Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.979
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Masalah-Masalah Hukum Lentera Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI JUSTISI JPIn : Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia RIO LAW JURNAL International Journal of Law Society Services Reformasi Hukum Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal SASI Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Saragih, Geofani Milthree
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Kajian Terhadap Penerapan Teori Sociological Yurisprudence Oliver Wendel Holmes Oleh Hakim Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan Nomor 119/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN/Bdg) Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Zulfah, Indana; Nasution, Junisyah; Ginting, Nabila Marsiadetama; Silaban, Helen Mutiara
MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Morality : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Palangkaraya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52947/morality.v10i2.457

Abstract

Hakim adalah wakil Tuhan dalam menegakkan hukum di dunia. Salah satu kajian utama dalam penelitian ini adalah menganalisis peranan hakim dalam menggali keadilan dalam masyarakat, dengan menggunakan perspektif teori Sociological Jurisprudence yang dikemukakan oleh Oliver Wendell Holmes. Dalam pandangan Holmes, hukum harus dipahami sebagai refleksi dari nilai-nilai dan realitas sosial yang ada dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi bagaimana teori Sociological Jurisprudence memengaruhi cara hakim memandang dan menginterpretasikan hukum untuk mencapai keadilan. Holmes menekankan bahwa hakim harus memahami konteks sosial dan ekonomi di mana hukum diterapkan. Hakim harus melihat hukum sebagai alat untuk mencapai tujuan sosial yang lebih besar dan memastikan bahwa keputusan hukum mereka mencerminkan realitas sosial saat ini. Ini memerlukan kemampuan hakim untuk beradaptasi dengan perubahan dalam masyarakat dan memahami implikasi sosial dari keputusan hukum mereka. Penerapan teori Holmes tersebut dikaitkan dengan Studi Putusan Nomor 119/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN/Bdg dalam penelitian ini, dimana dalam putusan tersebut hakim telah melakukan suatu penggalian nilai-nilai keadilan dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini menguraikan bagaimana pandangan Holmes tentang hukum dan keadilan memiliki dampak pada penegakan hukum. Penelitian ini juga akan menelusuri pemikiran holmes dalam Undang-Undang Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah normatif yuridis dengan menggunakan pendekatan filosofis. Hasil dari penelitian ini akan memperlihatkan bahwa peran hakim dalam menggali nilai-nilai keadilan dalam masyarakat, sebagaimana yang ditegaskan di dalam teori Sociological Jurisprudence oleh Holmes telah direalisasikan di dalam Putusan Nomor 119/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN/Bdg. Hal ini dianggap penting dalam memastikan bahwa hukum mencerminkan dan mendukung keadilan sosial.
KEBEBASAN BERSERIKAT DAN BERKUMPUL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA Tarmudi, Tarmudi; Widagdo, Gatot Subroto; Putra, Rengga Kusuma; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Amelia, Risky
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8, No 3a (2024): September-Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i3a.10654

Abstract

This study aims to analyze freedom of association and assembly from a human rights perspective, and explore the challenges faced in its implementation in various countries. The scope of the study includes a review of various cases of violations of the right to freedom of association and assembly, both in countries with democratic and authoritarian systems. In addition, this study will also discuss the role of international organizations and civil society in promoting and protecting these rights. This study will not only discuss the theory and basic principles of freedom of association and assembly, but will also dig deeper into how these rights are implemented in practice, the challenges faced, and steps that can be taken to strengthen the protection of these freedoms throughout the world. This study is expected to make a significant contribution to understanding the complexity of freedom of association and assembly and its impact on human rights as a whole. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study design. The qualitative approach was chosen because it allows researchers to dig deeper into freedom of association and assembly in the context of Human Rights (HAM).
ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL AUTHORITY IN THE FORMATION OF LOCAL REGULATIONS BASED ON PANCASILA IDEOLOGY: ANALISIS KEWENANGAN DAERAH DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN DAERAH YANG BERLANDASKAN IDEOLOGI PANCASILA Putra, Rengga Kusuma; Saragih, Geofani Milthree
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Center for Constitutional and Legislative Studies University of Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/cls.v4i01.92

