Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

Optimization of Zakat Management by Bkm Masjid in Medan City Perspective of Law No.23 Of 2011 Halim, Abdul; Pagar, Pagar; Tanjung, Dhiauddin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.3945

Abstract

Law No. 38 of 1999, later amended by Law No. 23 of 2011 on the Administration of Zakat, provides the legal basis for the administration of zakat in Indonesia. These laws and regulations recognise only two entities, namely the National Zakat Amil Agency (BAZNAS) and the Zakat Amil Institution (LAZ), as the legal managers of zakat in Indonesia. In Medan, there are two types of amil zakat, as well as community-formed amil-amil zakat who manage zakat at the mosque level, specifically for zakat fitrah. It is important to note that some of these mosque-level Amils have been approved by the state through a sub-unit framework known as the Zakat Collection Unit (UPZ). Meanwhile, some of these amil-amil have not yet been approved by the state and are only based on the policies of the Prosperity Board (BKM) of each mosque. In Islamic Jurisprudence, the appointment of an amil is carried out by the authority of the caliph/sultan (state). In this case, the amil's position is as a representative of the zakat mustahik. It is important to note that the appointment of an amil should be approved by the state to ensure compliance with Islamic Jurisprudence. This research aims to address three problems related to the establishment and management of zakat at the mosque level in the city of Medan, according to Law No. 23/2011. Specifically, the research will examine: 1) the procedure for establishing zakat amil at the mosque level, 2) the management of zakat by the zakat amil at the mosque level, and 3) ways to optimise the management of zakat by the zakat amil at the mosque level. The language used is clear, objective and value-free, with a formal register and precise word choice. The text follows conventional structure and format, with a consistent style of quoting and footnoting. The sentences and paragraphs create a logical flow of information with causal links between propositions. The content has not been changed. This research has identified three key findings in this area. Firstly, the procedure for establishing Amil Zakat at the mosque level in the city of Medan is based on the policy of each mosque administrator (BKM). Secondly, the BKM's policy is then confirmed (validated) through the UPZ system by the National Amil Zakat Agency (BAZNAS) of the city of Medan. Finally, it is recommended that a more standardised procedure be implemented to ensure consistency across all mosques in the city. Zakat administration at the mosque level in the city of Medan is an ancillary activity that takes place only during the month of Ramadan and mainly within the framework of Zakat fitrah. During the collection phase, Amil opens a zakat booth at the mosque or at the BKM office, and potential muzakis come to the mosque to pay their zakat. Mosque Zakat Amil uses two methods: the coupon method and the delivery method for the distribution stage to the mustahik. Under the voucher system, a Muslim must present a voucher at the mosque in order to collect his zakat. Currently, the optimisation of zakat management in mosque zakat amil is limited to the collection and distribution stages, without taking into account the utilisation of zakat. Optimising Zakat collection is achieved through Zakat education, specifically by choosing recitation or lecture topics that focus on Zakat and by starting the Zakat collection period at the beginning of the month. During the distribution stage, optimization is achieved by prioritising mustahik selection, with a focus on actual mustahik. This research has found that there is little coordination between the Zakat Amil of the mosque and the BAZNAS, as well as between the Zakat Amil of the other mosques. It is important to address this issue in order to improve the effectiveness of the Zakat distribution.
The Position of Deaf Witnesses in Proving Divorce (Syiqaq) Cases in Religious Courts handoko, riki; Pagar, Pagar; Tanjung, Dhiauddin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.4011

