Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Tinjauan Yuridis Hukuman Mati terhadap Pelaku Pencabulan pada Anak di Bawah Umur dalam Perspektif HAM Ngadio, Gabriel; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1108

Abstract

Indonesia is a legal state which consists of various rules to provide protection, security and welfare for its people. Especially regarding the rights of every person, such as the rights that every person gets when he is in his parents' womb, namely Human Rights, but not throughout a person's life it is guaranteed that his rights will not be disturbed or injured by other people, such as cases of sexual harassment received by children, both boys and girls. This research uses a normative type of research. In Indonesian law there are regulations that regulate the death penalty for perpetrators of abuse or rape of children. There are various pros and cons to this regulation because the imposition of the death penalty sanction is also a violation of a person's right to life which is regulated in Human Rights.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Terhadap Korban Atas Biaya Restitusi yang Tidak Terpenuhi Pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tangerang Nomor 1712/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Tng Firmansyah, Hery; Sun Lisyah, Lisyah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1159

Abstract

Restitution is compensation given to victims of criminal acts who have suffered both materially and physically, mentally or emotionally as a result of the perpetrator of the crime. The right to restitution is regulated in Government Regulation No. 3 of 2002. This right can be in the form of return of property, payment of compensation for loss or suffering, or reimbursement of costs for certain actions. Generally, the right to restitution is given to victims of serious crimes. However, not all victims receive this right fully, as happened in case No. 1712/PID.SUS/2021/PN.TNG, where the child victim was sexually assaulted, causing the victim to become pregnant and give birth to a child. This research was conducted using normative research methods with a statutory and case approach. This research data is of secondary type with primary and secondary legal materials which will be analyzed qualitatively. The research results show that the convicted person who is unable to fulfill the restitution demands will be subject to substitute imprisonment that does not exceed the threat of the main punishment and the state compensates a certain amount of restitution to victims of sexual violence according to the court's decision through the victim assistance fund.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Investasi Bodong (Kasus CV Raihan Jewellery) Putri, Lisentia; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1186

Abstract

Fraudulent investment is a form of crime where a certain amount of money is asked to invest in a product or business that does not ictually exist. Business in Indonesia is currently experiencing rapid development following the digital era, namely by utilizing technology to simplify the transaction process. The Indonesian financial services industry has utilized facilities called fintech. Companies and individuals also experience convenience in their business because they are assisted by fintech technology. However, in practice there are still many companies that use technology for illegal business, especially in the field of fraudulent investment with various kinds of schemes. The conditions for imposing criminal responsibility on perpetrators of online fraud are that all elements of the criminal act are fulfilled and the purpose of the act can be proven. This was done deliberately with awarenessm that the act would be condemned by law. To determine criminal responsibility for criminal acts of online buying and selling fraud, you must refer to specific laws, because to avoid misinterpretation if using conventional evidence and avoid the emergence of other interpretations, and there needs to be an understanding from law enforcers regarding the expansion of the evidence. In order to avoid misunderstandings, to have the same thoughts about the value of the evidentiary power of electronic evidence contained in the ITE Law.
Tinjauan Peran LPSK dalam Proses Penegakan Keadilan Terhadap Korban Inses Florencia Fevernova, Fiona; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1262

Abstract

LPSK, sebagai lembaga yang berdiri berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 yang diubah menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, memiliki tugas dan wewenang untuk memberikan perlindungan dan bantuan kepada saksi dan korban. Namun, kendala dan tantangan muncul terutama terkait dengan pemenuhan hak korban, seperti restitusi dan kompensasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK) dalam melindungi saksi dan korban kekerasan seksual di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah analisis dokumen resmi, termasuk undang-undang, regulasi, laporan LPSK, dan kebijakan terkait lainnya. Hasil analisis tersebut memberikan pemahaman mendalam tentang kerangka kerja dan implementasi perlindungan saksi dan korban Dalam laporan tahunan LPSK, terlihat peningkatan jumlah korban kekerasan seksual yang mendapatkan restitusi. Meski demikian, evaluasi terhadap prosedur pengajuan restitusi perlu dilakukan agar lebih transparan dan cepat. Selain itu, LPSK perlu melakukan advokasi yang lebih efektif terhadap aparat penegak hukum untuk memastikan pemberian fasilitas restitusi sesuai dengan kebutuhan korban.
Pengaruh Peran Amicus Curiae Terhadap Proses Peradilan dan Kepastian Hukum Mikael Rondo, Pieter Agustinus; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1283

