Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Muslim terhadap Mediasi di Era Digital Nasruddin; Agus Muchsin; M. Ihsan Darwis; Rahmawati; Islamul Haq
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i4.2490

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has fundamentally transformed various dimensions of human life, including the mechanisms of legal dispute resolution. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the legal awareness of the Muslim community in Parepare City, South Sulawesi, regarding the implementation of electronic mediation (e-mediation) in the digital era. Operating within the framework of the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 3 of 2022, the shift from conventional face-to-face mediation to virtual platforms presents significant sociological, psychological, and theological challenges. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method with normative-theological and empirical-juridical approaches, utilizing data from the Parepare Religious Court, Parepare Police Department, and the National Land Agency of West Bacukiki. The findings indicate that while the Muslim community in Parepare demonstrates a high preference for non-litigation dispute resolution, heavily influenced by the local culture of Siri' na Pacce and the Islamic concept of Islah (peacemaking), their adoption of fully digital mediation remains sub-optimal. The primary inhibiting factors include a stark digital literacy deficit, unstable internet infrastructure, privacy concerns, and most crucially, the loss of emotional intuition ("feel to feel") between the mediator and the disputing parties. To bridge this gap, this study proposes an optimization strategy grounded in the principles of Maqashid Al-Syariah and Restorative Justice, emphasizing the need for technical assistance hubs, culturally responsive digital training for mediators, and the development of proprietary encrypted judicial platforms to ensure confidentiality and maintain the sacredness of the mediation process.
Dekonstruksi Narasi Toxic Relationship di Media Sosial Analisis Hukum Keluarga Islam terhadap Sindrom Fear of Marriage pada Gen Z Nur Hazmi Asyikin; Rusdaya Basri; Budiman Budiman; Agus Muchsin; Aris Aris
Jurnal AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Volume 8, Nomor 1, Juni 2026
Publisher : IAIN BONE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/as-hki.v8i1.11553

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of toxic relationship narratives on social media and their influence on the emergence of fear of marriage syndrome among Generation Z from the perspective of Islamic family law. The widespread exposure to negative relationship content on digital platforms has shaped collective perceptions that marriage is a source of emotional harm rather than a sacred institution. This research employs a normative legal approach with conceptual and statutory methods, focusing on Islamic legal principles and maqashid sharia. The findings indicate that social media plays a significant role in constructing negative perceptions of marriage, which contradicts Islamic teachings that emphasize sakinah, mawaddah, and rahmah. This study contributes to the discourse by integrating digital media analysis with Islamic family law perspectives, offering a new framework to address contemporary challenges faced by Generation Z.
EFEKTIVITAS PENETAPAN STATUS HUKUM PENGANGKATAN ANAK DI KOTA PAREPARE Sitti Faisyah Az Zahra Darwis; Agus Muchsin; Aris Aris; Fikri Fikri; Mukhtar Mukhtar
Jurnal AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Volume 8, Nomor 1, Juni 2026
Publisher : IAIN BONE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/as-hki.v8i1.11566

Abstract

Child adoption is a form of child protection regulated under Indonesian positive law. However, adoption practices in Parepare City are still predominantly carried out through Bugis-Makassar customary mechanisms based on family agreements without formal legal procedures. This practice may create uncertainty regarding the legal status of adopted children, particularly in matters of inheritance, civil registration, and child rights protection. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of legal status determination in child adoption and identify the factors influencing its implementation in Parepare City. Employing a normative juridical approach and library research method, the study analyzes statutory regulations, legal literature, and the socio-cultural context of the Bugis-Makassar community. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of legal status determination for child adoption remains low. The main obstacles include procedural complexity, limited public awareness, high administrative costs, and the strong influence of customary norms that are often prioritized over state law. These conditions reflect a gap between legal substance and legal culture. The study proposes the Customary-Legal Harmonization-Based Adoption Model (MPAHA), which emphasizes procedural simplification, financial support, collaborative legal awareness programs, and strengthened post-adoption supervision. This model is expected to enhance legal certainty while preserving the familial values of the Parepare community.
REALISASI KELUARGA SAKINAH MAWADDAH WARAHMAH BAGI PENYANDANG DISABILITAS DALAM PERSPEKTIF FIQH MUNAKAHAT Suci Cahaya Ningsi; Agus Muchsin; Saidah Saidah; Islamul Haq; Muhiddin Bakry
Jurnal AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan Vol 8 No 1 (2026): Volume 8, Nomor 1, Juni 2026
Publisher : IAIN BONE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/as-hki.v8i1.11569

