Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.854
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Cita Hukum Unram Law Review Jurnal Selat Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Undang: Jurnal Hukum Nagari Law Review JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Unes Law Review Kosmik Hukum Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Restorative Justice JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Cepalo JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW jurnal hukum das sollen Corruptio Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Jurnal Hukum Malahayati Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Riau Law Journal DELICTUM : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Milthree Law Journal PESHUM Melayunesia Law Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security
Erdianto Effendi
Univeritas Riau
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 297 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 297 Documents
Search

 26   27   28   29   30 
Restorative justice Approach to Certain Criminal Actions with the Threat of Under Five Years Prison in Functioning Criminal Law as Ultimum Remedium Windy Rizky Putri; Erdianto Effendi; Zulfikar Jayakusuma
Melayunesia Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Melayunesia Law
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/dzt7a189

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the concept of criminal law renewal to place restorative justice as ultimum remedium in certain crimes with a prison sentence of under five years. This type of normative legal research with the type of legal synchronization. Collecting data on normative legal research uses data collection techniques from a literature study. In drawing conclusions the author uses the deductive thinking method, namely a way of thinking that draws conclusions from a general statement or argument into a specific statement. the results of research and discussion can be concluded. First; The restorative justice approach to criminal acts with the threat of imprisonment for under five years finds its footing in the basic philosophy of Pancasila, namely in accordance with the 4th precept of Pancasila "Deliberation to reach consensus". Currently, restorative justice has been regulated in various regulations/policies. The contents of this internal policy show that there is no uniformity in understanding and boundaries of criminal acts that can be resolved through restorative justice and does not create an Integrated Criminal Justice System. and the imposition of criminal sanctions on perpetrators.
Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Perbuatan Menyetubuhi Mayat Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Valeta, Echa; Erdianto, Erdianto; Ardiyanto, Syaifullah Yophi
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v10i2.4132

Abstract

This study aims to examine the policy of criminalizing sexual intercourse with corpses within the framework of Indonesian criminal law. The primary focus lies in comparing the old Criminal Code, which did not explicitly regulate such acts (only through Article 181 on mistreatment of corpses), with the new Criminal Code, which explicitly criminalizes the act under Article 271. Employing a normative juridical approach, this research is analyzed using the principles of legality, the theory of culpability, and supported by non-legal theories such as morality, legal sociology, and forensic psychology to strengthen the rationale for criminalization. The findings demonstrate that penalizing sexual acts with corpses is legally justifiable, both from the perspective of substantive and procedural criminal law, as it reflects the protection of human dignity even after death. This study also identifies several challenges in the implementation, including low public awareness and evidentiary difficulties, and proposes enhancing legal education and inter-agency collaboration as potential solutions. The research contributes to the development of a more humanistic and responsive Indonesian criminal law in addressing contemporary crimes.
CORRUPTION CRIMES IN THE 2023 INDONESIAN CRIMINAL CODE VS. THE ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS Hidayat, Rahmat Taufiq; Effendi, Erdianto; Rahmadan, Davit
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.8164

Abstract

Corruption Crime (Tindak Pidana Korupsi or Tipikor) poses serious threats to state finances, governance, and public trust, prompting its long-standing classification in Indonesia as an extraordinary crime regulated under Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001. The enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), however, marks a significant shift in the regulatory framework of corruption offenses, including changes in criminal sanctions and the integration of corruption into the general criminal law system. This transformation raises critical concerns regarding the future effectiveness of anti-corruption law enforcement and the consistency of criminal policy. This study aims to compare the regulation of corruption crimes under the 2023 Criminal Code and the Anti-Corruption Law, focusing on offense formulation and sanctioning patterns. Using a normative juridical method with a comparative legal approach, this research analyzes the implications of the regulatory shift for anti-corruption strategies in Indonesia. The findings highlight the need for careful legal harmonization to ensure that the reform of the Criminal Code does not undermine the deterrent function and integrity of corruption law enforcement. Keywords: Legal Comparison; Indonesian Criminal Code 2023; Anti-Corruption Law; Corruption Crime; Criminal Sanctions
PROBLEMATIKA PRAKTIK PEMBERIAN KETERANGAN AHLI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Effendi, Erdianto
LITIGASI Vol. 24 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v24i2.7252

