Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.979
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Masalah-Masalah Hukum Lentera Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI JUSTISI JPIn : Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia RIO LAW JURNAL International Journal of Law Society Services Reformasi Hukum Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal SASI Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Saragih, Geofani Milthree
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Tinjauan Yuridis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Efetivitas Penegakan Hukum Di Masyarakat DM, Mohd. Yusuf; Sugianto, Sugianto; Pangaribuan, Roland Latarsa; Putra Utama, Andi Wahyu; Saragih, Geofani Milthree
Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia (JPIn) Vol 5, No 2: Oktober 2022
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Intan Cendekia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47165/jpin.v5i2.369

Abstract

Hukum merupakan suatu hal yang abstrak, karena tidak dapat dilihat dan disentuh, namun dapat dirasakan keberadaannya. Hal ini karena hukum bukan suatu benda, melainkan tindakan (setelah dimplementasikan). Untuk mengkaji hal tersebut, maka kita harus memperhatikan eksistensi hukum melalui efektivitas hukum yang ada di tengah-tengah masyarakat. Membahas mengenai efektivitas hukum di tengah-tengah masyarakat berarti membahas mengenai daya kerja atau pengimplementasian suatu hukum dalam mengatur dan/atau memaksa masyarakat untuk patuh dan taat terhadap hukum. Maka, sudah pasti terdapat faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat efektivitas hukum tersebut. Kemudian, juga terdapat faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi hukum tersebut benar-benar berfungsi di dalam masyaralat. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian normatif yuridis dengan mengaitkan pokok pembahasan terhadap topik utama di dalam penelitian ini. Hasil dari penelitian ini memperlihatkan ada beberapa faktor yang mempengaruhi efektivitas penegakan hukum di masyarakat yaitu kaidah hukum (peraturan), penengak hukum, sarana atau fasilitas dan kesadaran masyarakat itu sendiri
Digital System Innovation to Strengthen the Constitutional Court in Managing Simultaneous Election Disputes Indonesia Tarmudi; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Fauzan Ghafur; Indana Zulfah; Zean Via Aulia Hakim
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 20 No. 1 (2025): June (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v20i1.13748

Abstract

This study examines the overburdening of the Constitutional Court (MK) due to the high volume of regional head election (pilkada) disputes, which has led to case backlogs, reduced legal efficiency, and increased state expenditures. Although institutions like Bawaslu and PTUN also have authority to resolve these disputes, many cases are submitted directly to MK, bypassing other mechanisms. Using a normative juridical method that includes legal analysis, historical context, comparative law, and case studies, the research evaluates previous dispute resolution practices and proposes a digitalization-based reform. Key challenges identified include procedural inefficiencies, high costs, and a lack of institutional coordination. The current system is viewed as suboptimal, with many disputes producing outcomes that fail to satisfy parties involved. To address these issues, the study proposes a digital platform aimed at streamlining the resolution process through integrated case registration, document submission, and inter-agency coordination. This system would reduce MK’s caseload, cut operational costs, and enhance transparency and accountability via real-time monitoring. By reinforcing the roles of Bawaslu and PTUN, the platform could help redistribute dispute resolution authority more effectively. The study concludes that digital transformation offers a viable solution to improve the efficiency, fairness, and cost-effectiveness of pilkada dispute resolution in Indonesia.
Potential corruption due to the change from the death penalty to life imprisonment in Indonesia's New Criminal Code Effendi, Erdianto; Dewi, Elya Kusuma; Saragih, Geofani Milthree
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v11i1.1404

Abstract

Capital punishment has long been used as a form of punishment for serious crimes, including corruption, with the aim of deterring and preventing offenses that harm the state and society. This study examines the impact of replacing the death penalty with life imprisonment in Indonesia’s new Criminal Code, particularly on efforts to eradicate corruption and its implications for law enforcement. The study employs a normative legal method, using legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches to explore the historical application of the death penalty for corruption offenses, compare practices in countries such as China and Saudi Arabia that still enforce capital punishment, and analyze the policy shift in the Indonesian context. The findings indicate that replacing the death penalty may weaken its deterrent effect and increase the risk of corruption, especially if not supported by policies that strengthen law enforcement. Nevertheless, this change aligns with the principle of human rights protection, which is a key consideration in modern legal systems. This study recommends alternative measures such as asset forfeiture, the imposition of maximum fines, restrictions on political rights, and enhanced transparency and oversight to promote more effective and equitable anti-corruption policies.
ANALISIS FAKTOR PENGHAMBAT PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF TEORI LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Setiawan, Feri; Sitompul, Hasran Irawadi; Berson, Hendri
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i2.6369

