Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal)

IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAHAM KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI POSITIF LEGISLATOR TERHADAP PRINSIP CHECK AND BALANCE: Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Positive Legislator: Implikasi Putusan terhadap Prinsip Checks and Balances di Indonesia Sulastri, Dewi; Sanmas, Abu
LITIGASI Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.21999

Abstract

The Indonesian Constitutional Court has undergone a transformation from a negative legislator to a positive legislator, particularly evident in Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which not only annulled unconstitutional norms but also created new regulations regarding age requirements for presidential candidates. This study examines the implications of Constitutional Court decisions as a positive legislator on checks and balances, practices in the United States, Germany, and South Korea, and the reformulation of Constitutional Court authority. Employing normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes Constitutional Court decisions and practices in three countries. The findings indicate that Constitutional Court decisions acting as a positive legislator tend to shift the balance of power between the judicial, legislative, and executive branches, creating legal uncertainty and institutional conflicts. Practices in the US, Germany, and South Korea reveal that the positive legislator role requires institutional dialogue mechanisms and clear authority limitations. The implications emphasize the need for reformulating Constitutional Court authority through establishing objective criteria, strengthening checks and balances mechanisms, and developing constitutional dialogue among the Constitutional Court, Parliament, and President. This study contributes by examining comparative practices (US, Germany, South Korea) and formulating reformulation guidelines not previously developed in existing scholarship.
Co-Authors A Syachruroji, A Abdullah, Mohd Kamarulnizam Adinda, Nendena Rizqi Alfianingrum, Alfianingrum Aminah, Siti Nur Aswindra, Jordy Stephano Cut Nurul Fahmi Dede Kania Djodi Setiawan Effendi, Listyani Encep Andriana Endeh Suhartini Faddillah Islam, Gita Fardiansyah, Bagas Farras, Raihan Muhammad Fikhruhu, Muhammad Dzaky Firdaus Arifin, Firdaus Firdausa, Muhamad Arga Firzatullah, Belva Prana Giandhani, Mochammad Rizky Hadi, Muhamad Rizal Nurul Hakim, Subqi Muhamad Fadhilah Hakim, Subqi Muhammad Fadhilah Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Hilmayanti, Hilmayanti I Gde Pantja Astawa Ikhsan, Fachrial Indriya Fathni Islam, Gita Faddillah Jaenal, Lestari Jasmiadi Jasmiadi Jauhari, Moh. Ahsanuddin Khaerunisa, Nisrina Khairil Anwar Khairunnas Rajab Khoirunnisa, Saskia Fazrin Kholik, Muhamad Abdul Maarif, Ihsanul Maelani, Rega Masyhuri Masyhuri Maulana, Mochamad Dilla Maulina, Wina Senja Mubarok, Abil Miftahul Munawar, Arby Muhyi Muslim, Sarip Nandang Najmudin Neng Yani Nurhayani, Neng Yani Neni Nuraeni, Neni Nur Alim Nurahman, Zamzam Nurhadi Nurhakim, Irfan Pratama, Agus Sangka Purnama, Alpin Radiyana, Aan Rahma, Dhea Maulidina Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam Rasimin Rasimin, Rasimin Ridho, Muhammad Ilham Rosada, Dede Sanmas, Abu Sidae, Siti Hartina Siti Maria Sonny Dewi Judiasih Sukma, Ersa Hermalia Sulwan Permana Suparman, Tegar Radiansyah Syahidin, Rosyad Syifa, Dian May Tiara Amanda Lestari Tohar, Ahmaddin Ahmad Yusra, Affan Zaen, Adhelia Husnainy Zaman, Muhammad Badru Zulbaidah, Z Zulfaidah, Rena Zulkhairi, Imam