Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Validity of Rental Agreement for Renting Land of Reward Between Village Head with Private Parties Who Exceed The Term of Office Village Head Enno Sellya Agustina; Tunggul Anshari; Aan Eko Widiarto
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v5i1.409

Abstract

Based on the issues related to the lease of reward land between the village chief and a private party that exceeds the chief's term, this paper aims to analyze the legality of the lease agreement for reward land between the village chief and a private party that extends beyond his term of office. In this paper, the researcher uses a normative juridical method, along with a legislative and case study approach. Then, with this analysis, the researcher can address the raised issue about the legality of the lease agreement for reward land between the village chief. From these issues, it can be concluded that the legality of the lease agreement for reward land between the village chief and a private party is regulated in Permendagri Number 1 of 2016 concerning the Management of Village Assets, with the maximum lease limit for reward land being a maximum of 3 (three) years. If there is a lease agreement for reward land between the village chief and a private party that exceeds the chief's term of office, then the agreement is legally void.
CLARITY OF REGULATORY OBJECTIVES REGARDING PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL IN THE FORMATION OF MINISTERIAL / HEAD OF INSTITUTION REGULATIONS Marianus; Aan Eko Widiarto; Indah Dwi Qurbani
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 5 No 2 (2023): International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v5i2.212

Abstract

As the holder of power in the administration of government based on the constitution, the president has set a new policy, namely regarding the mechanism for granting presidential approval to draft regulations of ministers or heads of institutions. With the birth of this arrangement, every policy of ministers or heads of institutions with certain criteria must obtain presidential approval before being determined. The mechanism carried out after harmonization has indirectly obscured the stage of forming laws and regulations that are prevalent today. With juridical normative research methods that use statutory, conceptual, and historical approaches, it was found that the arrangement for granting presidential approval actually brought back classic problems. The arrangement is harmonized with other regulations. There is vagueness in sentence formulation, use of words, terms, or phrases, which causes multiple interpretations. The arrangement also comes out of the national policy framework related to simplifying regulations promoted by the president himself. In its formation, there is also the possibility of the influence of bureaucratic political practices or competition among state administrative work units in finding alternative solutions to problems that arise in society.