Abstract

This research analyses the local authority in the formation of local regulations (Perda) based on the ideology of Pancasila. As a country with a decentralised system, Indonesia gives authority to local governments to form local regulations according to the needs of each region. However, in its implementation, this authority must remain in line with the principles contained in Pancasila as the basis of the state. This research uses normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach. The data source used is secondary data consisting of laws and regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature. The results show that in the formation of local regulations, local governments must pay attention to the principles of the formation of good laws and regulations as stipulated in Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Laws and Regulations. In addition, there is a supervisory mechanism from the central government and the Supreme Court to ensure that the Perda formed does not conflict with higher regulations and the values of Pancasila. This research recommends strengthening the synergy between local and central government in drafting local regulations, as well as increasing public participation to ensure that any local regulations formed truly reflect the values of Pancasila and the interests of the community at large.
The Urgency of Meaningful Participation in the Law Making Process from the Perspective of Democratic Countries (Comparison of Indonesia, South Africa and the United States) Putra, Rengga Kusuma; Nugroho, Aziz Widhi; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Fatimah, Siti; Nugraha, Satriya
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Meaningful participation in law formation is a crucial aspect of a democratic country. The existence of this participation not only reflects the voice of the people but also increases the legitimacy of the resulting law. A legislative process that involves the community can create rules that are more responsive and in line with community needs. In this context, this research discusses meaningful participation practices in Indonesia, South Africa, and the United States. Each country has different approaches and mechanisms for involving the public in the legislative process. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a comparative legal approach. Through this approach, the study analyzes the laws and regulations governing public participation and identifies best practices from each country. The research results show that South Africa implements an effective public consultation system, where the public can provide direct input in the discussion of draft laws. Meanwhile, the United States has a structured participation mechanism, including public hearings and gathering input from various stakeholders, thereby creating a space for constructive dialogue between policymakers and the public. On the other hand, Indonesia still faces challenges in ensuring meaningful participation, despite efforts through public discussion mechanisms. These findings suggest the need to improve participation mechanisms in Indonesia to optimize the quality of democracy and legal legitimacy. Apart from that, support from the government and society is needed to create a stronger culture of participation, so that every individual feels they have a role in the legislative process. In this way, it is hoped that the resulting law will not be just a formality, but wil.Keywords:Meaningfull Participation; Legislation; Law Making; Democratic.
The Philosophical of the Role of the Constitutional Court Related to the Certainty of Gender Equality Rights in Indonesia Artina, Dessy; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Lailam, Tanto
SASI Volume 30 Issue 1, March 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v30i1.1765

Abstract

Introduction: In the agenda of the supremacy of law in Indonesia, one of the tangible manifestations carried out is the establishment of the Constitutional Court in 2003. One of the powers of the Constitutional Court is judicial review which has a major role and influence in upholding human rights. The Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to analyze especially from the philosophical perspective of the role of the Constitutional Court in upholding certainty regarding gender equality in Indonesia. The main research authority is judicial review.The Methods of the Research: The research method used in this study is a normative research method with a legal and philosophical approach. The method and approach will be used in examining the role of the Constitutional Court in upholding certainty regarding gender equality in Indonesia.Results of the Research: A series of Constitutional Court decisions, including Number 22-24/PUU-VI/2008, demonstrates Indonesia's commitment to gender equality. These rulings changed election systems, ensuring equal opportunities for all candidates. The Court nullified affirmative action provisions in Law No. 10 of 2008, shifting from a 30% female representation goal. Decision Number 20/PUU-XI/2013 strengthened gender equality in politics, while Decision Number 82/PUU-XII/2014 supported women's electability in leadership roles. Decision Number 22/PUU-XV/2017 addressed gender-based discrimination in the Marriage Law. These decisions show the Constitutional Court's role in promoting gender equality, yet ongoing efforts are needed for further progress.
Evaluation of the Implementation of Pancasila Values and Human Rights Enforcement in Indonesian Judicial System Through Constitutional Approach Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana; Putra, Rengga Kusuma
Reformasi Hukum Vol 28 No 3 (2024): December Edition
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46257/jrh.v28i3.1082

