Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

KEEFEKTIVAN INTEGRASI SINTAKS INKUIRI TERBIMBING DAN STAD (INSTAD) UNTUK MEMPERKECIL KESENJANGAN KETERAMPILAN METAKOGNISI SISWA AKADEMIK ATAS DAN BAWAH Baskoro Adi Prayitno; Bowo Sugiharto
INFERENSI: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol 9, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/infsl3.v9i2.305-328

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating the influence of INSTAD model compared to guided inquiry, STAD and conventional toward metacognition skill, the influence of academic achievementtoward metacognition skill, and interaction of learning model and academic achievement toward metacognition skill. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental research method with factorial design of 2x4. The population of this study is seventh grade students of all State Junior High School in Surakarta. The writers used random sampling technique with school criteria of high and low quality. The research findings showed that there is an influence on learning model of metacognition skill. INSTAD model and guided inquiry are not significantly different, but those are significantly different from the Conventional and STAD models toward metacognition skill. There is an influence on theacademic achievement toward metacognition skill. Upper academic students have higher metacognition skill than lower academic students do. There is interaction of learningmodel and academic achievement toward metacognition skill.
PENERAPAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING PADA MATERI PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH TERTULIS SISWA KELAS X MIPA Rahmad Anung Prasetya Wibawa; Baskoro Adi Prayitno; Marjono Marjono
Biogenesis Vol 14, No 2 (2018)
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (360.722 KB) | DOI: 10.31258/biogenesis.14.2.29-36

Abstract

ABSTRACT The research aims to improve students written scientific argumentation through the application of  problem based learning into enviromental pollution main subject at class X Science. The research was a Classroom Action Research (CAR). It was carried out in two cycles in which each cycle consists of  four stages: planning, action, observation, and reflection. The subject of the research was 38 students of X Science.The source of the data came from teacher and students. Technique of collecting data used tests, interviews, and documentation. The main data about students written scientific argumentation covers three aspects, they are: claim, evidence, and reasoning. The technique used to validate this data was triangulation method. The data was analyzed using descriptive analysis technique. The research procedure used eas the spiral method. The reasearch target was improvement of written scientific argumentation increase ≥30% from base line.The result showed the application of problem based learning can improve written scientific argumentation students at class X Science. Percentage performance students written scientific argumentation in pre-action is 36,55% with a low category, consists of claim at  50,88% with a medium category, evidence at  35,09% with a low category; and reasoning at 23,68% with a low category. Percentage performance students written scientific argumentation in the first cycle increased to 57,89% with a medium category, consists of claim at  64,91% with a high category, evidence at  56,14% with a medium category; and reasoning at 52,63% with a medium category. Percentage performance students written scientific argumentation in the second cycle increased to 86,55% with a very high category, consists of claim at  97,37% with a very high category, evidence at  85,97%  with a very high category; and reasoning at 76,31% with a high category. Data increase written scientific argumentation from pre-action to second cycle has been increased according to the target is ≥30%. Key Words:written scientific argumentation, problem based learning, enviromental pollution.
Profil Miskonsepsi Materi Jaringan Tumbuhan pada Mahasiswa Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi Salah Satu Perguruan Tinggi di Surakarta Aullya Retno Giyanti; Arin Laila Fitriana; Ayuni Devitasari; Baskoro Adi Prayitno
Biosfer : Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi Vol 4 No 2 (2019): BIOSFER: Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, FKIP Unpas,

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (228.358 KB) | DOI: 10.23969/biosfer.v4i2.2133

Abstract

A person’s understanding of a material is very important to know the level of success of a learning. Misconceptionis a condition where the recipient of the material understands concepts that are not in accordance with scientific theory. If the misconception is not immadiately dealt with, the subsequent learning will be hampered. Using a multiple choice diagnostic test instrument aided by CRI (Certainly Response Index). Samples were taken with a stratified proportionate random sampling of 15% carried out in December 2019 in one of the tertiary institution in Surakarta. Yhe method used was quantitative descriptive analysis with data collection techniques through the questionnaire methode. The results of this study showed 35% of student who experienced misconceptions, 15% did not know the concept, and 50% of students already know the concept. Besides that, between students of biology and biology education who take semesters 3 and 5 have a level of misconception that is not much different, namely 2%.
Pengaruh Variasi Pakan Bekatul Suplementasi Daun Pepaya (Carica papaya L.) terhadap Berat Badan dan Karakteristik Ukuran Tubuh Ayam (Gallus domesticus) Cindyana Putri Puspita Hapsari; Baskoro Adi Prayitno; Meti Indrowati
Habitat: Jurnal ilmiah ilmu Hewani dan Peternakan Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Agustus : Habitat: Jurnal ilmiah ilmu Hewani dan Peternakan
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Tanaman Dan Hewani Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/habitat.v2i2.52

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of papaya leaf (Carica papaya L.) supplementation in bran feed on body weight and body size of chickens (Gallus domesticus). Three groups of chickens were fed with papaya leaf flour supplementation to see the efficiency on chicken growth. This study was conducted for 28 days at the "Rinael Farm" Farm, Pulerejo Village, Manggis, Mojosongo, Boyolali, Central Java. This study was implemented through an experimental method with a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) design that included three treatments and three repetitions: P0 (no supplementation), P1 (10% supplementation), and P2 (20% supplementation). The results of the study proved that 10% and 20% papaya leaf supplementation did not have a significant effect on chicken weight (P> 0.05). However, papaya leaf supplementation had a significant impact on the characteristics of chicken body size, with a p value <0.001. Papaya leaf supplementation increased chicken body size, with group P1 experiencing the most significant and consistent increase, while group P2 showed greater variation in growth. Supplementation with 10% papaya leaves (P1) proved to be the most effective in increasing chicken growth efficiency.
Validity and Reliability of Online Socio-Scientific Issue-Based Critical Reasoning Instrument yokhebed, yokhebed; Sutarno, Sutarno; Masykuri, Mohammad; Adi Prayitno, Baskoro; sudirman , sudirman
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/2hnw4674

Abstract

Information regarding the evaluation of reasoning skills related to online socio-scientific issues is still limited due to limited instruments. This research aims to determine the validity and reliability of an online socio-scientific issue-based critical reasoning instrument. Content validity was proven by the assessment method by five experts. Confirmatory factor analysis was carried out with the Lisrel 8.8 program to prove construct validity. Instrument testing was carried out on 145 grade 10 high school students. Convergent validity was determined through the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) calculation, and reliability was determined through Construct Reliability (CR). There are 12 items from four dimensions of critical reasoning based on online socio-scientific issues: (1) evaluating SSI information, (2) identifying SSI complexity, (3) checking the credibility of information sources, and (4) multiperspective. The results of the content validity test obtained the Aiken coefficient value in the valid category. Based on the analysis results, the GFI, RMSEA, and p-value of the instrument fit the model and have loading factors that meet the minimum criteria. In addition, the instrument meets convergent validity and internal consistency. Thus, it is concluded that the instrument is declared valid and reliable and can be used to measure critical reasoning based on online socio-scientific issues.
Analysis of Initial Profiles of Students' Creative Thinking Skills in Biology Learning Widiyaningsih, Tutut; Adi Prayitno, Baskoro; Indrowati, Meti
Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 6 (2026): SPECIAL ISSUE: Sustainable Innovation at the Intersection of Economics, Technology, L
Publisher : DAS Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53866/jimi.v6i1.1251

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the initial profile of high school students' creative thinking skills in biology learning. The research is descriptive quantitative research using an open-ended test method. The subjects of this study were tenth-grade high school students. The results of the analysis show that the average creative thinking skills of high school students is 37.85%, which is classified as not creative. Specifically, the lowest percentages were found in the aspects of originality, elaboration, and flexibility, while the aspect of fluency showed relatively higher achievements. The conclusion of this study is that the profile of students' creative thinking skills in biology learning is low. These findings indicate that the dominance of convergent learning through closed questions and student passivity in class are factors that inhibit the development of divergent thinking potential. Therefore, it is necessary to apply active learning models and use more exploratory evaluation instruments to stimulate students' ability to produce unique, flexible, and in-depth ideas.