Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Pandecta

Halal Certification Systems: A Comparison Between Indonesia and Turkey Nurul Fibrianti; Aprila Niravita; Sang Ayu Putu Rahayu; Ratih Damayanti; Ayup Suran Ningsih
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 18, No 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v18i2.48095

Abstract

Ensuring the halal status of a product involves utilizing the services of a halal certification body, offering legal protection and confidence in halal product assurance for Muslim consumers. Indonesia is currently in the process of transitioning the certification authority from the non-governmental organization MUI to the government agency BPJPH under the Ministry of Religious Affairs. The halal certification mechanism through BPJPH closely aligns with the established process carried out by MUI. Similarly, Turkey has established the Halal Accreditation Authority (HAK) to guarantee the legal certainty of halal products, providing accreditation services for halal conformity assessment agencies. This study uses a descriptive method with a comparative approach. Focuses on positive legal nor governing the implementation of halal product between Halal Prodyct Assurance  (JPH) and Halal Accreditation Authority (HAK).  The findings reveal that in order to implement the Halal Product Assurance (JPH) system, the Indonesian government established the Halal Product Assurance Organizing Agency (BPJPH). The establishment of a globally recognized halal certification system and the removal of trade barriers in halal goods and services require the effective execution of responsibilities, as demonstrated by Turkey through the activities of the Halal Accreditation Authority (HAK). Turkey's strategy for ensuring the genuineness of halal products involves the Halal Accreditation Authority, tasked with evaluating, accrediting, and supervising the competence of halal conformity assessment bodies. This procedural framework aligns with both national regulations and international standards, incorporating additional technical regulations specified in the accreditation body's implementation documents.
Development of Integrity Zone Towards Corruption-Free (WBK)/Clean Bureaucracy (WBBM) at Work Unit Law Faculty UNNES Aprila Niravita; Tri Andari Dahlan; Rahayu Fery Anitasari; Andry Setiawan; Ayup Suran Ningsih
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol 18, No 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v18i2.48338

Abstract

Regulation of the Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform Number 25 of 2020, which underlines the 2020-2024 Bureaucratic Reform Road Map, guides the government's efforts to realize world-class government. The goal of bureaucratic reform is to achieve three main conditions: a clean and accountable bureaucracy, a capable bureaucracy, and optimal public services. The Faculty of Law at Universitas Negeri Semarang(UNNES) is one of the units committed to achieving high standards of integrity. This requires structuring good governance, optimal public services, and high integrity for all human resources at the Faculty of Law. Therefore, this study aims to examine the readiness of the Faculty of Law in building Integrity Zones, especially in achieving Free from Corruption Areas (WBK) and Clean and Serving Bureaucratic Areas (WBBM). This research uses doctrinal or normative research methods with concept and case approaches. Legal materials are collected through the study of documents and presented systematically following legal issues and research problems. Then it is analyzed qualitatively juridically. The results of the study identify strategies used by the Faculty of Law to build Integrity Zones towards WBK and WBBM. In addition, this study also identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the Faculty of Law in achieving these goals. This in-depth understanding of the readiness of the Faculty of Law in bureaucratic reform is expected to guide improving bureaucratic performance and integrity at the faculty level.
Co-Authors Adyaksa, Bryan Rois Putra Ali Masyhar Aminah Aminah Anak Agung Gede Sugianthara Andry Setiawan, Andry Anitasari, Rahayu Fery Ansori, Rio Taufik Azra, Vira Bayangsari Wedhatami Bin Hassan, Muhammad Sayuti binti Jamil @ Osman, Zuraini Chairunnisa, Nursyifa Dewi Sulistianingsih Duhita, Elsa Ratna Eka Saputra, Dany Erisandi Arditama Fikri, Muhammad Adymas Haikal Fikri, Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fiorentina, Prita Indung Wijayanto Komariyah, Maulida Nurul Laskarwati, Batari Maharani, Ferra Tiara Mardiana - Masrukhi Masrukhi Maulana, Muhammad Reza Maulida, Tyas Ayu Meidianto, Muhammad Rizki Moh. Aris Munandar, Moh. Aris Muchammad Shidqon Prabowo N, Edwindha Prafitra Nadhif, Faza Fatkhun Naelufar, Rizqan Ningsih, Ayup Suran Ningsih, Dita Cahya Nurul Fibrianti Pancawati, Ria Pratiwi Prastiyo, Devanda PUJI LESTARI Pujiono, Wasis Puspitasari, Saniya Putra, Tegar Islami Putri, Nadiyah Meyliana Qadisah , Altares Ainun Rachmawati, Fairus Augustina Rahayu Fery Anitasari Rahayu, Sang Ayu Putu Ramadhani, Fauziah Ramli, Asmarani Rasdi Ratih Damayanti Ratih Damayanti Ridwan Arifin Robbani, Muhammad Rizqi Rodiyah - Rofi Wahanisa Rofi Wahanisa Rokhmad, Firman Nur Sang Ayu Putu Rahayu Sari, Indah Zunita Shidqon Prabowo, Muchammad Sibuea, Putri Merlin Yoseva Sri Lestari Suhadi - Suhadi Suhadi Syariefudin, Iqbal Syukron Salam, Syukron Tri Andari Dahlan Triandani, Salsabila Tursunov, Berdibek Ubaidillah Kamal Wahyu Putri Handayani Wardhani, Harumsari Puspa Waspiah - Wedhatami, Bayangsari Windiahsari, Windiahsari