Abstract

This study evaluates the application of Pancasila values and the enforcement of human rights in Indonesia's judicial system through a constitutional approach. Using normative legal research methods, the approach taken includes analysis of legislation, conceptual studies, as well as case studies of a number of relevant Constitutional Court decisions. The results show that the values of Pancasila, particularly the second and fifth precepts, play a fundamental role as the philosophical basis in the application and interpretation of human rights principles in Indonesia. The Constitutional Court has a strategic role in safeguarding the constitution while ensuring the enforcement of human rights through progressive legal interpretation. However, despite these positive steps, challenges such as inconsistencies in lower court decisions and mismatches between the rule of law and the needs of society remain. This research recommends strengthening Pancasila-based legal education, harmonizing legal policies, and increasing the capacity of judges in integrating human rights with social justice principles holistically. The findings confirm that the judicial system, with a strong constitutional approach, can be an effective tool in realizing social justice in accordance with the values of Pancasila and the constitution.
The Existence Principle Assertion in Authority Supervision Finance By Examining Body Finance in Indonesia SIKUMBANG, Yudhia Perdana; SARAGIH, Geofani Milthree
Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law. (July – October 2024)
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (189.403 KB) | DOI: 10.38142/pjlel.v1i1.402

Abstract

Examining Body Finance is state agency that has authority inspection finance in Indonesian constitution , p the by constitutional set in _ Article 23E paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. In operate function inspection state finances , the BPK in run it bound by principle assertion . However in level implementation , still there is action examinations carried out by the BPK in Thing this no notice principle assertion . Study this will study existence principle assertion in implementation authority inspection state finances by the BPK. Study this categorized as to in type study normative with based on problem or raised theme _ as topics study main inside _ study this . Approach used _ in study this is approach principle law with link a number of law existing positive _ During regarding with topics discussion main inside _ study this . Method analysis used _ is descriptive analytical with describe regulation current legislation _ apply as well as decisions later court _ linked with practice the law that occurs in the field ( facts ) law ). Research results this show that existence than principle assertion in law positive , practice law until guide for CPC in operate authority inspection to real state finances has emphasized even inside _ law related positive _ with CPC no someone confirmed _ by textual about role as well as attachment from principle assertion .
Politik Hukum Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan DM, Mohd. Yusuf; Firman, Firman; Afrijon, Emi; Aritonang, William Suryadi Ganda Tuah; Saragih, Geofani Milthree
Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia (JPIn) Vol 5, No 2: Oktober 2022
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Intan Cendekia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47165/jpin.v5i2.367

Abstract

Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara yang menjunjung tinggi hukum, hal ini dipertegas secara konstitusional di dalam Pasal 1 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Oleh karena itu, ada banyak aspek yang harus diatur di dalam hukum agar segala sesuatu tersebut dapat dilaksanakan dan dijalankan dalam bernegara di Indonesia. Sehingga, peraturan perundang-undangan selaku hukum positif yang memiliki peranan penting dalam penyelenggaraan ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Aspek penting yang harus dipahami dalam hal ini adalah pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Pasca berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dikenal metode baru dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif yuridis dengan mengaitkan pokok pembahasan terhadap topik utama di dalam penelitian ini. Hasil dari kesimpulan penelitian ini mempertegas mengenai kedudukan politik hukum metode pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan dengan menggunakan metode omnibus law di Indonesia setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia.
Kajian Terhadap Kekuatan-Kekuatan Sosial (Social Forces) Dan Fungsi Hukum Dalam Masyarakat DM, Mohd. Yusuf; L., Rainly; Hilman, Anton; Wardioso, Abdau; Saragih, Geofani Milthree
Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia (JPIn) Vol 5, No 2: Oktober 2022
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Intan Cendekia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47165/jpin.v5i2.372