Abstract

  Abstract                                                                          Based on article 22 of PP Number 9 of 1975, article 76 of Law Number 7 of 1989 and article 134 of Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 1991, Divorce (syiqaq) where disputes and quarrels are continuous must be proven by witness testimony, so The position of the witness is an important thing in deciding a divorce case. Witnesses who are present in court must materially see, hear and experience directly the legal events that occur, this must be in accordance with article 172 HIR/308 Rbg in conjunction with article 76 Law Number 7 of 1989. Meanwhile, in Islamic law, the position of deaf witnesses is that the majority of ulama seemed to have absolutely no tolerance for their opportunity to be witnesses. They agreed that hearing what the parties said and understanding what they meant was an absolute requirement for witnesses. The argument is because something that is the object of the witness is words. Law No.19/2011 about concerning ratification of the CRPD and the principle of Equality Before the Law also states the same thing, which does not differentiate between people in person. trial, while formally a deaf witness is not a mentally disabled witness, he just lacks hearing but can see and judge events well._________________________
The Implementation of Legal Istinbath Results at LBM MUDI Mesjid Raya Samalanga Abdullah, Abdullah; Pagar, Pagar; Ardiansyah, Ardiansyah
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4792

Abstract

This study explores the application of the LBM MUDI Mesjid Raya's legal istinbath results (jurisprudential reasoning) at Samalanga, focusing on their methods and approaches to legal decision-making. Employing phenomenological and sociological approaches, the research integrates qualitative field and library research to analyze legal phenomena within social and religious contexts. Key participants included the chairman and officials of Lajnah Bahtsul Masail (LBM), as well as scholars from Dayah Mudi Mesra Samalanga, Aceh. Data collection methods comprised in-depth interviews, direct observation, and document analysis. The data were analyzed by using a grounded theory approach, adhering to Miles and Huberman's stages of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicated that the approach of LBM MUDI Mesjid Raya is based on a systematic istinbath method and a qauli method that prioritizes classical texts. Their decision-making process incorporates multi-perspective problem analysis, consideration of the legal impact on social, political, and economic dimensions, and alignment with the principles of Ahlu al-Sunnah wa al-Jama'ah. The two stages of discussion, which include both members and leadership, make sure that there is full discussion and careful thought. They do this by combining traditional textual bases with modern situations to uphold the principle of maslahah (public interest). The ilhaq masail bi nadhairiha method generates solutions for issues beyond the scope of classical qauli methods. This illustrates LBM's adaptability in addressing contemporary issues while maintaining a commitment to classical Islamic principles, demonstrating a balance between tradition and modern relevance.
The Implementation of the Basic Agrarian Law in Fulfilling the Principle of Justice from the Islamic Legal Perspective Muthalib, Abdul; Pagar, Pagar; Harahap, Arifuddin Muda
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5039

Abstract

The Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) is an important legal foundation that regulates the utilization and management of agrarian resources in Indonesia. The principle of justice is one of the main principles sought in the implementation of the UUPA, aiming to create a fair and equitable distribution for all segments of society. This article analyzes how the implementation of the UUPA fulfills this principle of justice from an Islamic legal perspective. Islamic law emphasizes the importance of distributive justice, wise management of resources, and protection of the rights of vulnerable groups. This study uses a literature review method, examining related literature on the UUPA, agrarian law, and the principles of justice in Islamic law. The findings of the study show that there is alignment between the values of justice in the UUPA and the concept of justice in Islamic law, particularly regarding land rights distribution and the management of agrarian resources. However, challenges remain in implementing these principles, such as disparities in access and agrarian conflicts, which require fair resolutions in line with Islamic guidance. The article concludes that achieving substantive justice in agrarian management requires synergy between national law and the principles of justice in Islamic law
MUT‘AH DALAM CERAI GUGAT DI INDONESIA: TELAAH KEADILAN PERSPEKTIF MAQASHID SYARI‘AH Hidayat, Rahmat; Irham, M. Iqbal; Pagar, Pagar
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 9, No 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i1.5839