Abstract

Expert testimony is one of the pieces of evidence used in criminal procedural law based on the provisions of Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The testimony of criminal law experts is also used in proving corruption crimes. In practice, there are several problems related to the role of criminal law experts in proving corruption. Among the issues are allegations of non-objectiveness of experts in providing information. The information provided tends to benefit one presents it. This research uses a normative approach. The results of the study empirically found several problems in the evidentiary process using the testimony of criminal law experts. Some of these problems include: What should a criminal law expert prove, who should present an expert, whether investigators and judges are bound with the testimony of criminal law experts, whether the experts testimony is based on operational costs and honorariums, and other questions to which juridically answers have not been found.. Based on these findings, it is hoped that there wil.l be clear arrangements regarding the role of criminal law experts in proving corruption crimes. Keywords: Criminal Law Expert, Proof, Crime of Corruption.
Dynamics of Anti-Terrorism Regulation: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States: Dinamika Regulasi Anti-Terorisme: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Amerika Serikat Anang Hendri Prayogo; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Erdianto Effendi; Andi Hakim Lubis; Yuliana Yuliana
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i2.25125

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of anti-terrorism regulations in Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States by comparing the legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms in each country. legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms that apply in each country. The purpose of this research is to analyse how each country shapes its anti-terrorism law as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining a balance of as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining the balance between state security and human rights protection. The main issues discussed include differences in legal approach, scope of state authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent abuse of authority. abuse of authority. The method used is juridical method used is normative-comparative juridical by analysing statutory instruments, government policies, and institutional practices in the three countries. The results The results show that Indonesia emphasises procedural guarantees in its anti-terrorism law, Malaysia maintains a preventive detention model rooted in historical security doctrine. rooted in historical security doctrine, while the United States applies a layered a layered approach backed by extensive intelligence powers and judicial oversight. judicial oversight. In conclusion, although all three countries prioritise national security, their approaches reflect different security, their approaches reflect different legal traditions and political contexts. political context. Therefore, a balanced regulatory model should take into account effectiveness, constitutional accountability and protection of fundamental rights.
TANGGUNGJAWAB PEMBERI KUASA ATAS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PENERIMA KUASA Firdaus, Firdaus; Effendi, Erdianto; Hendra, Rahmad
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Repertorium
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v13i2.4015

Abstract

Realitas manusia sebagai mahluk sosial, menjadikan individu yang satu memberikan kepada individu lainnya suatu kewenangan berbuat untuk dan atas namanya. Dalam hukum perdata pemberian kewenangan sesuatu perbuatan oleh seseorang untuk dirinya kepada seorang lainnya sebut pemberian kuasa. Pelimpahan kewenangan bertindak atau pemberian kuasa dalam hukum perdata bertujuan untuk memenuhi kepentingan pemberi kuasa, dengan catatan bahwa kuasa tersebut harus sesuai dengan aturan hukum yang berlaku. Dalam perjanjian kuasa, pemberi kuasa tidak dapat dibebani tanggung jawab hukum atas tindakan penerima kuasa yang melampaui isi perjanjian. Meski demikian, secara akademik masih terdapat perdebatan mengenai apakah pemberian kuasa dapat mengakibatkan pemberi kuasa turut dianggap bertanggung jawab secara pidana. Beberapa ahli berpendapat bahwa tanggung jawab pemberi kuasa hanya dapat timbul jika tindakan penerima kuasa sesuai dengan isi perjanjian atau terdapat unsur kelalaian dari pemberi kuasa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif untuk menganalisis hubungan hukum antara pemberi dan penerima kuasa. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa perjanjian kuasa tidak dapat dijadikan dasar bagi pemberi kuasa untuk ikut bertanggung jawab secara pidana apabila penerima kuasa melakukan tindakan di luar kewenangan yang diberikan. Hal ini disebabkan oleh batalnya perjanjian kuasa secara hukum apabila tidak memenuhi syarat causa halal, yaitu suatu sebab yang sah menurut hukum. Dengan demikian, batasan kewenangan dalam perjanjian kuasa menjadi elemen penting untuk melindungi pemberi kuasa dari tanggung jawab atas tindakan melanggar hukum yang dilakukan oleh penerima kuasa.
Batasan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Nelayan Kecil Yang Melakukan Penangkapan Ikan Dengan Menggunakan Bahan Peledak Syafira, Putri; Erdianto Effendi; Ferawati
Milthree Law Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): November
Publisher : PT. Adikara Cipta Aksa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70565/mlj.v2i3.39

