p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.446
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies IJTIHAD Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan Jurnal Daulat Hukum UIR LAW REVIEW Jurnal Pengabdian UntukMu NegeRI Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) JOURNAL EQUITABLE Awang Long Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Law Research Review Quarterly Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Borneo Student Research (BSR) Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Lentera:Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Journal of Education Research Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Bacarita Law Journal Arus Jurnal Psikologi dan Pendidikan Qonun Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary on Social and Technology JURNAL RETENTUM ANDREW Law Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Journal of Innovative and Creativity Horizon: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah Jurnal Padamu Negeri Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

IDEAL REGULATIONS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST MEDICAL MALPRACTICE TRADITIONAL HEALTH WORKERS Oktareza, Dwi; Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi; Alhadi, Muhammad Nurcholis; Elviandri; Suhadi, Nainuri
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1410

Abstract

Traditional health services in Indonesia play an important role in maintaining public health, but the increasing cases of malpractice in this practice can endanger patient safety. The main challenges are the lack of supervision and the lack of legality that exacerbate the potential for malpractice. Therefore, strict legal protection is needed to ensure that traditional medicine is safe, effective, and meets standards, as well as to protect patients and traditional health workers. This study uses a normative legal method with a legislative, conceptual, and case study approach. Data were collected through literature studies and analyzed descriptively to understand the legal protection for patients of traditional health services. This study proposes strengthening supervision of traditional health practices through the establishment of a Traditional Health Worker Supervisory Board and non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation or arbitration. In addition, strict law enforcement against malpractice through administrative, civil, and criminal law will increase the accountability of traditional health workers, improve the quality of services, and provide a sense of justice for patients. Thus, it is hoped that a balance will be created between preserving tradition and effective legal protection to create a safe and fair health system in Indonesia.
THE IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION REGARDING THE LIMITATION OF REGIONAL HEADS' TERMS ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF REGIONAL HEADS' NOMINATIONS Noor, Andreyan; Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi; Elviandri, Elviandri; Alhadi, Muhammad Nurcholis
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1419

Abstract

The limitation of regional heads' terms in Indonesia is basically related to two things, the first is to avoid abuse of authority, and the second is to regenerate leadership in the regions, therefore the limitation of the regional heads' terms is very important. This research is normative legal research with a statute approach and a case approach, by analyzing the decisions of the Constitutional Court such as Decision Number 22/PUU-VII/2009, Number 67/PUU-XVIII/2020, and Number 2/PUU-XXI/2023. This study examines how the Constitutional Court interprets the term limits of regional heads, including the calculation of the term of office for regional heads who do not complete their term of office. The results of this study show that the Constitutional Court emphasizes that a term of office that is served for half of the term or more is counted as one full term, both for definitive officials and temporary officials. This interpretation aims to ensure legal certainty and prevent abuse of power, by providing protection for the constitutional rights of citizens who wish to run for re-election. The Constitutional Court's decision also confirms that the norm of term limits for regional heads is in line with the principles of justice, proportionality, and legal certainty guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution. Thus, this term limit is not only served to prevent the dominance of power, but also to encourage the regeneration of healthy leadership in the Indonesian democratic system. The implications of this Constitutional Court decision are very important for the implementation of the 2024 Simultaneous Regional Head Elections, where the KPU and Bawaslu must ensure the consistent implementation of this norm, to ensure the creation of fair, transparent, and quality elections.
Analisis Kesiapan Polisi dan Hakim dalam Memberikan Keadilan Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana di Kota Samarinda Andayani, Ana; Nurcholis, Muhammad; Surahman, Surahman; Elviandri, Elviandri
Journal of Education Research Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Perkumpulan Pengelola Jurnal PAUD Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37985/jer.v6i1.2182

