p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.142
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Celtic ELTIN Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) Englisia Journal Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature Journal of English Language Studies Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching Indonesian EFL Journal IRJE (Indonesian Research Journal in Education) VISION JCRS (Journal of Community Research and Service) SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning) Acuity : Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET) Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature Wacana : Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education Journal of English Education and Linguistics Journal of English Language and Education Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal English Language Education Reviews Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Journal of Educational Sciences Frasa: English Education and Literature Journal Excellence TELL - US JOURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora dan Seni BRIGHT VISION El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat JLE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan Journal of Research in English Language Teaching and Linguistics ELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

EXPLORING INDONESIAN EFL WRITING ERRORS: INSIGHTS FROM THE STIFIN PERSPECTIVE Benni Ichsanda Rahman Hz; Soraya Grabiella Dinamika
ELT Echo : The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JUNE 2024
Publisher : IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/eltecho.v9i1.15396

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the writing errors made by EFL students based on their brain dominance machine: Sensing, Thinking, Intuiting, Feeling, and Instinct (STIFIn). A qualitative case study was adopted in finishing this study. The data collected in this study were processed by using two methods: statistical calculations for quantitative data about the errors the participants made in their text writing by using Gass & Selinker’s (2008) writing errors approach which was then categorized based on the respondents’ STIFIn brain dominance, and constructive analysis for qualitative data related to the results of comparing the errors. This study enrolled 41 students from a college of management studies, located in the city of Medan, Indonesia. The individuals with Sensing Extrovert made the most errors, with a ratio of 1:15 errors recorded in their texts, followed by Intuiting Introvert with 1:14,5 errors, Thinking Extrovert with 1:13,3 errors, and Thinking Introvert with 1:13 errors. Sensing Introvert made 1:12,5 errors, Instring 1:9,4, Intuiting Extrovert 1:9, Feeling Introvert 1:7,6, and Feeling Extrovert 1:7,5. Sensing Extrovert students committed the most errors, whereas Feelings (extrovert and introvert) produced the fewest. Numerous of the causes behind these results are discussed in detailed explanation within the STIFIn theory.
Teacher’s Strategies in Developing English Speaking Skills of Students With Intellectual Disabilities Trough Role-Play Activities: A Case Study Rizki Tiara Ayunda; Benni Ichsanda Rahman Hz
Journal of Educational Sciences Vol. 10 No. 7 (2026): Journal of Educational Sciences
Publisher : FKIP - Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31258/jes.10.7.p.814-825

Abstract

This study investigates teachers’ strategies for developing English speaking skills in students with intellectual disabilities using role-playing activities in an inclusive high school classroom. This study takes a qualitative approach, with a case study design centered on an 11th-grade student with an intellectual disability. Data were gathered through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with the English teacher, field notes, and documentation. To increase the credibility of the findings, data were analyzed thematically using source triangulation. The findings show that the teacher used several key strategies, including providing meaningful communicative contexts through simplified role-play scenarios, scaffolding with modeling and cue cards, and consistently providing positive reinforcement during learning activities. The research findings also show that students’ speaking skills gradually improve, particularly in terms of participation, confidence in speaking, and willingness to use English in simple communication. Although linguistic improvements such as vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation are limited, role-playing allows students to engage in more authentic and contextual communication practices. This study confirms that role-playing, when combined with adaptive learning strategies, can help to create a more inclusive learning environment and promote the development of speaking skills in students with intellectual disabilities.
Information Literacy and Critical Analysis in Translation in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Benni Ichsanda Rahman Hz
SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning) Vol. 9 No. 1: January 2026
Publisher : Association of Language Teachers in Southeast Asia (ALTSA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35307/saltel.v9i1.169

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely used in the field of translation in recent years. However, the use of AI in translation has been limited due to its limitations in handling cultural nuances, implicit meanings, and complex language structures. This study aims to analyse the meta-language awareness of English Language Education students in conducting critical analysis of translation since the emergence of AI. In addition, this study explores how students assess the accuracy and bias in AI translation results and the extent to which they are able to correct or improve the translation independently. This case study focuses on students' perspectives and viewpoints in understanding, evaluating, and critiquing the translation results produced by AI and how their critical analysis skills develop in the context of translation. The findings highlight that AI can serve as a valuable tool, but it should not be solely relied upon for tasks requiring deep linguistic understanding, particularly in academic, professional, and cross-cultural communication settings.