Abstract

Penelitian ini menyoroti penerapan sanksi pidana bagi nelayan kecil yang menangkap ikan menggunakan bahan peledak di perairan Indonesia. Sebagai negara maritim, Indonesia memiliki kekayaan laut yang melimpah, yang menjadi sumber penghidupan nelayan lokal, khususnya nelayan kecil. Namun, beberapa nelayan kecil masih menggunakan bahan peledak dalam penangkapan ikan, karena metode ini dianggap murah, cepat, dan mudah. Praktik ini, selain melanggar hukum, merusak ekosistem laut dan mengancam keberlanjutan kesejahteraan nelayan kecil. Regulasi hukum dalam Pasal 100B Undang-Undang Perikanan memberikan sanksi pidana yang berbeda antara nelayan kecil dan skala besar, di mana nelayan kecil hanya dikenai sanksi alternatif, bukan kumulatif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah pertama, mengkaji aturan batasan sanksi pidana terhadap nelayan kecil yang menggunakan bahan peledak, dan kedua, merumuskan konsep sanksi yang lebih proporsional. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif kualitatif, dengan sumber data sekunder, termasuk peraturan dan putusan pengadilan. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan analisis deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan inkonsistensi dalam penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap nelayan kecil, dengan putusan pengadilan yang seringkali tidak konsisten dalam menentukan kriteria nelayan kecil. Untuk mengatasi hal ini, diperlukan penafsiran tegas mengenai definisi nelayan kecil dan penerapan sanksi tambahan berupa tindakan restoratif. Konsep pidana kerja sosial dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP dinilai sebagai alternatif yang lebih produktif, sejalan dengan teori pemidanaan gabungan, karena dapat memperbaiki pelaku dan memulihkan kerusakan lingkungan
Co-Authors ', Erdiansyah ', Frengki ', Wahyuni , Erdiansyah Abda Abda ABDUL HAMID ADE Inda Yani Ade Mulyani Adi Tiara Putri Adi Tiaraputri Adinda Nabilla Adri, Saidil Afni Adelina Simanjuntak Afrialdo, Masrizal Agafe Marulytua Ambarita Ahmad Zaki Akfini Aditias, Akfini Al Rusdi Alberth Simanjuntak Alfadrian Alfadrian Alpajri, Muhammad Alviona Vinda Safira Anak Agung Istri Sri Wiadnyani Anang Hendri Prayogo Ananta, Bella Andhika, Muhammad Zakhri Andi Hakim Lubis Andika Surya Andri Hidayat, Andri Andria Familta Anita Apriani Anita Julianti Anugrah, Roby Anwar, Muda R. Aprianti, Gusni Ardian Syahputra Arief Laksamana Aviska Loveana Tomanda Ayu Yohana Putri, Ayu Yohana Azimu Halim, Azimu Azlina, Ira Sinta Azmi Ramadhan Bagus, M. Rizky Bella Maida Sasmita Bella Shintia Anggraini Bijaksono, Athfal Habiby Bima Sakti Zalvadeora Caryn, Caryn Cyntia Ayustika Fitria Daniel Af Hutapea Danu Hermansyah, Danu Davit Rahmadan Davit Rahmadan Davit Rahmadan Dayu Dawana Dedek Budi Saputra Delia Nadriah Awina Wirdatul Nadriah Demi Manurung Dessy Artina Destrian Hasugian Devi Angriyani Dewa Ayu Putu Laksmi Dewi, Elya Kusuma Diana Dewi Setia Wati Diana Diana Dimas Prayoga Dimo Gilbranu Edwin Capri Purba Ega Septianing Yudhiati, Ega Septianing Ega Suzana Elmayanti, Elmayanti Emilda Firdaus Erdiansyah ' Erick Van Lambok S. Sialagan Erwin, Risto Evi Deliana HZ Fajar, Muhammad Abdul Fanny Ayunda Dwi Putri Fardika, Devia Fitriana Fauziah, Putri Febby Widya Febria, Anggun Febrianton ' Ferawati Ferawati Ferawati ' Ferawati Ferawati Ferawati Ferawati Ferawati, Ferawati Ferawati Ferdian, Wan Gilang Firdaus ' Firdaus Firdaus Fitri Febriyati Fitri Wahyuni Fitri, Anisa Frans Bragent Silitonga Fuji Lestari Gabriel, Alexander Ricardo Galingging, Winda Rosmauli Br Gendis Wahyuningrum Gilbranu, Dimo Gunawan Hutagalung Gusliana HB Gusti Erlangga JF Gustin, Darti Weni H Riyanda