Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.2
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies IJTIHAD Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan Jurnal Daulat Hukum UIR LAW REVIEW Jurnal Pengabdian UntukMu NegeRI JOURNAL EQUITABLE Awang Long Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Law Research Review Quarterly Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Borneo Student Research (BSR) Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Journal of Education Research Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Bacarita Law Journal Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia JURNAL RETENTUM Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum J-CEKI
Elviandri, Elviandri
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 48 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 48 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Sosialisasi Pembuktian Cyber Crime dalam KUHAP dan UU ITE Sunariyo, Sunariyo; Elviandri, Elviandri; Rahayuningsih, Uut; Prasetyo, Bayu
Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Alesha Media Digital

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59025/s6yw8h91

Abstract

Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini merupakan implementasi Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman masyarakat dan mahasiswa mengenai sistem pembuktian tindak pidana siber di Indonesia. Permasalahan utama mitra adalah rendahnya pemahaman terkait validitas alat bukti elektronik dan disharmoni antara Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) dengan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE), yang berakibat pada lemahnya tindak lanjut hukum terhadap laporan kejahatan siber. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, kegiatan sosialisasi dilaksanakan di Kelurahan Sidodadi, Samarinda, diikuti oleh 30 orang mahasiswa dan 20 orang dari mayarakat umum dengan metode ceramah normatif-yuridis, diskusi interaktif, dan studi kasus. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa peserta memperoleh peningkatan pemahaman tentang validitas alat bukti digital dari sisi formil dan materiil, serta pentingnya dokumentasi forensik dalam proses penyidikan. Diskusi juga menyoroti perlunya harmonisasi regulasi dan pendampingan hukum bagi korban kejahatan siber agar proses pelaporan tidak terhambat karena kekurangan alat bukti. Kesimpulannya, kegiatan ini berkontribusi dalam memperkuat kesadaran hukum, meningkatkan kapasitas masyarakat dalam menghadapi cybercrime, dan mendorong reformasi hukum acara pidana yang responsif terhadap perkembangan teknologi informasi.
DISPARITAS PEMIDANAAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA ASUSILA TERHADAP ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR: STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 21/PID.SUS/2019/PN PDP DAN 172/PID.SUS/2020/PN SBS Gustiawan, Putra Chusnul; Prasetyo, Bayu; Elviandri, Elviandri
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v5i3.755

Abstract

Indonesia, as a state based on law as stipulated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, is obliged to guarantee the protection of human rights, including the rights of children as a vulnerable group. Child protection is reinforced through Article 28B of the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 35 of 2014 in conjunction with Law No. 17 of 2016, which explicitly prohibit all forms of sexual violence against children. Philosophically, child protection reflects respect for human dignity; juridically, it is a constitutional mandate and statutory obligation; while sociologically, it is necessary to prevent the destruction of future generations caused by sexual violence. The urgency of this research arises from the increasing number of sexual violence cases against children and the presence of sentencing disparities, as reflected in Decision No. 21/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Pdp and Decision No. 172/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Sbs. This study aims to analyze judicial considerations in both decisions and identify their implications for victims, perpetrators, and society. The research applies a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches, supported by primary and secondary legal materials analyzed descriptively and analytically. The findings show that judges based their rulings on Article 82 paragraph (1) of the Child Protection Law, taking into account trial evidence, psychological impacts on victims, and violated social values. However, disparities emerged: six years’ imprisonment with an IDR 800 million fine in the Pdp case, and seven years’ imprisonment with only an IDR 60 million fine in the Sbs case. Such inconsistencies undermine legal certainty and judicial legitimacy. In conclusion, although sentencing has reflected criminal accountability, a balance between retributive and restorative aspects is lacking. Clear sentencing guidelines and stronger protection and recovery measures for child victims are therefore recommended to realize substantive justice.
Analysis of Court Decisions Regarding In Persona Claims in Credit Agreement Cases: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Mengenai Gugatan Kurang Pihak (In Persona) pada Perkara Perjanjian Kredit Adelya, Eka; Elviandri; Arif Pratama, Rio
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3726