Abstract

Abstract: This study examines the discourse on mut‘ah in divorce initiated by the wife in Indonesia, which is not explicitly regulated in statutory law or the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). According to Article 158 of the KHI, the right to mut‘ah is granted only to wives divorced by their husbands (talaq), not to wives who file for divorce. This research employs a normative juridical method by analyzing statutory regulations such as Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 and the KHI, and by comparing them with classical Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). This approach is combined with an analysis of justice from the perspective of maqashid shari‘ah. The findings indicate that mut‘ah may be granted to a wife in cases of cerai gugat as long as the wife is not nusyuz. Granting mut‘ah to a wife who initiates divorce is viewed as an implementation of justice and as an effort to protect women’s rights in the aftermath of divorce. This study recommends regulatory reform of both statutory law and the KHI regarding the provision of mut‘ah in cases of cerai gugat, in accordance with the values of justice within Indonesian Muslim society. Keywords: mut‘ah, divorce initiated by the wife, KHI, maqashid shari‘ah, marriage. Abstrak: Penelitian ini membahas diskursus mut‘ah dalam cerai gugat di Indonesia yang tidak diatur secara eksplisit dalam undang-undang dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Menurut Pasal 158 KHI, hak mut‘ah hanya diberikan kepada istri yang diceraikan oleh suaminya (talak), bukan kepada istri yang mengajukan perceraian. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan seperti UU Perkawinan No. 1/1974, KHI dan membandingkannya dengan fikih. Pendekatan ini dipadukan dengan analisis keadilan dalam perspektif maqashid syarī‘ah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemberian mut‘ah dapat diberikan kepada istri dalam kasus cerai gugat selama istri tidak nusyuz. Pemberian mut‘ah kepada istri yang melakukan cerai gugat dipandang sebagai implementasi keadilan serta sebagai upaya melindungi hak perempuan akibat perceraian. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perubahan regulasi terhadap undang-undang dan KHI dalam kasus pemberian mut‘ah dalam cerai gugat sesuai dengan nilai keadilan dalam masyarakat Muslim Indonesia. Kata Kunci: mut‘ah, cerai gugat, KHI, maqhasid syari’ah, perkawinan.
EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM BAGI PELAKU PERBUATAN ZINA (ANALISIS DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA, HUKUM PERDATA, DAN HUKUM ISLAM) Pratitis, Sugih Ayu; Pagar, Pagar; Matsum, Hasan; Lubis, Fauziah
Law Jurnal Vol 6, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v6i2.8131

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji efektivitas penegakan hukum terhadap perbuatan zina di Indonesia dalam kerangka pluralisme hukum, dengan menelaah pengaturannya dari perspektif hukum pidana, hukum perdata, dan hukum Islam. Kompleksitas pengaturan zina muncul akibat koeksistensi norma hukum positif, norma keperdataan, dan norma agama yang berjalan berdampingan namun tidak selalu harmonis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) yang bersifat deskriptif-analitis, dengan pendekatan peraturan-undangan, konseptualisasi, dan perbandingan. Data diperoleh melalui kajian kepustakaan terhadap bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan penalaran deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam hukum pidana positif, zina diatur secara terbatas sebagai delik aduan yang hanya melindungi institusi perkawinan, sehingga belum mencerminkan nilai moral dan keagamaan masyarakat secara luas. Dalam perspektif hukum perdata, zina tidak dikriminalisasi, tetapi menimbulkan akibat hukum keperdataan seperti dasar perceraian dan pelanggaran asas kesetiaan dalam perkawinan, meskipun belum diikuti mekanisme pemulihan hak korban yang memadai. Sementara itu, hukum Islam memandang zina sebagai jarīmah hudud dengan sanksi tegas yang berorientasi pada perlindungan kehormatan, keturunan, dan kesejahteraan sosial dalam kerangka maqāṣid al-syarī'ah, namun penerapannya secara formal dibatasi oleh sistem hukum nasional. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa efektivitas penegakan hukum terhadap perbuatan zina masih menghadapi kendala normatif, prosedural, dan kultural, sehingga diperlukan upaya harmonisasi dan penegakan hukum yang berimbang antara kepastian hukum, keadilan, kemanfaatan sosial, serta nilai moral dan keagamaan masyarakat Indonesia.
KONSEP PERWALIAN DI INDONESIA: ANTARA KEWAJIBAN HUKUM DAN KEBUTUHAN ANAK DALAM SOSIOLOGI KELUARGA Lubis, Syaddan Dintara; Irham, Muhammad Iqbal; Pagar, Pagar
Law Jurnal Vol 6, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v6i2.8337

