Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

INVESTIGATION LEGALITY AND CERTIFICATION PROCESS OF HALAL PRODUCT GUARANTEE: South Korea Muslim Federation as a Muslim Minority Country Chanifah, Nur; Rohmah, Siti; Kholish, Moh. Anas; Syaikhoni, Syaikhoni; Samsudin, Abu; Ansori, Ibnu Hajar
Al-Risalah Vol 25 No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v25i2.1620

Abstract

The halal industry is getting attention all over the world, including in countries with Muslim minorities such as South Korea. This country is committed to increasing tourism and promoting halal products, as evidenced by the issuance of a halal certification by the Korea Muslim Federation (KMF). This study examines the laws and procedures governing halal certification in South Korea, a secular country. A qualitative phenomenological approach was employed in this study, involving in-depth interviews with the president and administrators of KMF, as well as observations of halal products and restaurants. The study reveals that the South Korean government is collaborating with KMF for halal certification; however, limited human resources pose a significant obstacle. To overcome this, KMF is cooperating with Muslim-majority countries. In addition, a separate challenge is Korean culture, which is unfamiliar and often conflicts with Islam. Therefore, it is recommended that the government and KMF be more active in socializing the halal concept through exhibitions and public education. This effort is crucial to increasing public acceptance and supporting the success of South Korea's halal certification policy.
THE POSITION OF AN APOSTASY WIFE AS A CAUSE FOR THE DISSOLUTION OF A MARRIAGE IN THE COMPILATION OF ISLAMIC LAW AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR POST-DIVORCE RIGHTS Alhadi Saputra; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Nur Chanifah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4448

Abstract

Conversion to religion (apostasy) in Islamic marriage is a complex phenomenon that gives rise to debate between legal norms and social reality. In the context of Indonesian national law, apostasy has not been explicitly regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This legal gap is filled by the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), which, in Article 116 letter (h), stipulates that conversion to religion or apostasy can be grounds for divorce. However, in religious court practice, there is a disparity in decisions between courts that interpret apostasy as grounds for fasakh (annulment) and those that interpret it as grounds for divorce (talaq). This disparity has legal implications for women's rights after divorce, particularly regarding the right to maintenance during the iddah period, mut'ah, maskan, and kiswah. This study aims to explain the position of a wife who apostatizes as a cause of marital dissolution from the perspective of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and analyze its legal consequences for post-divorce rights. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and analytical approach. The results of the study indicate that a wife who apostatizes causes the marriage contract to be annulled (fasakh), but in practice, religious courts often still process it through the divorce mechanism (divorce talak) to ensure orderly legal administration. This disparity impacts the different treatment of the rights of apostate wives. From the perspective of legal utility, judges should consider the value of substantive justice and protection for women, even if the woman concerned has left Islam.
Strengthening Student Sexual Literacy to Prevent Violence in Indonesian Islamic Boarding Schools Chanifah, Nur; Ikhsan, M. Alifuddin; Syaikhoni; Luth, Thohir
Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): WASKITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangunan Karakter
Publisher : PUSAT MPK UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.waskita.2025.009.02.10

Abstract

This study examines sexuality literacy among students of Indonesian Islamic boarding schools (pesantren) as institutions historically central to moral and character development, yet recently marred by cases of sexual violence. Such incidents urgently require preventive reforms and decisive action against perpetrators. The research describes students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding sexuality literacy, their textual and contextual interpretations of Qur’anic verses, and school policies for preventing sexual violence. Using surveys, focus groups, and interviews, the study explores students’ perspectives and lived experiences in a pluralistic society. Findings reveal that strengthening sexuality literacy rooted in the Qur’an is achieved through four strategies. There are direct studies using a Sexuality Literacy Module and thematic Qur’anic interpretation, integration into fiqh studies, incorporation into moral education, and cultivation of a gender-sensitive, safe school culture. This research offers a practical framework for pesantren to align sexual education with Islamic teachings while addressing contemporary challenges. By demonstrating how critical-reflective Qur’anic learning fosters informed, gender-aware students, it provides policy guidance for educators, religious leaders, and regulators seeking to reduce sexual violence and promote holistic character formation in Islamic educational institutions.
Halal Certification of Cryptocurrency: A Framework for Strengthening Trust in Shariah-Compliant Digital Finance Junaidi, Muchammad Aqib; Dewantara, Reka; Chanifah, Nur
International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR) 2025: Volume 6 Issue 3
Publisher : Indonesian Academy of Social and Religious Research (IASRR)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53639/ijssr.v6i3.382

