Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Exploring The Prophetic Values Contained In The Advocate Profession Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi; Khudzaifah Dimyati; Absori Absori; Kelik Wardiono
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i2.2749

Abstract

The advocate profession in the early Islamic treasury is not formally institutionalized so that it needs to explore prophetic values in the history of Islamic civilization and objectified into the advocate profession. This study aims to reveal the advocate profession from the perspective of prophetic science and trace prophetic values into the foundation of the advocate profession. This study uses a normative research model through library materials or literature literature as a written source. The results of the study show, first, Islam respects human rights in defending their interests in court. Islam guarantees justice in a trial, equality of rights, and guarantees the right to defend the rights both alone and through legal counsel in accordance with the wakalah system. Second, prophetic values as the foundation of the advocate profession are upholding justice, being a peacemaker, the concept of submitting affairs to the experts leave the matter to the expert / knowledgeable, the concept of mutual help, and advocate ethics. These values are not only human dimensions but also transcendental.
THE CONCEPT OF THE POSITION OF REVELATION AS AN ONTOLOGY OF PROPHETIC BASED LEGAL SCIENCE Romi Saputra; Khudzaifah Dimyati; Absori Absori; Kelik Wardiono
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i1.4024

Abstract

This article aims to answer the position of revelation as a prophetic-based ontology of legal science. If the West issues revelations in science and more specifically in the formation of positive law, and glorifies human reason more, then this article explains that these revelations are part of positive law without ignoring human potential, and placing human potential proportionally. By using philosophical methods and approaches, this article shows that revelation in the study of prophetic law occupies a very high position, revelation functions to provide direction and guidance for reason in understanding reality and the formation of positive law. Law is interpreted by the will of Allah SWT which is based on the Koran and the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad. Revelation functions as a guide containing norms, values and rules, while reason is tasked with finding laws based on revelation's direction. For this reason, revelation, reason and the senses never come into conflict between the two, instead they become one unit, mutually reinforcing and reinforcing each other. The combination of revelation with reason and human life is then known as the Islamic moderation paradigm which synergizes things that are permanent with things that are flexible, combines the understanding of the Salaf with contemporary reforms (tajdid), is not jumud and liberal, and understand Islam comprehensively. Conflict between revelation and reason will only occur if one of them is fixed and the other is flexible, then of course the fixed one is superior to the flexible one, or both are equally flexible, so even if one is determined by interpreting the view of reason.
POLITICS OF BUSINESS LICENSING IN INDONESIA: Involvement of Community Consent in Building Approval Nurhayati, Nunik; Dimyati, Khudzaifah; Absori, Absori; Wardiono, Kelik
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.3912

Abstract

This article aims to discuss the urgency of community consent and involvement in development in the era of the Job Creation Law in Indonesia. Whereas, The Job Creation Law is designed to reduce the complexity and time needed to obtain permits with the aim of ease of doing business. The impact of this policy is to eliminate community consent in building approvals as one of the basic requirements for business licensing. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach. The data analysis technique uses descriptive analysis by describing general things to specific ones by describing current business licensing policies in Indonesia to provide general ease of doing business. The results of the discussion showed that community involvement in the building approval process is an important aspect that needs to be considered in the context of the Job Creation Law in Indonesia. Community involvement can be in the form of a public consultation process, where the building owners must obtain approval or at least discuss development plans with the surrounding community to ensure that the project does not harm the interests and lives of the local communities. Looking at the process of forming and amending the Job Creation Law, where there are many community rejections and low levels of participation, it can be seen that the legal politics of the Job Creation Law belongs to an authoritarian political configuration whose legal product character is conservative. This includes the substance of the regulation, which eliminates the requirement for community consent in managing Building Approval.Keywords:Law, Job Creation, Business License, Politics
Prophetic Paradigm as an Alternative Critique Toward Hart’s Concept of Morality and Law Hamdani, Fitrah; Dimyati, Khudzaifah; Absori, Absori; Wardiono, Kelik; Dianto, Dianto
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4945

Abstract

"Prophetic Paradigm" generally refers to a framework or approach that emphasizes the role of prophecy or prophetic figures in shaping religious, spiritual, or social understanding. This paradigm is often discussed in religious contexts, particularly within Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, where prophets are seen as key messengers of divine will, providing guidance, correction, and insight to communities. This article critiques the ethical principles of the epistemological basis of the relationship between law and morality in Herbert Leonel Adolphus Hart's (H.L.A. Hart) rational paradigm, which is founded on the prophetic paradigm via the lens of the Medina Charter. It employs a philosophical approach to investigate the fundamental assumptions of the epistemological foundation of legal science by connecting legal science to prophetic science. This study's data are collected from literature. This analysis shows that Hart's proposed separation of law and morality is inappropriate. Some rules are both legal and moral. Thus, the criticism of morality in the Medina Charter demonstrates that the distinction between law and morality established by Hart cannot be generally implemented and must be evaluated by taking into account social context and moral ideals considered significant by the society.