Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Dinamika Hukum Keluarga Islam Kontemporer di Indonesia: Tantangan dan Pembaruan Rahmani, Ilham; Akbarizan, Akbarizan; Nurcahaya, Nurcahaya
Tazkir: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Keislaman Vol 11, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/tazkir.v11i2.18409

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of contemporary Islamic family law in Indonesia, with a focus on the historical evolution of the Religious Courts (PA), the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and reforms such as Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning the age of marriage. The study also identifies the driving factors for social change renewal, the diversity of schools of thought, reformist thought (Muhammad Abduh, Munawir Syadzali), globalization, and human rights commitments (CEDAW, KKG), as well as challenges such as disparities in judicial decisions and textualist resistance. The research method is qualitative with a normative juridical approach and literature study, analyzing secondary data from classical/contemporary Islamic legal literature, regulations, court decisions, and fatwas of scholars through content analysis and deductive-inductive reasoning techniques. The results of the study show the evolution of Islamic family law from the ratification of the PA (Law 14/1970) to the KHI (Presidential Instruction 1/1991) and the reforms of the Reformasi era, which adopted takhayyur-talfiq for legal unification amidst the diversity of schools of thought. Reform faces obstacles such as different judges with different sentences, the failure of the Compilation of Islamic Law (CLDKHI), and conservative resistance, although breakthroughs such as raising the marriage age reflect the adaptation of the maqasid of sharia to modern issues (online unregistered marriages, digital domestic violence). Practical implications include recommendations for legislators, religious court judges, and the Religious Affairs Agency (Badilag) to harmonize sharia and human rights through maqasid-based training, community education, and contextual ijtihad to achieve gender justice and family protection.
Batasan Kewajiban Nafkah dalam Upaya Preventif Cerai Gugat: Studi Pada Pengadilan Agama Kota Pekanbaru Niko, Ferlan; Akbarizan, Akbarizan; Nurcahaya, Nurcahaya
Tazkir: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Keislaman Vol 11, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/tazkir.v11i2.18515

Abstract

The increasing number of divorce cases in Indonesia, particularly due to the failure to fulfill alimony obligations, indicates structural problems in the practice of Islamic family law and its implementation in the Religious Court. The lack of clarity regarding the normative and operational boundaries of fair and proportional alimony often triggers domestic conflicts that lead to divorce. This study aims to analyze the limits of alimony obligations in divorce cases in the Religious Court of Pekanbaru City and assess its role as a preventive instrument for divorce. The study uses a qualitative approach with a juridical-empirical method combined with normative-doctrinal analysis. Data was obtained through a study of divorce decisions from 2019 to 2023 and in-depth interviews with judges and court officials. The analysis was conducted descriptively and analytically using the perspectives of family law protection, gender justice, and maqasid al-syari'ah. The results of the study show that the significant increase in divorce lawsuits is influenced by the non-fulfillment of financial support, both absolutely and relatively, which is exacerbated by the absence of clear standards for adequate financial support in judicial practice. Financial support is understood not only as a minimum financial obligation but also as an instrument of relational justice that affects family stability. This study concludes that affirming the contextual and operational limits of alimony obligations has the potential to become a preventive instrument for divorce. The implications of this study emphasize the need to strengthen alimony assessment standards, family law education, and more responsive and equitable judicial policies.
A Comparative Study of Permission for Polygamy in Islamic Marriage Law: The Cases of Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam Mustafid, Mustafid; Akbarizan, Akbarizan; Abdul Munir, Akmal; Faiz Algifari, Muhammad
Syarah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): SYARAH : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultanah Nahrasiyah Lhokseumawe

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47766/syarah.v14i1.5977

Abstract

Polygamy is a sensitive issue in Islamic marriage law, which is regulated differently in each Muslim country. Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam both adhere to Islamic law, but have different legal approaches to granting permission for polygamy. This study will explore the legal provisions regarding permission for polygamy in Islamic marriage regulations, and will also discuss the similarities and differences in the procedures for granting permission for polygamy between Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam. This study is a comparative normative legal study utilizing the statute approach and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam both require permission for polygamy based on the principles of fairness and the husband's financial capability, but differ in their procedures and penalties. In Indonesia, permission must be obtained through the Religious Court with the consent of the first wife, while in Brunei, permission is granted by a judge with a penalty of a $2,000 fine for those who marry without written permission. This difference reflects Indonesia's more flexible legal system compared to Brunei, which enforces Islamic law more strictly.