Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.233
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan Al-Ulum Jurnal Dakwah Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Farmasi dan Farmasi Klinik (Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacy) Elkawnie Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika : Media Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Al-Ta'lim Jurnal Ilmu Kefarmasian Indonesia Ulumuddin : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan Lentera: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Jurnal Rekayasa Teknik dan Teknologi Variasi : Majalah Ilmiah Universitas Almuslim Jurnal Yustitia Kegiatan Positif : Jurnal Hasil Karya Pengabdian Masyarakat Alkhidmah: Jurnal Pengabdian dan Kemitraan Masyarakat Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Al-Intaj : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah Jurnal Keperawatan Sehat Mandiri International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan
Suhaimi Suhaimi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 30 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Counseling Analysis of Criminal Actions on the Judge's Decision Number 55 / PID.B/2015/PN-BNA AND 79/PID.B/2013/PN.SKA. Rini Mihartika; Rizanizarli Rizanizarli; Suhaimi Suhaimi
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 4, No 4 (2021): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute November
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v4i4.3466

Abstract

In light of the arrangements of Article 143 section (2) letter B of the Criminal System Code that the material necessities of the public prosecution should portray cautiously, obviously, and the criminal demonstration that is being accused of referencing the overall setting of the wrongdoing being perpetrated. Notwithstanding, in the choice No.55/PID.B/2015/PN-BNA and the Surakarta Locale Court Choice Number 79/PID.B/2013/PN.SKA the unmistakable components alluded to in the article have not been satisfied just as in the legitimate contemplations of the adjudicator's choice. , which doesn't plainly hold back the juridical realities uncovered at the preliminary. Since the appointed authority can't choose a case outside of the public investigator's prosecution. This composing plans to see and discover how the appointed authorities' contemplations in these 2 cases made the adjudicators just interested in 1 criminal demonstration and how the adjudicator settled on concursus. To accomplish this objective, the scientist utilizes a regulating legitimate exploration technique that leaves from lawful issues with a similar strategy. This review utilizes optional information sources comprising of essential lawful materials, auxiliary lawful materials that incorporate authority archives, books, and examination brings about the type of reports. The information was examined by subjective strategies. The outcomes showed that the appointed authority was considered unseemly in considering his choice where the sentence got by the litigant was not equivalent with what activities the respondent had submitted against the choice No.55/PID.B/2015/PN-BNA and the Surakarta Locale Court Choice Number 79/PID .B/2013/PN.SKA. It is suggested that the Public Examiner (Prosecutor) should be more cautious in setting up his arraignment as per Article 143 section (2) of the Criminal Technique Code. Similarly, the appointed authority in giving his choice. It is trusted that the appointed authority in giving the choice should contain juridical realities by considering the realities uncovered at the preliminary, so the choice given by the adjudicator doesn't contain blunders in settling on the choice, so nobody is hurt and upsets the general population by the appointed authority's choice.
Co-Authors Abdul Rahman Ach. Rifai Adi Gunawan Ahmad Nasir Ari Bowo Alma Ridha Hayati Almaly, Muhammad Amos, John Asnaini Asnaini Candra Audy Cherly Nadifa Dian Kartikasari Efitra Ema Syithah Evi Maria Silaban Febrina Heryanti Helmy Dharmawan Herliani, Aprida Ichsan Ichsan Idayani Idayani Idrawati Bahar Ifdil Ifdil Istiqomah Istiqomah Kumita Kumita Lia Mirani M Fikri Zalius M. Fahli Zatrahadi Mahaza Marsum Marsum Miftahhuddin, Miftahuddin Misnawati Misnawati Mohammad Fahrur Rozi Muhammad Arifin Ilham Mujibullah Mujibullah Mulyana Nur Amalia Munir Tubagus Munir Tubagus Nadjih, Difla Nisa Ananda Novelasari Novelasari Nurhapsari, Tiara Nurrahmatun Nisa Nuryadin Efendi R. Dedi Iman Kurnia Rahmad Rahmad Rahmiati Rahmiati Rapitos Sidiq Reflita Reflita Reni Indrayani Riduan Harahap Rini Mihartika Rizanizarli Rizanizarli Romaynoor Ismy Saidi Yako SAKINAH, PUTRI Salamudin Salamudin Saleh, Firman Sapto Wahyono Sayuti Sayuti Shirly Kumala Siti Rodhiyah, Siti Siti Utami Subroto, Gatot Suhertina Suhertina Syafridawati Syafridawati Syaiful Anam Syarizal Fhonna Syifaul Husni Taqwaddin Taqwaddin Teti Indrawati Tomi Apra Santosa Widdefrita Widdefrita Yannurdin Yannurdin