Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.306
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Tajdida Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurisprudence Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Hasanuddin Law Review SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Varia Justicia Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam Yustisia Merdeka : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Litbang Sukowati : Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum UNTAG Law Review Sakina: Journal of Family Studies IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) Journal of Transcendental Law Aloha International Journal of Multidisciplinary Advancement (AIJMU) The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Lex Publica Journal of Global Pharma Technology Nusantara: Journal Of Law Studies Mitsaqan Ghalizan SASI Jurnal Jurisprudence
Khudzaifah Dimyati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 53 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 53 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Comparison Of Legal Reasoning Models In Consideration Of Decision No. 064/G/2014/PTUN SMG, NO. 135/B/2015/PT.TUN.SBY, And No. 99/PK/TUN/2016 In The Case Of Pt Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk Environmental Permit In Rembang Regency, Central Java Hery Dwi Utomo; Absori Absori; Kachippa Suvirat; Khudzaifah Dimyati; Kelik Wardiono; Saepul Rochman
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 13, No. 1, June 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i1.1707

Abstract

ABSTRACT  Purpose of the study: This study aims to understand the lawsuit of the Samin Community in Rembang Regency against Governor's Decree No. 660.1/17/2012, which permits the development and exploitation of natural resources in the Kendeng Mountains. This dispute not only shows a lawsuit but, more broadly, is the counter-hegemonic movement between local law and national law, which is marked by the victory of the Samin Community at the level of Judicial Review at the Supreme Court. Methodology: The research was carried out through observation, interview, and literature review to explain local and national legal disputes, which were analyzed qualitatively using legislation, unwritten law, and the Gramsci Counter Hegemony approach. Results: The study revealed that: first, local law disputes against national law in Rembang Regency occurred because of the dominance of national law over local law, which recognizes indigenous people only when stated in the law. Second, the Samin Indigenous people still adhere to traditions, myths, and ecological principles called Saminism, which only allow them to farm and serve as a cultural identity. Therefore, they may not be able to survive if they have another profession. Third, the judge's decision in the form of a caliph on earth is influenced by the soul of the mother earth community of the Samin Community and forms a new norm so that it becomes a new hegemony against national law. Application of the study: This research can be used by law enforcers so that their legal decisions rely on not only legal positivism values but also transcendental local legal concepts. Novelty/Originality of research: No previous research has linked the dispute over permits for constructing a cement factory in the Rembang Regency and Decision No. 99/PK/TUN/2016 with a counter-hegemonic approach and transcendental-based local laws. Keywords: legal comparison, legal reasoning, environmental law, court judgment   ABSTRAK  Tujuan Kajian: Kajian ini bertujuan untuk memahami gugatan masyarakat Samin di Kabupaten Rembang terhadap Keputusan Gubernur No. 660.1/17/2012 yang mengizinkan pembangunan dan ekspolitasi sumber daya alam di pegunungan Kendeng. Sengketa ini tidak hanya menunjukan gugatan hukum namun yang lebih luas adalah gerakan kontra hegemoni antara hukum lokal dengan hukum nasional yang ditandai dengan kemenangan masyarakat Samin pada tingkat Peninjauan Kembali di Mahkamah Agung. Metodologi: Penelitian dilaksanakan dengan melakukan observasi, wawancara, dan kajian literatur yang dimaksudkan untuk menjelaskan sengketa hukum lokal dan nasional yang dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan menggunakan perundang-undangan, hukum tidak tertulis dan pendekatan Kontra Hegemoni Gramsci. Hasil-hasil: Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa pertama, Sengketa hukum lokal melawan hukum nasional di Kabupaten Rembang terjadi karena adanya dominasi hukum nasional atas hukum lokal yang hanya mengakui masyarakat adat hanya jika disebutkan oleh Undang-Undang. Kedua, masyarakat Adat Samin masih berpegang pada tradisi, mitos dan prinsip-prinsip ekologis yang disebut Saminisme yang yang hanya mengizinkan mereka untuk bertani saja dan sebagai identitas budaya, sebab itu mereka tidak mungkin mampu bertahan hidup apabila berprofesi lain; dan Ketiga, Amar putusan hakim berupa khalifah di muka bumi dipengaruhi oleh jiwa masyarakat ibu bumi masyarakat Samin dan membentuk norma baru sehingga menjadi hegemoni baru melawan hukum nasional. Aplikasi Kajian: Penelitian ini dapat digunakan bagi penegak hukum agar putusan hukumnya tidak hanya bersandar pada nilai-nilai positivisme hukum, namun juga konsep hukum lokal yang bersifat transendental. Kebaruan/Originalitas Penelitian: Belum ada penelitian sebelumnya yang menghubungkan sengketa izin pembangunan Pabrik Semen di Kabupaten Rembang dan putusan No. 99/PK/TUN/2016 dengan pendekatan kontra hegemoni dan hukum local berbasis transendental. Katakunci : Perbandingan Hukum, Penalaran Hukum, Hukum Lingkungan, Putusan Pengadilan
Prophetic Paradigm as an Alternative Critique Toward Hart’s Concept of Morality and Law Fitrah Hamdani; Khudzaifah Dimyati; Absori Absori; Kelik Wardiono; Dianto Dianto
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4945