Abstract

This study examines marriages of persons with disabilities in realizing sakinah, mawaddah, and rahmah families from the perspective of fiqh munakahat. This research is a field study using a qualitative approach conducted in Panca Rijang District, Sidenreng Rappang Regency. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving three married couples where one partner is a person with physical or sensory disabilities. The results show that efforts to build a sakinah family include mutual understanding of roles and obligations, cooperation in economic and domestic responsibilities, openness, and strengthening faith in Allah SWT. Supporting factors include spousal and family support, while inhibiting factors consist of physical limitations, unstable income, differences of opinion, and challenges in child-rearing. From the perspective of fiqh munakahat, marriages of persons with disabilities remain valid and oriented toward achieving the objectives of marriage (maqashid al-nikah), particularly tranquility, affection, and compassion within the household.
ADOPSI ANAK OLEH KOMUNITAS LGBTQ+ DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM TELAAH KOMPARATIF FIQH KLASIK DAN PENDEKATAN HUMANIS KONTEMPORER Ahmad ahmad; Agus Muchsin
USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/usrah.v7i1.2603

Abstract

This study examines child fostering (tabanni) by the LGBTQ+ community from the perspective of Islamic family law through a comparative analysis of classical fiqh and contemporary humanistic approaches. Its objective is to formulate an inclusive tabanni framework that balances Sharia principles with modern social dynamics in Indonesia. Employing a qualitative normative-empirical design, the research integrates textual analysis of classical fiqh documents from the four major Sunni schools (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali)-such as Al-Mughni, Bidayat al-Mujtahid, and Fath al-Qarib-with semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions involving 8-15 progressive Muslim respondents in Jakarta and Yogyakarta (2023-2025). Classical fiqh emphasizes child welfare without altering nasab status, within a heteronormative framework that prohibits full inheritance or mahram rights. In contrast, the contemporary humanistic approach, advocated by progressive Muslims, reinterprets tabanni through maqasid al-shariah (hifz al-nas and hifz al-ird), prioritizing verified caregiver suitability, transparent mechanisms, and cross-community dialogue. The integration of these approaches yields an inclusive tabanni framework encompassing caregiver verification criteria, preservation of the child's nasab, Sharia-based formal processes, and educational programs to address conservative resistance. These findings enhance child protection while offering contextual recommendations for more equitable and responsive Islamic family law in Indonesia's pluralistic society.
Dinamika Sistem Pemerintahan Kesultanan Ternate: Analisis Kritis Integrasi Ino Mano Nako dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Baharuddin Abdullah; Radia Ali; Fikri; Saidah; Agus Muchsin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6952

Abstract

This study elaborates on the governance pattern of the Ternate Sultanate as a form of integration between customary law and Islamic law through modern constitutional concepts. This research is significant for enriching the discourse on the diversity of governance systems based on local Indonesian values, which remains limited compared to studies on modern systems. A qualitative method was applied through the study of historical manuscripts, literature, and intensive dialogue with key actors. The findings reveal that this tiered structure represents a harmonious integration of customary law is represented by the Bobato Dunia institution and the Fala Raha council, Islamic law is represented by the Bobato Akhirat institution in the spiritual system, while modern constitutional law concepts are evident in the division of powers and the leader selection mechanism, which reflects an elite democracy. This governance model of the Sultanate demonstrates the adaptation of local values within a modern state system. It also recommends the formal validation of customary governance systems and policies that support regional autonomy without compromising national integration. Further research is required on public perception and comparative studies with other sultanates.
Sterilization in the Perspective of Modern Fiqh Methodology: A Comparative Study of Progressive and Conservative Fatwa Authorities in Southeast Asia Muchsin, Agus; Ahmad, Ahmad; Luthfi, Hidir; Wahidin, Wahidin
El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): EL-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/ujhk.v9i2.34839

Abstract

The contemporary discourse on Islamic bioethics, particularly concerning permanent sterilization (tubectomy and vasectomy), is characterized by a deep tension between classical jurisprudential norms and modern public health imperatives. This study investigates the institutional and sociological dimensions of fatwa authorities in Southeast Asia to understand how divergent methodologies (manhaj fiqh) produce either conservative or progressive rulings on reproductive autonomy. The problem centers on the observation that comparative studies of sterilization fatwas have traditionally focused on textual and legal outcomes, neglecting the underlying socio-political legitimacy, institutional structures, and epistemic frameworks of the fatwa-issuing bodies. This study focuses on how state and non-state religious authorities in Southeast Asia construct their sociological legitimacy. In what ways do differing approaches to maqāṣid al-sharīʿah influence the legal evolution of sterilization fatwas, and how do alternative, progressive authorities challenge hegemonic conservative paradigms? Employing a qualitative, socio-legal, and comparative doctrinal approach, this study synthesizes normative text analysis with the sociology of knowledge, utilizing library research and interviews to examine primary fatwa documents, historical policy shifts, and public health data. The findings reveal that institutional posture heavily dictates fatwa outcomes. Centralized, state-captured authorities maintain rigid, conservative prohibitions based on textual literalism. Semi-autonomous bodies demonstrate dynamic accommodation, transitioning from strict prohibition to conditional permissibility due to medical advancements in recanalization. Conversely, minority-context authorities utilize bioethical integration, while grassroots movements employ maqāṣid cum-mubādalah to center women's lived experiences. Ultimately, fatwas on sterilization are not merely products of divine text interpretation but are socially constructed instruments negotiated at the intersection of religious authority, medical legitimacy, and state population control.