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi sejauh mana kesiapan aparat kepolisian dan hakim dalam memberikan perlakuan yang adil kepada penyandang disabilitas yang terlibat dalam proses hukum. Dalam konteks ini, penyandang disabilitas sering kali menghadapi tantangan dalam mendapatkan hak-hak mereka, terutama saat berhadapan dengan hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif, di mana penulis melakukan wawancara dengan aparat kepolisian dan hakim di Kota Samarinda serta mengumpulkan data dari dokumen hukum yang relevan. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa meskipun terdapat kebijakan hukum yang mengakomodasi hak-hak penyandang disabilitas sebagai pelaku tindak pidana, namun masih terdapat tantangan dalam implementasi di lapangan, terutama dalam hal pemahaman dan kesadaran aparat hukum terhadap kebutuhan khusus penyandang disabilitas terutama bagi tunanetra, tunarungu, dan tunawicara yang memiliki keterbatasan dalam berkomunikasi dan menyampai keterangan pada proses peradilan. Sehingga perlunya pelatihan dan pembentukan aturan khusus mengenai hak-hak dan cara penanganan yang khusus pula bagi penyandang disabilitas (tunanetra, tunarungu, tunawicara) menjadi rekomendasi utama oleh penulis agar keadilan dapat tercapai secara inklusif.
THE DIALECTIC OF POSITIVISM AND SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE: THE PANCASILA RULE OF LAW PARADIGM Elviandri; Muhammad Amin; Demitha selvira amellia; Ricky Indrawan safutra; Andi Wibowo
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1777

Abstract

This study examines the dialectic between legal positivism and substantive justice within the framework of the Pancasila legal state paradigm as an effort to find a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice. The background of this study stems from the hegemony of legal positivism in Indonesia, which emphasizes formal and procedural legality, often neglecting the aspect of substantive justice that is at the core of the Pancasila legal ideal. In practice, law tends to stop at normative certainty (law in books), without touching on the values of humanity and justice that exist in society (law in action). The urgency of this study lies in the need to reposition Pancasila as a grundnorm and ethical foundation to return the orientation of Indonesian law to substantive justice, not merely formal justice. The research method used is juridical-normative with a legal philosophy and conceptual hermeneutics approach, which interprets law as das sollen (what should be). The results of the study show that rigid legal positivism has created a gap between legal certainty and substantive justice. The Pancasila legal paradigm presents itself as an integrative model that unites legal certainty and moral justice, positioning law not merely as an instrument of power, but as an ethical and spiritual means to uphold civilized justice. Thus, the Pancasila legal state offers a philosophical foundation for harmonizing positive norms and substantive values of justice in the national legal system.
PHILOSOPHICAL EXAMINATION OF DECISION NO. 916/PDT.P/2022/PN SBY: THE PARADIGM OF TRANSCENDENTAL LAW AND MAQĀṢID AL-SYARĪ‘AH Elviandri; Sutag Harsie; Muhammad Hanafi; Iranda Nadya Febianty; Munir Anshory
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1778

Abstract

This study is a philosophical examination of Surabaya District Court Decision Number 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN Sby through the approach of Transcendental Law and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah. The issue of interfaith marriage in the context of Indonesian law reflects the epistemological tension between legal positivism and the divine values that exist in society. The absence of explicit norms regarding the legality of interfaith marriage has encouraged judges to interpret the law formalistically, thereby depriving the law of its ethical and spiritual dimensions. The urgency of this study lies in the pressing need to present a transcendental legal paradigm, namely a law that combines legal rationality with moral values, maqāṣid, and divine justice. This study uses a normative-philosophical legal approach through analysis of court decisions, Islamic legal doctrine, and the principles of modern and prophetic legal philosophy. The methods of analysis include descriptive, hermeneutic, and heuristic approaches to explore the transcendental meaning behind the legal arguments of the decisions. The novelty of this research lies in the formulation of an epistemological synthesis between transcendental law and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah as an alternative paradigm in jurisprudential examination. The findings of this study show that the judges' considerations in this case are still trapped in procedural legalism, without regard to the principles of ḥifẓ al-dīn (protection of religion) and ḥifẓ al-nasl (protection of offspring), which are the basic objectives of Islamic law. Transcendental analysis reveals that law is not merely legally valid, but must achieve substantive justice that links legal certainty with moral and spiritual benefits. Thus, this study offers a conceptual model of “transcendental maqāṣid-based law” as a new direction for national legal reform based on Pancasila.
Analisis Yuridis Tentang Threshold Pilkada Berdasarkan Putusan MK Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 Salas, Jevi; Elviandri, Elviandri; Prasetyo, Bayu
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 31 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v31i1.1154