Abstract

Cryptocurrency has emerged as a significant global innovation that continues to stimulate debates regarding its permissibility within the framework of Islamic finance. This study examines Islamic legal perspectives on cryptocurrency by analyzing contemporary fatwas, academic discussions, and authoritative literature in the fields of ushul fiqh and Islamic economics. Using a qualitative descriptive method, the research identifies key legal considerations such as the presence of gharar, maysir, and riba, which determine the Shariah status of digital assets. The findings reveal that, in principle, cryptocurrency may be considered halal as a digital asset when it has straightforward utility, is transparent, and used for lawful economic activities. Several scholars view cryptocurrency as permissible when supported by reliable technology, adequate regulatory structures, and mechanisms that prevent fraud and speculation. Conversely, other scholars classify it as haram due to its extreme price volatility, speculative trading practices, lack of tangible underlying value, and inadequate regulatory oversight in many jurisdictions. To bridge these differing views, the study proposes developing Shariah-based assessment frameworks and halal certification mechanisms to provide greater legal clarity for Muslim investors. Furthermore, it underscores the urgent need for stronger regulatory policies and the advancement of Shariah-compliant blockchain systems that ensure ethical, transparent, and stable digital financial transactions.
COPYRIGHT WAKAF REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF MAQASHID SYARIAH Muhtadhy, Jailani; Sulistyarini, Rachmi; Chanifah, Nur
istinbath Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ijhi.v24i2.1090

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the validity of copyright waqf from the perspective of Maqashid Syariah and formulate an appropriate and legally certain regulation in Indonesia. Copyright waqf is an extension of the waqf object recognized in Law No. 41 of 2004 and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2006. However, there are no specific regulations regarding its mechanism, registration, and management. The research method employed is a normative juridical approach, incorporating legislative, conceptual, and historical perspectives. The results of the study indicate that a copyright waqf is valid according to Islamic law if it meets the principles of full ownership, sustainable benefits, and does not conflict with Islamic law. From the perspective of Maqashid Syariah, copyright waqf reflects the protection of religion and property (hifz al-din and hifz al-mal). However, in positive law, a normative vacuum persists, resulting in legal uncertainty. Therefore, this study recommends establishing special regulations and a copyright waqf management institution under the coordination of the Indonesian Waqf Board (BWI), so that its management is more professional, transparent, and in accordance with the principles of maqashid sharia.
The Dialectic Between the Fiqh of Tolerance and Human Rights in the Context of Religious Pluralism: The Indonesian Experience Chanifah, Nur
Peradaban Journal of Law and Society Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Pustaka Peradaban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59001/pjls.v4i2.762

Abstract

Indonesia is characterized by profound religious diversity encompassing multiple religions, beliefs, and religious practices. While such plurality has the potential to function as social capital for strengthening national cohesion, recent decades have witnessed a significant rise in religion-based intolerance, including the rejection of houses of worship, the dispersal of minority religious activities, and various forms of social intimidation. These developments indicate persistent structural and normative deficiencies in the governance of freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) in Indonesia. This article critically examines the relationship between religious plurality, practices of intolerance, and weaknesses in the governance of FoRB, while proposing a more progressive normative alternative. Employing a qualitative dialectical analysis based on document review and literature studies, the study maps the patterns and actors of religious intolerance and reassesses the normative foundations of religious governance through the integration of the fiqh of tolerance and human rights principles. The findings demonstrate that the escalation of intolerance is driven not only by regulatory weaknesses and majoritarian bias but also by exclusive religious interpretations that are misaligned with constitutional values and international human rights standards. This study argues that reconstructing an inclusive normative framework—grounded in a dialectical engagement between fiqh of tolerance and human rights—is essential for strengthening the protection of religious minorities and fostering social cohesion in Indonesia. Indonesia dicirikan oleh keberagaman agama dan kepercayaan yang kompleks, yang secara teoretis merupakan modal sosial bagi kohesi nasional. Namun, meningkatnya praktik intoleransi dalam beberapa dekade terakhir—seperti penolakan rumah ibadah dan intimidasi terhadap kelompok minoritas—mengindikasikan adanya persoalan struktural dan normatif dalam tata kelola Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan (KBB/FoRB). Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis hubungan dialektis antara pluralitas keagamaan, praktik intoleransi, dan kelemahan tata kelola KBB di Indonesia, serta menawarkan kerangka normatif alternatif yang progresif. Menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui analisis dialektis berbasis studi literatur, penelitian ini memetakan pola serta aktor intoleransi, sekaligus meninjau kembali fondasi pengelolaan kehidupan beragama melalui integrasi konsep fiqh toleransi dan prinsip Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa eskalasi intoleransi dipicu oleh bias mayoritarian dalam regulasi serta tafsir keagamaan eksklusif yang tidak selaras dengan nilai konstitusional dan standar HAM internasional. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa rekonstruksi kerangka normatif yang inklusif—melalui dialektika fiqh toleransi dan HAM—merupakan prasyarat krusial untuk memperkuat perlindungan kelompok minoritas dan menciptakan kohesi sosial yang berkelanjutan di Indonesia.
UNILATERAL CANCELLATION OF SHARIA INSURANCE POLICIES: JUDICIAL ANALYSIS FROM MAQASHID SHARIA PERSPECTIVE Vidya Nurchaliza; Nur Chanifah; Siti Rohmah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4519

Abstract

This research analyzes the judicial considerations in Court Decision Number 2030/Pdt.G/2024/PA.JS concerning unilateral cancellation of sharia insurance policies from a maqashid sharia perspective. The Islamic finance industry in Indonesia has experienced rapid growth, particularly in the sharia insurance sector. However, policy cancellation practices often create imbalances between insurance companies and policyholders. Article 251 of the Commercial Code (KUHD), which previously regulated unilateral cancellation rights, was revoked by Constitutional Court Decision Number 83/PUU-XXII/2024, creating a legal vacuum. Using a normative juridical approach with statute, case, and conceptual approaches, this study examines primary legal materials including legislation, court decisions, and DSN-MUI fatwas, as well as secondary materials from legal literature and journals. The research reveals that judicial considerations in the analyzed decision reflect efforts to harmonize positive law with maqashid sharia principles, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between intentional and unintentional violations in accordance with Islamic justice principles. The study proposes a cancellation mechanism based on maqashid sharia incorporating violation classification, proportional sanctions, clarification opportunities, transparent procedures, and sharia-based alternative dispute resolution. This mechanism aims to realize the principles of hifzh al-mal (property protection), 'adl (justice), tawazun (balance), and maslahah 'ammah (general welfare) in sharia insurance practices
EXCESSIVE DEBT COLLECTION BY CESSIONARIES IN ISLAMIC FINANCE DISPUTES: SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE AND SHARIA ECONOMIC LAW ANALYSIS Muhammad Rakhmat Alam; M. Hamidi Masykur; Nur Chanifah
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4857

Abstract

The assignment of receivables (Cessie) acts as a strategic mechanism for Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs) to manage Non-Performing Financing (NPF) and sustain liquidity. However, a significant juridical anomaly has emerged in Indonesia where the third-party assignee (Cessionary), often an unregulated individual investor, collects debts from the debtor (Cessus) at a value significantly exceeding the nominal outstanding value stated in the Cessie deed (over-collecting). This practice frequently involves capitalizing fines and imposing unilateral fees, thereby violating Sharia principles. This research rigorously analyzes the juridical validity of such excessive collection practices from the dual perspectives of Substantive Justice and Sharia Economic Law. Employing a normative legal research method with statute, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches, this study examines the stark disparity in religious court decisions and compares regulations across jurisdictions, including Indonesia, Malaysia, Kuwait, and Egypt. The findings reveal that over-collecting fundamentally violates the civil law principle of Nemo Plus Juris Ad Alium Transferre Potest Quam Ipse Habet and the Sharia prohibition of Riba (usury) and Zhulm (oppression). Through the lens of John Rawls’ theory, it breaches the Difference Principle by exacerbating the plight of the debtor as the least advantaged party. Consequently, such actions are legally void. The study recommends a regulatory formulation through the Financial Services Authority (OJK) by establishing a specific "Capping Rule" on collection rights and urges the issuance of a specific DSN-MUI Fatwa to regulate Sharia-compliant Cessie..
Digital Transformation Model of Tolerance Fiqh Education in The Context of Religious Plurality in University Chanifah, Nur
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Vol 1 no 2 December 2025
Publisher : Badan Usaha Milik Desa Berkaho Pungpungan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64084/ijmri.v1i2.113

Abstract

Digital transformation in tolerance fiqh education is an urgent need amid the increasing phenomenon of religious intolerance and polarization in Indonesia, especially among students who live in a digital ecosystem full of biased and unverified religious information. This research aims to analyze the digital transformation model of tolerance fiqh education in higher education, as well as formulate a pedagogical approach that is relevant to the context of religious plurality and students' digital literacy needs. Using a qualitative research method with a literature study design, this study collects and analyzes primary and secondary sources in the form of classical and contemporary fiqh books, reputable international journals, national intolerance research reports, and studies on digital education. Data analysis was carried out through reduction techniques, thematic categorization, and hermeneutical interpretation to understand the conceptual relationship between digital transformation, religious moderation, and fiqh learning. The results of the study show that an effective model of tolerance fiqh education must be hybrid, combining face-to-face for book studies and legal discussions, as well as digital platforms for simulation of intolerance cases, virtual interreligious dialogue, and access to global literature. These findings confirm that the critical and ethical integration of technology can strengthen students' competence of tolerance, interfaith empathy, and religious digital literacy.