Abstract

Evidence in criminal procedure law plays a very important role in the criminal proceedings. Because, in criminal procedural law, evidence is considered extremely important because its main purpose is to discover material truths in discovering criminal cases. To reveal the truth of the case, evidence is the main method used by the judge to determine whether the defendant committed a crime or to obtain the necessary basis to make a decision to resolve the case. Relevant evidence has been further stipulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, specifically: testimonies of witnesses, expert statements, letters, instructions, and statements of the accused. The evidence provision mechanism in criminal justice today is increasingly enriched thanks to the presence of the concept of amicus curiae or friend of the court. Amicus curiae is defined as a party who feels interested in a case and gives his legal opinion to the court. However, stakeholder participation is limited to providing opinions and is not intended to interfere with the judge. In the development of existing evidence and evidence mechanisms, one of them is the Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court). Amicus Curiae is a third party who feels interested in a case, provides legal advice to the court and does not intend to interfere with the judge. Amicus curiae has not been clearly regulated in Indonesia, but in principle it is accepted based on clause 5, paragraph 1 of the Judicial Power Law "Judges and constitutional magistrates are required to learn, comply with and understand legal values ​​and the sense of justice. exist in society. Furthermore, the admission of amicus curiae can be found in article 180, paragraph 1, of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which states that "In case it is necessary to clarify a question raised in the 'trial, the presiding judge of the court may be asked to provide expert information and may also request the parties involved to submit new documents.The premeditated murder committed by defendant Richard Eliezer in the Jakarta area is an example of a case involving amicus curiae.
Politik Hukum dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi melalui Pembaharuan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagai Extraordinary Crime dalam KUHP Nasional Fahmi Saputra, Ewaprilyandi; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1284

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perubahan dalam pengaturan tindak pidana korupsi sebagai kejahatan luar biasa dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana atau kerap disebut sebagai KUHP Nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif untuk menganalisis teks hukum yang relevan dan perubahan yang terjadi seiring waktu. Metode analisis deduktif digunakan dengan menerapkan premis mayor berupa prinsip-prinsip hukum dan ajaran terkait kejahatan korupsi, serta premis minor berupa fakta atau peristiwa hukum yang ada. Temuan utama penelitian ini adalah bahwa pembaharuan pengaturan tindak pidana korupsi dalam KUHP Nasional berpotensi menghilangkan sifat kekhususan tindak pidana itu sendiri, yang dapat menimbulkan akibat terhadap upaya pemberantasan kasus korupsi di Indonesia. Kendati demikian, perubahan tersebut mencerminkan usaha untuk mengadaptasi hukum dengan dinamika sosial dan politik, serta memperkuat kerangka hukum dalam memberantas korupsi. Penelitian ini memberikan wawasan tentang perkembangan hukum korupsi dalam konteks nasional dan dampak dari perubahan hukum tersebut terhadap upaya pemberantasan korupsi. Implikasi penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan pemahaman yang lebih mendalam tentang dinamika hukum dalam menghadapi tindak pidana korupsi serta memberi sumbangan dalam perbaikan lebih lanjut terhadap pengaturan hukum terkait.
Analisis Yuridis Pemberian Hibah Kepada Pejabat Ditinjau Dari Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi Audy, Viola; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1296

Abstract

Humans are social creatures who need each other to interact and carry out activities. In their daily life, humans are accustomed to doing something so that from this habit, laws are born that are agreed upon by the local community where the law was born. Because with the development of the times and the massive growth of humankind that is increasingly expanding, a law is needed that will become the single rule for all of society. Laws are made to provide protection and a sense of security for the community, but in some cases even though there are laws there are still those who commit criminal acts such as corruption. So it is necessary to have laws that regulate corruption at this time, because as technology develops, the modus operandi of corruption becomes more sophisticated. One of the efforts of criminal acts of corruption is giving gifts or grants to officials which is called gratuity. This study uses a type of qualitative research that examines and analyzes legal materials from relevant literature. The difference between gratuities and grants is needed is to avoid a legal vacuum or legal uncertainty, it will be difficult to ensnare corruptors into criminal acts, because basically grants are part of civil law making it difficult to fulfill elements of corruption. However, corruption through grants can be said to be gratification if it is given to state administrators and does not report the results of receiving the grant.
Sistem Diversi Pada Tindak Pidana Narkotika oleh Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum Mutiara Adival, Julisya; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1300

Abstract

The crime of narcotics abuse in camping continues to grow, with trafficking involving children. The status of children who are vulnerable to unlawful acts means that the justice system must also consider the child's condition. Therefore, in the Indonesian justice system, the term 'juvenile criminal justice' is known, which is specifically applied to criminal acts committed by children. This also means that various criminal acts, such as narcotics crimes committed by children, must also be tried appropriately. As happened to the child defendant in decision no. 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/Pn JKT.SEL. In this case study, children were involved as intermediaries in buying and selling narcotics. Based on this background, the aim of this research was to understand the criminal justice process in narcotics crimes against children, as well as the laws that can be used as a basis for justice applied to children. The research was carried out as a normative type of research, with a statutory and case study approach. The results of this research show that the administration of juvenile justice in Indonesia for narcotics crimes that make children suspects is carried out using a restorative justice approach with a diversion system. Even so, the judge still takes into account the demands of the prosecutor, and also the legal conditions that occurred. So that the judicial process can be relevant to the diversion that has been implemented. Meanwhile, the laws used as the basis for determining punishment consist of the Law on Narcotics, the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia concerning judicial power.
Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur Dengan Menggunakan Media Sosisal Elektronik Oktavina, Margaretha Andini; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1309

