworks, including the ITE Law and its 2024 amendment, the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 20 of 2025 on the new Criminal Procedure Code, and Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection. It also employs a case study of the Pandeglang District Court Decision No. 71/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Pdl to assess the gap between das sollen and das sein. The findings indicate that Indonesia has normatively established a clear legal basis recognizing electronic evidence as valid and binding. However, judicial practice, particularly in cases decided prior to the enactment of the new KUHAP and the Personal Data Protection Law, tends to prioritize evidentiary validity over the protection of victims’ privacy. The Pandeglang case demonstrates that although electronic evidence was lawfully admitted, the absence of procedural safeguards created risks of re-victimization and undermined the victim’s dignity. This study concludes that while the issue of admissibility has been resolved under the current legal framework, challenges remain in ensuring privacy protection in judicial practice. Therefore, courts must adopt rights-sensitive approaches, including closed hearings, anonymization, and proportional use of evidence, to balance evidentiary effectiveness with the protection of fundamental rights in the digital era.