Abstract

"Prophetic Paradigm" generally refers to a framework or approach that emphasizes the role of prophecy or prophetic figures in shaping religious, spiritual, or social understanding. This paradigm is often discussed in religious contexts, particularly within Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, where prophets are seen as key messengers of divine will, providing guidance, correction, and insight to communities. This article critiques the ethical principles of the epistemological basis of the relationship between law and morality in Herbert Leonel Adolphus Hart's (H.L.A. Hart) rational paradigm, which is founded on the prophetic paradigm via the lens of the Medina Charter. It employs a philosophical approach to investigate the fundamental assumptions of the epistemological foundation of legal science by connecting legal science to prophetic science. This study's data are collected from literature. This analysis shows that Hart's proposed separation of law and morality is inappropriate. Some rules are both legal and moral. Thus, the criticism of morality in the Medina Charter demonstrates that the distinction between law and morality established by Hart cannot be generally implemented and must be evaluated by taking into account social context and moral ideals considered significant by the society.
The Prophetic Paradigm as a Legal Adaptive Strategy for Agricultural Extension Workers to Protect Food Agricultural Land in Singkawang City Yuko Fitrian; Khudzaifah Dimyati; Absori; Arief Budiono; Said Saidakhrarovich Gulyamov
Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i2.298

Abstract

This study addresses the gap between the normative objectives of Indonesia’s Sustainable Food Agricultural Land Protection Law and its implementation in practice, particularly in urbanizing areas such as Singkawang City, West Kalimantan. It examines how adaptive, non-formal implementation strategies can bridge this gap by placing farmer welfare at the center of policy implementation and using the Prophetic Social Science paradigm as an analytical lens. Accordingly, the study asks how an adaptive approach to socializing sustainable food crop land protection policies, grounded in farmer welfare and prophetic values, can reconcile formal regulations with the social realities of farming communities in Singkawang City. The study employs a qualitative case study approach, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The data are analyzed using the street-level bureaucracy framework alongside three core prophetic values: humanization, liberation, and transcendence. The findings indicate that a formal, predominantly procedural approach is insufficient, as local governments operate under significant structural and institutional constraints. Instead, implementation becomes more effective through adaptive strategies developed by Field Agricultural Extension Workers. These strategies involve building social capital and trust through a humanistic approach and by providing concrete incentives that directly address farmers’ needs. Such practices reflect the prophetic value of liberation, helping farmers navigate and reduce the structural pressures that might otherwise undermine policy implementation. Academically, this study contributes to the street-level bureaucracy literature by demonstrating that non-formal and adaptive approaches inspired by prophetic values can enable street-level bureaucrats to translate state policies into meaningful social practices. It further shows that such approaches can strengthen government legitimacy by ensuring that policy implementation remains responsive to the lived realities and welfare needs of local communities.
Co-Authors Abdul Hakim Absori Aida Dewi Aidul Fitriciada Azhari Ajid Abdul Syawal Akhmad Muslih Angkasa Angkasa Anik Tri Haryani Apreliyanti, Virra Ervita Ardi Akbar Tanjung Arief Budiono Bambang Setiaji Budi Agus Riswandi Budi Winarno Chrisna Bagus Edhita Praja Dewi, Aida Diana Fitriana Dianto Dianto Dianto Dianto, Dianto Elviandari Elviandari Elviandri, Elviandri Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Farkhani Filzah Ilda Syafirah Fitrah Hamdani Fitrah Hamdani Gamal Abdul Nasir Hanafi, Muhammad Amin Hangabei, Sinung Mufti Haq, Hilman Syahrial Harun Harun Heru Santoso Wahito Nugroho Hery Dwi Utomo Izziyana, Wafda Vivid Kachippa Suvirat Kelik Wardiono Lyandova, Vanka Marisa Kurnianingsih Mohammad Busjro Muqoddas Mohammad BusjroMuqoddas Mohammed Razi Ellathodi Muh Zuhri Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi Muhtar Arifin Mukhlishin Mukhlishin Munir, Usman Mutimatun Niami Nasri Nasri Nasri Nasri Natangsa Subakti Natangsa Surbakti Nurani, Siti Syahida Nurjannah S Nurul Huda Purwadi Wahyu Anggoro Raden Roro Astuti Retno Lestari Ramadhan, Jelang Ramon, Tomás Mateo Ridwan Rohayu H, Rina Romi Saputra Saepul Rochman Saepul Rochman Said Saidakhrarovich Gulyamov Saputro, Muhammad Andi Sarip Sarip Sarjiyati Sarjiyati Shofia, Rahma Sigit Sapto Nugroho Siti Syahida Nurani Sri Waljinah Subakti, Natangsa Sulthani, Dinil Abrar Susiani Tri Wahyuningsh Syaifuddin Zuhdi Syawal, Ajid Abdul Taadi Taadi Wafdah Vivid Iziyana Wardah Yuspin Wibowo, Sugeng Widi Astuti Widihartati S Widihartati Setiasih Yuko Fitrian Yuni Purwati