Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Upaya Peningkatan Kinerja Intelijen Polsek Sebagai Basis Deteksi Dalam Mendukung Harkamtibmas Samsul Ma’arif; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Syafran Sofyan; Soegianto Soegianto
Journal Juridisch Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v2i2.8372

This study aims to analyze the performance of Police Sector intelligence as a detection base in supporting the maintenance of security and public order and analyze the efforts to improve the performance of Police Intelligence as a detection base in supporting the maintenance of security and public order in the Batang Police Department. The research method used is a sociological juridical. The analysis of research results shows that early detection efforts carried out by the Sector Police Unit of the Batang Resort Police security intelligence unit really need to be carried out so that they are able to detect, search and collect and dig up information from the community, then an identification process is carried out to sort, calculate and determine alternatives and consider and reading the signs of the facts from the detection results, the results are expressed in intelligence administration in the form of products that guarantee confidentiality, speed, accuracy and predictability. The discipline of the Batang Police Sector personnel in understanding the regulations and policies of leaders who are obliged to work is still lacking, as evidenced by the finding that the implementation of the Sector Police as a Detection Base has not run optimally, both operationally in the field and administratively. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kinerja Intelijen PoIsek sebagai basis deteksi dalam mendukung Harkamtibmas dan menganalisis upaya meningkatkan kinerja Intelijen Polsek sebagai basis deteksi dalam mendukung Harkamtibmas di wilayah hukum Polres Batang. Urgensi penelitian ini adalah sebagai acuan referensi yang mendukung bagi peneliti maupun pihak lain yang tertarik dalam bidang penelitian yang sama terutama tentang upaya meningkatkan kinerja intelijen Polsek sebagai basis deteksi. Metode penelitian hukum yang digunakan yuridis sosiologis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa upaya deteksi dini yang dilakukan Unit Polsek dari Satuan InteIkam Polres Batang sangat perlu dilakukan, sehingga mampu mendeteksi, mencari dan mengumpuIkan serta menggali informasi dari masyarakat, kemudian dilakukan proses identifikasi untuk memilah, menghitung dan menetapkan alternatif-alternatif serta mempertimbangkan dan membaca gelagat dari fakta-fakta hasil deteksi, maka hasil tersebut dituangkan dalam administrasi intelijen berupa produk-produk yang bersifat terjamin kerahasiaan, kecepatan, ketepatan dan predikitif. Kedisiplinan personil Polsek jajaran Polres Batang dalam memahami peraturan dan kebijakan pimpinan yang menjadi kewajiban bekerja masih kurang, terbukti dengan adanya temuan pelaksanaan Polsek Sebagai Basis Deteksi belum berjalan secara maksimal baik operasional dilapangan maupun secara administrasinya.

Tanggung Jawab Komisi Informasi Dalam Pembinaan Pejabat Pengelola Informasi Dan Dokumentasi Dalam Sengketa Informasi Publik Indra Ashoka Mahendrayana; Muhammad Junaidi; Mangaraja Manurung; Kukuh Sudarmanto
Journal Juridisch Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v2i1.8945