Abstract

Di dalam setiap masyarakat terdapat suatu kekuatan sosial (social forces) yang dapat berfungsi sebagai alat untuk mencapai suatu tujuan. Kekuatan sosial adalah faktor yang sangat mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Hal ini karena hukum yang akan diberlakukan pasti akan menghadapi kekuatan-kekuatan sosial yang ada di tengah-tengah masyarakat. Setidaknya, terdapat beberapa faktor-faktor berpengaruh dalam kekuatan sosial. Pembahasan ini menjadi salah satu isu krusial yang dikaji di dalam sosiologi hukum. Pada dasarnya, gejala sosial memiliki kaitan yang erat dengan pembahasan di dalam penelitian ini. Mengenai fungsi hukum di dalam masyarakat juga menjadi isu penting yang akan dibahas. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif yuridis dengan mengaitkan pokok pembahasan terhadap topik utama di dalam penelitian ini yakni mengenai Hak Asasi Manusia. Hasil dari penelitian ini akan memperlihatkan faktor-faktor kekuatan sosial yang mempengaruhi hukum yaitu kekuatan uang, kekuatan politik, kekuatan massa dan teknologi baru. Kemudian, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa terdapat manfaat sosiologi hukum dalam memahami seberapa jauh fungsi penegakan hukum di tengah-tengah masyarakat
Peranan Kepolisian Sebagai Law Enforcement Di Indonesia Dikaitkan Dengan Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum DM, Mohd. Yusuf; Gurning, Rijen; Sukrizal, Sukrizal; Saragih, Geofani Milthree
Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia (JPIn) Vol 5, No 2: Oktober 2022
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Intan Cendekia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47165/jpin.v5i2.366

Abstract

Indonesia merupakan negara hukum, sebagai negara yang sangat menjunjung tinggi hukum terdapat beberapa penegak hukum yang memiliki peranan penting di dalamnya. Kepolisian adalah salah satu law enforcement yang memiliki peranan penting dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Secara konstitusional, di dalam Pasal 30 ayat (4) UUD 1945 ditegaskan bahwa Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia sebagai alat negara yang menjaga keamanan dan ketertiban masyarakat memiliki tugas penting dalam melindungi, menganyomi, melayani masyarakat serta menegakkan hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif yuridis dengan mengaitkan pokok pembahasan terhadap topik utama di dalam penelitian ini. Di dalam penelitian ini akan dibahas mengenai sejarah singkat kelahiran kepolisian di Indonesia dan peranan Kepolisian sebagai penegak hukum dalam mewujudkan keamanan dan ketertiban negara. Hasil dari penelitian ini memperlihatkan telah bayak dinamika dalam perkembangan institusi kepolisian di Indonesia serta peranan penting kepolisian dalam mewujudkan keamanan dan ketertiban negara Indonesia.
Co-Authors Afrijon, Emi Aritonang, William Suryadi Ganda Tuah Berson, Hendri Dessy Artina Dewi, Elya Kusuma DM, Mohd. Yusuf Edy Setyawan Eka N.A.M Sihombing, Eka N.A.M Erdianto Effendi Fahrizal S.Siagian Fauzan Ghafur Firman Firman Firouzfar, Saied Gaol, Selamat Lumban Ginting, Nabila Marsiadetama Gurning, Rijen Handoko, Tito Hasgar A.S., A. Muhammad Hidayat, Freddy Hilman, Anton Indana Zulfah Ishwara , Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ivory, Jared L., Rainly Ledy Diana Mahardika, Ahmad Gelora Mexsasai Indra Mochammad Imron Awalludin Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar Mohd. Yusuf DM Nasution, Junisyah Nasution, Mirza Nugroho, Aziz Widhi Pangaribuan, Roland Latarsa Pasaribu, Davin Hansel Putra Utama, Andi Wahyu Putra, Rengga Kusuma Razak, Askari Rivera, Kevin M. Sanathana Ishwara, Ade Sathya Satriya Nugraha Setiawan, Feri Sikumbang, Yudhia Perdana Silaban, Helen Mutiara Siti Fatimah Sitompul, Hasran Irawadi Suaka, Mardhatillah Sugianto Sugianto Suherman, Jajang Sukrizal, Sukrizal Sulastri Sulastri Tanto Lailam Tarmudi Tarmudi, Tarmudi Tiraputri, Adi Wardioso, Abdau Wasiska, Asti Widagdo, Gatot Subroto Yati Sharfina Desiandri Yusuf DM, Mohd. Zean Via Aulia Hakim ZULFAH, INDANA