Articles
<![CDATA[Implementasi Tenaga Kerja dengan Perjanjian Kerja Berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Surakarta Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengelolaan Jasa ]]>
<![CDATA[Eusthacia Arzeti Kushandi]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 9, No 1 (2025): April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v9i1.84360
<![CDATA[This research aims to find out a clear picture of the systematic implementation of the procurement of TKPK services, obstacles and strategies to overcome obstacles regarding the procurement of labor services with employment agreements in Surakarta City. This type of research includes descriptive research. The research approaches taken are: statute approach, case approach, historical approach, and conceptual approach. The main data collection techniques were conducted through interviews and library data collection. The results of the research include: 1) The rationale for the issuance of Surakarta Mayor Regulation number 37 of 2021 concerning Guidelines for Procurement of Labor Services with Employment Agreements is in accordance with the needs of services to the community. The implementation of Labor Procurement with Employment Agreements in Surakarta City has been carried out in accordance with the support of the PDIP faction of the Surakarta City DPRD and the Personnel and Human Resources Development Agency carries out tasks related to planning, implementation and evaluation of TKPK in Surakarta City. 2). There are several obstacles that arise in the implementation of TKPK in Surakarta City. These are found in: Regulations and Policies are considered less consistent. Local Labor Empowerment is considered less appropriate. Evaluation and continuous improvement are not implemented. Budget Management and Performance Management System. 3) The strategy implemented to overcome the obstacles in the implementation of TKPK procurement in Surakarta City is that the strategy of Clarifying Regulations and Policies consistently, managing the Budget well and collaborating with other parties as a source of TKPK budget. Through the implementation of consistent clarification of regulations and policies, good budget management, and cooperation with other parties as a source of budget for TKPK employees. Suggestions that can be outlined are that future researchers with the same subject matter should further expand the scope of discussion related to problem-sol]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS KEWENANGAN KEMENTERIAN KETENAGAKERJAAN TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN PEKERJA RUMAH TANGGA PEREMPUAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Aldys Rismelin Alrasyid]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Agustus ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v8i2.85434
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kewenangan Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan dalam memberikan perlindungan bagi Pekerja Rumah Tangga khususnya bagi Pekerja Rumah Tangga Perempuan. Selain itu juga untuk mengetahui sejauh mana perlindungan yang telah diatur dalam kebijakan yang dibuat oleh negara dan sejauh mana peran Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan telah memenuhi perlindungan Pekerja Rumah Tangga Perempuan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif atau doktrinal dengan pendekatan masalah yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu, pendekatan Perundang-undangan ( Statute Approach ) dan pendekatan Konseptual ( Conceptual Approach ). Sifat dalam penelitian ini adalah perspektif. Penelitian ini menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan hukum dalam penelitian ini adalah menggunakan studi dokumen atau studi kepustakaan. Teknik Analisa bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penelitian hukum ini adalah penalaran hukum dengan metode deduksi silogisme. Berdasarkan penelitian ini diperoleh hasil bahwa kewenangan Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan sebagai lembaga pemerintahan yang memiliki kewenangan untuk memastikan apakah peraturan yang telah ada sudah efektif memberikan perlindungan bagi pekerja, begitupun dengan pekerja rumah tangga ternyata belum maksimal. Hal tersebut dikarenakan pekerja rumah tangga masih belum diakui sepenuhnya sebagai pekerja. Rencana strategis Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan tahun 2021-2024 tidak menyebutkan secara tegas perihal pekerja rumah tangga ataupun pekerja perempuan, atau pekerja informal. Selain itu, peraturan tentang ketenagakerjaan dan pekerja rumah tangga seperti, Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan di Rumah Tangga, dan Permenaker Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Perlindungan pekerja rumah tangga belum mengatur secara jelas pengawasan Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan dalam memberikan perlindungan kepada pekerja rumah tangga.]]>
<![CDATA[Analasis Perbandingan Pengaturan Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Profesi Advokat Antara Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat ]]>
<![CDATA[Afifah Eranie Mauluna]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 6, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v6i1.59625
<![CDATA[This research aims to find out the similarities and differences in the Implementation of Advocate Professional Education between Indonesia and the United States which will be used by Indonesia in forming an ideal Advocate Professional Education in Indonesia. Advocates are regulated in Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates, but in the Law there is still confusion when the Implementation of Advocate Professional Education is carried out by Advocate Organizations in the form of multi bars which should be single bars so that there is no standardization of Advocate Professional Education. Unlike the United States, which has an established and structured Advocate Professional Education with the Model Rules for Minimum Continuing Legal Education (MCLE) made by the American Bar Association (ABA). So that this raises two questions that will be discussed in this paper with the formulation of the problem in the form of how the similarities and differences in the Implementation of Advocate Professional Education between the two countries and how the ideal form of Advocate Professional Education in Indonesia. This paper uses a normative research method with a comparative approach. Overall, there are several indicators that can be compared in the Implementation of Advocate Professional Education in the two countries and in this case Indonesia must establish an Advocate Supervisory Board to improve the quality of Advocate Professional Education in Indonesia. ]]>