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors hindering law enforcement in Indonesia through the perspective of Lawrence Friedman's legal system theory, which consists of legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were analyzed from primary and secondary legal materials and correlated with relevant empirical practices. The findings reveal that the main obstacles to law enforcement lie in the lack of integrity and professionalism among law enforcement officials, inconsistencies in legal substance, and the generally low level of legal culture in society. Low legal awareness and a preference for informal dispute resolution further weaken the formal legal system. This study recommends structural reforms of law enforcement institutions and the enhancement of legal culture through legal education and consistent, fair law enforcement. Keywords: Legal Structure; Legal Substance; Legal Reform; Public Legal Awareness.
Comparative Analysis of Judicial Authority in Upholding Constitutionality: Indonesia’s Constitutional Court and us Supreme Court Wasiska, Asti; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Setyawan, Edy; Tarmudi, Tarmudi
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v12i2.46464

Abstract

In democratic governance, the Indonesian Constitutional Court and the United States Supreme Court serve as constitutional guardians, exercising judicial review within their respective legal traditions to uphold checks and balances and ensure the supremacy of the constitution. This study aims to compare the roles of the Indonesian Constitutional Court and the United States Supreme Court in implementing the principle of checks and balances through the judicial review mechanism. Using a normative juridical approach and comparative law methods, this study examines the institutional structure, scope of authority, and constitutional impact of the decisions of both institutions. The primary data sources include the constitutions of each country, specifically Article 24C of the 1945 Constitution and Article III of the United States Constitution, as well as Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court (in conjunction with Law Number 8 of 2011). The study shows that the United States Supreme Court has broader interpretive authority due to its common law tradition and the power of precedent, while the Indonesian Constitutional Court has limited authority within the context of a more normative civil law system. Differences in legal systems and institutional design affect the effectiveness of their oversight function.
Comparison of the Principle of Meaningful Participation in the Process of Law Formation in Indonesia, Switzerland, and Sweden Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Putra, Rengga Kusuma; Ishwara , Ade Sathya Sanathana; Nugroho, Aziz Widhi; Ivory, Jared
JUSTISI Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v11i3.4346

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of applying the principle of meaningful participation in lawmaking in Indonesia, Switzerland, and Sweden The method used is normative juridical with a case study and comparative law approach. Data collection was conducted through a literature review of regulations, official documents, and related literature, which was then analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-comparative framework. The novelty of this research lies in its functional comparative approach, which not only compares legal frameworks but also the practical implementation of the principle of participation in the legislative processes of each country. This study highlights the gap between formal regulations and substantive practices in Indonesia, and identifies best practices from Swiss referendum democracy and Swedish public consultation mechanisms. The results show that Indonesia still faces challenges in ensuring substantive public participation, which tends to be formal and limited without influencing the substance of regulations. In contrast, Switzerland implements direct democracy through referendums, and Sweden has developed transparent and structured public consultation mechanisms. However, the future prospects in Indonesia are quite positive, with increasing demands for transparency, technological advances, and the role of civil society opening up opportunities to develop more inclusive and effective public participation in law-making. In conclusion, although Indonesia is still limited in ensuring substantial public participation, the opportunities to improve participation mechanisms through transparency and technology are quite promising, leading to a more inclusive and influential system in law formation.
Reconstruction of Law-Making in Indonesia: A Review of Legal Effectiveness Nasution, Mirza; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Sulastri, Sulastri; Suaka, Mardhatillah; Sanathana Ishwara, Ade Sathya
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 17 No 2 (2025): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v17i2.10698

Abstract

Ideally, the formulation of laws in Indonesia should align with the principles of a state based on law, emphasizing justice, legal certainty, and utility. However, in reality, the legislative process is often influenced by political interests, weak public participation, and the poor quality of academic manuscripts that fail to support legal effectiveness. This study aims to analyze the weaknesses in the legislative procedure in Indonesia and to offer a more effective conceptual reconstruction so that legislative products truly reflect the will of the people and fulfill the principles of a state governed by law. This article falls under library research with a qualitative approach. The methodology employed is normative legal research. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of law in the legislative process has not yet been optimal due to ongoing political dominance, low-quality public participation, and weak academic foundations. Therefore, the reconstruction of the law-making process should focus on improving the quality of academic manuscripts, strengthening mechanisms for public participation, and consistently applying the principles of transparency and accountability.
Implikasi Hukum Penerapan Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) terhadap Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan di Indonesia Suherman, Jajang; Hasgar A.S., A. Muhammad; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Hidayat, Freddy; Gaol, Selamat Lumban
RIO LAW JURNAL Vol 6, No 2 (2025): Rio Law Jurnal
Publisher : Universitas Muara Bungo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36355/rlj.v6i2.1867

Abstract

Penerapan konsep Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) telah menjadi tren global yang semakin memengaruhi arah kebijakan dan praktik bisnis perusahaan, termasuk di Indonesia. ESG tidak hanya menjadi instrumen keberlanjutan, tetapi juga membawa konsekuensi hukum yang signifikan terhadap tanggung jawab perusahaan dalam menjalankan kegiatan usahanya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum penerapan ESG terhadap tanggung jawab perusahaan, khususnya dalam konteks kepatuhan terhadap regulasi lingkungan hidup, perlindungan hak-hak sosial, serta penerapan prinsip tata kelola perusahaan yang baik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan, seperti Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas, Undang-Undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, serta ketentuan pasar modal, ditambah dengan kajian literatur dan doktrin hukum. Analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan ESG memiliki implikasi hukum yang luas terhadap perusahaan, mulai dari peningkatan kewajiban kepatuhan hukum, perluasan tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan, hingga kemungkinan timbulnya tanggung jawab hukum apabila perusahaan lalai memenuhi standar ESG. Selain itu, penerapan ESG juga mendorong transformasi tata kelola perusahaan menuju praktik bisnis yang lebih transparan, akuntabel, dan berkelanjutan. Kesimpulannya, ESG bukan sekadar instrumen sukarela, melainkan telah berkembang menjadi kerangka normatif yang memengaruhi rezim tanggung jawab perusahaan di Indonesia. Rekomendasi penelitian ini adalah perlunya penguatan regulasi ESG secara komprehensif dan harmonisasi standar nasional dengan praktik internasional untuk memastikan perlindungan hukum yang efektif bagi masyarakat dan lingkungan.
Co-Authors Afrijon, Emi Aritonang, William Suryadi Ganda Tuah Berson, Hendri Dessy Artina Dewi, Elya Kusuma DM, Mohd. Yusuf Edy Setyawan Eka N.A.M Sihombing, Eka N.A.M Erdianto Effendi Fahrizal S.Siagian Fauzan Ghafur Firman Firman Firouzfar, Saied Gaol, Selamat Lumban Ginting, Nabila Marsiadetama Gurning, Rijen Handoko, Tito Hasgar A.S., A. Muhammad Hidayat, Freddy Hilman, Anton Indana Zulfah Ishwara , Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ivory, Jared L., Rainly Ledy Diana Mahardika, Ahmad Gelora Mexsasai Indra Mochammad Imron Awalludin Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar Mohd. Yusuf DM Nasution, Junisyah Nasution, Mirza Nugroho, Aziz Widhi Pangaribuan, Roland Latarsa Pasaribu, Davin Hansel Putra Utama, Andi Wahyu Putra, Rengga Kusuma Razak, Askari Rivera, Kevin M. Sanathana Ishwara, Ade Sathya Satriya Nugraha Setiawan, Feri Sikumbang, Yudhia Perdana Silaban, Helen Mutiara Siti Fatimah Sitompul, Hasran Irawadi Suaka, Mardhatillah Sugianto Sugianto Suherman, Jajang Sukrizal, Sukrizal Sulastri Sulastri Tanto Lailam Tarmudi Tarmudi, Tarmudi Tiraputri, Adi Wardioso, Abdau Wasiska, Asti Widagdo, Gatot Subroto Yati Sharfina Desiandri Yusuf DM, Mohd. Zean Via Aulia Hakim ZULFAH, INDANA