Elsera Yozani, H Riyanda Halawa, Ramadani Saputra Hamdani . Handoko, Tito Harisul Huda Hartina, Dian Hartini, Theresia Devi Haryanto, Popo Hengki Firmanda Heni Susanti Heni Susanti, Heni Henny Afrianti Henny Afrianti, Henny Hidayat, Rahmat Taufiq Hidayat, Roy Hidayat, Tengku Arif Ikhwan Habib, Ikhwan Ilham, Khairul Indah Permata Sukma Indah Rezeki Manurung Ipung Syahrir Situmorang Irdan Hasan Irfan Yobel Halomoan Sinaga Irvan Suherry Irwandi, Muhammad Ishaq Ishaq Johan Johan Jonatan Alexander G Juliani, Chaterine Junaidi ' Junaidi Junaidi Khaira Islamaili Khairul Bakri Khudsiyah, Deya Hazirattul Kinanti, Dinda Puteri Kurniawan, Raihan Lamtiur Siregar Larissa Evita Azalia, Larissa Evita Ledy Diana Lestari, Leny Lili Wulansari Lubis, Muhammad Al Amien Lumbanraja, Sahala J M Ichsyan M. Ahsanul Walidain M. Fadhillah Johar M. Imam Indra Malynda ' MANALU, KRISTINA Manurung, Indah Rezeki Margerytha Wulandara Hb Martinus Zebua Maxtry Parante Mexsasai Indra Mhd Syukri Mhd. Indra Kurniawan Mieke Christian S Miftahul Rahmi Muhammad Habibi Muhammad Ragel Muhammad Tuah Mukhlis R Mukhlis R. Mulia Andri, Mulia Mulyansyah, Handi Munthe, Henry Haro Muslimin Muslimin Nadia Yuri Malinda Nadya Alika Jely Nadya Syafira Naldi, Syafri Napitupulu, Titir Feronika Napitupulu, Yosua Alexander Natasya Alfiana Sagita Saragi Nilma Suryani NIM. A1011141008, YULIANA Nindy Axella Nova Ariati Nova Rifadilla Nova Yanti Siburian Novrianto Tambunan Nst, Habi Afpandi Nugraha Azel Putra, Nugraha Azel Nurfadilah Nurfadilah Nurhediansyah, Redyka Octavia, Ainun Yati Oktavianus, Jeffry Martunas Orde Prianata Pane, Paisal Arifsa Pangestu, Aji Bagus Pengky Stephen Sigalingging Perdana, Fharysha Irwan Pratama, Restu Ananda Putra, Raka Prasetya Putra, Ryanda Putri Asri Sri Rahayu Putri, Adi Tiara Putri, Melya Deana Putri, Nurul Izzah Alia RA, M. FAUZY Rafiqah Darwin Rahmad Hendra Ramadhana, Rhizkita Rani Oslina Nainggolan Raynanda Simanjuntak, Raynanda Rena Yulia Renhard Pebrian Reski Aslamiah Lubis Reski Reski Retno Andreas Reyhan Prima Gevari Rhizkita Ramadhana Rian Kurniawan Rianda Maisya Ridwan Sahputra Rifdah Juniarti Hasmi Rinda Yani, Rinda Rinta Meinika Rio Satria Harahap Risgaluh Maulidya Riyan Syahputra Rizki Pratama Kaloko Rizky Soehantoro RONALDO GUSTI SANDRA Roni Gunawan Rajagukguk Rori Oktavian Saputra Rut Lamria Kristina Tambunan Ryanda Putra S, Agrialdo Gamaliel S, Mieke Christian Safira, Dini Adelia Safrianda Safrianda Saidil Adri Sally Fisabillina Salsabila, Putri Nanda Samadi, Muhammad Alfarid Samuel ' Santo Barri Gultom, Santo Barri Saragih, Geofani Milthree Satrio, Andreas Sembiring, Rinawati Septiani, Dela Setia Putra Setia Putra, Setia Sibarani, Tamara Roully Sihombing, Mual Ady Putra Silalahi, Jonathan Christoper Sinaga, Lusya Ermauli Br Sridevi Ronauli Sukamariko Andrikasmi Sulandari, Devina Sutri Utami Sutrisno ' Syafira, Putri Syahra Syahra Syaifullah Yophi Ardiyanto Syamsiar, Syamsiar Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Syamsul Arifin Tabah Santoso Teguh Arif Setiawan Tiara Andicha Putri Tiaraputri, Adi Tirza Bonita Tomanda, Aviska Loveana Tri Dayanto Sugianto, Tri Dayanto Tri Handika Putra Tri Novita Sari Manihuruk Tri Saputra Triboyono, Agus Ulfia Hasanah Ulil Abshor Ulil Abshor, Ulil Valeta, Echa Veithzal Rivai Zainal Vicky Khoila Winarto Vidya Sanaya Vika Anggraini Wahyu Andrie Septyo Wati, Irena Weni Safitri Ismail Wialanda Wiguna Widia Edorita Widya Selvia Winda Wulan Windy Rizky Putri Wino Thantow Malbuano Wira Paska Lismer Simamora Wulanda Septrila Metri Yakub Frans Sihombing Yanto, Fahmi Riau Yeni Elviani Yonggi Oktavianus Yuri Prayoga A. Zhikrillah Zhikrillah Zulfikar Jayakusuma Zulham Daris Firidho