Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam

Takhrij Fikih dan Permasalahan Kontemporer Meirison, Meirison; Saharuddin, Desmadi; Rosdialena, Rosdialena
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 5 No 1 May (2020)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4803.75 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v5i1.1235

Abstract

This paper aims to describe Takhrij as a medium for understanding the general rules established by imams that are built on the fiqh fiqh by induction and analyzing specific problems (furu 'fiqhiyah), this is what the takhrij ushul means for furu'.Takhrij also means to resolve differences furu 'fiqhiyah with the ushuliyah rules originating from the imams. It is expected to find a law that does not have the proposition shara 'by returning it to the rules and ushul. With a literature study and comparative approach to descriptive analysis, it is found that fiqh takhrij is also used to recognize the law that comes from a priest in a problem that has no text. Its can be made by comparing it with the same furu 'problem with the texts (qiyas), or comparing it with the understanding of Imam's texts or its generality. This is the furu takrij 'on furu'. Takhrij fiqh can be applied to contemporary problems such as loading and unloading insurance, inflation, copyright, furu 'and Syariah laws' in contemporary matters. The development of takhrij fiqh is dependent on the interaction of theory and practice in the existing field to produce solutions to contemporary problems.
Sultan's Law and Islamic Sharia in The Ottoman Empire Court: An Analysis of The Existence of Secular Law Fatarib, Husnul; Meirison, Meirison; Saharuddin, Desmadi; Bahar, Muchlis; Karimullah, Suud Sarim
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 8 No 1 May (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v8i1.4908

Abstract

This article aims to describe the impact of legal dualism within the Ottoman Empire. After Constantinople was taken over, Sultan Muhammad Al-Fatih instituted a significant policy, including issuing laws and regulations for the benefit of society; then, there was also a dualism system within the Ottoman Empire, which was visible during the reign of Sultan Sulaiman I. During this time, foreign nationals were mainly recruited, and foreign traders began to gain impunity at the peak of power. This then prompted several questions, such as were the sultans free to create the laws they wanted, or was Islamic law still binding on them? Was Sultan's law an innovation from the Ottoman Empire or a legacy from the preceding dynasty in the form of Capitulation? To address those issues, the authors conducted a comparative historical analysis of various types of literature. We used a descriptive qualitative approach to Qānūn's position, which served as a springboard for foreign intervention in an Empire that was strong but weak in political policies which occasionally strayed outside the corridor of Islamic Sharia which had become customary and national culture. The tolerance separated from the corridors of Islam derailed during the crisis. This became a springboard for legal dualism in a state body with integrity in various dimensions.Keywords: Sultan's Law, Sharia, Judiciary,  Ottoman