Abstract

The criminal act of defamation by minors via electronic social media is an important issue in criminal law. This research aims to determine the threat of punishment for criminal acts of defamation using electronic social media and criminal liability for minors who commit ITE criminal offenses. The research method used is the normative juridical method. The results of the research show that there is a threat of strict sanctions against perpetrators of criminal acts of defamation using electronic social media, where the perpetrator can be punished with a maximum imprisonment of 4 years and/or a maximum fine of IDR 750,000,000.00. Criminal liability for minors who commit criminal acts of defamation through social media can be implemented by paying attention to the special provisions regarding children's rights in Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. This responsibility is imposed in accordance with the criminal elements which have been reviewed from the terms of criminal liability, so that perpetrators of criminal acts of defamation through social media can be held accountable for their actions as decided in court. Thus, the protection of children's rights and the application of criminal sanctions need to be harmonized with applicable legal provisions and pay attention to the special implementation of children's rights in the juvenile justice system.
Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Peran Media Sosial dalam Eksploitasi Anak Jean Ranice Siregar, Alynne; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1315

Abstract

Pada kemajuan era digital, sosial media memiliki peran yang cukup besar dalam kehidupan dan membantu mobilitas masyarakat. Dalam hal ini sangat disayangkan pada kenyataannya sering kali penggunaan media sosial disalahgunakan oleh oknum yang tidak bertanggungjawab untuk melanggar hukum, salah satunya media sosial juga memiliki pengaruh terhadap terjadinya eksploitasi terhadap anak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normative dengan melakukan studi kepustakaan menggunakan dokumen, asas, prinsip, doktrin para ahli, maupun teori hukum. Adapun, spesifikasi sifat penelitian yang dilakukan adalah secara deskriptif dengan menjelaskan relevansi antara berbagai teori dan regulasi perundang-undangan dalam peristiwa hukum yang akan diteliti secara lebih rinci. Data yang didapatkan melalui teknik pengumpulan data secara studi kepustakaan yang dilakukan merupakan jenis data sekunder dengan pendekatan yuridis yang berlandaskan pada menganalisis regulasi perundang-undangan. Oleh karena itu, melalui penulisan ini diharapkan dapat memberikan penggambaran mengenai bagaimana hukum di Indonesia dalam menyikapi peran media sosial terhadap terjadinya kasus eksploitasi terhadap anak.
Co-Authors Adeline, Laurencia Ahmad Muzacky Aisyah Cahyani, Putri Amelia Abdullah Zimah Aprianes, Cesilia Audy, Viola Cendranita, Ivannia Cesilia Aprianes Charenitha, Aurellia Chrishans, Raffael Moreno Cintya, Sindhi Claudia, Jean Deryl Leeland Dianti, Anisa Rahma Edgar, Calvin Egieta Christy Tarigan Evangeline Amanta Chrisya Evelyn Natasha, Evelyn Fahmi Saputra, Ewaprilyandi Febiola, Stefany Florencia Fevernova, Fiona George Daniel Pangaribuan Gunawan, Angelene Vivian Halim, Hartaty Harefa, Dany Hendra Jaya Harshita, Harshita Hasna, Nada Putri Henlindra, Roland Nofenick Gunther Hugo Feris Tri Susanto Hum, M. Indri Elena Suni Ivanca, Eveline Jean Ranice Siregar, Alynne Khoiroh, Aimmatul Kholim, Fellicia Angelica Kuistono, Caesar Andre Liberty, Gavriel Lim, Hamielly Cortez Madani, Irfan Syauqi Mandala, Azi Fachri Marbun, Jessica Marshanda, Talitha Mathiew Mahulette, Andrew Reinhard Matthew Mikha Sebastian Matondang Michelle, Grace Bernadette Mikael Rondo, Pieter Agustinus Mutiara Adival, Julisya Nadhir, Khibran Natashya, Natashya Naufal Wala, Gevan Ngadio, Gabriel Nugroho, Dryan Oemar, Erwin Natosmal Oktavina, Margaretha Andini Patty, Thalia Rizq Aurora Putra, Surya Dharma Putra, Verdy Cahyana Putri, Lisentia Putri, Nessya Monica Larasati Riyanto Prameswara, Dwi Sabrina, Najwa Maulida Sahrul, Farhan Ananda Sandini, Jessica Sanjaya, Bintang Theo Sealtiel, Marselly Siahaan, Shinta Aulia Sukur, Partermutios Susilo Putra Sun Lisyah, Lisyah Susanto, Hugo Feris Tri Tata Wijayanta Timothy Benaya, Marsahala Trinovada, Andrew Valedra Sitorus, Juan Vanessa Vanessa Walla, Mikhael Melvren Widagdo, Chanandika Dafri