The aim of this research is to analyze the responsibilities/authority of the Central Java Provincial Information Commission and its obstacles in developing Information and Documentation Management Officers (PPID) in resolving public information disputes. The type of research used in this writing is sociological legal research (sociolegal research) with a conceptual approach. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively. The Central Java Provincial Information Commission (KIP Central Java) has broad authority in developing Information and Documentation Management Officials (PPID) in its region which includes establishing information service standards, criteria and procedures for establishing PPID, as well as preparing technical guidelines. KIP also has a role in coaching through training, evaluation and supervision of PPID. In addition, KIP has the authority to handle complaints related to violations of the right to public information and can provide recommendations or sanctions. Monitoring, supervision and administrative actions are also part of KIP's responsibility to ensure PPID's compliance with legal provisions. The development of Information and Documentation Management Officers (PPID) by the Central Java Province Information Commission faces several obstacles, namely, regulations regarding the rights, authority and obligations of the Information Commission through the Council of Commissioners have not been clearly regulated in statutory regulations. In the Adjudication hearing there were also obstacles related to the Respondent's power of attorney, not all of whom were PPID. Then, PPID has difficulty ensuring the classification of the information requested by the Applicant, especially if the information is not listed as exempt information, and a lack of clear understanding of standard operational procedures can hinder the effective processing of information requests. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk menganalisis tanggung jawab/wewenang Komisi Informasi Provinsi Jawa Tengah dan kendalanya dalam pembinaan Pejabat Pengelola Informasi dan Dokumentasi (PPID) dalam penyelesaian sengketa informasi publik. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini yakni penelitian hukum yuridis sosiologis (sociolegal research) dengan pendekatan konseptual. Analisa data dilakukan secara kualitatif. Komisi Informasi Provinsi Jawa Tengah (KIP Jawa Tengah) memiliki wewenang yang luas dalam pembinaan Pejabat Pengelola Informasi dan Dokumentasi (PPID) di wilayahnya yang mencakup penetapan standar pelayanan informasi, kriteria dan prosedur pembentukan PPID, serta penyusunan pedoman teknis. KIP juga memiliki peran dalam pembinaan melalui pelatihan, evaluasi, dan supervisi terhadap PPID. Selain itu, KIP memiliki kewenangan dalam menangani pengaduan terkait pelanggaran hak atas informasi publik dan dapat memberikan rekomendasi atau sanksi. Pemantauan, pengawasan, dan tindakan administratif juga menjadi bagian dari tanggung jawab KIP untuk memastikan ketaatan PPID terhadap ketentuan hukum. Pembinaan Pejabat Pengelola Informasi dan Dokumentasi (PPID) oleh Komisi Informasi Provinsi Jawa Tengah menghadapi beberapa kendala yakni, regulasi mengenai hak, wewenang, dan kewajiban Komisi Informasi melalui Majelis Komisioner belum diatur dengan jelas dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Dalam sidang Ajudikasi juga terdapat kendala terkait kuasa Termohon yang tidak seluruhnya merupakan PPID. Lalu, PPID kesulitan memastikan klasifikasi informasi yang diminta oleh Pemohon, terutama jika informasi tersebut tidak terdaftar sebagai informasi yang dikecualikan, dan pemahaman kurang jelas terhadap prosedur operasional standar dapat menghambat pemrosesan permohonan informasi secara efektif.

Implementasi Pemberian Uang Pisah Kepada Pekerja Mangkir Yang Tidak Diatur Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Bersama Nursalam Nursalam; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Zaenal Arifin; Dedi Indra Wibisono; Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno
Journal Juridisch Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v2i2.9220

This research aims to analyze the legal implications of providing severance pay to employees who are absent without valid reasons and are not regulated in the employment contract. After the 1998 reform, labor law in Indonesia underwent significant changes aimed at creating a harmonious and fair industrial relationship. One important aspect is the regulation of termination of employment (layoffs) and the provision of compensation to workers, including severance pay. However, not all conditions of layoffs and compensation are specifically regulated in collective labor agreements or company regulations. The research method used is normative juridical with a case approach. The research findings indicate that the ambiguity of regulations regarding severance pay can lead to disputes between workers and employers, as well as legal uncertainty. The novelty of this research lies in the analysis of court decisions and applicable regulations regarding compensation for absent workers, which have not been regulated in employment agreements. This research suggests the need for clearer regulations to avoid legal conflicts in the future. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum pemberian uang pisah kepada pekerja yang mangkir tanpa keterangan yang sah dan tidak diatur dalam perjanjian kerja. Setelah reformasi tahun 1998, hukum ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia mengalami perubahan signifikan dengan tujuan menciptakan hubungan industrial yang harmonis dan adil. Salah satu aspek penting adalah pengaturan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) dan pemberian kompensasi kepada pekerja, termasuk uang pisah. Namun, tidak semua kondisi PHK dan pemberian kompensasi diatur secara spesifik dalam perjanjian kerja bersama atau peraturan perusahaan.. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketidakjelasan aturan mengenai uang pisah dapat menimbulkan perselisihan antara pekerja dan pengusaha, serta ketidakpastian hukum. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis putusan pengadilan dan peraturan yang berlaku terkait kompensasi bagi pekerja mangkir, yang belum diatur dalam perjanjian kerja. Penelitian ini menyarankan adanya regulasi yang lebih jelas untuk menghindari konflik hukum di masa depan.

Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Perkara Pemberkasan Yang Terpisah (Splitsing) Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Siyogo Siyogo; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Zaenal Arifin; Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno
Journal Juridisch Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v2i2.9221

This research aims to analyze the judge's considerations when deciding industrial relations court cases with separate filings and the legal consequences of differences in rulings from industrial relations court cases with separate filings (splitting). The urgency of this research is that currently, courts consider factors beyond the literal interpretation of the law when making decisions, therefore legal professionals, including judges, must have empathy for individuals which is reflected in their decisions. This type of research is normative juridical. The research results show that splitting in the resolution of industrial relations cases refers to the separation of interest disputes and employment termination (PHK) disputes in decisions. However, this separation creates legal uncertainty and a damaged sense of justice. This separation of cases also has the impact of separating settlements and decisions, resulting in two different decisions for each type of dispute, with different legal consequences. The Civil Procedure Law (HIR) and Field Room (RBg) systems are used in industrial relations courts, but high costs, especially for workers, are the main obstacle. Apart from that, differences in decisions between judges also give rise to injustice. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hakim pada saat memutuskan perkara pengadilan hubungan industrial dengan pemberkasan yang terpisah dan akibat hukum dari perbedaan amar putusan dari perkara pengadilan hubungan industrial dengan pemberkasan yang terpisah (splitsing). Urgensi penelitian ini yaitu saat ini, pengadilan mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor di luar penafsiran hukum secara harafiah ketika mengambil keputusan, oleh karena itu para profesional hukum, termasuk hakim, harus memiliki empati terhadap individu yang tercermin dalam putusannya. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa splitsing dalam penyelesaian perkara hubungan industrial mengacu pada pemisahan perselisihan kepentingan dan perselisihan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) dalam putusan. Namun, pemisahan ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan rasa keadilan yang tercederai. Pemisahan perkara ini juga berdampak pada pemisahan penyelesaian dan putusan, menghasilkan dua amar putusan yang berbeda untuk setiap jenis perselisihan, dengan konsekuensi hukum yang berbeda pula. Sistem Hukum Acara Perdata (HIR) dan Ruang Bidang (RBg) digunakan dalam pengadilan hubungan industrial, namun biaya tinggi, terutama bagi pekerja, menjadi kendala utama. Selain itu, perbedaan putusan antara hakim juga menimbulkan ketidakadilan.

Penerapan Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Narapidana Pelanggar Tata Tertib Terkait Pemberian Hak Dewi Setyawati; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Zaenal Arifin; Rilda Subiadi
Journal Juridisch Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v2i2.9538

This research aims to analyze the obstacles and supporting factors in the application of legal sanctions against inmates who violate the order related to the granting of rights in Class II A Penitentiaries Semarang. This is important to study considering that there are still violations of inmates' rights in some prisons in Indonesia. This research is a normative-empirical legal research, with a statutory approach. The novelty of this research is that there are changes in the statutory regulations and in the research location there is an increase in the number of offenders. The results of the study show that the limited capacity and density of prisons make implementing regulations more difficult. Discomfort and poor detention conditions create tensions and violations of inmates' rights. Meanwhile, the imposition of strict sanctions sometimes violates the rights of inmates which is also a problem for prison officers, referring to a comparison of data on the number of disciplinary offenders from the previous year at Semarang Class II Prison has not experienced significant changes. This means that the number of offenders continues to increase and there are still inmates who repeat their crimes. The obstacles in the application of legal sanctions against inmates who violate the statutory regulations in Semarang Class IIA Penitentiary include limited resources, density or overcapacity, resistance or resistance from inmates, and lack of external supervision. While the solutions are preventive efforts and repressive efforts. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kendala dan faktor pendukung dalam penerapan sanksi hukum terhadap narapidana yang melanggar tata tertib terkait pemberian hak di Lapas Kelas II A Semarang. Hal ini menjadi penting untuk diteliti mengingat masih terdapat pelanggaran terhadap hak-hak narapidana di beberapa Lapas di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif-empiris, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat dari sisi perubahan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pada tempat penelitian yang terdapat peningkatan jumlah pelanggar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terbatasnya kapasitas dan kepadatan penjara membuat peraturan pelaksanaan menjadi lebih sulit. Ketidaknyamanan dan kondisi penahanan yang buruk menciptakan ketegangan dan pelanggaran hak-hak narapidana. Sementara itu, pemberian sanksi yang tegas terkadang melanggar hak-hak narapidana yang juga menjadi permasalahan bagi petugas pemasyarakatan, mengacu pada perbandingan data jumlah pelanggar disiplin dari tahun sebelumnya di Lapas Kelas II Semarang tidak mengalami perubahan signifikan. Artinya, jumlah pelanggar masih terus bertambah dan masih terdapat narapidana yang mengulangi kejahatannya. Kendala dalam penerapan sanksi hukum terhadap narapidana yang melanggar peraturan perundang-undangan di Lapas Kelas II A Semarang antara lain adalah keterbatasan sumber daya, kepadatan atau kelebihan kapasitas, resistensi atau perlawanan dari narapidana dan kurangnya pengawasan dari luar. Sedangkan solusi yang dilakukan adalah upaya preventif dan upaya represif.

Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian Windro Akbar Panggabean; Ega Laksmana Triwiraputra; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Zaenal Arifin
Journal Juridisch Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v2i3.9853

This study aims to analyze the performance of Police Sector intelligence as a detection base in supporting the maintenance of security and public order and analyze the efforts to improve the performance of Police Intelligence as a detection base in supporting the maintenance of security and public order in the Batang Police Department. The research method used is a sociological juridical. The analysis of research results shows that early detection efforts carried out by the Sector Police Unit of the Batang Resort Police security intelligence unit really need to be carried out so that they are able to detect, search and collect and dig up information from the community, then an identification process is carried out to sort, calculate and determine alternatives and consider and reading the signs of the facts from the detection results, the results are expressed in intelligence administration in the form of products that guarantee confidentiality, speed, accuracy and predictability. The discipline of the Batang Police Sector personnel in understanding the regulations and policies of leaders who are obliged to work is still lacking, as evidenced by the finding that the implementation of the Sector Police as a Detection Base has not run optimally, both operationally in the field and administratively.

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemenang Lelang Benda Bergerak Non Eksekusi Sukarela di Balai Lelang Swasta Dimas Almeida Saputra; Zaenal Arifin; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno
Journal Juridisch Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v2i3.9854

This research aims to analyze the process of implementing a voluntary non-execution movable object auction at PT JBA Indonesia Semarang City Branch. As well as to analyze legal protection for winners of non-voluntary execution movable object auctions at PT JBA Indonesia Semarang City Branch. The urgency of this research is so that auction winners are not deceived by the condition of movable objects when they are declared to have won the auction. And so that the auction winner gets legal protection and understands the legal standing at the time of the auction. This writing is empirical juridical research with a statutory approach and a case approach. The research specifications used in this research are analytical descriptive. The data collection method used by the author is by examining primary data obtained through interviews with employees and assistants to the leadership of the private auction house PT JBA Indonesia, Semarang City Branch, which was conducted directly at the PT JBA Indonesia Semarang City Branch office and secondary data obtained from materials. References. The results of the research explain that the auction implementation at the private auction center PT JBA Indonesia uses a voluntary non-execution auction type, then the auction implementation is also divided into several categories, namely pre-auction, during the auction, and post-auction. There are several categories of legal protection for winners of auctions for non-voluntary movable objects, namely disclosure of information about auction winners, private auction houses daring to take responsibility for errors in auction implementation and special complaints regarding auction implementation.

Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan oleh Anak Melalui Diversi Rudi Prasetiyo; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Kadi Sukarna; Mukhlis Ridwan
Journal Juridisch Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v2i3.9855

The study aims to analyze the optimization of the settlement of theft criminal cases committed by children in a diverse way. Children, as part of the future of the nation, have the right to grow and develop optimally, both physically and mentally, as well as socially and morally. Children involved in criminal acts such as theft often come from an under-supported family background, a lack of adequate education, or a poor social environment. Handling criminal cases involving children requires a different approach than adult perpetrators. Diversion, as one of the forms of settlement of criminal cases of children outside formal judicial proceedings, has been regulated in Act No. 11 of 2012 on the Child Criminal Justice System (SPPA). The urgency of this research lies in the need to find an effective solution to dealing with the crime of theft by children through diversified mechanisms. This method of investigation is juridic normative with supported secondary data as primary data and data. By maximizing diversification, it is expected to provide better protection for children facing the law, reduce the negative effects of formal judicial processes, and encourage children to return to society. This research offers some significant aspects of innovation. First, the study developed a diversified optimization strategy model that had not been comprehensively outlined in previous research. Second, it used a multidisciplinary approach that integrated legal, psychological, and sociological perspectives into its analysis. Third, the research identified key factors that influenced the success of diversion implementation in cases of child theft, which could be a reference for future public policy.