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the juridical aspects of the threshold provisions in the Pilkada by referring to the decision. The research method used is a normative research method with a case approach that focuses on analyzing the Constitutional Court Decision Number 60/PUUXXII/2024. The results of the analysis show that the Constitutional Court's decision provides a new interpretation of the threshold provisions, which has the potential to affect the constitutional rights of political parties and independent candidates in the Pilkada contestation. The implication of this decision is a significant change in the regional head nomination mechanism in Indonesia. The General Elections Commission (KPU) revised KPU Regulation Number 8 of 2024 to KPU Regulation Number 10 of 2024 to adjust the nomination regulations with democratic principles and applicable laws. Thus, this decision ensures the legality of regional head candidacy and increases the value of democracy in the 2024 simultaneous regional elections in Indonesia.
THE DESIGN OF TERM LIMITATIONS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA'S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MEMBERS: CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY, AND THE CHECKS AND BALANCES MECHANISM Sulistafando, Ravidan Maheer; Elviandri; Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi; Hasmiati, Rahmatullah Ayu
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i2.1941

Abstract

The absence of term limits for legislative members has resulted in a pattern of power entrenchment, thus hampering the process of leadership regeneration and strengthening oligarchic tendencies within parliament. The absence of term limits in the Law of MD3 opens up space for power entrenchment, the formation of political dynasties, conflicts of interest, and a decline in the integrity of representation, reflected in the increasing constituency disconnect, the phenomenon of self-serving legislation, and the high number of legislative corruption cases. Therefore, a comprehensive design is needed to formulate a term limit model that aligns with the constitutional mandate. The study uses normative legal methods through legislative and conceptual approaches, examining the 1945 Constitution, the MD3 Law, the Election Law, Constitutional Court decisions, as well as the theories of constitutionalism, Habermas's deliberative democracy, and Madison's theory of power limitations. The analysis is conducted descriptively-analytical and interpretative-normative to build a cohesive legal argument. The results show that constitutionally, term limits can be justified as an integral part of the principle of power limitation and legal certainty; the current absence of norms has been shown to reduce the effectiveness of the representation function and open up opportunities for abuse of authority. From a leadership regeneration perspective, term limits increase the plurality of political actors, reduce incumbency advantage, and encourage policy innovation, while simultaneously breaking patronage networks that hamper oversight functions. Meanwhile, from a checks and balances perspective, term limits can strengthen the collegial independence of the House of Representatives (DPR) and increase the credibility of its oversight function over the executive, but they need to be designed proportionally to avoid creating an expertise gap or disrupting policy continuity.
THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AGAINST ABANDONED AND ABSENTEE LAND Kholil, Muhammad; Hasmiati, Rahmatullah Ayu; Elviandri; Surahman
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i2.1942

Abstract

This research is motivated by the increasing problem of abandoned land and absentee land, which indicates the ineffective enforcement of the land regulatory framework despite the comprehensive formulation of normative frameworks such as the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), Government Regulation No. 20 of 2021, and Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (BPN) No. 20 of 2021. Uncultivated land and agricultural land ownership by owners not domiciled in the area result in inefficient use of space, increase the risk of agrarian conflict, and reduce the social function of land, as seen in Jonggon Jaya Village. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of land regulatory framework enforcement, identify legal and administrative factors that hinder the handling of abandoned land and absentee land, and formulate strategies and formulations for strengthening the legal framework that is more responsive to local agrarian dynamics. The method used was sociological juridical research, combining normative analysis of land regulations with empirical findings through interviews, field observations, and review of land administration documents. These were then analyzed using Lawrence M. Friedman's legal system theory (structure, substance, and legal culture). The research results indicated that weaknesses in law enforcement stem from weak institutional capacity, fragmentation of legal substance, the absence of objective parameters for determining abandoned land, and low community compliance with land management obligations. To address these issues, this study offered five innovative policy formulations: the formulation of the Integrated Land Utilization Index (IULT), the development of Conditional Management Rights, the implementation of an electronic domicile verification system (E-DOM), the establishment of a Local Land Activation Fund, and the implementation of digital, electronically proven administrative protocols. These findings emphasize that strengthening the land regulatory framework requires synergy between normative reform, modernization of the administrative system, and strengthening of the community's legal culture to achieve sustainable agrarian justice.
Sentencing Disparities in Judicial Considerations of Electronic Sexual Violence Cases Nazrin, Mohamad; Prasetyo, Bayu; Elviandri, Elviandri
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 5 Issue 9, November 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v5i9.3410

