Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGGUNAAN BOM DALAM PENANGKAPAN IKAN DI WILAYAH PERAIRAN LAUT PULAU SEBUKU KABUPATEN LAMPUNG SELATAN (Studi Putusan Nomor : 321/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Tjk) Cahya Ningrum, Bella; Siregig, I Ketut; Ramadan, Suta
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (531.779 KB) | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v2i1.52

Abstract

The illegal act of fishing with explosives is currently regulated by Law No. 45 of 2009 on Fisheries, which states several legal provisions, including that waters are under the sovereignty and jurisdiction of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, as well as the Indonesian Exclusive Economic Zone, and are based on international provisions containing fish resources and potential fish farming land. In this work, a normative juridical approach and an empirical approach were used as research methods. Data is gathered through library research and field studies. The Defendant employed explosives in the shape of 6 (six) big bottles and 4 (four) tiny bottles obtained by purchasing 4 (four) kilograms of Ampo powder and then assembling them in a way that they could be used to bomb fish in order to carry out his action. The imposition of a crime in this case has the goal of not only punishing people who commit crimes, but also of fostering and educating people, so the judge believes that the sentence imposed on the defendant was appropriate and commensurate with his actions, based on aggravating and mitigating circumstances.
PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN PIDANA TERHADAP PERKARA PENIPUAN PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN AMENITAS KAWASAN PARIWISATA DI KABUPATEN PESISIR BARAT (Studi Putusan Nomor 17/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tjk). Harimurti, Pangestika Raras; Seregig, I Ketut; Ramadan, Suta
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.333

Abstract

Fraud cases are a crime that has recently been frequently reported in newspapers, magazines and other mass media and has experienced quite a serious increase. Article 378 of the Criminal Code states that a person who commits a crime of fraud is threatened with a maximum prison sentence of 4 years. The issues that will be discussed in this issue are, Factors that Cause Perpetrators to Commit Criminal Acts of Fraud on Tourism Area Amenity Development Projects in Pesisir Barat Regency based on Decision Number 17/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tjk and How Criminal Decisions Are Handed Down in Cases of Criminal Project Fraud Development of Tourism Area Amenities in Pesisir Barat Regency based on Decision Number 17/Pid.B/2022/PN.Tjk. The research method used is a normative juridical and empirical approach, using secondary and primary data, obtained from literature studies and field studies, and data analysis using normative juridical analysis. The results of the research are factors in the occurrence of criminal acts of fraud using the financing method, namely due to several factors such as the defendant's lack of understanding of religion, apart from internal factors, there are factors that influence the defendant in committing fraud, such as environmental conditions and the condition of the defendant's residence which supports the occurrence of the crime. This, the defendant's low education and economic conditions were also very influential in the occurrence of this crime
Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pembunuhan Berencana di Lampung Tengah (Studi Putusan Nomor: 86/PID.B/2022/PN.Gns) I Ketut Seregig; Suta Ramadan; Achmad Putra Syeban
Justice Legislation and Crime Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jlc.v1i2.7415

Abstract

Faktor-faktor terjadinya kejahatan pembunuhan berencana, maka penulis menganalisis bahwa dalam kejahatan pembunuhan berencana ini lebih cenderung mengarah kepada faktor sakit hati, faktor lingkungan dan dendam, yang membuat pelaku beritikad tidak baik dan melanggar hukum, jadi faktor yang lebih dominan dalam tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana adalah faktor sakit hati.Dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap pelaka tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Gunung Sugih No: 86/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns adalah dengan mempertimbangkan fakta-fakta yang terungkap dalam persidangan seperti : keterangan saksi-saksi, keterangan terdakwa, dan semua alat bukti yang diajukan di persidangan, mempertimbangkan dari unsur-unsur Pasal yang didakwakan. Pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan in mengacu pada teori keseimbangan, utusan ini mempertimbangkan keseimbangan antara syarat-syarat yang ditentukan oleh undang-undang dan kepentingan pihak- pihak yang berkaitan dengan perkara dan hakim juga mempertimbangkan penjatuhan putusan dengan mempertimbangkan segala aspek yang berkaitan dengan pokok perkara yang disengketakan kemudian dicari peraturan perundang- undangan yang relevan dengan pokok perkara yang disengketakan sebagai dasar hukum dalam penjatuhan putusan.
The Application of Criminal Sanctions Against the Victims of Narcotics Abuse (Case Study of Decision Number: 193/Pid.Sus/2025/PN. Sdn) Jainah, Zainab Ompu; Ramadan, Suta; Yulistia, Alyaa
The Future of Education Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan dan Publikasi Ilmiah Yayasan Pendidikan Tumpuan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61445/tofedu.v5i1.1592