Abstract

Perwalian  di Indonesia merupakan permasalahan yang mencakup aspek hukum dan sosial serta berdampak langsung terhadap kesejahteraan anak. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji konsep perwalian anak dalam perspektif hukum Indonesia dan analisisnya dalam konteks sosiologi keluarga. Studi ini juga berfokus pada hubungan antara kewajiban hukum wali dan pemenuhan kebutuhan anak, serta tantangan yang dihadapi dalam sistem perwalian. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengana pendekatan kualitatif  analisis terhadap bahan hukum yang relevan dan tinjauan sosial keluarga. Studi ini menemukan bahwa meskipun undang-undang di Indonesia  mengatur kewajiban orang tua untuk melindungi, merawat, dan memenuhi kebutuhan anak, dalam praktiknya sering kali terkendala oleh faktor sosial, budaya, dan ekonomi. Permasalahan dalam praktik perwalian mencakup diskriminasi gender, kurangnya pemahaman hukum, dan pengaruh struktur keluarga. Penelitian ini juga menyoroti pentingnya pendekatan sosiologi keluarga dalam memahami perwalian dan peran lingkungan keluarga serta masyarakat dalam mendukung tumbuh kembang anak.
KEADILAN HOLISTIC BAGI ISTERI DALAM POLIGAMI: PERSPEKTIF MASLAHAT Hasanah, Uswatun; Irham, Muhammad Iqbal; Pagar, Pagar
Law Jurnal Vol 6, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v6i2.8338

Abstract

Syariat Islam memperkenankan praktik poligami dengan mensyaratkan berlaku adil terhadap seluruh istri. Akan tetapi, pemahaman tentang keadilan dalam konteks poligami di tengah masyarakat cenderung tereduksi pada pemenuhan hak-hak kebendaan semata, yakni seputar distribusi nafkah ekonomi dan pembagian waktu bermalam secara bergiliran. Sementara itu, kebutuhan emosional dan dimensi spiritualitas para istri justru kurang mendapat perhatian yang memadai. Kesenjangan antara idealitas normatif dengan kenyataan empiris ini membuka peluang terjadinya ketimpangan yang bersifat hakiki dalam kehidupan berumah tangga. Penelitian ini berupaya menelaah bagaimana fuqaha dan mufasir kontemporer memandang persoalan keadilan dalam poligami, sekaligus mengeksplorasi konsepsi keadilan yang bersifat menyeluruh dan mencakup pemenuhan aspek jasmani, rohani, dan kejiwaan yang seharusnya diperoleh para istri dalam ikatan poligami dengan berlandaskan pada prinsip maslahat. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif melalui studi kepustakaan dengan kerangka konseptual. Data primer diperoleh dari khazanah kitab-kitab fiqh dan tafsir klasik maupun kontemporer, diperkaya dengan rujukan akademis terkini yang memiliki relevansi. Proses analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan mengintegrasikan dimensi normatif teks-teks keagamaan dan orientasi kemaslahatan sebagai tujuan substantif syariat Islam. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi bahwa keadilan dalam poligami tidak boleh dipahami secara terpotong-potong, melainkan mesti dimaknai sebagai kesatuan utuh yang meliputi terpenuhinya kebutuhan fisik, terjaganya stabilitas psikologis, serta terpeliharanya kehidupan spiritual para istri. Perspektif maslahat menegaskan bahwa praktik poligami baru dapat dilegitimasi secara syar’i manakala benar-benar mendatangkan kemanfaatan konkret bagi istri dan anggota keluarga lainnya secara komprehensif.