<![CDATA[Putusan Mk Nomor 39/PUU-XVII/2019 sebagai Dasar Hukum untuk Menentukan dan Menetapkan Pemenang Pemilu Presiden ]]>
<![CDATA[Fernindito Radiktya Prabaswara]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 5, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v5i2.58452
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTThis study aims to determine whether the Constitutional Court Decision Number 39 / PUU-XVII / 2019 can be used as a legal basis for determining and assigning the winner of a presidential election. This research is a prescriptive normative legal research. The research approach that I use is a statutory approach with data sources obtained through primary and secondary data. Primary data were obtained from laws and rulings, while secondary data were obtained through literature studies, namely books, journals and scientific articles, legal dictionaries and materials from internet media. The data collection technique used is literature study, so that the writing of this law is then understood as writing literature, namely research on secondary data. Based on the results of this study, the authors conclude that theConstitutional Court’s decision does not yet have strong force to become the legal basis for determining the winners of the presidential and vice presidential electionsand even though the principles of justice and truth have been reached, there is no guarantee that the decision will be obeyed.Keywords: legal basis; judicial judgment; general election.]]>
<![CDATA[PENYELESAIAN KASUS PELANGGARAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA BERAT DI INDONESIA OLEH KOMISI NASIONAL HAK ASASI MANUSIA DITINJAU DARI KEWENANGANNYA (STUDI KASUS TIMOR-TIMUR) ]]>
<![CDATA[Viddy Firmandiaz]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Januari - April 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v4i1.45695
<![CDATA[This study analyzes the settlement of serious human rights violations by Komnas HAM in terms of its authority to the East Timor case studies. This study is a prescriptive normative law that aims to analyze the effectiveness of the authority of Komnas HAM in the resolution of serious human rights violations and provide solutions for problems that were examined by the author. This study uses primary data in the form of an investigation report of the East Timor Human Rights Violation Investigation Commission and secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary law. Data collected through library research to find secondary data using primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. In writing this law, the writer uses the statutory approach, the concept approach, the case approach, and the historical approach. The results of this study show that the authority of Komnas HAM to be ineffective causing delays resolution of cases of serious human rights violations in Indonesia, which according to the author due to the weak legitimacy of institutions, lack of subpoena authority of Komnas HAM and disharmony with the Attorney General.]]>
<![CDATA[Hukuman Kebiri bagi Pelaku Pedofilia dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia ]]>
<![CDATA[Paulina Marbun]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 5, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v5i1.58447
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTIndonesia is one of the countries that often experience child sexual abuse. The cases number significantly increase. The regulations in law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection are unable to provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators of child sexual abuse. That’s why chemical castration punishment was born. The application of this punishment becomes controversial, some people thought it was appropriate to have a deterrent effect. But on the other hand, this punishment is considered to violate human rights. The problem in this research is: Does chemical castration punishment for pedophiles violate human rights? and what’s the ideal castration punishment to not to violate human rights? the research method used is normative legal research. The purpose of this study is to find out whether castration punishment violates human rights and to find out the ideal way of chemical castration punishment. The theoretical benefit of this research is to develop science, especially in human rights. while the practical benefits of this research are the consideration of the stakeholders in making government regulations related to the method of implementing castration punishment in Indonesia.Keywords : human rights; chemical castration; sexual abuse.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengaturan Agama Leluhur Pascaputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 97/PUU-XIV/2016 Ditinjau dari Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhamad Ridwan Herdika]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 5, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v5i3.58465
<![CDATA[ABSTRACTThis research describes and examines the problem, first about how to recognize local religion in post-Constitutional Court verdict No.97/PUUXIV/2016. Second, analysis of verdict of the Constitutional Court No.97/PUU - XIV/2016 on the fulfillment of human rights of followers of local religion. This research is a normative analytic and descriptive-analytical normative legal research. Secondary data types contain primary, secondary and tertiary legalmaterials. The data collection technique used is the study of literature, then the technical analysis used is the deductive method. The results of the research obtained by the author, the first verdict of the Constitutional Court No.97/PUU-XIV/2016 has been approved to significantly recognize the local religion in the legislation. Secondly, the implications of the Constitutional Court’s verdict No.97/PUU-XIV/2016 effect on the fulfillment of the rights of believers (ancestral local religion) throughout Indonesia.Keywords : MK verdict No. 97/PUU-XIV/2016; local religion; human rights.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Perlindungan Hukum bagi Para Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah dengan Adanya Sertipikat Ganda ]]>