Abstract

Introduction: Indonesia, as a state governed by the rule of law, upholds equality before the law and the protection of human rights as fundamental principles. However, the rapid development of digital technology has created new challenges, particularly the emergence of electronic sexual violence, which has raised significant public concern. Although Law Number: 12 of 2022 regulates such crimes, judicial practice reveals sentencing disparities that undermine legal certainty and victim protection.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the causes of judicial sentencing disparities in cases of electronic sexual violence and examine their implications for law enforcement in Indonesia.Methods of the Research: The research employs a normative juridical method with a library research approach. Data were collected from primary legal materials such as statutory regulations, secondary legal materials including literature, doctrines, and previous studies, as well as tertiary legal materials such as legal dictionaries and encyclopedias.Findings of the Research: The findings indicate the existence of disparities in three court decisions that applied similar provisions but resulted in significantly different sentences. Factors contributing to these disparities include differences in judicial interpretation, the application of individualized sentencing principles, and non-juridical considerations. Such disparities have serious implications, including diminished legal certainty, reduced deterrence for offenders, weakened victim protection, and declining public trust in the judiciary. Therefore, the establishment of consistent, transparent, and victim-oriented sentencing guidelines is essential to ensure substantive justice in Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Peran Hukum Kodrat dalam Menjawab Krisis Moral di Era Disrupsi Devi Mustika; Octaviani, Simalango Juita; Elviandri; Lisa Anggraini
Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/humani.v15i2.13095

