Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Status Hukum Pernikahan Saudara Tiri Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Ismail, Habib; Ja'far, A. Kumedi
Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman (November)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Nahdlatul Ulama (LPT NU) PCNU Kabupaten Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59240/kjsk.v4i2.82

Abstract

Marriage between stepsiblings, in the perspective of Islamic family law, is an issue that often sparks debate, both legally and socially. In general, scholars agree that marriage between stepsiblings is permissible in Islam because they do not fall under the category of mahram (forbidden relatives) who are prohibited from marrying. This study aims to examine in depth the Islamic legal perspective regarding marriage between stepsiblings and explore the social and cultural implications that may arise in the practice of such marriage. By understanding this, it is hoped that a clearer understanding of the legal and social aspects of marriage between stepsiblings can be achieved and provide valuable insights into the context of Islamic family law and civil law in Indonesia. This qualitative research aims to explain the Islamic legal perspective on marriage between stepsiblings. The study focuses on understanding marriage between stepsiblings within the context of Islamic family law and how this phenomenon is accepted and viewed from society's social and cultural perspectives. The method used is descriptive research, which explains marriage between stepsiblings from the perspective of Islamic family law. The results of this study indicate that marriage between stepsiblings, according to Islamic family law, is permissible under Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) and Indonesian civil law. Scholars, including Imam an-Nawawi, agree that stepsiblings are not considered mahram and thus are not prohibited from marrying because their relationship does not stem from direct blood ties or lineage but rather from the marriage of their parents. Therefore, marriage between stepsiblings is valid under Islamic law as long as there is no direct blood relation between them.
PEMBAGIAN WARISAN SATU BANDING SATU DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM Desiana, Hafsah; Ja'far, A Kumedi
Qanuni : Journal of Indonesian Islamic Family Law Vol 2 No 02 (2024): 2024
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam UIM Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31102/qanuni.2024.2.02.1-14

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas konsep waris dalam hukum keluarga Islam, yang merujuk pada harta yang ditinggalkan oleh orang yang telah meninggal dan dibagikan kepada ahli waris berdasarkan prinsip keadilan dan ketentuan Al-Qur'an. Pembagian waris diatur dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI), yang mengadopsi banyak prinsip dari fikih klasik dengan penyesuaian terhadap konteks lokal. Dengan menerapkan perbandingan satu banding satu (1:1) antara laki-laki dan perempuan, pembagian warisan mencerminkan prinsip kesetaraan yang lebih adil, mengakui tanggung jawab nafkah yang dapat dibagi secara merata. Seiring dengan meningkatnya kesadaran akan kesetaraan gender, wacana untuk mengadopsi prinsip ini semakin menguat, menunjukkan perlunya penyesuaian dalam pembagian warisan sesuai dengan konteks sosial yang berkembang. Penerapan prinsip keadilan dan kesetaraan gender juga memerlukan peningkatan peran perempuan dalam masyarakat, termasuk pemberdayaan dan penegakan sistem peradilan yang adil. Meskipun tantangan pluralitas hukum di Indonesia menyebabkan ketidakpastian, penerapan nilai-nilai keadilan ramah gender dalam warisan adalah kunci untuk menciptakan keadilan sosial dan memajukan posisi perempuan. Secara keseluruhan, upaya untuk mewujudkan keadilan gender dalam waris Islam merupakan langkah penting dalam mendukung emansipasi perempuan dan menghadapi tantangan modern di masyarakat yang terus berkembang.
Urgensi Perjanjian Perkawinan dalam Membentuk Keluarga Sakinah Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Al-Ghifarry, Idrus; Ja'far, A. Kumedi; Faizal, Liky
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 3 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v3i2.825

Abstract

This research was made to analyze the urgency of the marriage agreement in marriage. To analyze the urgency of the marriage agreement in forming a sakinah family in the perspective of Islamic Family Law. This type of research is library research. This research is descriptive in nature, namely by using qualitative methods. The results of this study show that the urgency of the marriage agreement is that the marriage agreement has good benefits as a preventive measure in the event of a divorce because the marriage agreement will facilitate the distribution of assets. The urgency of the marriage agreement in forming a sakinah family in the perspective of Islamic family law, namely. First, to form a sakinah family, it is best if the prospective husband and wife make a marriage agreement which includes communication problems, personal and shared assets, biological needs (sex), economic problems, and appearance. Second, the marriage agreement includes a form of maslahah for married couples to achieve maqashid asy-syari'ah. Through a marriage agreement, what is the goal of the Shari'a, namely to achieve benefit can be realized or achieved.
Reinterpretation of the Rights and Duties of Contemporary Husbands and Wives Ja'far, A. Kumedi; Hermanto, Agus
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.9124

