Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.642
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal VALENSI Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Prosiding Pendidikan Sains INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) PAEDAGOGIA Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING) Indonesian Journal of Chemistry Walisongo Journal of Chemistry JKPK (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia) SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan) SEMAR Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia
Elfi Susanti V. H.
Bachelor Program Of Chemistry Education, Faculty Of Teacher Training And Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia Jl.Ir Sutami No 36 A, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : PAEDAGOGIA

 1 
Content Analysis of School Textbooks on Chemistry Bond Materials Viewed from Chemical Representation Criteria Luthfiana, Eva; Raharjo, Sentot Budi; Vh, Elfi Susanti; Indriyanti, Nurma Yunita
PAEDAGOGIA Vol 22, No 1 (2019): PAEDAGOGIA Jilid 22 Nomor 1 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1102.313 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/paedagogia.v22i1.29984

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the chemical representation of chemical bonds in three chemical textbooks. Chemical studies are basically related to three types of chemical representations: macro, submicro and symbolic. In this study a detailed review was carried out and could define the chemical representations in school textbooks to improve students' understanding of chemistry. A detailed analysis reveals five criteria for evaluating chemical representations which are included in three detailed chemical textbooks revealing five criteria for evaluating the chemical representation used in school textbooks. These criteria (C1-C5) are: (C1) type of representation; (C2) interpretation of surface features; (C3) their relationship with the text; (C4) the existence and characteristics of a statement; (C5) the level of correlation between components consisting of several representations. The five criteria include the basic elements needed to utilize chemical representations that are better in understanding chemistry. These five criteria can also be used for analysis of existing school textbooks and as a tool for au­thors in designing new chemistry textbooks
Question Analysis in 11th Grade Chemistry Book in Term of Critical Thinking Indicators Imam Sri Nugroho; Sri Mulyani; Elfi Susanti
PAEDAGOGIA Vol 24, No 2 (2021): PAEDAGOGIA Jilid 24 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/paedagogia.v24i2.55137

Abstract

This study aims to determine the indicators of critical thinking skills that developed in the questions that contained in the XI grade high school chemistry textbook and to determine the critical thinking level of the questions developed in the XI high school chemistry textbook. This study is a qualitative research using descriptive documentation analysis method or content analysis. The document that analyzed are questions in the chemistry textbook used by eleventh grade students at four Senior High Schools in Surakarta. The sampling technique that used is multistage sampling and data validation using observer triangulation. The results showed that the critical thinking indicators that appeared on the questions from the textbooks analyzed included basic clarification, appearing at 100%; bases for a decision appearing at 0%; inference appearing at 88.9%; Advanced clarification appearing at 38.9%; supposition and integration appearing at 31.5%; auxiliary ability appearing at 40.7%. Meanwhile, based on the Critical Thinking Level (TBK), the questions included in the TBK 0 group are 0%; TBK 1 are 29.6%; TBK 2 are 68.5%; TBK 3 are 1.8%.
Co-Authors Adi, Yulia Kristi Agustin Wulandari Anastasia Diaz Pramesti Anastasia Diaz Pramesti Ari Syahidul Shidiq Ashadi, . Asna, Lilis Sofiyatul Aufa Vib Mitsalina Bayu Antrakusuma Catur Saputro, Agung Nugroho Dwi Retno Sari Endang Susilowati Endang Susilowati Fajar Rakhman Wibowo Hartantia, Restika Maulidina Iis Alviah Imam Sri Nugroho Juniar Fauziatul Azizah Lestari, Nova Dwi Lintang Nur Agia Luthfiana, Eva Magdalena, Octaviany Maria Ulfa Martini, Kus Sri Melati Kusuma Wardani Mohammad Masykuri Muhammad Hizbul Wathon Mulatsari, Desi Mulyani, Bakti Mulyani, Sri Mustofa Mustofa Muzzazinah Muzzazinah Nastiti, D. Ninda Dwi Cahya Devi Ningtyas, Arin Ika Nurma Yunita Indriyanti Nurma Yunita Indriyanti Nurma Yunita Indriyanti Nurman Perdana, R. Pramesthi, Hilda Nita Rahardjo, S. B. Rahmawati, Ani Ramandika, Muhammad Gunawan Dwi Redjeki, Tri Redjeki, Tri Redjeki, Tri Sabirin Matsjeh Safitri, Nadia Indri Salim, Eko Nur Samodra, Imam Saputro, Agung Nugroho Catur Saputro, Sulistyo Sastika, Agasta Ria Sentot Budi Raharjo Setiawan, Dwi Arief Setiyani Setiyani Setyowati, Widiastuti Agustina Eko Sri Mulyani Sri Mulyani Sri Mulyani Sri Mulyani Sri Retno Dwi Ariani Sri Retno Dwi Ariani Sri Retno Dwi Ariani Sri Retno Dwi Ariani Sri Retno Dwi Ariani Sri Retno Dwi Ariani Sri Yamtinah Sugiharto, Sugiharto Sulistyo Saputro Suryadi Budi Utomo Suryadi Budi Utomo Suryadi Budi Utomo Suryadi Budi Utomo Suryani, Adik Annisa Fitri Suryanto, Eko Tonang Dwi Ardyanto Totiana, Fian Tri Prianti Tri Redjeki Tutik Dwi Wahyuningsih Utami, Budi Utomo, Suryadi Budi Wathon, Muhammad Hizbul Widiastuti Agustina Eko Setyowati Wulandari, Lilis Yandi Syukri Zai, Fila Delfia Zulkarnaen, Rizmoon Nurul