Abstract

Era disrupsi yang ditandai oleh kemajuan teknologi digital dan perubahan sosial-ekonomi telah menimbulkan krisis moral dalam sistem hukum, di mana hukum sering kehilangan orientasi etiknya dan terjebak dalam formalisme positivistik. Kondisi ini menunjukkan urgensi perlunya fondasi moral baru bagi hukum yang tidak hanya sah secara formal, tetapi juga adil secara substantif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji peran hukum kodrat sebagai dasar moral dalam merespons krisis hukum kontemporer di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan normatif-filosofis dengan spesifikasi deskriptif-analitis, melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap berbagai literatur hukum dan filsafat. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada upaya mengaktualisasikan prinsip-prinsip hukum kodrat seperti keadilan, akal budi, dan kebaikan umum dalam sistem hukum nasional sebagai respons terhadap krisis nilai di era disrupsi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum kodrat mampu menjadi kerangka konseptual yang mengintegrasikan moralitas dan legalitas, serta menuntun hukum positif agar tidak kehilangan legitimasi etiknya. Penerapan nilai-nilai hukum kodrat dalam pembentukan, penegakan, dan pendidikan hukum di Indonesia diyakini dapat memperkuat integritas moral hukum dan mewujudkan tatanan hukum yang berkeadilan, bermartabat, dan berorientasi pada kemaslahatan umum.
Co-Authors Abdul Syahib Absori Absori Achmad Nazril Ade Putra Amanda Adelya, Eka Ahmad Yogi Setiawan Aidil Aidil Aidil, Aidil Akhmad Qadar Ramadhan Aksar Aksar Aksar Aldi Pebrian Ananda Dwi Indriyani Andayani, Ana Andi Fratiwi Andi Umirtang Andi Wibowo Andi Wibowo Andrean, Fisaka Wahyu Anita Audina Annisa Salsabila Aprilyani Ikra, Putri ARDIANSYAH ARDIANSYAH Ardiansyah Nurshah Putra Arif Pratama, Rio Ario, Dion Asrizal Saiin Aswin Zulfahmi Asya Noor Adha Atala Syahlina Saputri Aulia Vivi Yulianingrum Ayu Wulandari Ahmad Azqmi, Ulul Bayu Prasetyo Bayu Prasetyo Bayu Prasetyo, Bayu Cindi Aulia Cindy Eka Amalia Clara Ridha Nur Sinta Daffin Ramadhan Pradiza Dana, Robin Darlis Pattalongi, Muhammad Demitha selvira amellia Demitha selvira amellia Desi Sommaliagustina Devi Mustika Dewi Triesta Nabila Diana Rosmawati Dwi Edisam, Kuswandi E. Nur Ashfiya Elshanda Revalia Arisandy Erlyando Saputra Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani, Farkhani Fazratul Aulia M Fiqri Abdillah Firdaus, Andi Fitrah Ramadhan Gabriella Shalisha Mualim Gilvina Grace B.A. Gunawan, Predy Gustiawan, Putra Chusnul Hafied Zen Hasana Ina Gorang Hasmiati, Ayu Hayuningtyas, Wilda Herman, Akhmad Sobyan Imro'atul Azizah Indah Ratnanun Indah Ratnanun Indra Perdana Iranda Nadya Febianty Iranda Nadya Febianty Juono, Agustinus Arif Kevin Okta Zakin Khairunnisa Zain Dzakiyah Khairunnisa Zain Dzakiyah Kholik, Sadam Kholil Muhammad Khudzaifah Dimyati Kintan Artari Kusumastuti, Binarida Larassati, Aura Dara Lathifah Alya Larasati Lilis Lisa Anggraini Lisa Anggraini LUKMAN, LUKMAN Lusiawati Dwimega Utami M. Hendriazh Arnas Mardiah Mastur Rahmah Marjan Marjan Maulidha Eka Pratiwi Meisa Purnama Ayu Muh Zuhri Muhammad Adrian Abdillah Muhammad Amin Muhammad Amin Muhammad Ardi Samsudin Nur Muhammad Arif Yoga Paratama Muhammad Hanafi Muhammad Hanafi Muhammad Imam Ramadhani Muhammad Kholil Muhammad Miftah, Muhammad Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi Muhammad Ridho Gunawan Muhammad Taufiq Munir Anshory Munir Anshory Nabila Pasya Aisyah Nabila Ratu Adelia Nasywa Kayla N.A Nazrin, Mohamad Nazwa Anabella Alya Irawan Anuhu Neneng Lestari Nila M aulida Ningsih, Linda Setia Noor, Andreyan Norrafika Safitri Novyra Fitriany Karno Nugroho, Sigit Sapto Nur Rahmayani Mukhlis Nurcholis, Muhammad Nurul Amin Octaviani, Simalango Juita Oki Sadewo Setyo Oktareza, Dwi Olivia Nurul Utami Panggalih Husodo Pattalongi, Muhammad Darlis Putri, Merin Ananda Putri, Ona Monisca Putriani Meylinda Rachmat Ragil Iskandar Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati Raihana Raihana Raihana Raihana Raja Desril Rama Afriza Laksana Putra Reny Oktaviani Paturu Reynathan maulana resi Ricky Indrawan safutra Ricky Indrawan safutra Riduan Riduan Rifki Hidayat Rio Arif Pratama Riska Dwi Sagita Rinjani Risna Risna Riza, Wahyu Friyonanda Rizal Effendie Sadam Kholik Safira Dina Fakhirah Safira Nur Apriliani Sahbila Sahbila Salas, Jevi Sanda, Aditya Nur Tio Shaleh, Ali Ismail Shella Finly Sherly Kartika Devi Sigit Sapto Nugroho Siti Hawa Ainul Situngkir, Fernandes Situngkir, Swandi Aliverchan Sobyan Akhmad Suhadi, Nainuri Sukma Ayuningsih Sulistafando, Ravidan Maheer Sunariyo Sunariyo Sunariyo, Sunariyo Suparno, Achmad Surahman Surahman Surahman Surahman Surya Indra Danuarta Suswadi Sutag Harsie Sutag Harsie Syarief Hidayatullah Tasya Urmila Taufik Taufik Tiya Manikam Sariayana Tri Adi Saputra Tri Wahyuni Lestari Triwahyuni Lestari Turnip Mega Marta Turnip Mega Marta Ulul Azqmi Uut Rahayuningsih Wijoseno, Taufik Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi Yuniarti Wijinarko Zahrah Khan Zahrah Khan Zen, Hafied