Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Rechtsvinding

Expansion of Legal Measures Beyond Article 77 of The Criminal Code Concerning Pretrial and Constitutional Court Decision No. 76/PUU-XII/2014: Case Study No. 16/PDT. G/2022/PN. CBD Yazdi, Ahmad; Ahmad, Sufmi Dasco; Satory, Agus
Rechtsvinding Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.v3i2.1025

Abstract

This research discusses the expansion of legal remedies beyond Article 77 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) concerning pretrial mechanisms, focusing on the application of Constitutional Court Decision No. 76/PUU-XII/2014 in the context of civil tort claims (Perbuatan Melawan Hukum). The case study involves Case No. 16/Pdt.G/2022/PN.Cbd at the Cibadak District Court. Using a normative juridical and case study approach, the study analyzes primary legal documents, statutory regulations, and judicial decisions. Findings indicate that the investigator's summons without gubernatorial approval violated procedural legality and constitutional protection principles. Furthermore, premature media exposure of the plaintiff's identity contravened the presumption of innocence and caused immaterial harm not remediable through pretrial mechanisms. Thus, the tort lawsuit serves as a complementary alternative to pretrial review, reinforcing comprehensive legal protection for constitutional rights and personal reputation.
Legal Protection and Certainty for Children Born Out of Wedding Through Legal Remedies Recovering the Child's Origin in the Court (Analysis of Decision Number 196/Pdt.P/2023/Pn.Cbi) Salimah, Alvy Nur; Satory, Agus; Mahipal, Mahipal
Rechtsvinding Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Legal protection and guarantees for illegitimate children are crucial issues in the Indonesian family law system, as their legal status often faces discrimination and uncertainty regarding the recognition of civil relationships, inheritance, and access to basic rights. This study aims to examine legal steps that can be taken to provide legal protection and guarantees for illegitimate children, particularly through the process of applying for a determination of the child's parentage in court. Using a normative juridical approach and case analysis, this study analyzes relevant legal provisions, court decisions, and the principles of human rights and the best interests of the child as stipulated in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and national regulations. The research findings reveal that although illegitimate children have historically faced a number of legal obstacles, developments in jurisprudence following Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 have provided an opportunity for the recognition of civil relationships between children and their biological fathers through the process of applying for a determination of parentage in court. However, implementation in the field continues to face obstacles, both procedural and socio-cultural. Therefore, harmonization of legal norms, increased capacity of judicial officials, and extensive outreach are needed to ensure that every child, regardless of their origin, receives fair and non-discriminatory legal protection and certainty.