Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.968
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Arena Hukum Rechtsidee Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Iqra: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan dan Keislaman Simposium II UNIID 2017 Halu Oleo Law Review Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur dan Fasilitas Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Jambe Law Journal Unes Law Review Faletehan Health Journal Journal of Local Government Issues ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Partisipatoris Jurnal Layanan Masyarakat (Journal of Public Service) Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Journal of Judicial Review Yuridika Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Human Rights in The Global South (HRGS) JURNAL PARADIGMA: Journal of Sociology Research and Education IC Tech: Majalah Ilmiah SAGA: Journal of Technology and Information Systems Kreativitas Pada Pengabdian Masyarakat (Krepa) Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial RechtIdee IC Tech: Majalah Ilmiah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Inovasi Indonesia
Faizal Kurniawan
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 51 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Yustisia

 1 
THE RIGHT TO ACCESS BANKING DATA IN A CLAIM FOR A DIVISION OF COMBINED ASSETS THAT IS FILED SEPARATELY FROM A DIVORCE CLAIM Faizal Kurniawan; Xavier Nugraha; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto; Syifa Ramadhanti
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 1: January - April 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.34859

Abstract

Bank Secrecy remains as one of the most essential principles of banking. In Indonesia, however, this principle is not absolute. According to Article 40 (1) of Law No.10 of the Year 1998 regarding changes to Law Number 7 of the Year 1992 regarding Banking alongside Article 2 (4) of Bank Indonesia Number : 2/19/PBI/2000 regarding several exceptions in implementing Bank Secrecy. In its implementation, these exceptions have yet to adjust to recent social development. One problematic case is when it relates to a claim of combined assets that is filed in conjunction with a claim for divorce. In recent development, the Constitutional Court has asserted that the one of the exceptions for Bank Secrecy can occur for cases of divorce, in its Judgement Number 64/PUU-X/2012. However, this decision has yet to answer a problematic issue when the claim for divorce is filed separately from the claim for the division of combined assets. Such decision does not consider cases in which the two aforementioned claims are filed separately. This presents a problem for couples who are not muslim and are confined to divorce laws in which the two claims must be filed separately. Thus, does a claim for the division of combined assets that is filed separately from the claim of divorce fall under the Scope of Constitutional Court Decision Number 64/PUU-X/2012? According to the following research, such cases indeed fall under the scope of Constitutional Court Decision Number 64/PUU-X/2012. This conclusion is based on historical interpretation and Extensive Interpretation. According to historical interpretation, the original intent of the judges in drafting Constitutional Court Decision Number 64/PUU-X/2012 is to provide both the husband/wife equal share of their wealth. According to extensive interpretation, the concept of filing both claims separately is to an extension of the concept explicitly addressed in such Constitutional Court decision.   
Co-Authors Abdullah, Nurhidayah Adinda Prisca Anugerah Puteri Adiwinata, Gianina Elizabeth Agung Triayudi Agus Sekarmadji Agus Yudha Hernoko Aldiansyah, Komari Ali Maksum Aliansa, Wahyu Amanah Agustin Ardhana Christian Noventri Arif Wahyu Hidayat Aristyawan, Patricia Anais Ave Maria Frisa Katherina Ayik Parameswary Bagus Oktafian Abrianto Bart Jansen Christian Yulianto Rusli Cleoputri Yusainy Dany Miftahul Ula Darryl Evan Brouwer Debi Setiawati, Debi Dyah Devina Maya Ganindra Erni Agustin Fatmawati Fatmawati Ghansham Anand Hilda Yunita Sabrie Huzni Murad, Muhammad Syariqul Ilhami Ginang Pratidina Jusoff, Kamaruzaman Koko Srimulyo Komari Aldiansyah M. Hadi Subhan Maghfirah Aliefia Maradona Maradona Maradona, Maradona Maulani, Atiqoh Farhah Maulida, Vetty Silvana Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Mohamad Nur Kholiq Mohd Ismail, Maria Mohd Sharil Nizam bin Md Radzi Muhammad Amirul Alfan Muhammad Anas Newa, Erni Rambu Nugraha, Xavier Ode Mohamad Man Arfa Ladamay Patricia Inge Felany Peter Mahmud Marzuki Pitriani, Winda Prastuti Sulistyorini Prastuti Sulistyorini Prawitra Thalib Qona’aha Noor Maajid Radian Salman Ramadhanti, Syifa Ramesh Nair Rizky Amalia Rizky Amalia Romadhona, Mochamad Kevin Salah, Mohammed Sapta Aprilianto Shintarini Kristine Setyobudi Simamora, Yohanes Sogar Siti Hafsyah Idris Sri Hajati Sri Hajati Suryantoro, Satriyo Dwi Syifa Ramadhanti Thabib, Prawitra Tobing, Sari Mellina Vincentius Gegap Widyantoro Wewi, Krisna Rambu Kaita Wisudanto Wisudanto Yula Anggriani Yulianto Rusli, Christian Yuniarti Yuniarti Zaky, Pradana Zuhairah Ariff Binti Abd Ghadas