Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Cybercrime and Data Security: The Role of Criminal Law in Coping Digital Threats Ismed, mohamad
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.6081

Abstract

Development rapid digital technology has bring benefit big for society, but also improve risk cybercrime, especially related with data security. Various forms of cybercrime such as hacking, phishing, ransomware, and misuse of personal data the more threaten individuals, companies, and institution government. In the context of this, law criminal own role important in give protection and mitigation digital threats through clear regulations and enforcement​ effective law. Research​ This aiming for identify threatening forms of cybercrime data security, analyzing regulation law criminal in handle cybercrime, and evaluate effectiveness enforcement law in to overcome digital threats. The methods used is approach normative legal and empirical with analysis to regulation applicable legislation, studies​ literature, as well as various form weakness regulation based on from observation and interview from stakeholders. Research results This show that law criminal law in Indonesia is still face various challenge in protect data security from crime increasingly cyber​ complex. Although has There is regulation like Constitution Electronic Information and Transactions and Constitution Personal Data Protection, existing rules​ Still fragmented and more focused on security system compared to personal data protection in a way comprehensive. In addition, the limitations capacity apparatus enforcer law, weakness coordination between institutions, less sanctions​ give effect deterrent, and challenge jurisdiction in case cross country increasingly to complicate effort enforcement law. Modus operandi of cybercrime that continues developing, such as phishing, malware, and ransomware, are increasingly increase risk data theft and disturbance operational for individuals, companies and security national
Kewenangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum dalam Penyelesaian Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Rasyd, Helmy Febrianto; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Ismed, Mohamad
CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, Februari 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/cendekia.v3i2.2417

Abstract

The role of the Public Prosecutor in recovering state losses is not only carried out within the context of criminal law, but also through civil law mechanisms as stipulated in Article 32 of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning PTPK. Based on data from Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW), throughout 2023 the Prosecutor's Office handled 1,649 corruption cases with a total compensation claim of IDR 82.6 trillion, contributing more than 99% of the total national compensation claim (IDR 83.3 trillion). Normatively, legal instruments have provided a framework that allows for maximum recovery of state losses. However, empirically, its implementation remains far from expectations, both in terms of the achievement of the recovery value and the effectiveness of the decision execution mechanism. This phenomenon demonstrates the gap between das sollen and das sein in law enforcement. The problem formulation raised in this study is how the process of recovering state financial losses in corruption cases and the authority of the public prosecutor in resolving the recovery of state financial losses in corruption cases. In this study, the author uses the theory of authority and the Dual Track System theory as analytical tools in dissecting this study. The research questions addressed in this study are the process of recovering state financial losses in corruption cases and the authority of public prosecutors in resolving the recovery of state financial losses in corruption cases. In this study, the author uses the theory of authority and the Dual Track System theory as analytical tools in analyzing this research. The research method used is a normative juridical legal approach. This research uses a statute approach, a case approach, a conceptual approach, and an analytical approach sourced from primary legal materials consisting of the Criminal Code, the Corruption Act and existing case studies, secondary legal materials consisting of books, research results, articles and tertiary legal materials from libraries, articles and websites. The results of this study indicate that the process of resolving the return of state financial losses in corruption crimes consists of 2 (two) mechanisms, namely through criminal and civil. Through the criminal route, it can be carried out from the investigation stage, prosecution, trial examination, to the stage of executing court decisions and the authority of the Public Prosecutor in resolving the return of state financial losses is an attribution authority that comes directly from statutory regulations, especially the Corruption Law and statutory regulations regarding the Prosecutor's Office. The suggestion in this study is that it is necessary to strengthen the strategy of tracking and securing assets from the investigation stage. In this case, the Public Prosecutor needs to optimize coordination with investigators, auditors, and related institutions in conducting comprehensive asset tracking from the initial stages of the investigation and optimizing the execution of replacement money to ensure that the replacement money crime is truly realized.