Abstract

Indonesia has aggressively combated narcotics over the past decade, yet it remains one of the countries with the highest incidence of narcotics offenses, exacerbated by cross-border trafficking. To prevent and eradicate narcotics abuse and illicit trafficking that endanger society, the nation, and the state, Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics was enacted. This law regulates the use of narcotics for medical purposes, health services, and physical and social rehabilitation, and also stipulates sanctions such as imprisonment, fines, rehabilitation, and capital punishment. This study aims to examine the factors that cause offenders to become victims of narcotics abuse and to analyze criminal liability for victims of narcotics abuse based on Decision Number 193/Pid.Sus/2025/PN.Sdn. This research employs a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis. The findings indicate that narcotics abuse is caused by internal factors and external environmental factors, including lack of family attention and support during adolescent development, peer influence, and free social interaction, all of which may lead to narcotics abuse and jeopardize the future of young individuals. Criminal liability for narcotics abusers may be imposed under Article 127 paragraph (1) letter (a) of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, with a maximum imprisonment of four (4) years. Therefore, this situation requires an active role of the government in increasing public legal awareness of the dangers of narcotics, as well as community participation in narcotics eradication efforts.
The Cancellation of a Plaintiff's Lawsuit Due to Bad Faith in Mediation (A Study of Decision Number: 103/Pdt.G/2023/PN Tjk Rusli, Tami; Ramadhan, Suta; Devira, Devira
The Future of Education Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan dan Publikasi Ilmiah Yayasan Pendidikan Tumpuan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61445/tofedu.v5i1.1541

Abstract

A lawsuit is often dismissed if the plaintiff is proven to have acted in poor faith during the legal process. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the Indonesian judicial system, particularly in the context of resolving civil disputes involving consumers. Mediation, as a dispute resolution method, is crucial for resolving disputes involving unlawful acts in consumer financing agreements. However, its success depends heavily on the good faith of the parties involved. If one party lacks good faith, mediation will be ineffective. The research question is how to resolve disputes regarding the dismissal of a plaintiff's lawsuit who lacks good faith in mediation based on Decision Number 103/Pdt.G/2023/PN Tjk? And what are the judge's considerations regarding the dismissal of a plaintiff's lawsuit who lacks good faith in mediation based on Decision Number 103/Pdt.G/2023/PN Tjk?The research method uses two approaches: a normative juridical approach and an empirical approach. Data collection was conducted through literature review and fieldwork. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively.  There was one source in this research: a Judge at the Tanjung Karang District Court. The settlement of the dispute over the cancellation of the plaintiff's lawsuit for failing to act in good faith during mediation complies with the dispute resolution procedures under Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK), which was carried out by PT. Astra Sedaya Finance. The Unlawful Act (PMH) for the Violation of the Inclusion of Standard Clauses committed by PT. Astra Sedaya Finance has seriously harmed the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff deserves legal certainty at the Tanjung Karang District Court. The Judge adjudicated by declaring the Plaintiff's failure to act in good faith during the mediation process, declaring the Plaintiff's lawsuit inadmissible, ordering the Plaintiff to pay mediation costs of IDR 800,000.00 (eight hundred thousand rupiah), and ordering the Plaintiff to pay court costs, which to date have been set at IDR 676,000.00 (six hundred seventy-six thousand rupiah).  The judge's considerations regarding the dismissal of the plaintiff's lawsuit for failing to act in good faith during mediation were consistent with the decision rendered by the Panel of Judges. The plaintiff's failure to attend mediation is comparable to failing to attend court, given that mediation is an integral part of the civil trial process. Based on these considerations, the panel of judges decided to dismiss the plaintiff's lawsuit for failing to act in good faith during the mediation process. This decision was made to uphold the principle of good faith in the judicial process and ensure that mediation is not abused by parties who are not serious about resolving the dispute. The recommendation in this study is that the Panel of Judges should enforce the law fairly and issue decisions based on legal facts and available evidence. It is also hoped that the public will be raised awareness about the dangers of embezzlement in office and its impact on organizations and society.
The Legal Certainty in the Application of Sanctions for the Abuse of Narcotics Class I Not Derived from Plants Based on the Principle of Justice (A Study of Decision Number: 528/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Tjk) Jainah, Zainab Ompu; Ramadan, Suta; Ningrum, Intan Putri Yani Cahya; Anggara, Firga Fiksona
The Future of Education Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Lembaga Penerbitan dan Publikasi Ilmiah Yayasan Pendidikan Tumpuan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61445/tofedu.v5i1.1544