Kohabitasi Dalam KUHP 2023 Ternyata Tidak (Perlu) Dipidana Widhie Kurniawan; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Kadi Sukarna; Mangaraja Manurung
Journal Juridisch Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v2i3.10491

This study aims to analyze the crime of cohabitation as an absolute complaint offense in practice before and after the enactment of Article 412 of Law No. 1/2023 concerning the Criminal Code. The background is the negative stigma against cohabitation in Indonesian society and the ambiguity of the law before the existence of explicit regulations. The urgency of this study is to provide legal certainty and avoid arbitrary handling of cohabitation cases. The research method used is normative juridical with a descriptive analysis approach, using secondary data from laws and regulations, literature, and dictionaries. The novelty of this study lies in the comprehensive analysis of the handling of cohabitation before and after the enactment of the new Criminal Code Law. The results of the study show that before Law No. 1/2023, the handling of cohabitation varied, ranging from customary sanctions to the application of adultery articles. With the enactment of the new Law as of January 2, 2026, cohabitation is regulated as an absolute complaint offense with limitations on complainants. In conclusion, although cohabitation now has a clear legal basis, its implementation still considers aspects of social balance and family resolution, similar to the concept of restorative justice. Customary law can still be applied in handling cohabitation, but requires government regulations as derivative rules for its implementation. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tindak pidana kohabitasi sebagai delik aduan absolut dalam praktik sebelum dan setelah berlakunya Pasal 412 UU No. 1/2023 tentang KUHP. Latar belakangnya adalah stigma negatif terhadap kohabitasi di masyarakat Indonesia dan ketidakjelasan hukum sebelum adanya aturan eksplisit. Urgensi penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan menghindari penanganan sewenang-wenang terhadap kasus kohabitasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analisis, menggunakan data sekunder dari peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur, dan kamus. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis komprehensif terhadap penanganan kohabitasi sebelum dan setelah berlakunya UU KUHP baru. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebelum UU No. 1/2023, penanganan kohabitasi bervariasi, mulai dari sanksi adat hingga penerapan pasal perzinahan. Dengan berlakunya UU baru per 2 Januari 2026, kohabitasi diatur sebagai delik aduan absolut dengan limitasi pengadu. Kesimpulannya, meskipun kohabitasi kini memiliki dasar hukum yang jelas, penerapannya tetap mempertimbangkan aspek keseimbangan sosial dan penyelesaian kekeluargaan, mirip dengan konsep keadilan restoratif. Hukum adat masih dapat diterapkan dalam penanganan kohabitasi, namun memerlukan peraturan pemerintah sebagai aturan turunan untuk implementasinya.

Kewenangan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Daerah Jawa Tengah Dalam Pengawasan Siaran Iklan Kampanye Pemilu 2024 Di Televisi Atok Dadyo Utomo; Kukuh Sudarmanto; Muhammad Junaidi; Zaenal Arifin; Bahmid Bahmid
Journal Juridisch Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v3i1.11047

This study aims to analyze the authority of the Regional Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPID) of Central Java in supervising television broadcasts of campaign advertisements for the 2024 General Election. The urgency of this research lies in the ongoing violations of broadcast neutrality, which have the potential to influence public opinion and undermine the quality of democracy. The method employed is normative juridical with a statutory approach, supported by interview data from KPID Central Java. The findings indicate that KPID’s authority complies with the eight principles of legality and has proven to be fairly effective through the fulfillment of five factors in broadcast law enforcement. This study differs from previous research as it specifically evaluates the role of KPID in the context of the 2024 Election and the challenges posed by contemporary broadcasting regulations. In conclusion, KPID’s supervision contributes to the creation of democratic and high-quality broadcasts, although institutional strengthening and regulatory support are still required. This research contributes to the development of broadcasting law studies while also providing recommendations for the government and KPI to reinforce both the authority and effectiveness of election broadcast supervision in the future. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kewenangan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Daerah (KPID) Jawa Tengah dalam pengawasan siaran iklan kampanye Pemilu 2024 di televisi. Urgensi penelitian didasarkan pada masih ditemukannya pelanggaran netralitas siaran yang berpotensi menggiring opini publik dan mengancam kualitas demokrasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan yang didukung data wawancara dengan KPID Jawa Tengah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan KPID telah memenuhi delapan prinsip legalitas hukum dan terbukti cukup efektif melalui pemenuhan lima faktor penegakan hukum penyiaran. Penelitian ini berbeda dari studi sebelumnya karena secara khusus mengevaluasi peran KPID dalam konteks Pemilu 2024 serta tantangan regulasi penyiaran kontemporer. Kesimpulannya, pengawasan KPID mendukung terciptanya siaran demokratis dan berkualitas, namun masih memerlukan penguatan kelembagaan dan dukungan regulasi. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan kajian hukum penyiaran sekaligus memberikan rekomendasi bagi pemerintah dan KPI untuk memperkuat kewenangan serta efektivitas pengawasan penyiaran Pemilu di masa mendatang.

Title

Found 71 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 71 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 71 Documents
Search