Abstract

This study examines the legal reasoning employed by judges in resolving civil cases involving insufficient parties (in persona) within credit agreement disputes, and evaluates the consistency of judicial considerations across three levels of the court system: District Court, High Court, and the Supreme Court. The issue arises due to the absence of clear standards regarding which parties must be included in civil lawsuits, particularly in credit agreements that often involve more than two parties. Using a normative juridical method with a statutory and case approach, this research analyzes three decisions: No. 30/Pdt.G/2022/PN WNG, No. 133/PDT/2023/PT SMG, and No. 469 K/Pdt/2024. The findings reveal differing judicial orientations: the District Court prioritizes the substance of default, the High Court emphasizes formal completeness of parties, and the Supreme Court seeks a balance between both. The study concludes that there is no uniformity in judicial assessment concerning party sufficiency in credit agreement disputes, indicating the need for the Supreme Court to issue clear guidelines to ensure legal certainty and the protection of all parties involved.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBATALAN KEPUTUSAN KPU KABUPATEN MAHAKAM ULU BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 224/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025: Analisis Yuridis Pembatalan Keputusan Kpu Kabupaten Mahakam Ulu Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 224/Phpu.Bup-Xxiii/2025 Miftah, Muhammad; Prasetyo, Bayu; Elviandri
Jurnal Media Justitia Nusantara Vol 15 No 2 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30999/mjn.v15i2.3729

Abstract

This study examines Constitutional Court Decision No. 224/PHPU.BUP-XXIII/2025, which annulled the results of the 2024 Mahakam Ulu Regency Regional Head Election due to proven serious violations of the principle of neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) and abuse of authority by the incumbent regent in supporting his biological child’s candidacy for regional head. Employing a normative juridical method and a case study approach, the research focuses on analyzing the Constitutional Court’s legal reasoning and the juridical implications of annulling the decision of the Mahakam Ulu General Election Commission (KPU). The findings indicate that the actions of the public official in question met the criteria for structured, systematic, and massive (TSM) violations, significantly undermining electoral integrity and fairness. The Constitutional Court’s ruling is regarded as a form of constitutional protection of voters’ rights as well as a reinforcement of the rule of law and substantive democracy. This study underscores the urgency of reforming the electoral oversight system and strictly enforcing the principle of bureaucratic neutrality in the conduct of regional elections in Indonesia.
QUO VADIS PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DAN KOALISI PARTAI POLITIK DALAM SISTEM PRESIDENSIAL DI INDONESIA Elviandri; Aswin Zulfahmi; Andi Fratiwi
Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/jf.v12i2.147

Abstract

Perdebatan tentang polemik ambang batas dalam pencalonan presiden dan wakil presiden sudah saatnya diakhiri. Demikian juga dinamika koalisi partai politik berpotensid mempengaruhi stabilitas politik dan arah kebijakan pemerintahan. Energi yang dimiliki parpol semestinya dipusatkan dan digunakan untuk memformulasi dan merumuskan agenda perubahan yang subtansial ditengah percaturan dan persiangan global. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis secara sistematis dan deskriptif. Agenda mendesak yang perlu dilakukan adalah rekonstruksi hukum terhadap presidential threshold dan Koalisi Partai Politik. Kedepan kita berharap agar koalisi partai politik terbentuk didasarkan pada kepentingan politik, kesamaan visi, misi, dan tujuan untuk kebaikan rakyat. Sehingga yang ada hanya satu komitmen, yaitu komitmen dalam mensejahterakan dan memastikan keadilan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia sebagaiman yang dimanatkan dalam sila ke 5 dan termaktub dalam konstitusi. Kata Kunci: presidential threshold, koalisi partai politik, presidensial
Legal Protection of Children as Perpetrators or Victims of Criminal Acts Whose Identities Are Revealed in Court Decisions Larassati, Aura Dara; Elviandri, Elviandri
Bacarita Law Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2025): August (2025) BACARITA Law Journal
Publisher : Programs Study Outside the Main Campus in Law Pattimura University ARU Islands Regency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/bacarita.v6i1.18169

Abstract

This research aims to determine the legal provisions regarding judge's decisions that reveal the child's identity. Understand the legal implications of disclosing the identity of child perpetrators or victims of criminal acts in court decisions regarding children's rights. The approach method applied in this research is a normative method, which includes research into the literature studied. Using a statutory approach regarding the protection of children's identities in the criminal justice system, while an empirical approach is used to study the implementation of these regulations in judicial practice, especially in decision number 14/Pid.Sus- Anak/2021/PN Srg. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of this research are that protecting children in conflict with the law is the state's obligation to protect every right they have. This obligation is aimed at the best interests of the child and prevents the child from being mistreated by any party. One of these rights is that it is not permissible to publish a child's identity in conflict with the law, whether in print/electronic media. A court decision that reveals a child's identity can be considered a criminal offense because it violates legal provisions regarding the confidentiality of a child's identity which must be protected. One of the main principles of child protection is the best interests of the child. In this case, the judge is also obliged to keep the identity of the child as the perpetrator of the crime secret during the trial process. In conflict with the law, children's identities must be kept confidential, both in print and electronic media. Children are the nation's generation and figures who greatly influence the continuity of the nation's life, where they have rights that must be protected, respected and fulfilled. The confidentiality of the identity of children in conflict with the law is one of the rights given to them to protect their reputation.
VALIDITY OF THE DIVINE VALUE IN THE PHRASE "IN THE NAME OF JUSTICE BASED ON THE ONE SUPREME DIVINE BEING": (The Dialectic of Hans Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law and the Transcendental Paradigm of Law) Elviandri, Elviandri; Darmawan, Aman; Ridwan, Agusriansyah; Rifandi, Andri; Ryan Tan Hui
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.7137