Abstract

Class I narcotics crimes that are not plants are serious crimes that have a wide impact on public health, security, and order, and threaten the future of the nation's generation. One of the important problems in handling narcotics crimes is ensuring legal certainty in the application of criminal sanctions to perpetrators who commit acts without rights and against the law. The problems raised are: Legal Certainty in the Application of Sanctions Without Rights and Against the Law on Class I Narcotics Crimes that are not Plants Based on Decision Number 528 / Pid.Sus / PN Tjk. and What are the factors causing perpetrators to commit Class I narcotics Abuse based on the principle of justice. The research method uses a normative and empirical juridical approach. The normative juridical approach is taken through a literature study by examining relevant laws and regulations, doctrines, and legal literature. Meanwhile, the empirical approach is carried out by interviewing parties involved or directly understanding the case to obtain a factual picture regarding the application of the law in the field. The results of the study indicate that the application of criminal sanctions to the defendant in Decision Number 528/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Tjk has fulfilled the principle of legal certainty, especially regarding the fulfillment of the elements of "without rights and against the law" as regulated in Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. However, there are still several inhibiting factors in the application of legal certainty, These include differences in legal interpretation, limited evidence, and the influence of non-juridical factors in the law enforcement process. Factors causing class I drug abuse include environmental factors, drug dependence, and family factors. The judge's considerations in the decision emphasized aspects of legal certainty and community protection, but did not fully reflect the principle of substantive justice that prioritizes a rehabilitative approach for drug abusers as victims of dependence. The imposition of prison sentences on class I drug users still raises debate regarding its suitability with the objectives of punishment and the spirit of rehabilitation mandated by law. The suggestion from this study is that the handling of class I drug abuse cases needs to prioritize substantive justice through the implementation of rehabilitation for pure abusers, supported by the active role of the community in prevention in order to create legal certainty and suppress drug distribution.
Pertanggungjawaban Terhadap Pelaku yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Percobaan Pencurian Kendaraan Bermotor Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Putusan Nomor 649/Pid.B/2024/PN Tjk) Tami Rusli; Suta Ramadan; Renita Agustiani
Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jclhr.v1i2.5360

Abstract

Tindak pidana pencurian dengan kekerasan (curas) atau perampokan, merupakan pencurian yang disertai ancaman atau penggunaan kekerasan terhadap korban, yang dianggap lebih serius dibandingkan pencurian biasa. Percobaan pencurian dengan kekerasan, meskipun tidak berhasil, tetap memiliki potensi bahaya bagi masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor penyebab pelaku melakukan tindak pidana percobaan pencurian kendaraan bermotor dengan kekerasan serta bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pelaku di hadapan hukum. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan empiris serta analisis kualitatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa faktor ekonomi, rendahnya pendidikan, kurangnya lapangan pekerjaan, serta lingkungan sosial yang tidak mendukung menjadi pendorong utama tindakan kriminal. Dalam kasus percobaan pencurian kendaraan bermotor dengan kekerasan yang diputuskan di Pengadilan Negeri Tanjung Karang, terdakwa terbukti melakukan tindak pidana yang mengakibatkan korban luka-luka. Terdakwa dijatuhi hukuman penjara selama 3 tahun 6 bulan sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku. Penelitian ini menyarankan perlunya penegakan hukum yang lebih adil, peningkatan patroli polisi, dan perhatian terhadap faktor sosial yang mempengaruhi tindak pidana.
Pertimbangan Hakim Praperadilan Terhadap Tidak Sahnya Perhitungan Kerugian Keuangan Negara (Studi Putusan Nomor: 3/Pid.Pra/2024/PN.Kbu) I Nyoman Octaria Andi; Bambang Hartono; Suta Ramadhan
Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jclhr.v1i2.5342

Abstract

Kerugian keuangan negara merupakan suatu tindakan yang memiliki potensi merugikan keuangan negara dimana hal ini termasuk kedalam tindakan melanggar etik yang biasa disebut tindak pidana korupsi. Dalam hal ini, hakim praperadilan memiliki kewenangan untuk memberikan pertimbangan terkait penilaian dan juga penghitungan kerugian keuangan negara yang dilakukan oleh lembaga-lembaga terkait yang berwenang. Dari pembahasan penelitian ini maka terdapat beberapa permasalahan yang akan dianalisis yakni Bagaimana pertimbangan Hakim Praperadilan dalam menilai keabsahan perhitungan kerugian keuangan negara berdasarkan Perkara Nomor : 3/Pid.Pra/2024/PN.Kbu Dan Apakah dampak dari perhitungan kerugian negara yang tidak sah terhadap proses hukum dalam kasus tindak pidana korupsi Perkara Nomor : 3/Pid.Pra/2024/PN.Kbu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu Metode Yuridis Normatif dengan pendekatan empiris. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan dan juga Wawancara.
Studi Yuridis Peran Hacker Dalam Cyber Crime dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keamanan Sistem Elektronik Bambang Hartono; Suta Ramadan; Salsabila Brillianti Sarenc
Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jclhr.v1i2.5333

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi yang pesat telah membawa dunia digital menjadi bagian integral dalam berbagai aspek kehidupan manusia, mulai dari komunikasi hingga layanan kesehatan. Namun, kemajuan ini juga memunculkan ancaman serius berupa kejahatan siber yang melibatkan hacker sebagai aktor utama dalam serangan digital yang merugikan individu, organisasi, dan negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji peran hacker dalam kejahatan siber serta dampaknya terhadap keamanan digital melalui perspektif yuridis. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi literatur dengan mengumpulkan dan menganalisis sumber-sumber tertulis yang relevan, seperti buku, jurnal, laporan riset, dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hacker dengan berbagai motivasi memiliki pengaruh besar dalam meningkatkan risiko serangan siber, sehingga upaya pencegahan dari individu, organisasi, dan pemerintah sangat diperlukan. Implementasi teknologi keamanan, penguatan regulasi hukum, serta edukasi masyarakat menjadi langkah strategis dalam memitigasi ancaman tersebut. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan adanya kolaborasi yang lebih kuat antara sektor publik dan swasta untuk memperkuat ketahanan digital melalui pelatihan, peningkatan kesadaran, dan penerapan kebijakan yang adaptif terhadap perkembangan teknologi.
Pertanggungjawaban Korupsi dalam Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Kesehatan (BOK) di Indonesia Udea Tri Yunita; Bambang Hartono; Suta Ramadhan
Journal of Constitutional, Law and Human Rights Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jclhr.v1i2.5334

Abstract

Korupsi dalam sektor kesehatan tidak hanya merugikan anggaran negara, tetapi juga menghambat upaya pemerintah dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan rakyat, yang pada akhirnya dapat menurunkan tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem pelayanan public seperti korupsi dalam pengelolaan Bantuan Operasional Kesehatan (BOK). Penelitian ini menyoroti faktor-faktor yang mendorong korupsi, seperti penyalahgunaan wewenang, lemahnya pengawasan, dan kurangnya sanksi hukum yang efektif, yang mengganggu efektivitas pelaksanaan BOK. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi literatur, dengan menganalisis berbagai sumber seperti buku hukum, artikel ilmiah, peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan, serta putusan pengadilan terkait kasus korupsi BOK. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan pendekatan normatif hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik korupsi dalam BOK mencakup pemotongan anggaran, penyelewengan dana, dan manipulasi data, serta mengidentifikasi perlunya penguatan mekanisme pengawasan, peningkatan transparansi, dan penegakan sanksi yang lebih tegas untuk mencegah kasus serupa di masa depan. Saran dari penelitian ini diperlukan upaya pembenahan yang komprehensif, termasuk penguatan sistem pengawasan, peningkatan transparansi pengelolaan dana.
Co-Authors Abdul Rohim, Abdul Achmad Putra Syeban Adelia Febianita Agum Rizky Waldini Akbar, Annafi Al Makki Ahmad Hartori Aldi Yansah Alinda Julietha Adnan Amallia, Rizka Anggara, Firga Fiksona Aprinisa AR Siti Nurhaliza Ardi Rian Pratama Ardinia Awanis Shabrina Asmara, Bunga Dewi Atika Putri Jayanti Bachruddin, Salman Zahir Bafaddol, M Bagas Baharudin Baharudin Baharudin, Baharudin Bambang Hartono Bambang Hartono Cahya Ningrum, Bella Cintya Anindita Choirunnisa Cornellia Adinda Putri Watun Danuwangsa, Fabio Arya Deta Merly Oktavianti Devira, Devira Dewi Putriyani Difa, Muhammad Anta Dita Rizqita Sari Dodi Setiawan Ega Waifannur Erlangga Adnus Erlina B Erlina B Fajar Ramadan Harimurti, Pangestika Raras Helin Kristikaningwulan Hycal Asmara Wibowo I Ketut Seregig I Ketut Siregig I Nyoman Octaria Andi Intan Nurina Seftiniara Kautsar Gusti Cakra Marshenda Afi Ananta Muhammad Ade Rafli Muhammad Anta Difa Muhammad Arullah Aqil Muhammad Bagas Baffadol Muhammad Rizki Nabila Fakhirah Herlian Namira Namira Namira, Namira Ningrum, Intan Putri Yani Cahya Noviyana Hadiyati Nuri, Paten Pika Sari Pratiwi, Galuh Pribadi, Arief Erwanda Raudatul Zanah Al-Zahra Renita Agustiani Renita Agustiani Retno Wulansari Rian Setiawan Riyan Saputra, Riyan Rizka Dewi Aprillia Rosmeli Heriyanti Ruddy Heavent S. Endang Prasetyawati Salsabila Brillianti Sarenc Seftiniara, Intan Siregar, Michael Gabe Bryan Siregig, I Ketut Siregig, Ketut syah, bagas muzekki Tami Rusli Udea Tri Yunita Wiritanaya, Rara Yuanda Alyansyah Putra, Y. L Yulia Hesti Yulistia, Alyaa Yusril Nasawijaya, Muhammad Zainab Ompu Jainah