<![CDATA[Risha Khonza Persada]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>;
<![CDATA[Andina Elok Puri Maharani]]>
<![CDATA[ Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2022: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Pendaftaran tanah yang diadakan sebagai upaya untuk memberikan jaminan perlindungan kepastian hukum kepada para pemegang hak, justru membuat para pemegang hak merasa tidak diberikan perlindungan dengan munculnya Sertipikat Ganda yang mana merupakan sertipikat resmi yang di terbitkan oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional. Masalah sertipikat ganda menimbulkan keresahan bagi pemegang hak dikarenakan rawan terjadinya gugatan. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum pemegang hakatas tanah dengan adanya sertipikat ganda, penelitian ini menggunakan metode normative, bersifat preskriptif serta pendekatan perundang-undangan.Hasil dari penelitian ini, Sertipikat Ganda muncul karena factor kelalaian Badan Pertanahan Nasional dan kurang sempurnanya system pendaftaran tanah.Perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang sertipikat ganda berdasarkan ketentuan PP 24 Tahun 1997 dan sengketa ini dapat diselesaikan dengan jalur kekeluargaan dan melalui Pengadilan.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Penegakan Hukum Pelaksanaan Ganti Kerugian Pengadaan Tanah untuk Jalan Tol Solo-Jogja ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Faza Abyan Naufal]]>;
<![CDATA[I Isharyanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2022: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Program pembanguan jalan tol merupakan program pemerintah dalam upaya untuk pemerataan pembangunan di Indonesia. Pembangunan infrastruktur jalan tol salah satunya Jalan Tol Yogyakarta-Solo merupakan salah satu unsur penting dalam mempercepat mobilitas penduduk, dan memberikan dampak positif terhadap perkembangan dan pertumbuhan ekonomi.Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana bentuk pelaksanaan ganti rugi atas kepemilikan tanah untuk kepentingan pembangunan menurut Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2012 dan PP No 19 tahun 2021 tentang pengadaan tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum dan mekanisme penyelesaian hukum ketika pemilik hak atas tanah menolak bentuk dan/atau besarnya ganti kerugian yang telah di tetapkan. Jenis penelitian yang dipakai adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Hasilnya bahwa pada proyek pembangunan tol Solo-Jogja ini telah sesuai dengan Undang - Undang No 2 Tahun 2012 dan Peraturan Pemrintah No 19 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah. Pengadaan tanah ialah mewujudkan pengadaan tanah yang memenuhi rasa keadilan, baik bagi masyarakat yang terkena pengadaan tanah untuk mendapatkan ganti rugi yang layak demi kelangsungan hidup mereka dan pemerintah maupun pemerintah daerah dapat memperoleh tanah untuk pembangunan.]]>
<![CDATA[The Influence of Quasi- or Hybrid-Authority Governments in Promoting the Emergence of a Sequential Decentralization Model: A Comparison of the United Kingdom and France Model ]]>
<![CDATA[Anajeng Esri Edhi Mahanani]]>;
<![CDATA[Pujiyono Suwadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Jadmiko Anom Husodo]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Al-Mazaahib ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v14i2.4966
<![CDATA[Structural inconsistencies regarding the legal status of the Nusantara Capital City Authority (IKN) and its Head who simultaneously act as special regional government administrators and central government representatives have produced a governance setup marked by dual authority. This institutional overlap is exacerbated by the fact that the IKN Authority and its leadership also operate as contracting parties in private investment agreements for capital development. Such regulatory design under the IKN Law departs sharply from constitutional and statutory provisions that traditionally govern regional administration. Addressing these discrepancies, this article applied a normative legal research design with a comparative approach. The analysis demonstrates that a quasi- or hybrid-authority governance model provides a novel theoretical framework to map the relational dynamics between the IKN Authority and the Central Government. To eliminate statutory disparities while respecting constitutional local governance principles, the paper argues for a sequential asymmetric decentralization model adapted from Tulia G. Falleti’s theory—an approach previously implemented in jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and France. Beyond theoretical contributions, these findings offer concrete guidance for future policy planning and regulatory design for the national capital within Indonesia's regional autonomy framework Ketimpangan pengaturan kedudukan Lembaga dan Kepala Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN) sebagai penyelenggara Pemerintahan Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota dan juga sebagai wakil pemerintah pusat, memunculkan model pemerintahan dengan kewenangan yang ganda. Problematika semakin menguat melihat Lembaga dan Kepala Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara juga bertindak sebagai pihak dalam perjanjian investasi pembangunan IKN. Pengaturan UU IKN juga memiliki perbedaan mendasar dengan pengaturan pemerintahan daerah pada konstitusi dan undang-undang pemerintahan daerah. Untuk dapat mengurai permasalahan ketimpangan tersebut, penulisan jurnal ini menggunakan metode penelitian normative dengan studi perbandingan. Ditemukan hasil bahwa model quasi atau hybrid authority government merupakan model baru yang dapat digunakan untuk menggambarkan pola hubungan kewenangan Lembaga Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara dengan Pemerintah Pusat. Agar tidak ada ketimpangan pengaturan kedudukan Lembaga Otorita IKN dengan segala kewenangan yang dimiliki dan melihat ketentuan konsep pemerintahan daerah sebagaimana diatur dalam konstitusi dan undang-undang, maka perlu diselenggarakan model desentralisasi asimetris sekuensial yang lahir dari adopsi teori sequential decentralization milik Tulia G. Falleti, yang juga diterapkan di beberapa negara, misal Inggris dan Perancis. Artikel ini diharapkan dapat memberikan sumbangsih model pengaturan penyelenggaraan desentralisasi asimetris di Ibu Kota Negara pada masa depan. Temuan model ini merupakan temuan baru yang dapat menjadi pertimbangan rancangan kebijakan penataan Ibu Kota Negara dalam rezim otonomi daerah.]]>