Abstract

This study analyzes the dialectics between Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law and the transcendental legal paradigm in interpreting the validity of law in Indonesia. According to Kelsen, a norm derives its validity from a higher norm within the Stufenbau des Recht hierarchy, culminating in the Grundnorm, without reliance on morality, politics, or religion. However, in the Indonesian context, legal validity does not rest solely on formal legality but also gains transcendental legitimacy through Pancasila as the basic norm, particularly its first principle of Belief in One Almighty God. This dimension finds juridical manifestation in the phrase “For Justice Based on the Belief in the One and Only God” as inscribed in every judicial decision. The research employs a normative legal method with a philosophical approach. The analysis shows that Kelsen’s positivism, which emphasizes the autonomy of law from external values, undergoes correction within Indonesia’s legal system. The theological phrase in judicial rulings is not a mere formality but an ethical and prophetic foundation that underscores the judge’s responsibility not only in a legal-formal sense but also spiritually before God. Thus, the transcendental paradigm expands the conceptual horizon of Kelsenian positivism. Law functions not merely as a normative instrument ensuring certainty but also as an ethical-prophetic medium for realizing substantive justice. Consequently, the validity of law in Indonesia is dual in nature: procedurally valid and spiritually legitimate, integrating modern legal rationality with divine values as the foundation of justice.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Pemberhentian PNS Oleh Gubernur Kalimantan Timur Dalam Putusan Nomor 34/G/2020/PTUN.SMD Abdillah, Fiqri; Prasetyo, Bayu; Elviandri
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 8 (2025): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i8.1820

Abstract

This study examines the judicial considerations in Decision Number 34/G/2020/PTUN.SMD concerning the annulment of the Governor of East Kalimantan’s decree dismissing a civil servant. The analysis reveals procedural and substantive defects, as the decision failed to comply with statutory regulations and the General Principles of Good Governance. The Administrative Court declared the decree null and void, restoring the plaintiff’s rights as a civil servant. The findings highlight the role of the Administrative Court as a judicial control mechanism over public officials’ actions while reinforcing legality, accountability, and good governance in public administration.
Co-Authors Abdillah, Fiqri Absori Absori Adelya, Eka Aidil Aidil Aksar Aksar Aksar Aldi Pebrian Andayani, Ana Andi Fratiwi Andrean, Fisaka Wahyu Aprilyani Ikra, Putri Ardiansyah ARDIANSYAH ARDIANSYAH Arif Pratama, Rio Asrizal Saiin Aswin Zulfahmi Bayu Prasetyo, Bayu Dana, Robin Darmawan, Aman Desi Sommaliagustina Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani, Farkhani Gilvina Grace B.A. Gustiawan, Putra Chusnul Hafied Zen Indra Perdana Juono, Agustinus Arif Kholik, Sadam Khudzaifah Dimyati Kusumastuti, Binarida Larassati, Aura Dara LUKMAN, LUKMAN Muh Zuhri Muhammad Darlis Pattalongi Muhammad Miftah, Muhammad Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi Muhammad Taufiq Ningsih, Linda Setia Noor, Andreyan Norrafika Safitri Nugroho, Sigit Sapto Oktareza, Dwi Pattalongi, Muhammad Darlis Putri, Merin Ananda Rahayuningsih, Uut Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati Raihana Raihana Raihana Raihana Raja Desril Ridwan, Agusriansyah Rifandi, Andri Rifki Hidayat Rio Arif Pratama Ryan Tan Hui Salas, Jevi Saputra, Erlyando Shaleh, Ali Ismail Sigit Sapto Nugroho Suhadi, Nainuri Sunariyo, Sunariyo Surahman Surahman Surahman Surahman Suswadi Syarief Hidayatullah Tri Wahyuni Lestari Triwahyuni Lestari Wahyu Friyonanda Riza Wijoseno, Taufik Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi