Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
11.113
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies IJTIHAD Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan Jurnal Daulat Hukum UIR LAW REVIEW Jurnal Pengabdian UntukMu NegeRI JOURNAL EQUITABLE Awang Long Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Law Research Review Quarterly Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review Borneo Student Research (BSR) Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Lentera:Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Journal of Education Research Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Bacarita Law Journal Arus Jurnal Psikologi dan Pendidikan Qonun Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary on Social and Technology JURNAL RETENTUM ANDREW Law Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Journal of Innovative and Creativity Horizon: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Mediasas : Media Ilmu Syari'ah dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah Jurnal Padamu Negeri Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Elviandri, Elviandri
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 101 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 101 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
THE DIALECTIC OF POSITIVISM AND SUBSTANTIVE JUSTICE: THE PANCASILA RULE OF LAW PARADIGM Elviandri; Muhammad Amin; Demitha selvira amellia; Ricky Indrawan safutra; Andi Wibowo
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1777

Abstract

This study examines the dialectic between legal positivism and substantive justice within the framework of the Pancasila legal state paradigm as an effort to find a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice. The background of this study stems from the hegemony of legal positivism in Indonesia, which emphasizes formal and procedural legality, often neglecting the aspect of substantive justice that is at the core of the Pancasila legal ideal. In practice, law tends to stop at normative certainty (law in books), without touching on the values of humanity and justice that exist in society (law in action). The urgency of this study lies in the need to reposition Pancasila as a grundnorm and ethical foundation to return the orientation of Indonesian law to substantive justice, not merely formal justice. The research method used is juridical-normative with a legal philosophy and conceptual hermeneutics approach, which interprets law as das sollen (what should be). The results of the study show that rigid legal positivism has created a gap between legal certainty and substantive justice. The Pancasila legal paradigm presents itself as an integrative model that unites legal certainty and moral justice, positioning law not merely as an instrument of power, but as an ethical and spiritual means to uphold civilized justice. Thus, the Pancasila legal state offers a philosophical foundation for harmonizing positive norms and substantive values of justice in the national legal system.
PHILOSOPHICAL EXAMINATION OF DECISION NO. 916/PDT.P/2022/PN SBY: THE PARADIGM OF TRANSCENDENTAL LAW AND MAQĀṢID AL-SYARĪ‘AH Elviandri; Sutag Harsie; Muhammad Hanafi; Iranda Nadya Febianty; Munir Anshory
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 04 (2025): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i04.1778

Abstract

This study is a philosophical examination of Surabaya District Court Decision Number 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN Sby through the approach of Transcendental Law and Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah. The issue of interfaith marriage in the context of Indonesian law reflects the epistemological tension between legal positivism and the divine values that exist in society. The absence of explicit norms regarding the legality of interfaith marriage has encouraged judges to interpret the law formalistically, thereby depriving the law of its ethical and spiritual dimensions. The urgency of this study lies in the pressing need to present a transcendental legal paradigm, namely a law that combines legal rationality with moral values, maqāṣid, and divine justice. This study uses a normative-philosophical legal approach through analysis of court decisions, Islamic legal doctrine, and the principles of modern and prophetic legal philosophy. The methods of analysis include descriptive, hermeneutic, and heuristic approaches to explore the transcendental meaning behind the legal arguments of the decisions. The novelty of this research lies in the formulation of an epistemological synthesis between transcendental law and maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah as an alternative paradigm in jurisprudential examination. The findings of this study show that the judges' considerations in this case are still trapped in procedural legalism, without regard to the principles of ḥifẓ al-dīn (protection of religion) and ḥifẓ al-nasl (protection of offspring), which are the basic objectives of Islamic law. Transcendental analysis reveals that law is not merely legally valid, but must achieve substantive justice that links legal certainty with moral and spiritual benefits. Thus, this study offers a conceptual model of “transcendental maqāṣid-based law” as a new direction for national legal reform based on Pancasila.
Analisis Yuridis Tentang Threshold Pilkada Berdasarkan Putusan MK Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024 Salas, Jevi; Elviandri, Elviandri; Prasetyo, Bayu
Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda Vol. 31 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/disiplin.v31i1.1154

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the juridical aspects of the threshold provisions in the Pilkada by referring to the decision. The research method used is a normative research method with a case approach that focuses on analyzing the Constitutional Court Decision Number 60/PUUXXII/2024. The results of the analysis show that the Constitutional Court's decision provides a new interpretation of the threshold provisions, which has the potential to affect the constitutional rights of political parties and independent candidates in the Pilkada contestation. The implication of this decision is a significant change in the regional head nomination mechanism in Indonesia. The General Elections Commission (KPU) revised KPU Regulation Number 8 of 2024 to KPU Regulation Number 10 of 2024 to adjust the nomination regulations with democratic principles and applicable laws. Thus, this decision ensures the legality of regional head candidacy and increases the value of democracy in the 2024 simultaneous regional elections in Indonesia.
THE DESIGN OF TERM LIMITATIONS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA'S HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MEMBERS: CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY, AND THE CHECKS AND BALANCES MECHANISM Sulistafando, Ravidan Maheer; Elviandri; Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi; Hasmiati, Rahmatullah Ayu
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i2.1941

Abstract

The absence of term limits for legislative members has resulted in a pattern of power entrenchment, thus hampering the process of leadership regeneration and strengthening oligarchic tendencies within parliament. The absence of term limits in the Law of MD3 opens up space for power entrenchment, the formation of political dynasties, conflicts of interest, and a decline in the integrity of representation, reflected in the increasing constituency disconnect, the phenomenon of self-serving legislation, and the high number of legislative corruption cases. Therefore, a comprehensive design is needed to formulate a term limit model that aligns with the constitutional mandate. The study uses normative legal methods through legislative and conceptual approaches, examining the 1945 Constitution, the MD3 Law, the Election Law, Constitutional Court decisions, as well as the theories of constitutionalism, Habermas's deliberative democracy, and Madison's theory of power limitations. The analysis is conducted descriptively-analytical and interpretative-normative to build a cohesive legal argument. The results show that constitutionally, term limits can be justified as an integral part of the principle of power limitation and legal certainty; the current absence of norms has been shown to reduce the effectiveness of the representation function and open up opportunities for abuse of authority. From a leadership regeneration perspective, term limits increase the plurality of political actors, reduce incumbency advantage, and encourage policy innovation, while simultaneously breaking patronage networks that hamper oversight functions. Meanwhile, from a checks and balances perspective, term limits can strengthen the collegial independence of the House of Representatives (DPR) and increase the credibility of its oversight function over the executive, but they need to be designed proportionally to avoid creating an expertise gap or disrupting policy continuity.
THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AGAINST ABANDONED AND ABSENTEE LAND Kholil, Muhammad; Hasmiati, Rahmatullah Ayu; Elviandri; Surahman
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i2.1942

Abstract

This research is motivated by the increasing problem of abandoned land and absentee land, which indicates the ineffective enforcement of the land regulatory framework despite the comprehensive formulation of normative frameworks such as the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), Government Regulation No. 20 of 2021, and Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (BPN) No. 20 of 2021. Uncultivated land and agricultural land ownership by owners not domiciled in the area result in inefficient use of space, increase the risk of agrarian conflict, and reduce the social function of land, as seen in Jonggon Jaya Village. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of land regulatory framework enforcement, identify legal and administrative factors that hinder the handling of abandoned land and absentee land, and formulate strategies and formulations for strengthening the legal framework that is more responsive to local agrarian dynamics. The method used was sociological juridical research, combining normative analysis of land regulations with empirical findings through interviews, field observations, and review of land administration documents. These were then analyzed using Lawrence M. Friedman's legal system theory (structure, substance, and legal culture). The research results indicated that weaknesses in law enforcement stem from weak institutional capacity, fragmentation of legal substance, the absence of objective parameters for determining abandoned land, and low community compliance with land management obligations. To address these issues, this study offered five innovative policy formulations: the formulation of the Integrated Land Utilization Index (IULT), the development of Conditional Management Rights, the implementation of an electronic domicile verification system (E-DOM), the establishment of a Local Land Activation Fund, and the implementation of digital, electronically proven administrative protocols. These findings emphasize that strengthening the land regulatory framework requires synergy between normative reform, modernization of the administrative system, and strengthening of the community's legal culture to achieve sustainable agrarian justice.
Sentencing Disparities in Judicial Considerations of Electronic Sexual Violence Cases Nazrin, Mohamad; Prasetyo, Bayu; Elviandri, Elviandri
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 5 Issue 9, November 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v5i9.3410

Abstract

Introduction: Indonesia, as a state governed by the rule of law, upholds equality before the law and the protection of human rights as fundamental principles. However, the rapid development of digital technology has created new challenges, particularly the emergence of electronic sexual violence, which has raised significant public concern. Although Law Number: 12 of 2022 regulates such crimes, judicial practice reveals sentencing disparities that undermine legal certainty and victim protection.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the causes of judicial sentencing disparities in cases of electronic sexual violence and examine their implications for law enforcement in Indonesia.Methods of the Research: The research employs a normative juridical method with a library research approach. Data were collected from primary legal materials such as statutory regulations, secondary legal materials including literature, doctrines, and previous studies, as well as tertiary legal materials such as legal dictionaries and encyclopedias.Findings of the Research: The findings indicate the existence of disparities in three court decisions that applied similar provisions but resulted in significantly different sentences. Factors contributing to these disparities include differences in judicial interpretation, the application of individualized sentencing principles, and non-juridical considerations. Such disparities have serious implications, including diminished legal certainty, reduced deterrence for offenders, weakened victim protection, and declining public trust in the judiciary. Therefore, the establishment of consistent, transparent, and victim-oriented sentencing guidelines is essential to ensure substantive justice in Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Legislasi di Era Transformasi Digital Elviandri, Elviandri; Putri, Ona Monisca; Azqmi, Ulul; Hayuningtyas, Wilda
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): November - January
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4870

Abstract

Pesatnya transformasi digital telah memunculkan pacing problem, yakni kondisi ketika perkembangan teknologi berlangsung jauh lebih cepat dibandingkan kemampuan hukum untuk beradaptasi. Fenomena ini berdampak signifikan pada proses pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan, khususnya terkait mekanisme partisipasi publik yang semakin terdigitalisasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis validitas konstitusional partisipasi publik digital dalam proses legislasi serta urgensi pengembangan model legislasi adaptif di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Fokus kajian diarahkan pada Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan serta Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 yang menegaskan pentingnya meaningful participation dalam pembentukan undang-undang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa praktik partisipasi publik berbasis digital yang saat ini diterapkan masih bersifat prosedural dan rentan terjebak pada fenomena click-activism, di mana keterlibatan publik hanya diukur dari kuantitas interaksi tanpa jaminan kualitas deliberasi. Ketiadaan mekanisme verifikasi identitas yang memadai serta tidak adanya kewajiban pemberian umpan balik dari pembentuk undang-undang menyebabkan hak publik untuk didengar, dipertimbangkan, dan memperoleh penjelasan tidak terpenuhi secara optimal. Selain itu, struktur hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan yang kaku turut menciptakan Collingridge Dilemma, yang menghambat kemampuan hukum untuk merespons inovasi teknologi secara tepat waktu. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa digitalisasi proses legislasi tidak boleh berhenti pada aspek prosedural semata, melainkan harus diarahkan pada pemenuhan substansi demokrasi konstitusional. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini merekomendasikan pelembagaan konsep Regulatory Sandbox dalam sistem hukum nasional serta revisi ketentuan partisipasi publik agar mencakup mekanisme umpan balik terverifikasi yang bersifat wajib, guna memastikan hukum tetap adaptif, responsif, dan demokratis di era digital.
Living Law, Kepastian Hukum, dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Politik Hukum dalam KUHP 2023 di Indonesia Ario, Dion; Situngkir, Swandi Aliverchan; Situngkir, Fernandes; Elviandri
Lentera: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Lentera: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/lentera.v7i1.13426

Abstract

The recognition of living law in Indonesia’s 2023 Criminal Code (KUHP 2023) has sparked significant debate regarding its compatibility with the principle of legality and human rights protection. Existing studies largely approach this issue descriptively, leaving a gap in normative analysis concerning the transformation of legality and its constitutional limits. This study critically examines the incorporation of living law in the KUHP 2023 by analyzing its implications for the shift from formal legality toward material legality and the resulting tension between legal certainty, human rights, and communal justice. Employing normative legal research, this study applies statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches, drawing on theories of material legality, legal pluralism, and constitutionalism. The analysis focuses on relevant provisions of the KUHP 2023, legal doctrines, and international human rights principles to assess the conditions and limits of applying living law within criminal law. The findings reveal that the recognition of living law represents a deliberate move toward a socially responsive criminal justice system. However, this shift also generates inherent human rights challenges, particularly concerning the foreseeability of criminal norms and the risk of arbitrary enforcement. This study argues that such tensions cannot be eliminated but must be managed through constitutional interpretation, judicial restraint, and human rights–based oversight. The study contributes a normative framework for balancing legality, human rights protection, and communal justice within Indonesia’s plural legal system, offering guidance for legislators, judges, and law enforcement authorities.
Analisis Implementasi Hukum Kepemiluan dan Kepartaian dalam Mewujudkan Pemilu yang Demokratis dan Berintegritas di Indonesia Taufiq, Muhammad; Suparno, Achmad; Elviandri
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 1 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i1.3560

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis implementasi hukum kepemiluan dan kepartaian dalam upaya mewujudkan pemilihan umum (Pemilu) yang demokratis dan berintegritas di Indonesia. Sebagai negara demokrasi konstitusional, Indonesia menempatkan pemilu sebagai mekanisme utama dalam memastikan legitimasi kekuasaan, sehingga kerangka hukum yang mengatur penyelenggaraan pemilu dan keberadaan partai politik memegang peranan strategis. Kajian ini menelaah efektivitas regulasi seperti Undang-Undang Pemilu, Undang-Undang Partai Politik, serta peraturan pelaksana dari KPU, Bawaslu, dan DKPP dalam menjamin transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan keadilan. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan normatif-yuridis dengan menganalisis landasan hukum, praktik penyelenggaraan, serta berbagai putusan lembaga peradilan pemilu. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa meskipun kerangka hukum telah cukup komprehensif, implementasinya masih menghadapi sejumlah tantangan, antara lain lemahnya penegakan hukum, potensi konflik kepentingan elite partai, dan praktik politik uang. Selain itu, kualitas pendidikan politik dan tata kelola partai turut mempengaruhi efektivitas hukum kepemiluan dalam menjaga integritas pemilu. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya konsistensi regulasi, penguatan kelembagaan penyelenggara pemilu, serta reformasi internal partai untuk membangun pemilu yang benar-benar demokratis dan mencerminkan kehendak rakyat.
Hegemoni Positivistik Dan Involusi Local Wisdom: Menata Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia Maulidha Eka Pratiwi; Reny Oktaviani Paturu; Tiya Manikam Sariayana; Elviandri
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 1 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i1.4134

Abstract

Pembangunan hukum di Indonesia hingga saat ini masih didominasi oleh paradigma positivistik yang menempatkan hukum sebagai sistem norma tertutup, otonom, dan terlepas dari nilai moral serta realitas sosial masyarakat. Dominasi tersebut berdampak pada praktik penegakan hukum yang formalistik dan prosedural, sehingga sering kali gagal menghadirkan keadilan substantif dan menjauhkan hukum dari kebutuhan masyarakat yang majemuk. Selain itu, pendekatan positivistik turut memarginalkan living law dan local wisdom yang sejatinya merupakan bagian integral dari identitas budaya dan sistem sosial masyarakat Indonesia. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis keterbatasan paradigma positivistik dalam pembangunan hukum nasional serta menawarkan kerangka konseptual pembangunan hukum keindonesiaan melalui perpaduan Teori Hukum Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Progresif. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan metode analisis konseptual dan filosofis. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa teori hukum pembangunan memberikan dasar struktural bagi hukum sebagai sarana pembaruan sosial yang tertib dan terarah, sementara hukum progresif berfungsi sebagai koreksi etis dan humanistik untuk menjamin terwujudnya keadilan substantif. Dengan demikian, hukum keindonesiaan dapat dirumuskan sebagai sistem hukum nasional yang berbasis Pancasila serta mengintegrasikan kepastian hukum, keadilan substantif, dan kearifan lokal. Hukum keindonesiaan berfungsi sebagai sarana pembaruan sosial yang humanistik, kontekstual, dan berkeadaban, sehingga relevan untuk menjawab tantangan pembangunan hukum nasional dalam masyarakat Indonesia yang plural.
Co-Authors Abdul Syahib Absori Achmad Nazril Ade Putra Amanda Adelya, Eka Adi Gunawan GN Ahmad Yogi Setiawan Aidil Aidil Akhmad Qadar Ramadhan Aksar Aksar Aksar Aldi Pebrian Ananda Dwi Indriyani Andayani, Ana Andi Fratiwi Andi Umirtang Andi Wibowo Andi Wibowo Andrean, Fisaka Wahyu Andreyan Noor Anita Audina Annisa Salsabila Aprilyani Ikra, Putri Ardiansyah Nurshah Putra Arif Pratama, Rio Ario, Dion Asrizal Saiin Aswin Zulfahmi Asya Noor Adha Asyisytri, Mannissa Sannia Atala Syahlina Saputri Aulia Vivi Yulianingrum Ayu Wulandari Ahmad Azqmi, Ulul Bayu Prasetyo Bayu Prasetyo Bayu Prasetyo, Bayu Cindi Aulia Cindy Eka Amalia Clara Ridha Nur Sinta Clerine Clarisa Daffin Ramadhan Pradiza Dana, Robin Darmawan, Aman Demitha selvira amellia Demitha selvira amellia Desi Sommaliagustina Dewi Triesta Nabila Diana Rosmawati Dwi Edisam, Kuswandi Dwi Oktareza E. Nur Ashfiya Eka Wati Elshanda Revalia Arisandy Erlyando Saputra Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani, Farkhani Fazratul Aulia M Fiqri Abdillah Firdaus, Andi Fitrah Ramadhan Gabriella Shalisha Mualim Gilvina Grace B.A. Gunawan, Predy Gustiawan, Putra Chusnul Hafied Zen Hasana Ina Gorang Hasmiati, Ayu Hasna Hasna Hayuningtyas, Wilda Herman, Akhmad Sobyan Imro'atul Azizah Indah Ratnanun Indah Ratnanun Indra Perdana Insan Nur Rahmanda Putra Iranda Nadya Febianty Iranda Nadya Febianty Juono, Agustinus Arif Kevin Okta Zakin Khairunnisa Zain Dzakiyah Khairunnisa Zain Dzakiyah Kholik, Sadam Kholil Muhammad Khudzaifah Dimyati Kintan Artari Kusumastuti, Binarida Larassati, Aura Dara Lathifah Alya Larasati Lilis Lisa Anggraini LUKMAN, LUKMAN Lusiawati Dwimega Utami M. Hendriazh Arnas Mardiah Mastur Rahmah Marjan Marjan Marsetina, Lola Naury Maulana Maulana Maulidha Eka Pratiwi Meisa Purnama Ayu Merin Ananda Putri Muh Zuhri Muhammad Adrian Abdillah Muhammad Amin Muhammad Amin Muhammad Ardi Samsudin Nur Muhammad Arif Yoga Paratama Muhammad Darlis Pattalongi Muhammad Hanafi Muhammad Hanafi Muhammad Imam Ramadhani Muhammad Kholil Muhammad Miftah, Muhammad Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi Muhammad Ridho Gunawan Muhammad Taufiq Munir Anshory Munir Anshory Nabila Pasya Aisyah Nabila Ratu Adelia Nainuri Suhadi Nasywa Kayla N.A Nazrin, Mohamad Nazwa Anabella Alya Irawan Anuhu Neneng Lestari Nila M aulida Ningsih, Linda Setia Noor, Andreyan Norrafika Safitri Novyra Fitriany Karno Nugroho, Sigit Sapto Nur Rahmayani Mukhlis Nuralifah Tasya Nurcholis, Muhammad Nurul Amin Oki Sadewo Setyo Oktareza, Dwi Olga Luthfia Andani Olivia Nurul Utami Panggalih Husodo Pattalongi, Muhammad Darlis Pirmasyah A B, Narendra Putri Delfyrah Putri, Merin Ananda Putri, Ona Monisca Putriani Meylinda Rachmat Ragil Iskandar Rahma, Paramita Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati Raihana Raihana Raihana Raihana Raja Desril Rama Afriza Laksana Putra Ramadhannia, Rosnila Nur Reny Oktaviani Paturu Reynathan maulana resi Ricky Indrawan safutra Ricky Indrawan safutra Riduan Riduan Ridwan, Agusriansyah Ridwan, Salwa Salsabila Aulia Rifandi, Andri Rifki Hidayat Rio Arif Pratama Riska Dwi Sagita Rinjani Risna Risna Riyan Riyan Riza, Wahyu Friyonanda Rizal Effendie Rizky Amelia Ryan Tan Hui Sadam Kholik Safar Nasa Safira Dina Fakhirah Safira Nur Apriliani Sahbila Sahbila Salas, Jevi Sanda, Aditya Nur Tio Saputra, Dhimas Shaleh, Ali Ismail Shella Finly Sherly Kartika Devi Sigit Sapto Nugroho Siti Hawa Ainul Situngkir, Fernandes Situngkir, Swandi Aliverchan Sobyan Akhmad Suhadi, Nainuri Sukma Ayuningsih Sulistafando, Ravidan Maheer Sunariyo Sunariyo Sunariyo, Sunariyo Suparno, Achmad Surahman Surahman Surahman Surahman Surya Indra Danuarta Suswadi Sutag Harsie Sutag Harsie Syarief Hidayatullah Tasya Urmila Taufik Thahirah, Berliana Ath Tiya Manikam Sariayana Tri Adi Saputra Tri Wahyuni Lestari Triwahyuni Lestari Turnip Mega Marta Turnip Mega Marta Uut Rahayuningsih Wijoseno, Taufik Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi Yuniarti Wijinarko Zahrah Khan Zahrah Khan