Abstract

A concept of rights and obligations will work when there is a balance between the two. Malahat theory is an intra doctrinal reform for the realization of humane legal norms. However, in reality, this concept is not easy to implement. It is said that a woman is made as to the subordinate in the family and sometimes there is no justice for her. At this time, women not only play a role as housewives but also help earn money for the family. What becomes a problem is how to reinterpret the equitable distribution of household rights and obligations. This study aims to describe the rights and obligations of husband and wife by maintaining the values of justice. This research is library research that discusses the husband's income for his wife, who is also the breadwinner. The paradigm of the husband is the leader of the household, and the wife is the housewife is something that spurs Muslim feminists to reinterpret. It is because wives are no longer only responsible as housewives, but more than that, they also help make a living in the household. Then, the concepts of justice, equality, ukhuwah islamiyah and mu'asyarah bil ma'ruf must be prioritized for the benefit and the formation of a sakinah, mawaddah wa rahmah in a family. It needs to be reconsidered if we want to make it a new fiqhparadigm.
Menikah Lebih dari Empat Perempuan dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Mhd. Sufi’y; A. Kumedi Ja’far
Bulletin of Community Engagement Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Bulletin of Community Engagement
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/bce.v4i3.1496

Abstract

This paper discusses the concept of marrying more than four women in the perspective of Islamic family law. Islam sets a limit on the maximum number of wives that a man can marry, namely four, as stipulated in the Qur'an Surah An-Nisa verse 3. Polygamy in Islam is allowed under certain conditions, one of which is the husband's ability to be fair to his wives. However, marrying more than four women is not allowed and is against Islamic law. The discussion in this paper includes an analysis of the Shari'ah fundamentals governing polygamy, the wisdom behind limiting the number of wives, and the implementation of Islamic family law in various Muslim countries, including Indonesia. In addition, the paper highlights the importance of justice in polygamy as a key requirement, and the legal consequences for violating this rule. The conclusion that can be drawn is that marrying more than four women is not permitted in Islam, and this prohibition aims to maintain justice and welfare in domestic life. It also provides protection for women's rights and prevents injustices that may arise in the practice of excessive polygamy.  
Pernikahan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Eti Karini; A. Kumedi Ja’far
Bulletin of Community Engagement Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Bulletin of Community Engagement
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51278/bce.v4i3.1550

Abstract

Marriage is an important foundation in family life, especially in Muslim society, but interfaith marriage is a complicated and controversial issue. Although the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) fatwa prohibits interfaith marriage, this phenomenon continues to increase, causing social problems and pressure from the environment. Therefore, it is important to understand the perspective of Islamic family law to find a balanced solution between personal beliefs and harmonious life in society. The objectives of this study are: (1) To determine the views of Islamic family law on interfaith marriage; (2) To determine the application of Islamic family law in cases of interfaith marriage in Indonesian religious courts; (3) To determine the impact of interfaith marriage on family relationships. The research method used in this study is library research using a descriptive qualitative approach. While the data collection technique used is documentation. The data sources used are various studies.  The technical analysis of descriptive data and analysis of theoretical content that discusses the topic of use is the Appendorff analysis. The results of this study are: (1) The view of Islamic law on interfaith marriage is prohibited or forbidden, this is emphasized in the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia and supported by the MUI fatwa; (2) The application of Islamic family law in cases of interfaith marriage in Indonesian religious courts is carried out by considering the provisions contained in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and fatwas issued by the MUI, (3) The impact of interfaith marriage on family relationships has a significant negative impact on family relationships. These impacts include psychological pressure, mental conflict, and tension in relationships, which are difficult to overcome if religious differences are not resolved.
Islamic Family Law Perspective on Marrying Pregnant Women Anfasa, Farid; Ja’far, A. Kumedi
At-Tahdzib: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Muamalah Vol 12 No 2 (2024): At-Tahdzib
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam At-Tahdzib, Ngoro, Jombang, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61181/at-tahdzib.v12i2.465

Abstract

Background. Sexual intercourse between a man and a woman without a valid marriage contract is called zina. Zina does not differentiate between a girl, a man, a husband or a widow, a wife or a widower. Islamic law strictly forbids zina, never even approaching zina. One of the consequences of zina is pregnancy outside of marriage.. Aims. This article examines pregnant marriage from the perspective of Islamic law in the four imams of the school of thought, and the Compilation of Islamic Law. Method. The study uses a normative legal approach. Results. Pregnant marriage is a marriage with a woman who is pregnant outside of marriage, either married to the man who impregnated her or to the man who did not impregnate her. The Marriage Law only implicitly regulates the marriage of pregnant women, namely in Article 2 paragraph (1). The Compilation of Islamic Law regulates the marriage of pregnant women in Article 53. The differences of opinion among scholars regarding the marriage of pregnant women due to adultery do not bring blessings to the community. The Compilation of Islamic Law states that children resulting from adultery legally do not have a kinship relationship with their father, even though the father formally acknowledges and legitimizes that the child is his own child. They do not have the intended relationship, be it family relationships, guardianship in marriage or inheritance issues. The child only has a bloodline relationship with his mother.
Perkawinan Turun Ranjang Dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Aziz Basuki; A. Kumedi Ja’far
Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Publisher : PT. ALHAFI BERKAH INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62007/joumi.v2i4.378

Abstract

Bed-step marriage is a tradition that still thrives in several cultures, where a man, usually the younger brother of the deceased husband, marries the deceased's wife to maintain the integrity of the family. Although this tradition is considered an effort to maintain the honor and stability of the family, this practice raises a number of questions from an Islamic legal perspective. This paper aims to examine the phenomenon of bed-step marriage from an Islamic legal perspective, focusing on the requirements for a valid marriage, women's rights, the principle of justice in inheritance, and the purpose of marriage in Islam. Based on a literature review and analysis of sharia arguments, it was found that although Islamic law does not explicitly prohibit marriage with the husband's younger brother after the 'iddah period is over, this practice has the potential to conflict with the principles of consent, freedom to choose a partner, and justice in inheritance if carried out on the basis of coercion or social pressure. Therefore, bed-step marriage in Islamic law is only valid if it meets the requirements that have been set, without any element of coercion, and aims to form a harmonious and loving family.
Problems of Mediation by Religious Court Judges in Lampung Province Ja’far, A. Kumedi; Gumiri, Erik Rahman; Susilo, Edi
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 28, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/madania.v28i2.6591

Abstract

This article discusses the problems surrounding mediation by Religious Court judges in Lampung Province. Mediation can help simplify a dispute so that it can be resolved more cheaply and quickly. Interestingly, mediation allows litigants to find their solutions or settlements, expecting each party to be satisfied and fairly treated. However, this is not the case in real life. Mediation implementation falls short for a variety of reasons. The results of this study show that the mediation carried out by judges at the Religious Court of Lampung has several problems. Judges are unable to provide optimal mediation in divorce cases because mediation is frequently carried out in their respective homes by religious or traditional leaders. As a result, when mediation takes place in court, the mediation is less than optimal, and the divorce process is thought to be complicated or prolonged. Because not all judges hold mediator certificates, their ability to conduct mediation remains limited. When acting as mediators, some judges appear to be trial judges instead of judges who have received mediator training. Policies such as 'one-day minutes, one-day publish' indirectly impact the performance of judge mediators, despite some Religious Courts setting aside special time for mediation. Artikel ini membahas tentang permasalahan mediasi yang dilakukan oleh hakim Pengadilan Agama di Provinsi Lampung. Mediasi dapat membantu menyederhanakan suatu sengketa sehingga dapat diselesaikan dengan lebih murah dan cepat. Menariknya, mediasi memungkinkan para pihak yang bersengketa untuk menemukan solusi atau penyelesaiannya, dengan harapan masing-masing pihak merasa puas dan diperlakukan secara adil. Namun, kenyataan di lapangan tidak demikian. Pelaksanaan mediasi tidak berjalan dengan baik dengan berbagai penyebab.. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa mediasi yang dilakukan oleh hakim Pengadilan Agama Lampung memiliki beberapa permasalahan. Hakim tidak dapat memberikan mediasi yang optimal dalam perkara perceraian karena mediasi sering kali dilakukan di rumah masing-masing oleh tokoh agama atau adat. Akibatnya, ketika mediasi dilakukan di pengadilan, mediasi menjadi kurang optimal, dan proses perceraian dianggap rumit atau berlarut-larut. Karena tidak semua hakim memiliki sertifikat mediator, maka kemampuan mereka dalam melakukan mediasi pun menjadi terbatas. Ketika bertindak sebagai mediator, beberapa hakim tampak seperti hakim pengadilan, bukan hakim yang telah mendapatkan pelatihan mediator. Kebijakan seperti 'one-day minutes, one-day publish' secara tidak langsung berdampak pada kinerja mediator hakim, meskipun beberapa Pengadilan Agama menyediakan waktu khusus untuk mediasi.
Wasiat Kepada Non Muslim Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam Jaya Putra, Marwan; Putra, Marwan Jaya; Ja'far, A. Kumedi
Policy and Law Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Laskar Karya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study discusses the law of bequests to non-Muslims within the context of Islamic family law and positive law in Indonesia. The background of this issue arises from the tension between the Sharia provisions that do not allow inheritance among individuals of different religions and the needs of an increasingly inclusive multicultural society. The aim of this writing is to explore the perspectives of Islamic law and positive law regarding bequests, as well as their social and ethical implications. The research method used is a literature review and comparative analysis between the two legal systems, focusing on legal texts, scholarly fatwas, and court decisions. The research findings indicate that, although Islamic law has strict limitations on inheritance for non-Muslims, there is room for bequests that can be executed as a legal instrument. On the other hand, positive law in Indonesia, through the practice of mandatory bequests, recognizes the rights of non-Muslim heirs, thus creating equality in the distribution of inheritance. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the necessity for open dialogue and a deeper understanding of the interaction between the two legal systems. This is crucial to reduce potential conflicts and ensure justice and inclusivity in inheritance practices within a diverse society.